150 欧元的出色电池续航能力--小米红米 15 4G 评测

Name: Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G
Brand: Xiaomi

预算有限，运行时间长。

不出所料，对于这个级别的设备来说，小米红米 15 4G 没有 5G 连接。即便如此，整体配置仍然令人信服。除了 256 GB 的存储空间和 144 Hz 刷新率的 6.9 英寸 IPS 显示屏之外，这款经济型智能手机还配备了 7,000 mAh 硅碳电池。因此，红米 15 成为了经济型智能手机电池续航时间的佼佼者。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/30/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米红米 15 4G 的评价

红米 15 是一款配置精良、价格实惠的智能手机。它的优势包括 144 Hz 的大显示屏、支持到 2029 年底的软件以及稳固的整体功能集。

最明显的亮点是 7000 毫安时硅碳电池，它使红米 15 成为以相对较低的价格就能买到的最耐用的智能手机之一。一小时左右的充电时间进一步增加了它的吸引力。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

不过，大容量电池也使得红米 15 相对较重。此外，该机的照片质量并不突出，游戏性能有限，而且只能提供单声道音效，尽管音质悦耳动听。

价格和供应情况

小米红米 15的官方售价为 179.90 欧元。但实际上，它的价格已经更低了，比如在亚马逊（Amazon）上就可以买到。如果选择 128 GB 版本，价格还能再降低 20 欧元左右。

$7.59
Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G/4G Screen Protector Tempered Glass, 3D full Coverage Ultra Resistant, Hatterproof, Bubble Free for Redmi Note 15 5G Tempered Glass, Case Friendly
$8.59
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Protector for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G/4G/Xiaomi Poco M8 with Camera Lens Protector,9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free
$8.00
MTRIEBA [3 Pack] Compatible for Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Tempered Glass Screen Protector [9H hardness][High Definition,Scratch-resistant and shatterproof]

小米红米 15 4G 的评价
规格
外壳--大容量电池使红米 15 十分沉重
功能--除 5G 外，所有重要功能均包括在内
软件 - HyperOS 2.0，带Android 17 更新保证
通信与全球导航卫星系统 - GPS 性能卓越的小米红米 15
电话和通话质量
摄像头 - 5000 万像素主摄像头，但没有超广角摄像头
配件和保修
输入设备和操作 - 足够快，可完成日常任务
显示屏 - IPS 面板，亮度高，无 PWM
性能 - 搭载老化的骁龙 685 SoC 的红米 15
排放--小米红米 15 保持凉爽
电池续航时间 - 7,000 mAh 电池是最大亮点
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品一览

小米新推出的红米 15 系列旨在以强大的性价比给人留下深刻印象。即使是小米红米 15 4G，作为该系列中最小的机型，也有很多可圈可点之处。它配备了 144 Hz 刷新率的 6.9 英寸显示屏、7,000 mAh 电池和 256 GB 存储空间，售价约为 150 欧元。

规格

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G (Redmi 15 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G 8 x 1.9 - 2.8 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

6.90 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 374 PPI, capacitive, IPS, brightness: 700 cd/m², up to 850 cd/m² (HBM), glossy: yes, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 230 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Virtual proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, IR blaster, USB-OTG, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/5/8), 4G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/20/38/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 171.1 x 82.1

Battery

7000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 33W max. charging speed, 18W reverse charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, video recording up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, quick start guide, warranty card, Xiaomi HyperOS 2, 12 Months Warranty, IP64 certified; GPS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I), Galileo (E1); Connectivity: Dual Nano SIM, VoLTE/WiFI calling, no eSIM support; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V1-V5; no HDR support; update policy: security updates every 90 days, security update EOL 2029-10, future OS versions: Android 16, Android 17, fanless

Weight

224 g

Price

179 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳--大容量电池使红米 15 十分沉重

虽然红米 15 的机身在扭动时会发出轻微的吱吱声，但它的做工质量非常扎实。得益于其圆润的边角设计，握持感依然舒适。这款智能手机通过了 IP64 认证，可以承受少量水溅而不受损坏。

与同类设备相比，该机的重量较重，主要是因为采用了 6.9 英寸的外形尺寸和 7,000 毫安时的大容量电池。

在机身背面，红米 15 配备了 5000 万像素主摄像头，有三种颜色可供选择：午夜黑、泰坦 灰和沙紫三种颜色可供选择。没有超广角摄像头。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Motorola Moto G06 Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G ZTE Nubia Music Samsung Galaxy A17 4G DIN A6 ❌

功能--除 5G 外，所有重要功能均包括在内

小米官方在线商店中，红米 15 仅提供 8GB 内存和 256GB 存储空间的单一配置，售价略低于 180 欧元。比价门户网站还列出了稍便宜的第二种配置：6GB内存和128GB存储空间。

除了缺少 5G 功能外，该产品在功能方面没有重大遗漏。USB-C 端口的工作速度为 USB 2.0，音频由单声道扬声器处理，SIM 卡插槽支持两张 Nano SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。

microSD 读卡器

在拷贝测试中，microSD 读卡器在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡时的速度约为 32 MByte/s。这符合预期，因为同类设备的速度也没有明显提高。顺序读取速度高达 88 MByte/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99	40.9 MB/s +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (Angelbird V60)	35.9 MB/s +12%
Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81 (Angelbird V60)	34.7 MB/s +8%
Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=72, last 2 years)	32.4 MB/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (Angelbird V60)	32.1 MB/s
ZTE Nubia Music UNISOC SC9863A (Angelbird V60)	24.4 MB/s -24%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.5 (19.6-46)

Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø21.9 (7.84-44.7)

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø20.9 (7.18-44.8)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.5 (28.5-49.3)

ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.7 (20.9-38)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.5 (41-87.8)

Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.4 (25.2-85.3)

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.2 (31-85.3)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.1 (41.8-85.1)

ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.4 (26.9-82.8)

软件 - HyperOS 2.0，带Android 17 更新保证

红米 15 搭载基于Android 15 的 HyperOS 2.0。小米计划在 2029 年 10 月之前，每隔三个月为其经济型智能手机提供一次更新。.据小米称，红米 15 还将获得Android 16 和Android 17。

可持续性

红米 15 采用无塑料包装。不过，小米并没有提供具体信息，说明智能手机本身或包装中是否使用了可回收材料，或使用的程度如何。

小米公司提供红米 15 的备件供用户购买，包括相应的工具，同时还为旧设备提供以旧换新计划。.根据欧盟的 EPREL 数据库，红米 15 的能效等级为B 级。.

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - GPS 性能卓越的小米红米 15

红米 15 采用 WiFi 5 作为最快的无线标准，在连接到我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）时，传输速率稳定在 300 MBit/s 左右。这使它与同类设备不相上下，因为在这个价位的设备中，一般不会有更高的速度。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	295 (min: 213) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	311 (min: 104) MBit/s ∼43%
Motorola Moto G06 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	289 (min: 257) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	354 (min: 334) MBit/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	278 (min: 206) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	337 (min: 219) MBit/s ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	224 (min: 113) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	313 (min: 179) MBit/s ∼43%
ZTE Nubia Music 802.11a/b/g/n
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	52.5 (min: 15) MBit/s ∼8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	52.2 (min: 18) MBit/s ∼7%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	338 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	700 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	723 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø295 (213-330)

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø278 (206-302)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø311 (104-371)

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø337 (219-350)

红米 15 支持 GPS、GLONASS、北斗和伽利略卫星系统，均为单频模式。在实际测试中，它的导航性能令人惊喜。

无论是在狭窄的老城区街道，还是在建筑密度较低的地区，该设备几乎都能保持理想的线路，总体而言，其准确度几乎与对比设备 Garmin Venu 2 不相上下。

电话和通话质量

作为传统手机使用时，红米 15 的表现非常可靠。在我们的通话测试中，无论是语音清晰度还是信号质量，都没有任何异常。除 VoLTE 外，小米手机还支持 WiFi 通话，并可使用两张 Nano SIM 卡。

摄像头 - 5000 万像素主摄像头，但没有超广角摄像头

自拍摄像头的分辨率为 800 万像素。它无法捕捉到大量细节，边缘锐化处理也比较激进，但整体图像质量尚可接受。

5000 万像素的主摄像头也大致如此，该摄像头由用于深度信息的第二个镜头提供支持。在光线条件良好的情况下，主摄像头拍摄的照片效果很好，色彩相当逼真，但与自拍摄像头相比，效果并不明显。尽管如此，主摄像头在弱光环境下的表现也相当不错。

红米 15 没有配备超广角摄像头，而且与自拍摄像头一样，视频录制也仅限于最高 1080p 和每秒 30 帧。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme Tageslicht-Aufnahme Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修

小米随红米 15 附送一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个保护套。

在制造商保修方面，小米的做法比较克制，因为红米智能手机在欧盟享受 12 个月的制造商保修。尽管如此，法定的 24 个月销售商保修在欧盟范围内适用。

输入设备和操作 - 足够快，可完成日常任务

启动后，HyperOS 2.0 仍会在某些地方偶尔出现卡顿。不过，当一切加载完成后，红米 15 对输入的响应速度很快，而且由于采用了 144 Hz IPS 面板，操作起来感觉很流畅。在日常使用中骁龙 685通常能提供足够的性能。

集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器完全发挥了其应有的作用。它工作可靠，解锁智能手机非常迅速。2D 面部识别功能也同样可靠。

显示屏 - IPS 面板，亮度高，无 PWM

红米 15 的显示屏亮度约为 650 尼特，达到了这个价位的典型水平。在使用 APL18 测量的小图像区域中，IPS 面板可将亮度提升至 839 cd/m²。虽然不支持 HDR，但显示屏的无闪烁功能弥补了这一不足，对于对 PWM 比较敏感的用户来说，小米智能手机是一个非常不错的选择。


631 cd/m²	630 cd/m²	598 cd/m²
599 cd/m²	656 cd/m²	621 cd/m²
618 cd/m²	632 cd/m²	641 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 656 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 625.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 656 cd/m²
Contrast: 1426:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.76 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.181
CCT: 6420 K

	Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G IPS, 2340x1080, 6.9"	Motorola Moto G06 IPS, 1640x720, 6.9"	Samsung Galaxy A17 4G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G IPS, 1600x720, 6.9"	ZTE Nubia Music IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
Screen		-19%	-18%	-11%	-45%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	656	531 -19%	687 5%	591 -10%	514 -22%
Brightness (cd/m²)	625	512 -18%	666 7%	557 -11%	508 -19%
Brightness Distribution (%)	91	94 3%	93 2%	91 0%	94 3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.46	0.3 35%		0.51 -11%	0.37 20%
Contrast (:1)	1426	1770 24%		1159 -19%	1389 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.76	4.28 -55%	3.45 -25%	3.25 -18%	5.21 -89%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.77	6.77 -42%	5.49 -15%	6.77 -42%	8.64 -81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	3.6 -80%	3.6 -80%	1.6 20%	5.3 -165%
Gamma	2.181 ^101%	2.235 ^98%	2.026 ^109%	2.299 ^96%	2.212 ^99%
CCT	6420 ^101%	7429 ^87%	6192 ^105%	6967 ^93%	7903 ^82%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	839 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8042 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

有三种色彩模式可用于色彩再现：饱和、鲜艳和标准。此外，色温也可自由调节。在默认设置下，IPS 面板可实现高度精确的色彩再现，Delta E 值低于 3，色温几乎达到理想的 6420 K。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.2 ms rise
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.4 ms rise
38.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

在室外，只要避免阳光直射可视角度稳定的显示屏，红米 15 依然易于使用。不过，测试期间的冬季条件对 IPS 面板没有构成任何挑战，因为在任何时候，从任何视角看内容都清晰可辨。

性能 - 搭载老化的骁龙 685 SoC 的红米 15

红米 15 采用骁龙 685这颗 SoC 已经有五年多的历史了。不过，在日常使用中，这一点几乎看不出来，因为大部分时间都能流畅运行标准应用程序，而且由于采用了 UFS 2.2 存储系统，加载时间仍然可以接受。

对于要求更高的应用程序或游戏，基于 ARM 的 SoC 很快就会达到极限。如果需要更高的性能，价格相近的三星Galaxy A17 4G或小米红米 15C 5G是更好的选择。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=207, last 2 years)	1779 Points +275%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	733 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	732 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (474 - 478, n=2)	476 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	474 Points
Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	399 Points -16%
ZTE Nubia Music UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	196 Points -59%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=207, last 2 years)	5199 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1966 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1877 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	1620 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (1544 - 1620, n=2)	1582 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1359 Points -16%
ZTE Nubia Music UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	830 Points -49%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=144, last 2 years)	1493814 Points +287%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	413934 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	385742 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (352825 - 385742, n=2)	369284 Points -4%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=180, last 2 years)	14872 Points +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	11422 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	9502 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (7305 - 9502, n=3)	8743 Points -8%
ZTE Nubia Music UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 4096	5187 Points -45%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=144, last 2 years)	7772 Points +180%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3123 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	2777 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (2728 - 2777, n=3)	2747 Points -1%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=144, last 2 years)	11565 Points +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (5926 - 6320, n=3)	6134 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	5926 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	5536 Points -7%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=144, last 2 years)	8856 Points +150%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	4662 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	3544 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (3254 - 3544, n=3)	3361 Points -5%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=144, last 2 years)	26432 Points +1021%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2851 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	2358 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (2331 - 2358, n=3)	2341 Points -1%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2587, n=144, last 2 years)	1708 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1293 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	1201 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (1144 - 1232, n=3)	1192 Points -1%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=128, last 2 years)	19732 Points +350%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	7288 Points +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (4387 - 4615, n=3)	4482 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	4387 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=69, last 2 years)	746 Points +669%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	235 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	209 Points +115%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	97 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (n=1)	97 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	80 Points -18%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=69, last 2 years)	3045 Points +3007%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	323 Points +230%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	313 Points +219%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	98 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (n=1)	98 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	80 Points -18%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=69, last 2 years)	4474 Points +2883%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	203 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	199 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	150 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (n=1)	150 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	142 Points -5%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=80, last 2 years)	5363 Points +3428%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	176 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192	152 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (n=1)	152 Points 0%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 Points +151%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	333 Points +135%
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	168 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	142 Points
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	62 Points -56%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	370 Points +164%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	329 Points +135%
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	169 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	140 Points
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	61 Points -56%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1333 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1199 Points +89%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	636 Points
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	633 Points 0%
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	271 Points -57%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps +40%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps +145%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps +71%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +73%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps +225%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +61%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.7 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps +233%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.5 fps +67%
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	8.9 fps +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.7 fps
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.7 fps -35%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.3 fps +75%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	6 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	2.9 fps -19%
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.2 fps -67%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps +209%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	14.8 fps +53%
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	13 fps +34%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.7 fps
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	6.2 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15.9 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	7.9 fps -28%
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.4 fps -69%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.6 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2.4 fps +60%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.5 fps
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	1.3 fps -13%
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	0.54 fps -64%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=142, last 2 years)	157.2 Points +107%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140)	94.709 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G (Chrome 141)	85.963 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)	76.098 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (58.9 - 76.1, n=3)	65.8 Points -14%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=114, last 2 years)	233 runs/min +183%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)	82.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (50.9 - 82.2, n=3)	61.8 runs/min -25%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years)	14.8 runs/min +166%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)	5.56 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (n=1)	5.56 runs/min 0%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=139, last 2 years)	147.8 Points +114%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140)	88 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)	69 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (49 - 69, n=3)	58.7 Points -15%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=190, last 2 years)	49530 Points +143%
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140)	26675 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)	20375 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (15695 - 20375, n=3)	17323 Points -15%
ZTE Nubia Music (Chrome 131)	6015 Points -70%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (2000 - 2535, n=3)	2356 ms * -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)	1999.6 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140)	1534.5 ms * +23%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=150, last 2 years)	1156 ms * +42%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G	Motorola Moto G06	Samsung Galaxy A17 4G	Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G	ZTE Nubia Music	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-58%	-54%	-2%	-71%	11%	111%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	1027.22	301 -71%	518.6 -50%	509.9 -50%	269.6 -74%	909 ?(482 - 1041, n=58) -12%	2199 ?(270 - 4370, n=192, last 2 years) 114%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	617.41	243.5 -61%	172.6 -72%	512.1 -17%	236.5 -62%	733 ?(369 - 998, n=58) 19%	1879 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=192, last 2 years) 204%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	179.34	100 -44%	141.1 -21%	196.3 9%	47.6 -73%	224 ?(99.7 - 295, n=58) 25%	296 ?(47.6 - 576, n=192, last 2 years) 65%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	218.17	99.2 -55%	55.9 -74%	329 51%	53.9 -75%	247 ?(99.2 - 390, n=58) 13%	346 ?(9.4 - 987, n=192, last 2 years) 59%

排放--小米红米 15 保持凉爽

温度

即使在持续负载的情况下，红米 15 的手感也不会让人感到不舒服，因为在测试过程中，机身表面温度没有超过 41 °C。

内部发热也非常适中。在 3DMark 压力测试中，性能没有明显下降。

Max. Load

Idle


40 °C	39.2 °C	32.6 °C
39.1 °C	34.7 °C	31.8 °C
38.4 °C	35.5 °C	32.1 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 35.9 °C


34.2 °C	36.2 °C	38.7 °C
33.8 °C	34.6 °C	38.5 °C
33.2 °C	34.5 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 38.7 °C
Average: 35.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	99.5 % 0%
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	99.3 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 %
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.2 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	99 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.5 %
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.2 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash	98 % -1%
ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash	94.2 % -4%

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø0.836 (0.83-0.842)

Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø1.022 (1.017-1.028)

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø2.05 (2.03-2.07)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.18)

ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.3689 (0.3555-0.3774)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.92)

Motorola Moto G06 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.8 (3.79-3.81)

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.43-7.48)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.9 (7.8-7.95)

ZTE Nubia Music GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.618 (1.613-1.621)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.82 (3.82-3.82)

发言人

红米 15 不提供立体声音效。不过，位于 USB-C 端口旁边的单声道扬声器表现不错。正如智能手机的典型特点一样，低频较少，而中频和高频的再现则相当均衡。

外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.0 连接。红米 15 支持当前广泛的蓝牙编解码器，包括 aptX HD 和 LHDC V1 至 V5。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 7,000 mAh 电池是最大亮点

耗电量

7,000 毫安时硅碳电池是红米 15 的突出特点。它采用高能效的骁龙 685也起到了辅助作用。

在测试中，使用 Anker 317 100 W 电源适配器时，一个完整的充电周期仅需不到一个小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.3 / 1.6 / 1.9 Watt
Load	3.8 / 7.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G 7000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G 6000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	10%	-12%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.3	0.6 54%	1.067 ?(0.8 - 1.3, n=3) 18%	0.855 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=163, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.6	0.9 44%	1.3 ?(1 - 1.6, n=3) 19%	1.439 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=163, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.9	1.3 32%	1.633 ?(1.5 - 1.9, n=3) 14%	1.619 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=163, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average * (Watt)	3.8	5.4 -42%	4.07 ?(3.6 - 4.8, n=3) -7%	6.75 ?(2.3 - 15.4, n=135, last 2 years) -78%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	7.9	6.7 15%	7.47 ?(6.7 - 7.9, n=3) 5%	11.1 ?(3.53 - 22, n=135, last 2 years) -41%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.81 (1.6-7.92)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.46 (0.632-6.85)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.58 (1.331-2.21)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.655 (0.551-0.891)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.93 (2.97-4.42)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.88 (5.46-6.72)

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.58 (1.331-2.21)

Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.655 (0.551-0.891)

电池寿命

红米 15 在电池续航方面兑现了承诺。得益于其 7000 毫安时的超大电池容量，小米智能手机的续航时间轻松超过了所有同类设备，并且在实际的 WiFi 测试中仅在近 27 小时后才关机。

这使得红米 15 特别适合那些不想每天为智能手机充电或随时携带电源适配器的用户。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)

26h 44min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G 7000 mAh	26.7 h
Motorola Moto G06 5200 mAh	16.7 h
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G 5000 mAh	13 h
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G 6000 mAh	18.6 h
ZTE Nubia Music 5000 mAh	15.3 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米红米 15 4G 以强大的性价比脱颖而出。虽然它没有 5G 连接，但其他功能设置非常均衡。这款 6.9 英寸智能手机性能稳定，电池容量为 7,000 mAh，续航能力出色。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G - 01/26/2026 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

79%

Keyboard

71 / 75 → 95%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

42 / 69 → 61%

Weight

88%

Battery

94%

Display

84%

Games Performance

3 / 55 → 6%

Application Performance

51 / 85 → 60%

AI Performance

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 83%

Camera

63%

Average

63%

73%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
95.4%

Repairability
60%

Software Updates
83.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 56.5%

可能的替代品一览

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 72.9%	Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $7.59 Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi Red... 2. $8.59 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. $8.00 MTRIEBA [3 Pack] Compatible ... List Price: 179 Euro	224 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.90" 2340x1080 374 PPI IPS
2. 71%	Motorola Moto G06 Mediatek Helio G81 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC	Amazon: 1. $179.99 Motorola Moto G Play - 2026 ... 2. $7.99 beukei (3 Pack) Compatible f... 3. $249.99 Motorola Moto G86 Dual-SIM 2... List Price: 129€	194 g	256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash	6.88" 1640x720 260 PPI IPS
3. 72%	Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC	Amazon: $228.34 List Price: 185€	190 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI AMOLED
4. 72.1%	Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Redmi 15C... 2. $7.59 Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi R... 3. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 170€	211 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.90" 1600x720 254 PPI IPS
5. 66.7%	ZTE Nubia Music UNISOC SC9863A ⎘ PowerVR GE8322 / IMG8322 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC	Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $10.52 HGJTFANY 2 Pack for ZTE Nubi... 3. $8.00 MTRIEBA [3 Pack] Compatible ... List Price: 149€	199 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.60" 1612x720 267 PPI IPS

150 欧元的出色电池续航能力--小米红米 15 4G 评测

预算有限，运行时间长。

小米红米 15 4G 的评价

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳--大容量电池使红米 15 十分沉重

尺寸比较

功能--除 5G 外，所有重要功能均包括在内

microSD 读卡器

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

软件 - HyperOS 2.0，带Android 17 更新保证

可持续性

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - GPS 性能卓越的小米红米 15

电话和通话质量

摄像头 - 5000 万像素主摄像头，但没有超广角摄像头

配件和保修

输入设备和操作 - 足够快，可完成日常任务

显示屏 - IPS 面板，亮度高，无 PWM

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 搭载老化的骁龙 685 SoC 的红米 15

排放--小米红米 15 保持凉爽

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 7,000 mAh 电池是最大亮点

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品一览

More articles related to this device

Transparency