判决
Meswao MES-B3 或 azamp MES-B3 是一款特殊的平板电脑：16:9 格式的显示屏非常罕见，而 15.6 英寸的显示屏几乎是独一无二的。大显示屏有它的优势，尤其是在观看视频时，整个屏幕区域都能得到充分利用。在 YouTube 上以 1440p 格式播放流媒体时非常流畅。
遗憾的是，制造商没有考虑到 Widevine 许可问题，这样你也可以享受其他流媒体提供商提供的高清内容。说到安全更新，制造商说到了 2027 年之前的更新保证，但实际上并没有实现：我们测试设备上的安全补丁已经过期一年多了。
你不应该对摄像头和扬声器抱太大期望。屏幕的亮度也不是特别高，但通常足够室内使用。至少在亮度较低时不会出现 PWM 闪烁。
运行时间尚可，但充电需要很长时间。性能是足够的，但你必须忍受偶尔的卡顿和等待时间。
总的来说，azamp / Meswao MES-B3 的亮点在于它的大屏幕。如果这足以作为论据，并且您可以接受上述缺点，那么您一定可以在日常生活中享受到平板电脑带来的乐趣。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
测试设备有 azamp MES-B3 和 Meswao MES-B3。虽然是同一款平板电脑，但在某些情况下价格相差很大。
测试时最便宜的是灰色的 Meswao MES-B3，在amazon.com 上的价格约为 377 美元。
规格
机箱和设备 - 重，但稳定
重量超过 1.1 千克的平板电脑很少随身携带。作为回报，MES-B3 提供了 16:9 格式的 15.6 英寸超大屏幕。屏幕边缘宽度适中。
背面略显粗糙，有灰色、黑色和白色可供选择。就其尺寸而言，这款平板电脑非常稳定，几乎无法扭曲。压力会迅速传到液晶上，形成可见的波纹。
这款平板电脑配备 6GB RAM 和 128GB 大容量存储空间，在同价位产品中配置非常有限。内存可通过 microSD 读卡器扩展，但数据传输并不快。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Teclast T70 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 58.4, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| azamp MES-B3 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通讯和操作 - 带有 WiFi 功能的平板电脑 5
WiFi 5 是该平板电脑配备的最快的 WiFi 标准。它能稳定地实现约 300 MBit/s 的预期数据传输速率。
没有 5G 接收和卫星定位功能。
触摸屏的操作相当准确，不过有时需要重复命令。平板电脑顶部的待机和音量按钮有点小，但很容易找到。无法通过指纹传感器或面部识别解锁平板电脑。
| Networking | |
| azamp MES-B3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Teclast T70 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - 更新承诺听起来不错，但...
Android 平板电脑上预装了 14 个安全补丁。安全补丁也需要一个新版本，因为它们可以追溯到 2024 年。
这是一个遗憾，因为制造商实际上承诺更新到 2027 年，但显然没有提供。
制造商承诺通过抵消排放实现二氧化碳零排放生产，但这一点无法证实。其他可持续发展方面的努力也无法确认。
照相机 - 几乎没有用处
背面有一个 3200 万像素的传感器，作为主摄像头。不过，这只是临时的，拍摄的照片粗糙、颗粒感强，缺乏活力和清晰度。照片的默认格式也是 16:9，这对于静态图像来说很不寻常。
视频最高可录制 1,440p 30 fps。自动对焦和亮度校正有点慢，但总体来说视频效果还可以。
前置摄像头可拍摄合格的自拍照，但也有些颗粒感。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
显示屏 - 显示屏大但暗淡
大屏幕无疑是 azamp MES-B3 或 Meswao MES-B3 的最大亮点。15.6 英寸的大屏幕对于平板电脑来说确实非常大，16:9 的格式为观看视频提供了理想的条件，因为互联网上的大多数视频都是这种格式。
但有一个问题：MES-B3 没有通过 Widevine L1 认证，因此不适合播放受拷贝保护的内容。因此，Netflix 等网站上的流媒体只能以标清格式播放。
屏幕的最大亮度并不是特别高，只有不到 300 cd/m²，但对于室内使用来说已经足够。虽然灰度显示只是略带黄色，但色彩偏差很大，尤其是蓝色调和强烈的色彩：画面整体显得非常暗淡。
屏幕无 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 296 cd/m²
Contrast: 643:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
63.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.135
| azamp MES-B3 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6" | Teclast T70 IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x2136, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 72% | 30% | 73% | |
| Brightness middle | 296 | 605 104% | 400 35% | 566 91% |
| Brightness | 269 | 603 124% | 385 43% | 540 101% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 98 18% | 92 11% | 89 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.36 22% | ||
| Contrast | 643 | 1111 73% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.79 | 2.6 55% | 5.15 11% | 0.91 84% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.26 | 5.4 73% | 10.41 49% | 1.59 92% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.6 57% | 4 -8% | 1.4 62% |
| Gamma | 2.135 103% | 2.08 106% | 2.131 103% | 2.251 98% |
| CCT | 6145 106% | 6405 101% | 7235 90% | 6703 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8343 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 1440p 足够强劲
多亏了 联发科 Helio G99，这款巨型平板电脑可提供中端动力。其性能通常足以满足日常使用。通过 YouTube 播放分辨率为 1,440p 的流媒体视频也很流畅。遗憾的是，eMMC 内存的运行速度非常慢，延迟了加载时间和复制进程。
在长时间负载的情况下，平板电脑几乎不会发热，SoC 对其性能的影响也微乎其微。
这款大型平板电脑配有四个扬声器。不过，这些扬声器的音量并不大，而且高音偏重。连接外部扬声器或扩音器会更有趣。可以通过 USB 或蓝牙无线连接。有多种无线音频编解码器可供选择，让您可以聆听高品质的音乐。
在我们的无线局域网测试中，12,000 毫安时电池的续航时间长达 17 分 35 秒。这个成绩尚可，但没有打破记录；大屏幕可能限制了运行时间。由于充电功率只有 15 瓦，因此充电时间最长不到 6 小时。
| azamp MES-B3 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | Teclast T70 | Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 817% | 118% | 860% | -22% | 241% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 285.6 | 3912.45 1270% | 975.4 242% | 3782.3 1224% | 294 ? 3% | 1399 ? 390% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 174.5 | 2963.58 1598% | 505.3 190% | 3098.21 1675% | 195.5 ? 12% | 1008 ? 478% |
| Random Read 4KB | 146.6 | 342.97 134% | 165.1 13% | 445.76 204% | 84.6 ? -42% | 213 ? 45% |
| Random Write 4KB | 152.3 | 554.76 264% | 195.5 28% | 667.18 338% | 57.9 ? -62% | 229 ? 50% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| azamp MES-B3 | |
| Teclast T70 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Teclast T70 | |
| azamp MES-B3 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra | |
azamp MES-B3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Teclast T70 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| azamp MES-B3 12000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 11200 mAh | Teclast T70 10000 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra 12000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -45% | -11% | 21% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1055 | 585 -45% | 943 -11% | 1281 21% |
| Reader / Idle | 935 | 1474 | ||
| H.264 | 721 | 1023 | 1305 | |
| Load | 207 | 224 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
如果你绝对需要一个巨大的屏幕，那么 MES-B3 几乎是无与伦比的。
不过，MES-B3 也有一些硬伤，比如完全过时的安全补丁。
azamp MES-B3
- 07/19/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 对可能的替代品进行比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
