Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Focus 15 (Clevo NP50HK)游戏笔记本回顾。RTX 3050 Ti的极限

高TGP,高噪音水平。 考虑到其GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,申克科技的XMG Focus 15旨在吸引有价格意识的游戏玩家。我们对这款15英寸的笔记本电脑进行了广泛的测试。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

XMG Focus 15可以在制造商的bestware.com上进行单独配置。主页上。然而,与Schenker Technologies公司的许多其他笔记本电脑相比,配置选项变得相当少。目前只有显示器(144赫兹的全高清IPS)、显卡(GeForce RTX 3050 Ti),以及处理器(酷睿i7-11800H).你会发现工作内存有更多选择,从8GB到最大64GB不等,存储方面则使用M.2 SSD和/或2.5英寸硬盘。主要是由于2.5英寸的插槽,电池容量只有49Wh。为了使电池寿命更长,我们希望看到这里有两个M.2插槽。客户还可以选择通信模块、键盘语言和操作系统。

XMG Focus 15的价格从1199欧元(约1401美元)起。我们测试的配置有32GB的双通道内存和1TB的固态硬盘,最终价格超过1500欧元(约1753美元),这对RTX 3050 Ti设备来说是相当大的。

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 471.68, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, one M.2 slot (in use), one 2.5-inch-slot (empty)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 headset, 1 microphone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22 x 360 x 238
Battery
49 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 150 W power supply, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.94 kg, Power Supply: 438 g
Price
1512 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

竞争对手包括其他15英寸笔记本电脑,其显卡为中高档或低档,如 戴尔XPS 15 9510,以及华硕TUF F15 FX506HM,以及联想Legion 5 15ACH,以及Ryzen版的睿频版的Alienware m15 R5.所有这些笔记本电脑都列在我们的比较图表中。

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.2 %
10/2021
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
88.4 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
85.9 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例

这款机箱基于Clevo的裸机(NP50HK机箱),几乎在所有方面都显得不显眼。除了设计相当简单外,其余方面也不引人注目。这台15英寸的笔记本电脑大多显示出干净的做工和良好的稳定性,尽管在某些地方,塑料表面可以用一些力量压住。然而,这在实际操作中从未成为一种烦恼。铰链也很牢固。虽然在打开盖子时,底座也会略微抬起,但仍然可以用一只手打开显示屏。

XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15

这款机箱的亮点是其低重量。 1.9公斤(约4.2磅)是测试领域的最低值,戴尔XPS 15也是如此。RTX 3060笔记本电脑带来了2.3至2.5公斤(约5-5.5磅)的重量。Focus 15也因其纤细的结构而得分。只有2.2厘米(约0.9英寸)的高度确保了纤细的外观,加上适度的重量,确保了良好的移动性。

Size Comparison

363 mm 261 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 238 mm 22 mm 1.9 kg356.2 mm 272.5 mm 22.85 mm 2.5 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

装备

连接

那些可以不用Thunderbolt的人应该对Focus 15的连接设备感到满意。左侧提供了一个Kensington锁的开口,两个USB-A端口(1个2.0,1个3.0),以及两个用于麦克风和耳机的音频输出,右侧提供了一个全尺寸读卡器,一个USB-C端口(3.2 Gen2),一个额外的USB-A端口(3.0),以及一个带有折叠装置的RJ45端口。最后,电源和显示输出(HDMI 2.0,Mini-DisplayPort 1.4)的连接位于背面。

由于一些连接被放置在后面,而且USB端口分布良好,所以应该有足够的空间来使用外部鼠标。

左侧。Kensington锁,USB-A 3.0,USB-A 2.0,麦克风,耳机
左侧。Kensington锁,USB-A 3.0,USB-A 2.0,麦克风,耳机
右侧:读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen2、USB-A 3.0、RJ45 LAN
右侧:读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen2、USB-A 3.0、RJ45 LAN
背面。Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, 电源连接
背面。Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, 电源连接

SD卡阅读器

内置读卡器支持SD、SDHC和SDXC卡格式,并提供了一个平庸的性能。在连续读取和传输照片时,你可以期待大约80至90 MB/s。作为比较,戴尔XPS 15使用我们的AV Pro 128 GB V60参考卡突破了200MB大关。所有其他竞争对手都不提供读卡器。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=97, last 2 years)
97.6 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
202.8 MB/s +123%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=92, last 2 years)
120.5 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91 MB/s

沟通

我们的测试装置使用英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201作为通信模块。除了WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax之外,它还支持蓝牙5.1。在我们的范围测试中(与Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器的距离为1米),Focus 15取得了非常好的成绩,发送数据时为1500 Mbit/s,接收数据时为1300 Mbit/s以上。凭借这些数值,它在我们的测试领域分别取得了第一名和第三名的成绩。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1482 (759min - 1594max) MBit/s
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (669min - 1440max) MBit/s -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=2, last 2 years)
1149 MBit/s -22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s -47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s +1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1319 (1015min - 1489max) MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1318 (667min - 1344max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=2, last 2 years)
1291 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s -33%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s -37%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (667-1344)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1457 (759-1594)

网络摄像头

像往常一样,你不应该对网络摄像头有太多的期望。图像的清晰度和色彩还原度相当有限。

ColorChecker
24.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Focus 15: 21.09 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 33.64 ∆E

辅料

盒子里有一本快速入门手册,一张驱动DVD,一个装有软件的U盘,以及2.5英寸插槽的螺丝。Focus 15的电源是一个令人愉快的轻巧的150瓦模型。

维护

为了进入内部,你必须首先从机箱底部卸下总共15颗飞利浦螺钉。然后,你只需用很小的力气就可以掀开底盖。作为Clevo机箱的典型代表,维护选项非常好。除了电池、WLAN模块和工作内存外,你还可以接触到M.2和2.5英寸的插槽。冷却系统由两个风扇组成,每个风扇都有几根热管通向CPU和GPU(焊接在一起,所以不能更换)。

XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15

担保

基本保修期为2年(6个月快速维修)。在额外的费用下,整个保修期内还可以提供长达3年的快速维修。

输入设备

键盘

我们已经知道其他Clevo Barebones的键盘。这款可以用多种颜色和级别照明的小鸡模型提供了一个专门的数字块和相当好的打字体验。买家也应该对舒适的按键尺寸感到满意。除了WASD键之外,方向键也有一个合适的尺寸。打字的噪音既不是很安静,也不是特别大,安在中间的位置。一个积极的观点是,由于键盘的位置较高,掌托的尺寸很充足。

触摸板

触摸板也令人印象深刻。大约12×7.3厘米(约4.7×2.9英寸),对于一个15英寸的笔记本电脑来说是相当多的。遵循目前的趋势,这是一个没有专用按键的ClickPad。凭借光滑的表面和良好的精确度,鼠标移动非常顺利地成功。 然而,制造商应该改进稳定性。特别是垫子的左右边缘可以比平时压得更紧。同样的问题也出现在17英寸的机型上,该机型将很快得到审查评估。

显示

该显示屏由经典的IPS面板组成,分辨率为1920x1080像素,刷新率为144赫兹。

361
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 418 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 376.1 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1020:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
36%
-35%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
64.6
99.9
55%
41.9
-35%
65.4
1%
sRGB Coverage
95.3
100
5%
62.9
-34%
96.3
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.5
98.1
48%
43.3
-35%
67.5
2%
Response Times
74%
-102%
10%
42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18 ?(9.2, 8.8)
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
80%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-58%
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
24%
4 ?(1.2, 2.8)
78%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 ?(3.6, 5.2)
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
68%
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-145%
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
-5%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
5%
PWM Frequency
59.5 ?(99)
Screen
49%
-99%
-40%
-13%
Brightness middle
418
362
-13%
268.3
-36%
350
-16%
329
-21%
Brightness
376
367
-2%
257
-32%
350
-7%
321
-15%
Brightness Distribution
83
97
17%
84
1%
96
16%
92
11%
Black Level *
0.41
0.06
85%
0.34
17%
0.3
27%
0.27
34%
Contrast
1020
6033
491%
789
-23%
1167
14%
1219
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.67
2.1
-26%
5.05
-202%
3.9
-134%
2.78
-66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.88
4.1
-6%
15.43
-298%
8.2
-111%
4.88
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.98
2.5
-155%
3.21
-228%
1.6
-63%
1.63
-66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
1.4
52%
5.5
-90%
5.5
-90%
2.5
14%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.18 101%
2.35 94%
2.15 102%
2.106 104%
CCT
6209 105%
6608 98%
7392 88%
7414 88%
6201 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
53% / 50%
-79% / -86%
-10% / -24%
15% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

在积极的一面,我们有特别好的亮度。在最大亮度下近376cd/m²的亮度代表了我们测试领域的最佳价值,紧随其后的是戴尔XPS 15的OLED面板,为367cd/m²。这意味着你也可以在户外轻松使用这台15英寸的笔记本电脑。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

由于黑值低于最佳值(0.41cd/m²),对比度值只放在领域的中间。但对于大多数买家来说,大约1000:1应该是足够的。另一方面,良好的色彩再现值得一些正面评价。15英寸的屏幕在交付状态下已经提供了一个平衡的图像。

XMG Focus 15 vs sRGB
XMG Focus 15 vs sRGB
子像素网格
子像素网格
XMG Focus 15 VS AdobeRGB
XMG Focus 15 VS AdobeRGB

对于色彩空间覆盖率,我们测量了95%的sRGB和66%的AdobeRGB。对于一台游戏笔记本来说,这些都是相对较好的数值。测得的8.8毫秒黑色到白色和18毫秒灰色到灰色的响应时间与其他144赫兹的IPS面板相似。

背光
背光
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

测试条件

预装的控制中心允许调整各种系统设置。我们的测试是在性能模式下使用自动风扇控制进行的。

控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心

业绩

尽管我们的测试装置带来了八核CPU、32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘,但XMG Focus 15 "只 "定位于中端。GeForce RTX 3050 Ti更多的是为了那些不需要以最大细节玩每一个新游戏,并且对获得一个面向未来的设备不提出特别高要求的偶尔玩家。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

处理器

在移动游戏领域,英特尔的 酷睿i7-11800H是目前最成功的处理器之一。这款10纳米的型号包含24MB L3缓存,并能够通过超线程在16个线程上同时运行。在负载下,时钟速度在2.3和最高4.6GHz之间。

在我们的Cinebench循环中,Focus 15的结果只是一般。即使CPU性能在较长的时间内保持相当稳定,并且范围高于戴尔XPS 15,但Core i7-11800H在其他笔记本电脑中仍然取得了更好的基准测试结果(例如,见华硕TUF F15)。Focus 15在与基于Ryzen 7 5800H的笔记本电脑的比较中也有困难。 Ryzen 7 5800H.然而,由于大多数3D应用都受到GPU的限制,游戏玩家在玩游戏时不必担心任何限制。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1723 (1688.33-1770.15)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=223, last 2 years)
19900 Points +84%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points +20%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=48)
11650 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
10816 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points -3%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=221, last 2 years)
1824 Points +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=45)
1497 Points +8%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1390 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=221, last 2 years)
7566 Points +76%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points +17%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=50)
4459 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
4307 Points
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points -11%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=221, last 2 years)
702 Points +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=47)
576 Points +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
536 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=226, last 2 years)
3140 Points +77%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points +18%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024 Points +14%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2010 Points +14%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=50)
1894 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1770 (1688.33min - 1770.15max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=225, last 2 years)
269 Points +28%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=46)
225 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
210 Points
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
278 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=46)
277 Seconds * -0%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * +14%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=218, last 2 years)
197.4 Seconds * +29%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=220, last 2 years)
78482 MIPS +65%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=46)
48384 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47642 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS -11%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=220, last 2 years)
6164 MIPS +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5732, n=46)
5492 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS +5%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
5164 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=225, last 2 years)
13839 Points +53%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
9073 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=40)
8551 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points -17%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=225, last 2 years)
1819 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=40)
1561 Points +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1480 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=221, last 2 years)
21.6 fps +58%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps +9%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)
13.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.7 fps
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps -9%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * -139%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=217, last 2 years)
49.5 s * -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.3 s *
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)
46.5 s * +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.601 sec *
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)
0.566 sec * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=220, last 2 years)
0.4684 sec * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1770 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
221 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Help

系统性能

不仅仅是由于快速的固态硬盘,这台15英寸的笔记本电脑最终在系统测试中排名第一。在PCMark 10中获得6478分,排名第三,Schenker笔记本电脑的表现与Alienware m15 R5的测试配置持平。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=192, last 2 years)
7614 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6478 Points
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6019 - 6556, n=5)
6355 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=191, last 2 years)
10744 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10171 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9490 - 10846, n=5)
10071 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=191, last 2 years)
9744 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points +13%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8639 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8176 - 8723, n=5)
8466 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=191, last 2 years)
11541 Points +37%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points +12%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8399 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7475 - 8577, n=5)
8175 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points -11%
PCMark 10 Score
6478 points
Help

DPC延迟

即使XMG Focus 15与竞争对手相比显示出相对较低的延迟,但根据LatencyMon工具,它只在有限的程度上适用于实时音频和视频处理。至少,在没有任何手动调整的交付状态下是这样的。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1914 μs * -239%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431 μs * -154%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
564 μs *
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * +24%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们的测试设备配备了一个强大的三星固态硬盘。970 Evo Plus的1TB版本超过了所有竞争设备中的固态驱动器,无论是美光、SK海力士还是东芝。该M.2驱动器在读取和写入数据时提供了一流的性能。

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-26%
-17%
-16%
-38%
Write 4K
238.3
109.3
-54%
168.1
-29%
124.6
-48%
116.9
-51%
Read 4K
55.6
53.9
-3%
65.1
17%
54.2
-3%
44.56
-20%
Write Seq
3013
1991
-34%
2124
-30%
2706
-10%
1552
-48%
Read Seq
2879
1759
-39%
2204
-23%
2298
-20%
1682
-42%
Write 4K Q32T1
569
499.8
-12%
455.3
-20%
499.7
-12%
497.8
-13%
Read 4K Q32T1
715
438.8
-39%
465.6
-35%
570
-20%
436.8
-39%
Write Seq Q32T1
3287
2835
-14%
2911
-11%
2999
-9%
1461
-56%
Read Seq Q32T1
3561
3235
-9%
3519
-1%
3461
-3%
2364
-34%
AS SSD
-53%
-9%
-23%
-64%
Seq Read
2988
1362
-54%
2873
-4%
2960
-1%
2082
-30%
Seq Write
2541
1440
-43%
1619
-36%
2586
2%
825
-68%
4K Read
42.82
38.43
-10%
57.5
34%
46.84
9%
42.41
-1%
4K Write
87
121.4
40%
149.6
72%
96.1
10%
98.3
13%
4K-64 Read
2096
370.5
-82%
1252
-40%
854
-59%
1255
-40%
4K-64 Write
2455
1054
-57%
2196
-11%
2015
-18%
738
-70%
Access Time Read *
0.068
0.042
38%
0.04
41%
0.048
29%
0.109
-60%
Access Time Write *
0.043
0.135
-214%
0.082
-91%
0.094
-119%
0.17
-295%
Score Read
2437
545
-78%
1597
-34%
1197
-51%
1506
-38%
Score Write
2797
1319
-53%
2508
-10%
2370
-15%
918
-67%
Score Total
6452
2160
-67%
4869
-25%
4170
-35%
3136
-51%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-40% / -41%
-13% / -12%
-20% / -20%
-51% / -53%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3561 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3287 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 715 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 569 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2879 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3013 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 238.3 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

为了获得最大的图形性能,从GeForce RTX 3050 Ti制造商为Focus 15配置了75瓦的TGP(包括动态提升)。有了它,这台15英寸的笔记本电脑明显领先于戴尔XPS 15,后者的RTX 3050 Ti只得到45瓦,只比一半多一点。这种情况也反映在基准运行中,尽管Focus 15并没有提供两倍的性能。

RTX 3050 Ti的最大问题是视频存储量太少。对于一个中端GPU来说,4GB已经不是最新的了。在2012年至少应该是6GB的VRAM。目前的游戏,如"死神》(Deathloop"已经要求在全高清分辨率下超过4GB,即使是在最低设置下。这意味着,Nvidia在这里过于节俭,不必要地限制了未来的实用性。你也不应该期望RTX 3050 Ti有很高的光线追踪性能。例如,在3DMark基准测试的Port Royal测试中,其结果是悲惨的,与RTX 3060,它经常在类似价格的笔记本电脑中运行。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=220, last 2 years)
40873 Points +107%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29164 Points +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
27898 Points +41%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26881 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19746 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7952 - 20905, n=27)
17562 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 Points -22%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=225, last 2 years)
29710 Points +102%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21806 Points +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21111 Points +44%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
20312 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14696 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12119 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=222, last 2 years)
12161 Points +117%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8844 Points +58%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8295 Points +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7677 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5594 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4591 Points -18%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=141, last 2 years)
7851 Points +1268%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4852 Points +745%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4795 Points +735%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
574 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (280 - 591, n=9)
498 Points -13%
3DMark 11 Performance
19072 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42503 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13179 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5963 points
Help

游戏性能

尽管RTX 3050 Ti的存储量很小,但它的速度足以在高至最大细节设置的原生全高清分辨率下流畅地运行大多数游戏。只有在糟糕的编程和/或要求极高的游戏中,如"孤岛危机重制版"时,DirectX-12芯片才开始出现问题。虽然Focus 15在这里仍然领先于戴尔XPS 15,但它明显落后于使用RTX 3060的笔记本电脑,后者运行速度约为40%。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=159, last 2 years)
222 fps +118%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
146 fps +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
143.9 (136min - 155max) fps +41%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
142 fps +39%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
102 (87min) fps
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
91 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 110, n=26)
88.8 fps -13%

我们通过运行角色扮演""来评估显卡在更长的3D负载下的表现。角色扮演Witcher 3"大约60分钟(FHD/Ultra)。结果是,就像CPU的性能一样,GPU的性能也保持相当稳定。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø54.7 (51-57)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø69.6 (65-77)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø73.6 (66-77)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 180 147 74.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 181 102 56
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 175 163 154 145
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 78.9 57.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 133 115 91.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 101 93 86
Strange Brigade (2018) 138 112 96.4
Hunt Showdown (2020) 92.5 79.2
Death Stranding (2020) 98.1 89.3 85.8
Crysis Remastered (2020) 90.4 46.6 31.3
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 83.2 66.7 53.1
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 74.1 68.3
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 172 151 138
FIFA 21 (2020) 237 205 192
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 79.1 76.2 67.4
Outriders (2021) 76.2 69.5 57.2
Resident Evil Village (2021) 102 101 76.4
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 115
Days Gone (2021) 91.2 79.8 59
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 144 143
Deathloop (2021) 72.4 57.4 51.2

排放

噪声排放

正如我们已经从其他Clevo Barebones知道的那样,风扇控制原来是非常不幸的,至少在性能模式下是如此。在空闲操作或要求不高的情况下,风扇不是让15英寸的笔记本电脑在低噪音水平下持续运行,而是完全安静或快速旋转到非常明显的水平。然后,Focus 15在负载下的情况就变得非常烦人了。噪声水平在56和58 dB(A)之间的噪音甚至没有达到一些RTX 3070和RTX 3080笔记本电脑也达不到。.这样不戴耳机的游戏就没意思了。除了联想Legion 5在3D操作过程中变得同样响亮之外,竞争对手在测试过程中仍然明显更安静。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.644.941.235.736.941.42536.637.23735.43741.13144.843.749.243.643.948.84031.230.834.131.53133.45025.730.429.92628.729.26332.73630.925.128.131.7802339.823.519.221.232.610022.433.219.721.118.83512525.528.619.518.217.328.416027.830.521.121.419.130.820027.131.724.922.621.633.425027.433.621.22116.135.131528.737.319.521.315.538.240027.83717.516.814.538.550026.437.116.913.811.837.963028.438.718.711.511.340.280029.840.318.710.810.241.5100032.24319.611.81143.8125033.944.620.411.810.945.916003445.220.611.610.946.5200032.244.419.511.61145.7250031.744.918.312.111.445.8315030.944.114.612.711.945.5400028.845.914.913.412.347.5500028.247.314.213.112.449.1630026.845.613.713.212.547.6800022.442.613.613.112.344.61000017.939.413.412.912.240.91250014.535.712.912.511.837.91600013.929.812.612.111.132.3SPL42.756.23025.524.357.7N410.81.20.70.611.8median 27.8median 39.4median 18.7median 13.1median 12.2median 40.9Delta3.95.62.83.225.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Focus 15

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 30 / 43 dB(A)
Load
56 / 58 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Noise
25%
20%
5%
13%
off / environment *
24
23.8
1%
24.8
-3%
24.2
-1%
24
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25
23.8
5%
24.6
2%
29
-16%
24
4%
Idle Average *
30
23.8
21%
24.9
17%
29
3%
25
17%
Idle Maximum *
43
23.8
45%
24.9
42%
29
33%
35
19%
Load Average *
56
36
36%
27.1
52%
53.5
4%
44
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
56
36
36%
46.4
17%
53.5
4%
48
14%
Load Maximum *
58
38.2
34%
49
16%
53.5
8%
50
14%

* ... smaller is better

温度

由于显卡在使用FurMark和Prime95工具进行压力测试时被节流了,因此,如果我们用""看一下测试期间的温度发展,那是最好的。。Witcher 3."大约一小时后,机箱顶部的温度高达50℃(122°F),底部的温度高达56℃(133°F)。 对于RTX 3050 Ti设备来说,这些又是相当高的数值。所以Focus 15的冷却系统似乎不是很有效。在空闲运行期间,几乎30至40°C(86-104°F),机箱表面也变得比平时更热。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
Max. Load
 42 °C43 °C41 °C 
 41 °C42 °C42 °C 
 33 °C32 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
42 °C46 °C45 °C
45 °C46 °C39 °C
33 °C39 °C31 °C
Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Heat
16%
14%
15%
-13%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
45.5
-6%
46.4
-8%
42.6
1%
62
-44%
Maximum Bottom *
46
44.2
4%
45.4
1%
52.2
-13%
61
-33%
Idle Upper Side *
39
27
31%
26
33%
24.9
36%
36
8%
Idle Bottom *
40
26.7
33%
27.4
31%
25.3
37%
33
17%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

根据我们的音频分析,声音质量还有待提高。除了低音之外,最大音量也可以更好。就声音而言,戴尔XPS 15在一个更高的联盟中发挥。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.939.8253737.13143.946.64031315028.729.36328.131.98021.229.710018.827.212517.334.816019.133.720021.637.125016.13831515.547.640014.555.150011.858.363011.364.180010.266.310001166.2125010.966.2160010.967.620001169.7250011.466.3315011.966.6400012.361.1500012.463.8630012.561.8800012.362.21000012.261.91250011.8591600011.164.8SPL24.377.5N0.638.9median 12.2median 61.9Delta29.338.33227.426.433.135.832.5372633.920.744.619.453.823.761.318.563.416.765.517.568.317.269.113.169.211.670.810.772.311.171.511.571.710.873.310.781.310.783.11178.61174.811.475.411.869.31274.312.273.712.472.112.369.212.365.611.556.323.888.80.577.6median 11.8median 71.723hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Focus 15Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

消耗功率

即使Focus 15提供图形切换(Nvidia 优化),空闲运行时的消耗值也相当高,为23至29瓦。大多数竞争对手的功耗都低于20瓦。在3D操作中,功耗与TGP和图形性能的比例相当好,如下图所示。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 2.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 23 / 25 / 29 Watt
Load midlight 106 / 156 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Power Consumption
45%
18%
15%
2%
Idle Minimum *
23
7.6
67%
9.5
59%
7.3
68%
11
52%
Idle Average *
25
9.9
60%
12.1
52%
10.5
58%
14
44%
Idle Maximum *
29
10.8
63%
22.5
22%
15.7
46%
25
14%
Load Average *
106
81
24%
99.5
6%
108
-2%
123
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
128
76.2
40%
157
-23%
175
-37%
176
-38%
Load Maximum *
156
131
16%
173.5
-11%
228
-46%
226
-45%

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3 Power Consumption

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15: Ø128 (125-133)

电池寿命

作为一个变化,我们使用娱乐模式而不是性能模式进行电池测试。当查看运行时间值时,很快就会发现小电池有负面作用。与竞争对手提供的80至90瓦特相比,49瓦特显得微不足道。在中等亮度的WLAN测试中,Focus 15只持续了4个小时,而戴尔XPS 15在这里能维持7个小时,华硕TUF F15甚至几乎能维持8个小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 27min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 54min
SCHENKER XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 49 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
88%
97%
59%
53%
52%
Reader / Idle
387
660
71%
881
128%
WiFi v1.3
235
420
79%
473
101%
290
23%
306
30%
Load
54
106
96%
119
120%
105
94%
55
2%
H.264
624
259
525
Witcher 3 ultra
96

Pros

+ 许多维护选项
+ 尺寸紧凑
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 重量小
+ 144-Hz面板

Cons

- 风扇控制不良
- 负载下的排放
- 电池电量不足
- 没有Thunderbolt
- 声音小

判决书

XMG Focus 15,测试单元由Schenker Technologies提供
XMG Focus 15,测试单元由Schenker Technologies提供

对于所提供的东西来说太贵了。这就是你可以用一句话来概括XMG Focus 15的情况。虽然除了一些较小的细节,外壳、输入设备和144-Hz显示屏令人信服,但这台15英寸的笔记本电脑在其他大部分类别中都落后于竞争对手,无论是在电池寿命、冷却系统、风扇控制,还是声音方面。

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的高TGP同时也是一种诅咒和祝福。

一方面,Focus 15的性能能够将许多配备RTX 3050 Ti的竞争对手甩在身后(例如戴尔XPS 15--然而那是针对多媒体用户而非游戏玩家的)。另一方面,在1000至1500欧元(约1169-1753美元)的价格范围内,GeForce RTX 3060仍然是一个明显更好的选择,即使只是因为更大的视频存储(6 GB GDDR6对4 GB)。

总之,如果再少几百欧元,而且噪音更低,Focus 15会是一个有趣的选择。但就其目前的形式而言,我们建议你买一台替代的笔记本电脑。

价格和可用性

XMG Focus 15在制造商的bestware.com上有售。商店有售,起价1199欧元(约1401美元)。

SCHENKER XMG Focus 15 - 09/23/2021 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
63 / 80 → 79%
Weight
64 / 10-66 → 96%
Battery
57 / 95 → 60%
Display
89%
Games Performance
93%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
77 / 95 → 81%
Noise
53 / 90 → 59%
Audio
74%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Average
73%
83%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > XMG Focus 15 (Clevo NP50HK)游戏笔记本回顾。RTX 3050 Ti的极限
Florian Glaser, 2021-10- 1 (Update: 2021-10- 1)