结论:Teclast ArtPad Air
Teclast ArtPad Air 售价低廉,集金属外壳、4G 功能、笔输入和分辨率不错的无 PWM 屏幕于一身。4:3 格式的 11 英寸显示屏非常适合显示文件或照片,亮度也足够室内使用。不过,它很难实现逼真的色彩显示。
速度达到了同类产品的水平,但对于要求较高的任务,性能储备不多,系统偶尔会出现卡顿。手写笔不一定随附,因此应查看经销商的说明。使用它可以很好地工作,但绝对达不到 iPad Pro 或其他高品质平板电脑的水平。此外,只有在帧频为 60 Hz 时才能达到最佳效果。
如果您正在寻找一款性能稳定、外观漂亮、价格低廉的平板电脑,而且它非常适合文档编辑和简单的草图绘制,那么您可以考虑 Teclast ArtPad Air。不过,你不要指望能像顶级平板电脑那样获得绝对流畅的绘图体验。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Teclast Art Pad Air 目前在Temu 有售。购买时,价格不到 230 美元。
规格
机箱和设备 - 带假天线的金属机箱
Teclast 将 Art Pad Air 装入金属外壳中,尽管这款平板电脑售价不高。外壳相当坚固。看起来就像在外壳上精心印制了天线,就像 iPad Pro的天线一样,精心印制在外壳上,但上边缘的塑料插件颜色略有不同,因此天线更有可能安装在机身内部。
屏幕四周的边缘宽度适中,在外观和操作之间取得了很好的平衡。4:3 的格式非常适合显示文件或照片,平板电脑的重量也处于屏幕尺寸的正常水平。
128 GB 大容量存储空间和 8 GB 内存是该价位产品的标准配置。内存可通过 microSD 插槽扩展,但读卡器的工作速度比同类平板电脑要慢一些。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab (Angelbird V60) | |
| Teclast Art Pad Air (Angelbird V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 配备移动无线电和导航
WiFi 5 是目前 WLAN 网络速度最快的标准。因此,ArtPad Air 可以达到每秒约 300 MBit 的速度。总之,传输速度也相当稳定,在我们的测试中,速度从未低于 200 MBit/s。
此外,还提供 4G,因此您可以通过移动网络访问互联网。在我们的测试中,4G 网络正常运行,接收效果一般。平板电脑还可以进行卫星定位,因此可以用作汽车导航系统等。
除了易于使用的触摸屏,您还可以使用 Teclast T-Pen 手写笔。它提供 4,096 级压力,可通过 USB-C 接口充电。它可以通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的顶部进行存储。
没有指纹传感器,只有面部识别解锁。
| Networking | |
| Teclast Art Pad Air | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| OnePlus Pad Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性--最新的不确定性
Android 平板电脑上预装了 15 个安全补丁。
更新可以通过一个特殊的应用程序启动,这意味着我们的测试设备至少能达到 2025 年 8 月的安全补丁,而在测试时这些补丁也已经过时。制造商没有说明更新将持续多久。
没有关于可持续性的信息;包装使用的是塑料。
摄像头 - 仅用于紧急情况
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light

显示屏 - 4:3,分辨率不错
4:3 格式的 IPS 屏幕直径为 11 英寸,分辨率为 1,840 x 1,280 像素。这个价位的平板电脑分辨率更高,但像素密度足以满足日常使用。
397 cd/m² 的最大亮度在室内使用尚可,但在室外或强光下,屏幕内容往往会被反光覆盖。
我们没有发现 PWM 闪烁。虽然我们尝试了所有的设置选项,但色彩准确度相当一般:画面中仍有强烈的蓝色偏差。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 397 cd/m²
Contrast: 794:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 8.14 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 8.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
84.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.005
CCT: 9049 K
| Teclast Art Pad Air IPS, 1840x1280, 11" | OnePlus Pad Lite IPS, 1920x1200, 11" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G TFT-LCD, 2560x1600, 11" | Lenovo Idea Tab LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 11" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 46% | 41% | 38% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 397 | 519 31% | 398 0% | 411 4% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 376 | 511 36% | 354 -6% | 392 4% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 88 | 97 10% | 84 -5% | 91 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.5 | 0.37 26% | 0.28 44% | 0.39 22% |
| Contrast (:1) | 794 | 1403 77% | 1421 79% | 1054 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.14 | 3.12 62% | 1.6 80% | 1.06 87% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.5 | 5.8 54% | 3.2 74% | 3.92 69% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 2.5 70% | 3.2 61% | 1.3 84% |
| Gamma | 2.005 110% | 2.359 93% | 2.67 82% | 2.232 99% |
| CCT | 9049 72% | 6496 100% | 6542 99% | 6249 104% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Teclast Art Pad Air | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8091 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise | |
| ↘ 15.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 20.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 负载情况下无节流现象
联发科 联发科 Helio G100联发科 Helio G100 在廉价平板电脑中非常流行,Teclast ArtPad Air 的性能达到了同类产品的标准。不过,它的性能水平并不是特别高,因此偶尔会出现卡顿现象,在执行要求较高的任务时性能储备有限。
UFS 2.1 内存至少相当快,可以缩短加载时间。
在负载情况下,机壳几乎不会发热,即使在压力测试中也能保持 SoC 的全部性能。
Teclast ArtPad Air 配备了四个扬声器。尽管扬声器的音量还可以再大一些,但整体音效不错,中高音均衡。
因此,你绝对可以享受到音乐或电影的音效。不过,如果你有更高的要求,你可能更喜欢通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接外部扬声器或耳机。它支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器,因此您也可以通过无线方式聆听高品质的音乐。
8,000 毫安时电池并不是一个亮点--竞争对手有时会提供更大容量的电池。这一点在运行时间上也很明显:在我们的 WLAN 测试中,12:47 小时的运行时间并不突出。不过,在适度使用的情况下,充一次电足够在沙发上使用一天了。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Quantized NPU 1.5 | |
| Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| OnePlus Pad Lite | |
| Teclast Art Pad Air | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G100 (77.2 - 88.7, n=4) | |
| Teclast Art Pad Air | OnePlus Pad Lite | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | Lenovo Idea Tab | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | -2% | -24% | -25% | 40% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1021.1 | 976 -4% | 975.3 -4% | 534.11 -48% | 739 ? -28% | 1786 ? 75% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 882.3 | 883.8 0% | 913.33 4% | 489.67 -45% | 536 ? -39% | 1337 ? 52% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 241.1 | 215.4 -11% | 214.81 -11% | 226.81 -6% | 193.6 ? -20% | 246 ? 2% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 217 | 214.2 -1% | 228.14 5% | 227.97 5% | 186.7 ? -14% | 279 ? 29% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
| Teclast Art Pad Air | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab | |
| Teclast Art Pad Air | |
| OnePlus Pad Lite | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G | |
Teclast Art Pad Air audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Idea Tab audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Teclast Art Pad Air 8000 mAh | OnePlus Pad Lite 9340 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G 9000 mAh | Lenovo Idea Tab 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 80% | 26% | -4% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 12.8 | 23.1 80% | 16.1 26% | 12.3 -4% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 28.4 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 13.3 | |||
| Load (h) | 4.6 |
Teclast Art Pad Air
- 01/04/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teclast Art Pad Air Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $18.98 NOUKAJU [3pack] Screen Prote... 2. $16.98 NOUKAJU Screen Protector for... List Price: 220€ | 523 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" 1840x1280 204 PPI IPS | |
| OnePlus Pad Lite Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Clear Case for OnePlus Pad L... 2. $10.96 Kepuch Custer Case Compatibl... 3. $17.89 for OnePlus Pad Lite/Oppo Pa... List Price: 200€ | 530 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" 1920x1200 206 PPI IPS | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $199.99 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G LTE (C... 2. $272.99 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 4G LTE (C... 3. $167.70 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi... | 519 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI TFT-LCD | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $328.00 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 2. $239.00 Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta... 3. $249.95 Lenovo Idea Tab Plus - Light... List Price: 200€ | 480 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.00" 2560x1600 274 PPI LCD IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.























