Wiko U Feel Prime 智能手机简短评测

Name: Wiko U Feel Prime
Brand: Wiko

便宜，值。 Wiko带来了一台全高清双卡并带有指纹识别功能的5英寸智能手机，并且价格不到300欧元(约合316美元)。我们的测试报告将会告诉你这台设备仅是廉价或亦富有竞争力。

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 01/22/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone ARM Android

Test device courtesy of Wiko Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Wiko U Feel Prime (U Feel Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Memory

4 GB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, 五点触控电容屏, IPS, 2.5D-glass, 全贴合, CABC, 1600W色, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 22 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm 耳机接口, Card Reader: 最大69G micro-SD 储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 罗盘

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B20); bandwidth (download/upload): 150Mbps/50Mbps (LTE); SAR-rate: 0.99W/kg (head), 0.80W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 142.5 x 69.9

Battery

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 28 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 21 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 450 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 双LED闪光灯, HDR, 录像@1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 自拍闪光灯, 录像@720p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: 底边单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 耳机, USB 线缆, 充电器r, SIM 工具, SIM 转换插座, News Republic, phone assistent, Zenly, One Clean, 24 Months Warranty, USB-OTG, FM 收音机, fanless

Weight

150 g, Power Supply: 48 g

Price

0 Euro

Links

Wiko homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	318 MBit/s +498%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash	104 MBit/s +95%
Wiko U Feel Prime Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.2 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ZUK Z2 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash	296 MBit/s +434%
HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle Adreno 305, 400 MSM8928, 32 GB eMMC Flash	101 MBit/s +82%
Wiko U Feel Prime Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


354 cd/m²	410 cd/m²	389 cd/m²
355 cd/m²	411 cd/m²	393 cd/m²
381 cd/m²	387 cd/m²	390 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 411 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 385.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17.81 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1142:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.53

	Wiko U Feel Prime IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00	Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Lenovo ZUK Z2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00	Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.20	Wiko U Feel IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen		-38%	-7%	-21%	-9%	-4%
Brightness middle	411	518 26%	512 25%	451 10%	289 -30%	500 22%
Brightness	386	475 23%	502 30%	443 15%	291 -25%	485 26%
Brightness Distribution	86	81 -6%	84 -2%	93 8%	96 12%	83 -3%
Black Level *	0.36	0.61 -69%	0.58 -61%	0.4 -11%		0.22 39%
Contrast	1142	849 -26%	883 -23%	1128 -1%		2273 99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.3	6.8 -58%	3.8 12%	5.4 -26%	4.7 -9%	6.3 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.9	11.4 -44%	11.2 -42%	9.9 -25%	7.3 8%	14.4 -82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	7 -150%	2.7 4%	6.7 -139%	3 -7%	5.2 -86%
Gamma	2.53 ^87%	2.35 ^94%	2.09 ^105%	2.33 ^94%	2.03 ^108%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	6589 ^99%	8151 ^80%	6076 ^107%	8262 ^79%	6291 ^103%	7536 ^86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2273 Hz

≤ 1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	44420 Points
Sony Xperia XA	48331 Points +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	122513 Points +176%
Honor 8	94671 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	27232 Points -39%
Wiko U Feel	28175 Points -37%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	644 Points
Honor 8	1726 Points +168%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	2085 Points
Honor 8	5481 Points +163%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	9548 Points
Sony Xperia XA	11156 Points +17%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	29241 Points +206%
Honor 8	20235 Points +112%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4400 Points -54%
Wiko U Feel	4969 Points -48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	10916 Points
Lenovo ZUK Z2	32997 Points
Honor 8	22157 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3838 Points
Wiko U Feel	4355 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA	12138 Points
Lenovo ZUK Z2	20910 Points
Honor 8	15531 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9022 Points
Wiko U Feel	9801 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	584 Points
Sony Xperia XA	603 Points +3%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	3302 Points +465%
Honor 8	1273 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	53 Points -91%
Wiko U Feel	202 Points -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	514 Points
Sony Xperia XA	525 Points +2%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	4506 Points +777%
Honor 8	1112 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	42 Points -92%
Wiko U Feel	166 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	1118 Points
Sony Xperia XA	1259 Points +13%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1706 Points +53%
Honor 8	2587 Points +131%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	709 Points -37%
Wiko U Feel	860 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	301 Points
Sony Xperia XA	422 Points +40%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2419 Points +704%
Honor 8	961 Points +219%
Wiko U Feel	126 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	250 Points
Sony Xperia XA	306 Points +22%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2792 Points +1017%
Honor 8	818 Points +227%
Wiko U Feel	101 Points -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	1034 Points
Sony Xperia XA	1236 Points +20%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1648 Points +59%
Honor 8	2482 Points +140%
Wiko U Feel	853 Points -18%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	16 fps
Sony Xperia XA	28 fps +75%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	60 fps +275%
Honor 8	43 fps +169%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	9.7 fps -39%
Wiko U Feel	14 fps -12%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	17 fps
Sony Xperia XA	18 fps +6%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	91 fps +435%
Honor 8	41 fps +141%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	5.2 fps -69%
Wiko U Feel	8.4 fps -51%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	7.5 fps
Sony Xperia XA	15 fps +100%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	43 fps +473%
Honor 8	19 fps +153%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	3.8 fps -49%
Wiko U Feel	5.9 fps -21%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	7.1 fps
Sony Xperia XA	7.2 fps +1%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	44 fps +520%
Honor 8	19 fps +168%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1.8 fps -75%
Wiko U Feel	3 fps -58%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	4.8 fps
Sony Xperia XA	11 fps +129%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	29 fps +504%
Honor 8	11 fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Wiko U Feel	4.4 fps -8%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	4.4 fps
Sony Xperia XA	4.8 fps +9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	30 fps +582%
Honor 8	10 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	fps -100%
Wiko U Feel	1.9 fps -57%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	3347 Points
Sony Xperia XA	4685 Points +40%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	6969 Points +108%
Honor 8	6735 Points +101%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	4126 Points +23%
Wiko U Feel	3856 Points +15%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	290 Points
Sony Xperia XA	1043 Points +260%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2290 Points +690%
Honor 8	2034 Points +601%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	585 Points +102%
Wiko U Feel	544 Points +88%
System (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	1281 Points
Sony Xperia XA	2289 Points +79%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	2986 Points +133%
Honor 8	3952 Points +209%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	1060 Points -17%
Wiko U Feel	1121 Points -12%
Memory (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	774 Points
Sony Xperia XA	1076 Points +39%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1983 Points +156%
Honor 8	2556 Points +230%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	643 Points -17%
Wiko U Feel	455 Points -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	740 Points
Sony Xperia XA	669 Points -10%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	4335 Points +486%
Honor 8	1703 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	312 Points -58%
Wiko U Feel	288 Points -61%
Web (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	10 Points
Sony Xperia XA	717 Points +7070%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	1071 Points +10610%
Honor 8	994 Points +9840%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	551 Points +5410%
Wiko U Feel	595 Points +5850%

Legend

Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo ZUK Z2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko U Feel Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	3383 Points
Sony Xperia XA	4046 Points +20%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	8436 Points +149%
Honor 8	10692 Points +216%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	2730 Points -19%
Wiko U Feel	2723 Points -20%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	10826 ms *
Sony Xperia XA	9610 ms * +11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	3290 ms * +70%
Honor 8	2979 ms * +72%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	13046 ms * -21%
Wiko U Feel	13599 ms * -26%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	21.4 Points
Sony Xperia XA	27.5 Points +29%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	51.7 Points +142%
Honor 8	64 Points +199%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	16.8 Points -21%
Wiko U Feel	18 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	270.9 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	240.4 MB/s -11%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	239.4 MB/s -12%
Honor 8	247.5 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	147 MB/s -46%
Wiko U Feel	234.8 MB/s -13%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	137.3 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	68.6 MB/s -50%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	46.52 MB/s -66%
Honor 8	119.3 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	72 MB/s -48%
Wiko U Feel	39.94 MB/s -71%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	55 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	22.05 MB/s -60%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	21.27 MB/s -61%
Honor 8	34.16 MB/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	21 MB/s -62%
Wiko U Feel	23.24 MB/s -58%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	9.4 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	10.6 MB/s +13%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	5.64 MB/s -40%
Honor 8	31.5 MB/s +235%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	11.6 MB/s +23%
Wiko U Feel	8.83 MB/s -6%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	41.98 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	72.9 MB/s +74%
Honor 8	53.7 MB/s +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	79.8 MB/s +90%
Wiko U Feel	30.25 MB/s -28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Wiko U Feel Prime	35.21 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	50.7 MB/s +44%
Honor 8	23.59 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016	46.61 MB/s +32%
Wiko U Feel	16.24 MB/s -54%

Max. Load

Idle


37.4 °C	37.5 °C	35.1 °C
37.8 °C	37.1 °C	34.2 °C
37.1 °C	36.2 °C	34.2 °C

Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 36.3 °C


35.8 °C	35 °C	35.1 °C
35.4 °C	35.2 °C	34.9 °C
34.3 °C	34.7 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 35 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Wiko U Feel Prime audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC Desire 10 Lifestyle audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.23 Watt
Idle	0.66 / 1.66 / 1.76 Watt
Load	2.85 / 5.01 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Wiko U Feel 2500 mAh
Power Consumption		-6%	-53%	-28%	17%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	0.66	0.72 -9%	1.31 -98%	0.78 -18%	0.61 8%	0.82 -24%
Idle Average *	1.66	1.5 10%	2.03 -22%	1.89 -14%	1.41 15%	1.61 3%
Idle Maximum *	1.76	1.57 11%	2.08 -18%	2.02 -15%	1.51 14%	1.8 -2%
Load Average *	2.85	3.48 -22%	5.45 -91%	5.28 -85%	2.56 10%	5.99 -110%
Load Maximum *	5.01	6.04 -21%	6.75 -35%	5.44 -9%	3.1 38%	6.7 -34%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		20h 54min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 35min

	Wiko U Feel Prime 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	Lenovo ZUK Z2 3500 mAh	Honor 8 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 3100 mAh	Wiko U Feel 2500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-39%	-5%	3%	20%	-4%
Reader / Idle	1254	775 -38%		1487 19%	1599 28%
WiFi v1.3	575	353 -39%	546 -5%	499 -13%	643 12%	552 -4%
H.264		460		526	658
Load		170		255	402

Pros

+ 高分辨率，高色准屏幕

+ 出色的内存配置

+ 出色的续航时间

+ 坚固的外壳

+ 相对较快的GPS

+ 可扩展的手势控制

+ 双SIM卡

Cons

- 屏幕亮度偏低

- 麦克风音量偏低

- 主相机跑焦

- 部分边缘粗糙

In review: Wiko U Feel Prime. Review sample courtesy of Wiko Germany.

虽然相较于Wiko’s U Feel贵70欧元（约74美元），但十分值得：Wiko’s U Feel Prime在几乎所有的测试中都完胜同系列低配款。他们的电池续航能力相当，但Wiko’s U Feel Prime有更高的分辨率，且内存配置更好，更不用说性能了。

Wiko U Feel Prime 在和其他手机的竞争中也有一些自己的优势。但在稍高一点的价位上，相比起Wiko U Feel Prime来说，荣耀8和联想ZUK2有着客观的性能提升。

但较低的屏幕亮度与轻微的亮度不均匀是一大遗憾。麦克风仍是老旧的型号，导致我们的声音在对方听来很小声。摄像头本可以有更好的素质，特别是主摄像头的锐利度堪忧。

用户将会以不到300欧元（约合316美元）的价格得到一台有着金属外壳，全高清屏幕和出色性能的手机。Wiko U Feel Prime给我们留下了良好的印象并有着出色的性价比。

总之，在众多中低端手机中，Wiko’s U Feel Prime是一款值得推荐的手机。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Wiko U Feel Prime - 2016-12-29 12/29/2016 v6^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

85%

Keyboard

68 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

38 / 60 → 64%

Weight

92%

Battery

92%

Display

86%

Games Performance

19 / 63 → 31%

Application Performance

35 / 70 → 49%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 62%

Camera

66%

Average

71%

82%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Wiko U Feel Prime 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2017-01-22 (Update: 2017-01-22)