Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Moto G5 智能手机简短评测

次世代。又一次得到重生的Moto G希望凭高性价比和美观的设计赢得我们青睐。在接下来的深入测试中,我们将会考察第五代的Moto G能否延承前代机型的传统,成为一台竞争力很强的中端Moto机型。
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone
Lenovo Moto G5 (Moto G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memory
3 GB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: microSD 最高支持 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,近距感应器,陀螺仪, USB-OTG,
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); 带宽 (下载/上传): 150Mbps/​50Mbps; 电磁辐射值: 0,618 W/kg (头部), 1,340 W/kg (身体), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 144.3 x 73
Battery
10.8 Wh, 2800 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 快速充电
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, 相变感应自动对焦, LED闪光灯, 视频拍摄 @ 1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, 广角
Additional features
Speakers: 前置扬声器, Keyboard: 触控键盘, 电源适配器, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
144.5 g, Power Supply: 73 g
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

153 mm 76.6 mm 9.8 mm 155 g150.2 mm 74 mm 9.7 mm 155 g149.5 mm 73.7 mm 8.55 mm 148 g148.7 mm 75.3 mm 7.99 mm 138 g147.2 mm 72.9 mm 7.6 mm 147 g144.3 mm 73 mm 9.5 mm 144.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
100 MBit/s -9%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s -50%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s -51%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 MBit/s -55%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s 0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s -55%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s -61%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.2 MBit/s -62%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Junction
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Overview
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Overview
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Junction
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Junction
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Bridge
GPS Lenovo Moto G5: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
622
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
660
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 660 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 624.9 cd/m² Minimum: 6.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 660 cd/m²
Contrast: 2276:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Lenovo Moto G4
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.30
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.20
Screen
-22%
-23%
-38%
-23%
-23%
Brightness middle
660
503
-24%
724
10%
384
-42%
575
-13%
507
-23%
Brightness
625
495
-21%
723
16%
350
-44%
559
-11%
474
-24%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
87
-5%
85
-8%
91
-1%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.29
0.31
-7%
0.71
-145%
0.36
-24%
0.39
-34%
0.53
-83%
Contrast
2276
1623
-29%
1020
-55%
1067
-53%
1474
-35%
957
-58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.9
6.2
-27%
4.5
8%
6
-22%
5.2
-6%
4.7
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.6
9.8
-29%
8.4
-11%
14
-84%
10.3
-36%
7.2
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
6.8
-42%
4.9
-2%
5.9
-23%
7.2
-50%
4.8
-0%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.33 94%
2.44 90%
2 110%
2.4 92%
2.25 98%
CCT
7357 88%
8113 80%
6496 100%
8042 81%
7224 90%
6441 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Max. Load
 43 °C39.8 °C34.4 °C 
 43 °C40 °C33.3 °C 
 40.2 °C39 °C33.1 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
33.1 °C34.7 °C36.6 °C
33.2 °C34.3 °C36.5 °C
32.6 °C34.3 °C36.1 °C
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.62525.436.23125.335.84032.927.85033.627.66331.630.38028.430.31002727.812520.832.9160223220021.339.625020.845.531521.252.840019.457.350019.564.963017.769.480017.969.8100017.873.2125017.372.1160017.470.2200016.770.7250017.272.5315018.271.8400017.969.8500017.669.6630017.765.7800017.8641000017.964.31250018.157.51600018.251.3SPL3082.1N1.351.5median 17.9median 64.9Delta1.49.83237.832.4323430.431.33430.628.931.730.630.831.52630.834.830.339.434.828.328.936.228.330.529.328.630.528.525.825.428.533.125.921.333.145.934.823.345.951.942.122.551.956.146.422.456.158.750.621.358.76354.218.46366.85817.566.870.761.817.570.772.16517.272.175.567.216.875.574.866.117.374.875.867.117.475.877.468.416.677.47869.417.37876.867.517.676.87566.417.67571.462.417.771.470.761.917.470.770.360.417.770.367.158.317.967.163.754.118.163.758.651.418.158.686.677.829.886.666.439.21.366.4median 70.3median 60.4median 17.7median 70.38.910.11.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Moto G5Lenovo Moto G4
Lenovo Moto G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.64 / 1.68 Watt
Load midlight 3.46 / 6.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5 Plus
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4
3000 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
-19%
8%
-47%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.91
-25%
0.65
11%
0.76
-4%
1.44
-97%
0.74
-1%
Idle Average *
1.64
1.83
-12%
1.89
-15%
1.59
3%
2.47
-51%
2.04
-24%
Idle Maximum *
1.68
1.87
-11%
1.92
-14%
1.61
4%
2.58
-54%
2.22
-32%
Load Average *
3.46
3.17
8%
5.28
-53%
3.24
6%
4.55
-32%
5.57
-61%
Load Maximum *
6.13
4.87
21%
7.45
-22%
4.15
32%
6.3
-3%
6.59
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Pros

+ 高品质坚固金属机身
+ 用户可自行更换电池
+ 双SIM卡机型可选
+ 最新安卓7操作系统
+ 高速无线网络
+ 不错的通话品质
+ 指纹感应器
+ 非常明亮的高对比度屏幕
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 合理的功耗

Cons

- 屏幕略微偏蓝
- 安全更新不够及时
- 发热量较高
- 相机在暗光环境下效果一般
- 拍照色彩还原准确度低

第一眼看到Moto G5,我们就确定它会是一台十分有趣的智能手机:在保持实惠价位的同时搭配了高品质屏幕,轻盈金属机身,不错的硬件配置和可更换电池设计。联想很好地证明了在中低端市场保持竞争力并不一定需要让用户被迫接受一块昏暗、低对比度的屏幕和缓慢的通信模组。

拿出250美元(约1725人民币)的预算,用户可以得到一块低黑值、高对比度的明亮屏幕,不错的扬声器,坚固金属机身,可更换电池,和指纹感应器。除此之外它还提供了高速的无线模组和内部闪存,不错的性能和优秀的通话品质让它在这个价位上近乎完美。它需要改进的方面包括:相机在暗光环境下的拍摄效果,负载下较高的发热量,一般般的电池续航。

Moto G5提供了优秀的功能和很高的性价比。电池续航相对不足的问题可以通过支持更换电池功能得到解决。

G5和G5 Plus之间的价差现在变得越来越大,这也要归功于相比G4联想成功地进一步降低了G5的售价。联想得以在降低售价的同时改进组件的品质让我们十分钦佩,这也让G5在中低端价位上成为了非常值得参考的一款机型。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Moto G5 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-05- 6 (Update: 2017-05- 7)