结论：小米红米 15C 5G
经济实惠的红米 15C 现在也推出了 5G 版本。它不仅带来了更快的连接速度，而且性能和充电速度也明显高于以往。机身外观很吸引人，但宽边框和适中的稳定性让人明白这仍然是一款入门级设备。
摄像头的效果尚可。扬声器可完成其工作，但也仅此而已。GPS 的精确度足以满足日常导航的需要，而 IPS 显示屏则以良好的亮度和准确的色彩还原给人留下了深刻印象。
目前，红米 15C 的 4G 和 5G 版本在网上商店的差价为 30-40 欧元。如果你能投入这笔钱，你将会得到值得的实质性升级，尤其是在系统速度和加载时间方面。
就其本身而言，小米红米 15C 5G 是一款有实力的入门级智能手机。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在我们评测期间，红米 15C 5G 的起价约为 140 欧元，可通过 MediaMarkt 和amazon.de 购买。.虽然该机型出现在小米公司的全球网站上，但并未在该公司的美国或英国商店正式销售。美国和英国的买家目前只能通过第三方进口商购买，价格取决于卖家。
- $5.69Aiziki (2 Pack Designed for Xiaomi Redmi 15C 4G Screen Protector Tempered Glass, Ultra Resistant, 9H Hardness Shatterproof, Bubble Free for Redmi 15C 4G Screen Protector, Case Friendly
- $7.99Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Screen Protector Tempered Glass，Case Friendly [High definition][Hardness 9H][Anti Scratch]
规格
外壳：彩色塑料设计
与红米 14C 相比，评测机的机身增长了几毫米，显示屏面积也略有增大。不过，其重量保持不变，仍为 211 克。
这款智能手机采用塑料外壳。评测机为紫罗兰色，其背板采用了反光和不反光表面的混合设计。相比之下，绿色和黑色版本的设计更为简洁。
正面，屏幕由大猩猩 3 号玻璃保护。边框清晰可见，这标志着红米 15C 5G 是一款入门级智能手机。
在日常使用中，这款手机的外壳感觉很稳定，但在受压时会发出轻微的吱吱声，并显示出轻微的弯曲。
制造商规定的防护等级为 IP64：手机可完全防止灰尘和固体颗粒，但只能防止溅水。
功能：内存有限
小米红米 15C 5G 有以下存储版本：
- 4 GB 内存/128 GB 存储空间
- 4 GB 内存/256 GB 存储空间
不提供超过 4GB 的运行内存，因此几乎无法运行要求苛刻的应用程序或多任务处理。
USB-C 端口内部接线仅为 USB 2.0，因此无法通过线缆输出视频，也不支持更快的数据传输速率。
包括用于非接触式支付的 NFC。
microSD 读卡器
可通过 microSD 插槽扩展存储空间。读写速度相当可观。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Motorola Moto G35 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (Angelbird V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
软件：更新至 2031 年
小米手机预装了 HyperOS 2，这是基于Android 15 的自家用户界面。小米手机的一个缺点是预装软件太多，而且某些地方还会出现广告。虽然可以 禁用虽然可以关闭广告，但需要逐个应用程序关闭，过程十分繁琐。
制造商承诺提供六年的安全更新，一直持续到 2031 年。系统升级也已确认，直至Android 17。
可持续性
目前还没有关于红米 15C 5G 可持续性的具体声明，也没有提供维修手册。
不过，小米确实在其网站上列出了备件的大致价格。而且包装基本不使用塑料。
通信和全球导航卫星系统：5G 频率覆盖良好
Wi-Fi 5 是小米红米 15C 5G 支持的最快无线标准。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行测试时，我们发现数据传输速率偶尔会出现明显下降。不过，总体而言，传输速度在 250 到 350 Mbit/s 之间是比较典型的。
4G 和 5G 频率覆盖范围很广，可以在旅行中频繁使用移动互联网。不过，对于非常遥远的国际旅行，买家应提前检查兼容性，因为红米 15C 5G 并非真正的全球通用手机。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
在户外，智能手机可快速确定位置，精确度可达两米。
在我们的实际骑行测试中，红米 15C 5G 的定位精度总体表现良好。
对于不需要绝对精确度的用户来说，这款手机可以作为一款可靠的导航设备推荐给他们。
电话功能和通话质量：清晰可靠
小米依赖于谷歌的标准手机应用。该应用最近进行了更新，但仍然直观易用。
通话质量稳定：整体语音传输清晰，但对方偶尔会听起来有点刺耳。
相机：性价比高
5000 万像素的主摄像头位于机身背面，并配有深度传感器，可实现人像效果。照片具有良好的色彩还原能力，但往往缺乏清晰度。
在弱光环境下，暗部经常会出现阴影。
视频录制可达 1080p 和 30 fps。自动对焦和曝光往往反应较慢，但考虑到该设备的价格，效果还是可以接受的。
1300 万像素的前置摄像头能拍出不错的自拍照。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
配件和保修：不包括充电器
包装中不包括充电器，但提供了 USB 数据线、SIM 卡工具和硅胶套。
小米手机提供 12 个月 保修为在欧盟购买的智能手机提供 12 个月的保修服务。
输入设备和操作：可靠的生物识别技术
120 Hz 的显示屏能快速响应输入，通常能顺利执行。触摸屏甚至提供高灵敏度模式，允许湿手操作。在测试中，效果相当不错。
指纹传感器集成在右侧的待机键上。它能非常可靠地解锁智能手机，几乎没有延迟。还可通过前置摄像头进行生物人脸识别。这种方法被证明是可靠的，但它只是基于 2D 的，因此不是特别安全。
显示屏：明显更亮
IPS 面板的对角线尺寸为 6.9 英寸，分辨率相对较低，仅为 1,600 × 720 像素。像素密度仅为 254 PPI，内容看起来并不特别清晰。
不过，亮度令人印象深刻，明显高于前代产品：高达 591 cd/m²，即使在较亮的环境中也能确保相当好的可读性。
色彩还原也相当不错，不过红色尤其显得略微过饱和。
测试期间没有发现 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 591 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.25 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.299
CCT: 6967 K
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G IPS, 1600x720, 6.9" | TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi 14C IPS, 1640x720, 6.9" | Motorola Moto G35 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -12% | -9% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 591 | 500 -15% | 422 -29% | 1069 81% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 557 | 493 -11% | 401 -28% | 976 75% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 95 4% | 89 -2% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.51 | 0.5 2% | 0.3 41% | 0.7 -37% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1159 | 1000 -14% | 1407 21% | 1527 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.25 | 3.95 -22% | 3.21 1% | 3.32 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.77 | 7.23 -7% | 6.29 7% | 5.48 19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.1 -31% | 2.9 -81% | 3.6 -125% |
| Gamma | 2.299 96% | 2.241 98% | 2.382 92% | 2.167 102% |
| CCT | 6967 93% | 6481 100% | 6338 103% | 6141 106% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). | ||
性能：物美价廉
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6300为入门级手机提供了可靠的 SoC，与前代产品相比性能提升明显。A 摩托罗拉 Moto G35仍能提供更强的动力。
在日常使用中，评测机在启动应用程序时偶尔会出现卡顿和犹豫。但总体而言，菜单导航还算流畅。但在执行要求较高的任务时，智能手机很快就会达到极限。
| Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (413934 - 418604, n=3) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (4545 - 7288, n=3) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (153 - 5210, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (211 - 235, n=2) | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (178 - 35890, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (323 - 343, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (203 - 209, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 12845, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (166 - 214, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (86.7 - 94.7, n=2) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (Chrome 131) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 621, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (n=1) | |
| Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 41.7, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (4.28 - 6.54, n=2) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (Chrome 131) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 302, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (84 - 91, n=3) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (Chrome 131) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (24975 - 29211, n=4) | |
| Motorola Moto G35 (Chrome 128) | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (Chrome 131) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C (Chrome 131) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (Chrome 131) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (1435 - 1681, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G (Chrome 140) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (263 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
UFS 2.2 闪存比上一代产品使用的 eMMC 有了明显的改进。它能实现相当快的数据传输速度和更短的加载时间。
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | Xiaomi Redmi 14C | Motorola Moto G35 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | -59% | 50% | 1% | 160% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 509.9 | 528.8 4% | 300.9 -41% | 989.3 94% | 733 ? 44% | 2209 ? 333% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 512.1 | 498.7 -3% | 193.1 -62% | 860.3 68% | 527 ? 3% | 1812 ? 254% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 196.3 | 227.7 16% | 88.6 -55% | 272.1 39% | 192.7 ? -2% | 294 ? 50% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 329 | 235.8 -28% | 78.9 -76% | 318.9 -3% | 185.9 ? -43% | 339 ? 3% |
排放：无发热问题
温度
即使在负载情况下，机箱温度也几乎没有升高。
3DMark 压力测试显示，在长时间使用过程中仅出现极小的节流现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G35 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 14C | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper | |
发言人
底部边缘的小型扬声器音量相当大，但声音偏高音。
提供 3.5 毫米耳机插孔和用于无线音频的蓝牙 5.3。支持基本的无线音频编解码器。
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G35 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命：大容量电池，可长时间运行
耗电量
事实证明，红米 15C 5G 在闲置时非常经济，即使在负载情况下，其功耗也保持在合理的范围内。
最高支持 33 瓦充电。手机在所有测试的充电器上都能正常工作。充满电仅需不到 1 小时 40 分钟。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  0.6 / 0.9 / 1.3 Watt |
| Load |
5.4 / 6.7 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G 6000 mAh | Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -57% | -44% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.6 | 1.177 ? -96% | 0.854 ? -42% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 0.9 | 1.86 ? -107% | 1.423 ? -58% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.3 | 2.14 ? -65% | 1.592 ? -22% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 5.4 | 5.55 ? -3% | 7.25 ? -34% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 6.7 | 7.75 ? -16% | 11.1 ? -66% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
红米 15C 5G 配备了 6,000 毫安时电池，超越了同价位的许多竞争对手。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间达到了 18 小时 35 分钟，足够正常使用两天。
| Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G 6000 mAh | TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 5010 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5160 mAh | Motorola Moto G35 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 18.6 | 15.5 -17% | 16.3 -12% | 16.7 -10% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
事实证明，红米 15C 5G 是一款性能出众的入门级手机，它配备了明亮的显示屏和比价格更强劲的动力。
Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G
- 09/26/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 72.1%  | Xiaomi Redmi 15C 5G Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 GANGANPRO 1 Pack HD Screen P... 2. $5.69 Aiziki (2 Pack Designed for ... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 170€ | 211 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" 1600x720 254 PPI IPS |
2. 73.4%  | TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $36.99 SECRETIGER LCD Screen Displa... 2. $47.00 JENCYFU TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper ... 3. $41.00 JENCYFU TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper ... List Price: 299€ | 196 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.80" 2460x1080 395 PPI IPS |
3. 70.7%  | Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $132.98 List Price: 150€ | 211 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.88" 1640x720 260 PPI IPS |
4. 72.3%  | Motorola Moto G35 Unisoc T8100 (T760) ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP4 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $32.89 IPS LCD Display Assembly Scr... 3. $6.99 NECARSIN 3 Pack for Motorola... List Price: 179€ | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 392 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
