Notebookcheck

雷蛇 Blade (2016) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sven Kloevekorn, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), 12/07/2016
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

坚如磐石。 新一代的雷蛇Blade在出色的铝合金机身内搭载了GTX 1060显卡。这台设备提供了可靠的输入设备,Thunderbolt 3接口和一块出色的IGZO屏幕。说到这里,它还会有什么令人不满意的吗?除了一些小问题之外,它的最大缺点就是一般般的游戏性能,幸运的是这已经通过更新得到了解决。

Razer Blade (2016) (Blade Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1405 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 369.15, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道,板载
Display
14 inch 16:9, 3200 x 1800 pixel 262 PPI, 10点触控, Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, QHD+, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, 512 GB 
, 插槽: 1x m.2 PCIe
Soundcard
Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频输入输出接口, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 345 x 235
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 200万像素
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0 (Dolby Digital Plus), Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 电源适配器:165瓦
Weight
1.96 kg, Power Supply: 420 g
Price
2600 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)
Razer Blade (2016)

Size Comparison

349 mm 247 mm 25 mm 2.2 kg345 mm 245 mm 22.8 mm 1.9 kg345 mm 235 mm 18 mm 2 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
646 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
591 MBit/s ∼100%
337
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 374 cd/m² Average: 328 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 69 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 1491:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.91 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.69 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Razer Blade (2016)
Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, 3200x1800, 14
Schenker XMG P406
LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), IPS, 1920x1080, 14
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-9%
29%
23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 (15, 26)
56 (22, 34)
-37%
31.6 (10.4, 21.2)
23%
38 (16, 22)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
37 (9, 28)
30 (8, 22)
19%
24.4 (5.2, 19.2)
34%
23 (5, 18)
38%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
Screen
-58%
-27%
-58%
Brightness middle
328
282
-14%
288.4
-12%
315
-4%
Brightness
328
266
-19%
282
-14%
290
-12%
Brightness Distribution
69
81
17%
83
20%
85
23%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.35
-59%
0.32
-45%
Contrast
1491
1282
-14%
824
-45%
984
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.91
4.98
-161%
2.61
-37%
4.88
-155%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.23
10.2
-216%
7.34
-127%
8.88
-175%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.69
4.08
-141%
1.18
30%
4.17
-147%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.51 88%
2.24 98%
2.53 87%
CCT
6418 101%
5877 111%
6506 100%
6683 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
54
-14%
56.4
-10%
55
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
83
-14%
86.4
-11%
83
-14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-34% / -50%
1% / -17%
-18% / -44%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼67% +1%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points ∼67%
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
141 Points ∼65% -3%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
130 Points ∼60% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG P406
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼16% +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼15% +1%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points ∼15% +1%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼15%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
671 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5023 Points ∼77% +19%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5011 Points ∼77% +19%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4796 Points ∼74% +14%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4214 Points ∼65%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4651 Points ∼76% +36%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4016 Points ∼66% +18%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3417 Points ∼56%
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3371 Points ∼55% -1%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3417 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4214 points
Help
Razer Blade (2016)
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Schenker XMG P406
Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
28%
-63%
-54%
Write 4k QD32
480
287.3
-40%
156.3
-67%
256.3
-47%
Read 4k QD32
573.4
320.5
-44%
247.4
-57%
149.4
-74%
Write 4k
139.6
110.3
-21%
35.31
-75%
75.74
-46%
Read 4k
42.22
43.82
4%
17.68
-58%
21.44
-49%
Write 512
603.5
1285
113%
246.7
-59%
287.8
-52%
Read 512
654.8
1149
75%
223
-66%
294.8
-55%
Write Seq
603.4
1290
114%
299
-50%
312.4
-48%
Read Seq
1296
1634
26%
335.3
-74%
485.4
-63%
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
Sequential Read: 1296 MB/s
Sequential Write: 603.4 MB/s
512K Read: 654.8 MB/s
512K Write: 603.5 MB/s
4K Read: 42.22 MB/s
4K Write: 139.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 573.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 480 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22022 Points ∼43% +59%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14977 Points ∼29% +8%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13891 Points ∼27%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9649 Points ∼19% -31%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
16525 Points ∼41% +52%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11776 Points ∼29% +8%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10890 Points ∼27%
Schenker XMG P406
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7436 Points ∼18% -32%
3DMark 11 Performance
11139 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9193 points
Help
Mirror's Edge Catalyst
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
92 fps ∼100% +87%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
49.1 fps ∼53%
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.6 fps ∼100% +74%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
57.4 fps ∼58%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
55.2 fps ∼100% +48%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
37.3 fps ∼68%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.4 fps ∼100% +55%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
66.2 fps ∼65%
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66.237.3fps
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 76.5fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 63.657.449.1fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 81.759.956.4fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 52.14744.1fps
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
74.2 fps ∼100% +32%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
56.4 fps ∼76%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
77.2 fps ∼100% +29%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
59.9 fps ∼78%

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 33 / 35 dB(A)
Load
39 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Noise
-6%
-4%
0%
off / environment *
30
29.1
3%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
32
-3%
32
-3%
Idle Average *
33
32
3%
32
3%
33
-0%
Idle Maximum *
35
40
-14%
33.5
4%
34
3%
Load Average *
39
47
-21%
50
-28%
39
-0%
Load Maximum *
51
51
-0%
51.5
-1%
51
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 50.1 °C48.5 °C52.7 °C 
 45.2 °C47.3 °C44.4 °C 
 37.5 °C39.1 °C38.1 °C 
Maximum: 52.7 °C
Average: 44.8 °C
48.4 °C46.7 °C48.2 °C
44.9 °C45.2 °C40 °C
38.2 °C38.7 °C36.2 °C
Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.3 °C / -18.6 F).
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Heat
-25%
-20%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
52.7
55
-4%
55.6
-6%
48
9%
Maximum Bottom *
48.4
58.7
-21%
62.4
-29%
46.8
3%
Idle Upper Side *
29.3
36.9
-26%
33.2
-13%
33.7
-15%
Idle Bottom *
28.4
41.7
-47%
37.2
-31%
30.5
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.237.92541.143.53138.239.9403135.75030.8356325.931.48025.633.410024.943.312523.550.116026.55620021.359.225021.160.131523.164.140019.765.550019.466.963018.768.480017.672.1100018.970.7125017.566.4160017.767.4200017.668.7250017.968.3315017.963.7400017.863.750001861.463001861.980001853.81000018.152.21250018.145.21600018.138.7SPL30.478.7N1.444.5median 18.1median 63.7Delta26.936.433.736.43537.133.834.834.134.634.132.532.632.433.13231.230.63129.137.428.745.928.750.527.353.426.955.226.165.425.167.927.265.825.262.724.958.124.459.423.85923.557.523.360.923.564.323.369.523.166.823.169.123.367.123.252.523.437.236.676.72.838.9median 24.9median 592.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade (2016)MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 9 / 14 / 22 Watt
Load midlight 72 / 124 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC940
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Schenker XMG P406
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Power Consumption
-22%
-27%
-58%
Idle Minimum *
9
12
-33%
12.1
-34%
20
-122%
Idle Average *
14
16
-14%
19
-36%
24
-71%
Idle Maximum *
22
22
-0%
19.5
11%
29
-32%
Load Average *
72
90
-25%
106.7
-48%
86
-19%
Load Maximum *
124
170
-37%
159
-28%
183
-48%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 03min
Razer Blade (2016)
70 Wh
Schenker XMG P406
45 Wh
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
61 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
62 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
243
197
-19%
261
7%
196
-19%

Pros

+ 6个可选配置型号
+ 紧凑且相对轻盈
+ 非常坚固的铝合金机身
+ 完美的制造工艺
+ 典雅的黑色以及阳刚的设计
+ 接口布局合理
+ 支持USB-C接口Thunderbolt 3
+ HDMI 2.0
+ 非常优秀的无线网卡性能
+ 易于打开和维护,可以清理风扇
+ Chroma键盘提供了多种背光自定义选项
+ 可编程按键
+ 非常优秀的IGZO屏幕
+ 低功耗(相比同类设备)

Cons

- 易于沾染指纹
- 非常规的键盘布局
- 按键字符难以看清
- 很多功能无法在注册前使用(Razer Synapse)
- 低于平均水平的鼠标按键
- 90%亮度以下均采用闪烁亮度控制
- 响应速度慢
- 镜面屏幕
- 可视角度范围相比IPS较窄
- 在高负载下处理器降频严重(可通过更新修复)
- 在中高风扇速度下有轻微哨声噪音
- 扬声器无法满足听音乐的效果需要
In review: Razer Blade (2016). Test model provided by Razer Germany.
In review: Razer Blade (2016). Test model provided by Razer Germany.

考虑到众多的优势,我们对于严重的处理器降频问题感到格外遗憾。它的屏幕闪烁亮度控制和较慢的响应时间也可能会让一些潜在用户迟疑。正常使用所必须的注册账号程序也让我们感到十分不便。鉴于机身较薄,我们认为它的噪音控制属于可以接受的水平,不过风扇在高速旋转时发出的哨声一般的噪音则会给用户带来一些问题。

新一代的雷蛇Blade整体表现十分优秀,不过在处理器性能上受到了限制,无法发挥全部的潜力。它的最大优势是高品质的机身,我们几乎挑不出任何瑕疵。它的Chroma键盘布局不太寻常,不过丰富的个性化设置是个很大的优势。搭配高速ac无线网卡,Thunderbolt 3 USB-C和HDMI 2.0接口,Blade已经为未来做好了准备。这台游戏本也搭配了明亮的IGZO屏幕面板,高对比度和准确的色彩都可以令人满意。

更新12/05/16:之前已经提到,它的处理器降频问题已经通过EC更新得到了解决。因此它的分数调整到了最初的84%。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Razer Blade (2016) - 12/25/2016 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis
93 / 98 → 95%
Keyboard
76%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
63 / 81 → 77%
Weight
64 / 10-66 → 96%
Battery
75%
Display
88%
Games Performance
89%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 88%
Noise
76 / 90 → 85%
Audio
66%
Camera
71 / 85 → 84%
Average
79%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 雷蛇 Blade (2016) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-12- 7 (Update: 2016-12- 7)