宏碁 Iconia X12 的评价
从技术上讲，如果像宏碁这样的老牌笔记本电脑制造商能够在Android 平板电脑市场上提供更多的竞争机会，应该是一件好事。但遗憾的是，宏碁的 Iconia X12 并没有成功。
主要问题在于其价格：在 500 美元左右的价位上，宏碁的竞争对手是Apple iPad 11，后者的性能与宏碁完全不同。而这个价位的其他竞争对手也提供了更高的性能、更快的网络速度，在某些情况下还提供了更亮的屏幕。
这家制造商甚至在自己的一个核心领域都失败了：虽然宏碁为其笔记本电脑提供了良好的服务，但其Android 平板电脑却没有任何更新承诺。
尽管如此，我们还是看到了一丝希望：的确，AMOLED 显示屏在这个价位的产品中是非常罕见的。即便如此，Iconia X12 也只能提供有限的亮度和不准确的色彩还原。
此外，一些小问题，如触摸屏的误触检测能力差、显示屏边缘狭窄等，也给这款平板电脑带来了不少麻烦。
如果价格大幅下降，宏碁 Iconia X12 可能会物有所值，因为它拥有良好的电池续航能力。此外，购买者还可获得体面的配件包。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
宏碁 Iconia X12 目前可从亚马逊购买，售价 559.83 美元。
- $11.19FZZSZS (2-Pack Screen Protector for Acer Iconia X12, Anti Scratch 9H Hardness Protective Film Premium HD Clarity Tempered Glass Friendly Designed for Acer Iconia X12 (12.6")
- $16.99Vaxson 3-Pack Screen Protector, compatible with Acer Iconia X12 12.6" Tablet TPU Film Protectors [ Not Tempered Glass ]
规格
外壳和连接性 - "灵活 "金属外壳
宏碁将其平板电脑装进了一个深灰色的金属外壳中，外壳上边缘有一个塑料条，以提高天线接收质量。它的外壳厚度仅为 6.7 毫米，实际上相当纤薄，但考虑到其 12.6 英寸的屏幕尺寸，其他方面的尺寸都很正常。此外，600 克的重量也是可以接受的。
它的外壳四角可以明显弯曲，而且比较省力；如果能再稳固一些，就能改善其质量印象。它没有防水或防尘功能。
内部的 USB 端口只能按照 USB 2.0 标准连接。不过，用户可以使用 3.5 毫米接口将模拟信号传输到耳机或扬声器。
这款平板电脑的大容量存储空间为 128 或 256 GB，内存为 8 GB。您可以通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。microSD 读卡器的速度还不错。
这款平板电脑还附带了数量惊人的配件：充电器、USB 线缆，甚至还有一个保护套。在某些国家，还随附了一支触控笔。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Acer Iconia X12 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 58.4, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 没有指印传感器的宏碁平板电脑
遗憾的是，该平板电脑支持的最快 Wi-Fi 标准是 Wi-Fi 5，而且在传输和接收方向上各有一根天线。因此，在我们的测试中，它的传输速率明显低于同类设备，仅为 264 到 379 MBit/s。
它的触摸屏帧频只有 60 Hz，这意味着输入速度有时会比屏幕速度更快的平板电脑稍慢。窄边框设计赋予了平板电脑现代感的外观，但也容易造成误输入，我们在测试过程中就曾多次遇到这种情况：当我们不小心将手掌放在屏幕上时，它不能准确识别，导致触摸屏不再响应其他地方。
它没有指纹传感器，也无法进行面部解锁。
| Networking | |
| Acer Iconia X12 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple iPad 11 (2025) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - 更新不明确
Iconia X12-11 运行Android 14，目前还不清楚何时以及是否会更新到Android 15。宏碁也没有说明更新的持续时间，只是说大约每六个月会有一个新版本。其他制造商在更新方面则更加明确和迅速。
已安装的Android 基本没有变化，所以你很快就能找到方向。除了几款游戏外，没有预装任何第三方应用程序。
在可持续发展方面，我们也很难给宏碁加分，尽管它宣传通过第三方供应商的补偿来实现二氧化碳的中性生产。除此以外，其包装中还使用了塑料薄膜，而且制造商也没有提供有关产品二氧化碳排放量或所使用材料的信息。
照相机 - 可用于拍摄快照
Acer Iconia X12 背面有一个 1300 万像素的摄像头，在光线条件良好的情况下也能拍出不错的照片。不过，你还是不应该把照片放大太多：这样，细节往往会显得模糊和不准确。
在拍摄周围环境时，虽然建筑物的轮廓和许多细节看起来也很模糊，但相机还是很好地应对了逆光的困难照明条件。在弱光环境下，自动对焦很吃力，亮度也一般。
视频最高可录制 1440p，但不能选择超过 30fps。录制的视频基本可用，但自动对焦时常反应迟缓，而且不是很精确。
平板电脑前置 800 万像素摄像头，自拍效果不错，但照片缺乏动感。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
显示屏 - 最便宜的 OLED 平板电脑之一
据说宏碁 Iconia X12-11 的亮点在于它的屏幕，因为它配备了 OLED 面板。这通常只出现在更昂贵的平板电脑上，因为这种大尺寸的 OLED 显示屏相对昂贵。
但问题是，迫于成本压力，宏碁很难发挥这项技术的实际优势：它的最大亮度被限制在 400 cd/m² 以下，而且由于无法调节白平衡，出厂设置也只能达到中等精度，其色彩还原性也不是最好的。
此外，我们还测量到在低亮度水平下会出现 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 378 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
154.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Acer Iconia X12 AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6" | Apple iPad 11 (2025) IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Xiaomi Pad 7 LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2" | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 48% | 77% | 23% | 34% | |
| Brightness middle | 378 | 526 39% | 838 122% | 409 8% | 513 36% |
| Brightness | 356 | 531 49% | 815 129% | 388 9% | 480 35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 93 8% | 96 12% | 89 3% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.11 | 1.9 73% | 1.8 75% | 3.46 51% | 2.82 60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.75 | 4 63% | 3.9 64% | 5.46 49% | 8.83 18% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 2.9 54% | 2.5 60% | 5.2 17% | 2.9 54% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.25 98% | 2.106 104% | 2.265 97% |
| CCT | 7323 89% | 6982 93% | 6912 94% | 5823 112% | 7189 90% |
| Contrast | 531 | 952 | 1023 | 1283 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 121 Hz Amplitude: 42 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8418 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 相对于同价位机型而言，动力不足
在性能方面，宏碁采用了 联发科 Helio G99.对于这个价位的平板电脑来说，这是一个不寻常的选择，从基准测试中可以看出，Iconia X12 的性能赶不上同价位的平板电脑。
在日常使用中，这款平板电脑通常运行流畅，只是偶尔会出现卡顿。不过，在游戏或更复杂的应用程序中，它的性能储备并不多。
在长时间负载后，其外壳上的热量积累在局部是有限的，整体上也非常适中。此外，压力测试显示其性能几乎没有下降。
宏碁 Iconia X12 一共有四个扬声器，音效并不是最好的，高音有些偏重。如果你想连接无线音频设备，可以选择蓝牙音频编解码器。
平板电脑的最大充电功率为 20 瓦。因此，其 10,000 毫安时电池充电时间长达 4 小时。不过，它的续航时间还是相当不错的，在我们的无线局域网测试中，它的续航时间长达 13:51 小时。在沙发上使用一天绝对足够了。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
| Acer Iconia X12 | |
| Apple iPad 11 (2025) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Acer Iconia X12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
| Apple iPad 11 (2025) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Apple iPad 11 (2025) | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Acer Iconia X12 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Acer Iconia X12 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Acer Iconia X12 10000 mAh | Apple iPad 11 (2025) 7698 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 8850 mAh | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | 31% | -4% | 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 831 | 633 -24% | 1086 31% | 798 -4% | 924 11% |
| Reader / Idle | 2481 | 1523 | 2236 | ||
| H.264 | 1249 | 1018 | 1052 | ||
| Load | 241 | 256 | 245 |
Notebookcheck 总评分
宏碁 Iconia X12-11 是目前市面上最便宜的 OLED 显示屏平板电脑。
不过，你必须接受它在性能和显示屏本身方面的一些限制。
Acer Iconia X12
- 05/26/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
