结论 - 小米红米 K Pad
小米红米 K Pad 是一款做工精良、结构紧凑、配置出众的平板电脑，设计时尚，价格极具竞争力。不愿意进口紧凑型平板电脑的粉丝们只能寄希望于小米在欧洲推出全球版本。在微型平板电脑领域，没有比这更好的了。在许多方面，小米红米 K Pad 甚至超过了 iPad Mini（2024）。
强大而高效的芯片组、最小的节流和大容量电池的组合带来了出色的运行时间和强劲的系统性能。没有 OLED 面板而感到失望的用户也不必担心。小米红米 K Pad 的液晶显示屏非常出色，运行时不会出现 PWM 闪烁。
令人遗憾的是，小米没有提供配备 5G 调制解调器的版本，因为该设备的小巧外形可以使其成为某些用户的智能手机替代品。在日常使用中，该产品还缺少指纹传感器，而且与许多经济实惠的中端平板电脑一样，买家需要接受长期软件更新支持方面的不确定性。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
- $247.50Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Version 12.1" Octa Core Global ROM 10000mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8MP Dual Camera (Graphite Gray, 128GB + 6GB)
- $12.78for Xiaomi Redmi K Pad 8.8 Inch Android Tablets Case,Ultra-Thin Full Coverage Corner,BOVUGAC Soft TPU Shockproof Kids Friendly for Redmi K Pad 13.2" Tablet Case Cover (Clear)
Table of Contents
小米红米 K Pad 外形小巧轻便，但这款 8.8 英寸平板电脑却拥有令人印象深刻的规格。搭载了 联发科 Dimensity 9400+ 和高达 16 GB 的 RAM，小米平板电脑性能强劲，可与 iPad Mini.
规格
机箱 - 紧凑型Android 平板电脑
小米红米 K Pad 的制造质量处于较高水平。金属一体成型机身和玻璃面板的组合给人留下了高档的印象，而磨砂后面板则相对不易沾染指纹。
此外，超过 83% 的屏占比也令人印象深刻，这对于一款小型平板电脑来说非常难得。相比之下 iPad Mini（2024 年）相比之下，iPad Mini（2024）的屏占比仅为 77%，这使得小米红米 K Pad 的外观更加时尚，外形也更加小巧。
这款 8.8 英寸平板电脑仅重 326 克，手感舒适。即使长时间使用，也能轻松握住，与较大的平板电脑相比，它在日常使用中明显更舒适。 大尺寸平板电脑.不过，它的一个缺点是没有任何 IP 认证。
功能 - 配备快速 USB 的小米平板电脑
红米 K Pad 是一款装备精良的平板电脑，尤其突出的是它有两个 USB-C 端口。底部边缘的 USB-C 端口支持 USB 3.2，数据传输速率高达 5 Gbps，还可通过 DisplayPort 进行视频输出。机身左侧的第二个 USB-C 端口指定为 USB 2.0。这种组合使用户能够通过 USB-OTG 交换数据，或通过耳机听音乐，同时为设备充电或使用游戏控制器。
在无线连接方面，支持 Wi-Fi Direct 和 Miracast，允许用户将内容串流到电视等设备。不过，它没有 SD 卡插槽，也没有传统的 3.5 毫米耳机插孔。
软件 - 配备Android 15 的小米红米 K Pad
小米红米 K Pad 搭载了第二代 HyperOS，开箱即预装谷歌框架。这使用户可以轻松手动安装和使用 Play Store。
除中文和英文外，没有德语语言包。无论选择何种语言，某些系统区域仍可能显示汉字，这就需要偶尔变通一下。
至于软件更新，小米并未针对中国市场做出明确承诺。在测试时，这款中端平板电脑运行的是从 2025 年 6 月开始的安全补丁。
可持续性
小米红米 K Pad 采用无塑料包装。制造商没有提供任何有关回收材料或可修复性的信息。
通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 5G 的小米平板电脑
这款小巧的小米平板电脑支持快速的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，但不支持 6 GHz 频段。在使用 Wi-Fi 6E 路由器进行的测试中，我们获得了较高且相对稳定的传输速度。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 搭配使用时，传输速度超过了 1,700 Mbit/s。
小米红米 K Pad 缺少用于移动上网的蜂窝调制解调器。此外，也没有支持卫星定位服务的版本。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
摄像头 - 配备单摄像头的小米红米 K Pad
小米红米 K Pad 采用了 Omnivision 传感器。前置摄像头为 800 万像素广角摄像头，能够以每秒 30 帧的速度录制 1080p 视频。后置主摄像头采用 1300 万像素传感器，光圈为 f/2.28，支持 HDR 和 30 帧/秒的 4K 录制。
在日光下拍摄的照片清晰度和色彩还原度都不错，不过小米红米 K Pad 对蓝色调的呈现往往有些过度饱和。不过，该相机硬件还是非常适合扫描文件或进行数字笔记。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraLow Light
配件和保修 - 带电源适配器的小米平板电脑
包装盒中包括一条 USB 线缆和一个 67 瓦的电源适配器。深圳贸易公司还提供了适用于当地插座的欧盟插头适配器，不过这并不是官方标准包装的一部分。小米为其小巧的平板电脑在中国的客户提供了多种配件，包括游戏手柄和保护套，不过这些配件大多不在常见的进口商店中列出。
保修:12 个月。对于我们通过深圳贸易公司购买的评测机，保修索赔可通过德国的退货地址处理。
输入设备和操作 -Android 平板电脑支持手写笔
小米红米 K Pad 的一个突出特点是它的振动电机。小米表示，它使用了两个双 X 轴电机，为平板电脑提供了令人惊讶的良好触觉反馈。
得益于高达 165 Hz 的高刷新率，即使在 3K 分辨率下也能获得非常流畅的视觉效果，并且能以高达 1,080 Hz 的采样率无延迟地处理输入。该平板电脑可使用手指、小米 Focus Pen 或红米手写笔进行操作。
遗憾的是，这款中端平板电脑缺少指纹传感器。解锁只能通过前置摄像头进行 2D 面部识别。
显示屏 - 不带 OLED 的小米红米 K Pad
在 APL18 测试中，这款 8.8 英寸 12 位显示屏的峰值亮度达到了 779 cd/m²，表现非常出色。
小米为这款小巧的平板电脑配备了 3,008 × 1,880 像素的高分辨率，并通过了德国莱茵 TÜV 三重认证，这是一项针对显示安全和视觉舒适度的德国标准。液晶面板无 PWM 闪烁，支持多种 HDR 格式，包括杜比视界和 HDR Vivid。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 743 cd/m²
Contrast: 1486:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.61 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232
CCT: 6864 K
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad LCD, 3008x1880, 8.8" | Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) IPS, 2266x1488, 8.3" | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU LTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8" | Xiaomi Pad 7 LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -13% | 0% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle | 743 | 525 -29% | 441 -41% | 838 13% |
| Brightness | 721 | 512 -29% | 420 -42% | 815 13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 91 -3% | 91 -3% | 96 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.43 14% | 0.5 -0% | 0.88 -76% |
| Contrast | 1486 | 1221 -18% | 882 -41% | 952 -36% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.61 | 2 -24% | 1.08 33% | 1.8 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.82 | 4.3 -13% | 2.52 34% | 3.9 -2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3 -3% | 1.1 62% | 2.5 14% |
| Gamma | 2.232 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6864 95% | 7109 91% | 6655 98% | 6912 94% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
小米红米 K Pad 的 sRGB 色彩空间色彩校准执行得很好，与参考色没有明显偏差。小米平板上 0.5 cd/m² 的黑阶略微偏高，但由于亮度高，我们仍能获得约 1,500:1 的对比度。
测得的响应时间没有达到 OLED 的水平，但对于大多数休闲游戏玩家来说应该绰绰有余。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). | ||
希望在户外使用小米红米 K Pad 的用户需要在晴天时待在有遮阳的地方。否则，在阳光直射下，玻璃表面的反光会令人分心。不过，视角稳定性非常好。
性能 - 配备高端芯片的小米 pad
内置 Dimensity 9400+对于同价位的小米红米 K Pad 而言，这是一款异常强大的芯片组，为这款中端平板电脑带来了高度灵敏的手感和出色的基准测试结果。在 Geekbench 多核测试中，它的性能甚至超过了 iPad mini 的 Apple A17 Pro.人工智能基准测试的成绩也非常出色。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Average of class Tablet (3195 - 25683, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Average of class Tablet (172 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (138 - 156427, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (229 - 1483, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (230 - 9666, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (508 - 13178, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 12784, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
这种情况在 GPU 测试中依然存在。GPU Immortalis-G925 MP12小米红米 K Pad 的性能甚至明显优于 iPad mini。在要求苛刻的 GFXBench Tier 测试中，它几乎将竞争对手甩在了身后。 Apple 竞争对手一骑绝尘。
在我们的游戏测试中，可以轻松达到 120 FPS，《源氏冲击》等要求苛刻的游戏也能在 3K 显示屏上以最高图形设置稳定运行。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135) | |
| Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135) | |
| Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135) | |
| Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad (Chrome 136) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135) | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | Xiaomi Pad 7 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 258% | 183% | 239% | 60% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 3448.34 | 3984.3 16% | 3911.82 13% | 3674 ? 7% | 1425 ? -59% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1494.45 | 3483.56 133% | 3387.43 127% | 3068 ? 105% | 1022 ? -32% |
| Random Read 4KB | 309.61 | 355.12 15% | 311.09 0% | 381 ? 23% | 217 ? -30% |
| Random Write 4KB | 49.93 | 483.73 869% | 344.51 590% | 460 ? 821% | 230 ? 361% |
游戏
排放物 - 游戏过程中会产生适度热量
温度
负载下的表面温度并不极端，但会明显变热。不过，这在 3DMark 压力测试中并没有反映出来。小米红米 K Pad 显示的节流极小，这对于配备旗舰级 SoC 的紧凑型平板电脑来说令人印象深刻。 旗舰级 SoC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 7 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad | |
| Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU | |
| Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) | |
发言人
作为一款中端设备，立体声扬声器的音质出奇的好。我们的粉红噪声测量结果显示，中音和高音都很线性，声音曲线中还带有一点低音。此外，还可通过 USB 端口或蓝牙 5.4 无线连接耳机。
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Pad 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 可快速充电的小巧平板电脑
功耗
我们的电量测量结果显示，小米红米 K Pad 的效率并不是特别高。不过，它的 7500 毫安时电池是一大亮点，可以在高达 67 瓦的功率下快速充电，大约一小时即可充满。
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  3.9 / 4.3 / 4.9 Watt |
| Load |
9.4 / 12.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad 7500 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 5078 mAh | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU 6550 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 8850 mAh | Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 22% | 42% | 52% | 0% | 16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 0.95 76% | 1.4 64% | 0.74 81% | 3.9 ? -0% | 1.857 ? 52% |
| Idle Average * | 4.3 | 3.76 13% | 1.9 56% | 1.72 60% | 4.3 ? -0% | 3.69 ? 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.9 | 3.79 23% | 2.6 47% | 1.74 64% | 4.9 ? -0% | 4.01 ? 18% |
| Load Average * | 9.4 | 6.75 28% | 6.6 30% | 7.26 23% | 9.4 ? -0% | 9.18 ? 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 12.1 | 15.56 -29% | 10.4 14% | 8.11 33% | 12.1 ? -0% | 12.7 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power draw: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power draw: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池续航时间 - 可快速充电的小巧平板电脑
在我们的 WLAN 测试中，在显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际条件下，大型储能装置实现了出色的运行时间。近 20 小时的续航时间几乎是 iPad Mini 的两倍。 Apple 迷你 iPad.
| Xiaomi Redmi K Pad 7500 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 5078 mAh | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU 6550 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 7 8850 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 1197 | 718 -40% | 1038 -13% | 1086 -9% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
那些愿意进口小巧的小米红米 K Pad 的用户，将以极具竞争力的价格获得小巧外形中的顶级硬件。如果这款平板电脑从未通过官方渠道进入欧洲市场，那将是一件非常遗憾的事。
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
- 07/27/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 90.2%  | Xiaomi Redmi K Pad Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.78 for Xiaomi Redmi K Pad Andro... 2. $247.50 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve... 3. $12.78 for Xiaomi Redmi K Pad 8.8 I... List Price: 330€ | 326 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.80" 3008x1880 403 PPI LCD |
2. 86.6%  | Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro ⎘ Apple A17 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $570.54 List Price: 1149€ | 297 g | Apple 512GB NVMe | 8.30" 2266x1488 327 PPI IPS |
3. 86.5%  | Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.99 Bkinew Clear Case for 2025 L... 2. $13.13 HYUScase Case for Lenovo Leg... 3. $9.82 elitegadget Case for Lenovo ... List Price: 599€ | 350 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI LTPS |
4. 85.9%  | Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $399.00 Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... 2. $649.99 Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver... 3. $9.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Pad 7 Scr... List Price: 400€ | 500 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI LCD |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
