Notebookcheck

诺基亚 5 智能手机简短评测

Manuel Masiero (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 09/08/2017
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

华丽转身。 从微软分离开后,诺基亚发布了一些新手机。凭借5.2英寸的中端机型诺基亚5,该制造商迅速得分。因为很多用户喜欢这些产品,只有少数不喜欢。

Nokia 5
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 505 - 2048 MB
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.2 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 282 PPI, capacitive, IPS, 2.5D Corning Gorilla glass, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 8.47 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm audio, Card Reader: microSD cards up to 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor (G-Sensor), surrounding light sensor, e-compass, fingerprint sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, USB OTG, App2SD
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40), downloads up to 150 MBit/s, uploads up to 50 MBit/s , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.05 x 149.7 x 72.5
Operating System
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix PDAF, 1,12 µm, f/2, dual-tone flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix AF, 1,12 µm, f/2, 84 degrees field of view
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual, USB cable, modular charger, earphones, quick-start instructions, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
148 g, Power Supply: 30 g
Price
200 Euro

 

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Lenovo K6
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Nokia 5: overall route
Nokia 5: overall route
Nokia 5: forested area
Nokia 5: forested area
Nokia 5: bridge
Nokia 5: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: forested area
Garmin Edge 500: forested area
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
652
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
661
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 667 cd/m² Average: 634.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.59 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 630 cd/m²
Contrast: 1105:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | - Ø
97.6% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.37
Nokia 5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Lenovo K6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Wiko U Feel Prime
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
5%
4%
31%
12%
Brightness
635
461
-27%
291
-54%
625
-2%
386
-39%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
96
7%
92
2%
86
-4%
Black Level *
0.57
0.38
33%
0.29
49%
0.36
37%
Contrast
1105
1237
12%
2276
106%
1142
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5
5.2
-4%
4.7
6%
4.9
2%
4.3
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.9
5.6
19%
3
57%
4.8
30%
2.8
59%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.24 107%
2.03 118%
2.18 110%
2.53 95%
CCT
8736 74%
7924 82%
6291 103%
7357 88%
6589 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
45274 Points ∼20%
Lenovo K6
43673 Points ∼19% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼12% -40%
Lenovo Moto G5
44653 Points ∼20% -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points ∼19% -2%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
3807 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2913 Points ∼43% -23%
Lenovo Moto G5
3583 Points ∼52% -6%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
5060 Points ∼61%
Lenovo K6
3387 Points ∼41% -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼50% -18%
Lenovo Moto G5
4730 Points ∼57% -7%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points ∼40% -34%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 5
671 Points ∼44%
Lenovo K6
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼36% -18%
Lenovo Moto G5
686 Points ∼44% +2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
740 Points ∼9%
Lenovo K6
732 Points ∼9% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼4% -58%
Lenovo Moto G5
722 Points ∼8% -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points ∼9% 0%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 5
788 Points ∼18%
Lenovo K6
530 Points ∼12% -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼15% -18%
Lenovo Moto G5
538 Points ∼12% -32%
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points ∼17% -2%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 5
2154 Points ∼33%
Lenovo K6
1282 Points ∼19% -40%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼16% -51%
Lenovo Moto G5
1656 Points ∼25% -23%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points ∼19% -41%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 5
958 Points ∼25%
Lenovo K6
263 Points ∼7% -73%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼15% -39%
Lenovo Moto G5
815 Points ∼22% -15%
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points ∼8% -70%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
974 Points ∼11%
Lenovo Moto G5
1731 Points ∼20%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
2849 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1261 Points ∼7% -56%
Lenovo Moto G5
2563 Points ∼14% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
671 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
517 Points ∼11% -23%
Lenovo Moto G5
619 Points ∼13% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
1227 Points ∼41%
Lenovo K6
1047 Points ∼35% -15%
Lenovo Moto G5
1245 Points ∼41% +1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points ∼34% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
245 Points ∼5%
Lenovo K6
240 Points ∼4% -2%
Lenovo Moto G5
243 Points ∼5% -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points ∼5% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 5
298 Points ∼8%
Lenovo K6
290 Points ∼7% -3%
Lenovo Moto G5
296 Points ∼8% -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points ∼8% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
1268 Points ∼42%
Lenovo K6
1002 Points ∼33% -21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼24% -44%
Lenovo Moto G5
1243 Points ∼41% -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points ∼37% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
503 Points ∼7%
Lenovo K6
491 Points ∼6% -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼1% -92%
Lenovo Moto G5
496 Points ∼6% -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points ∼7% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 5
581 Points ∼12%
Lenovo K6
554 Points ∼11% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -91%
Lenovo Moto G5
572 Points ∼11% -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points ∼12% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 5
9023 Points ∼13%
Lenovo K6
9034 Points ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼13% 0%
Lenovo Moto G5
9089 Points ∼13% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
9684 Points ∼2%
Lenovo K6
9691 Points ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% -60%
Lenovo Moto G5
9617 Points ∼2% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 5
9529 Points ∼5%
Lenovo K6
9537 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% -54%
Lenovo Moto G5
9494 Points ∼5% 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points ∼5% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 5
17 fps ∼1%
Lenovo K6
16 fps ∼1% -6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -69%
Lenovo Moto G5
16 fps ∼1% -6%
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps ∼1% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 5
27 fps ∼6%
Lenovo K6
15 fps ∼3% -44%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼2% -64%
Lenovo Moto G5
14 fps ∼3% -48%
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps ∼3% -41%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 5
7.2 fps ∼1%
Lenovo K6
7.1 fps ∼1% -1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -75%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.1 fps ∼1% -1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps ∼1% -1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 5
14 fps ∼4%
Lenovo K6
7 fps ∼2% -50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -73%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.4 fps ∼2% -47%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps ∼2% -46%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
4.6 fps ∼1%
Lenovo K6
4.4 fps ∼1% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
4.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps ∼1% -4%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
10 fps ∼6%
Lenovo K6
4.4 fps ∼3% -56%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
5 fps ∼3% -50%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps ∼3% -52%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
2.5 fps ∼1%
Lenovo K6
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 5
5.2 fps ∼0%
Lenovo K6
2.4 fps ∼0% -54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.7 fps ∼0% -48%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2.7 fps ∼0% -48%

Legend

 
Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Nokia 5
21.48 Points ∼100%
Lenovo K6
21.436 Points ∼100% 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
21.4 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Moto G5
20.36 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points ∼78% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo K6
3438 Points ∼100% +10%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3383 Points ∼98% +8%
Nokia 5
3138 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points ∼79% -13%
Lenovo Moto G5
2604 Points ∼76% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * ∼100% -25%
Lenovo Moto G5
11358 ms * ∼87% -9%
Lenovo K6
10849.6 ms * ∼83% -4%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10826 ms * ∼83% -4%
Nokia 5
10396 ms * ∼80%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Lenovo Moto G5
57 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 5
57 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼82% -18%
Lenovo K6
42 Points ∼74% -26%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 5Lenovo K6Samsung Galaxy J5 2016Lenovo Moto G5Wiko U Feel Prime
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-14%
47%
7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62
50.4
-19%
46.61
-25%
57.98
-6%
35.21
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.9
78.2
-7%
79.83
-5%
78.51
-6%
41.98
-50%
Random Write 4KB
8.39
10.5
25%
11.6
38%
37.9
352%
9.4
12%
Random Read 4KB
40.54
32.01
-21%
21
-48%
37.6
-7%
55
36%
Sequential Write 256KB
74.86
46.66
-38%
72
-4%
45.6
-39%
137.3
83%
Sequential Read 256KB
255.56
262.56
3%
147
-42%
230.6
-10%
270.9
6%
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high54 fps
in comparison
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Huawei Nova
 625, Adreno 506
53
Lenovo K6
 430, Adreno 505
53
Nokia 5
 430, Adreno 505
54
NVIDIA Shield Tablet P1761W
 K1, GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
55
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
 8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12
55
   ...
OnePlus 5 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Max. Load
 33.8 °C34.1 °C34.3 °C 
 33.6 °C34.3 °C36.9 °C 
 33.9 °C34 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
34.6 °C35.2 °C34.6 °C
34.7 °C34.7 °C35 °C
34.7 °C35 °C34.7 °C
Maximum: 35.2 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.4 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.131.129.12529.330.129.33129.929.929.94038.634.438.65028.234.628.26326.829.326.88028.632.228.610030.234.130.212538.836.938.816043.923.843.920051.521.551.525055.620.955.63155921.35940061.419.761.450063.520.163.563063.918.563.980067.519.367.5100070.417.870.4125071.217.471.2160072.916.472.9200072.816.472.8250072.416.672.4315075.416.175.4400074.816.174.8500070.716.170.7630068.11668.1800067.316.167.3100006616.1661250058.81658.81600049.21649.2SPL83.630.183.6N55.71.455.7median 66Nokia 5median 17.4median 66Delta8.73.78.737.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2Samsung Galaxy J5 2016median 42.6median 17.7median 65.213.911.21.613.928.227.428.225.627.925.624.125.224.125.728.725.724.726.424.723.622.923.624.623.624.625.224.325.234.325.134.340.319.740.347.818.647.850.519.750.55219.95249.918.949.949.818.949.854.819.854.863.220.863.271.317.271.372.617.172.674.414.474.473.413.973.471.913.271.970.212.970.267.51367.568.412.868.473.812.773.875.712.775.772.512.872.569.112.869.159.913.159.983.62883.653.6153.6median 67.5Lenovo K6median 17.1median 67.511.33.811.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nokia 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo K6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.52 / 1.78 / 1.96 Watt
Load midlight 3.23 / 4.88 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-6%
17%
-10%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
0.52
0.65
-25%
0.61
-17%
0.73
-40%
0.66
-27%
Idle Average *
1.78
1.65
7%
1.41
21%
1.64
8%
1.66
7%
Idle Maximum *
1.96
1.67
15%
1.51
23%
1.68
14%
1.76
10%
Load Average *
3.23
3.58
-11%
2.56
21%
3.46
-7%
2.85
12%
Load Maximum *
4.88
5.58
-14%
3.1
36%
6.13
-26%
5.01
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 32min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
11h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 23min
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Lenovo K6
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
-3%
-27%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1772
1626
-8%
1599
-10%
1243
-30%
1254
-29%
H.264
790
633
-20%
658
-17%
616
-22%
WiFi v1.3
713
715
0%
643
-10%
561
-21%
575
-19%
Load
323
350
8%
402
24%
207
-36%

Pros

+ 高品质的机身
+ 多LTE频段
+ 双SIM卡插槽
+ Android 7.1
+ 指纹传感器
+ 优秀的13-MP相机
+ 明亮高清显示
+ 电池续航
+ 低发热

Cons

- 只有16GB的存储空间
- 没有USB Type-C接口
- 冷色调屏幕
- 黑屏时漏光
In the test: Nokia 5. Test unit provided by cyberport
In the test: Nokia 5. Test unit provided by cyberport

Nokia 5 - 08/01/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
38 / 60 → 63%
Weight
93%
Battery
94%
Display
84%
Games Performance
20 / 63 → 31%
Application Performance
42 / 70 → 61%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
80%
Average
73%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 诺基亚 5 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09- 8)