Notebookcheck Logo

realme 10 智能手机评测。时髦而轻巧的中档手机

足够的更新。 新的SoC、NFC和修改后的相机设置--这就是realme 10计划保持最新的方式。作为一款拥有漂亮机身的轻量级手机,它也有可能赢得人心。在我们的电池测试中,看看这款中档智能手机的表现是否符合预期。
Android ARM Smartphone
realme 10
realme 10 (10 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (dedicated, up to 256GB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 159.9 x 73.3
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field, monochrome (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.45, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB-C cable, SIM tool, case, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
178 g
Price
279 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

rating
date
model
weight
drive
size
resolution
price from
79.2 %
01/2023
realme 10
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
178 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
81.9 %
12/2022
Motorola Moto G72
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
166 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.3 %
10/2022
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
197 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
80.8 %
08/2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.59"2412x1080
78.8 %
04/2022
realme 9i
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2412x1080

案例和特点。轻盈、闪亮、前卫

realme 10看起来很别致。背面是闪亮的珍珠效果,加上从银色到深蓝色的颜色渐变,或者在另一种颜色变化中,从杏色到浅蓝色。此外,还有一个哑光的、有棱有角的边框,背面有两个大的相机眼,尽管当你仔细看时,实际的镜头本身是相当小的。

由于采用了圆润的边缘,这款手机的手感很好,加上6.4英寸的屏幕,比许多对手更紧凑、更轻。屏幕由大猩猩5号玻璃保护。

我们得到的手机有8GB的内存和128GB的大容量存储,这是一个很好的配置。NFC是在船上,与前辈不同。 realme 9.不幸的是,USB-C端口只能以相当慢的USB 2.0标准传输数据。

除了两个SIM卡插槽外,还有microSD读卡器,所以你可以同时使用双SIM卡功能和microSD卡。在我们对天使鸟V60参考SD卡的测试中,读卡器处于其他智能手机的通常水平,但它甚至不能接近使用该卡的全部功能。

realme 10
realme 10

尺寸比较

165.4 mm 76.9 mm 8.4 mm 197 g164.3 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 195 g164.4 mm 75.7 mm 8.4 mm 190 g160.5 mm 74.4 mm 7.9 mm 166 g159.9 mm 73.3 mm 8 mm 178 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
45.7 MB/s ∼100% +54%
Motorola Moto G72
  (Angelbird V60)
34.2 MB/s ∼75% +15%
realme 10
  (Angelbird V60)
29.7 MB/s ∼65%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
28.9 MB/s ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=120, last 2 years)
25.9 MB/s ∼57% -13%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
realme 10 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.5 (26.5-44)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (29.9-52.3)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.2 (29.8-46.8)
realme 10 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.5 (36.7-80.5)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.9 (67.1-81.5)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (42.7-84.9)

通信、软件和操作。更新情况不清楚

对于我们的Wi-Fi测试,我们将realme 10连接到我们的参考华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器,并测量数据速率。我们观察到,对于一个WiFi 5设备来说,传输率总体上相对稳定。然而,对比设备之间的差距相当小。

在上一代产品中,realme提供了单独的、专用的5G版本的中端设备。这一次也是如此,基本的realme 10只支持LTE网络,作为最快的移动选择。虽然有一些额外的支持频率,但对于全球可用性来说还是远远不够的。在我们的测试中,这款手机的接收质量很好,但明显落后于其他高端手机。

Android 12,上面有realme UI 3.0,被用作操作系统。在测试时,安全补丁是2022年11月的,因此是合理的最新版本。很难确定realme 10将在多长时间内提供更新,尽管宣布 13将很快发布。智能手机上预装了不少额外的应用程序,因此,如果你想要一个干净的系统,一开始你必须清理一下。Android

这款智能手机可以相当流畅地操作,这也得益于90赫兹的屏幕。指纹传感器被集成到右侧的待机按钮中。一旦学会了,它就能非常可靠地识别手指,并在最短的等待时间内解锁手机。通过人脸识别进行生物识别解锁也是可能的,但它只是二维的,因此没有那么安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
realme 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
370 (345min - 381max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (354min - 376max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Motorola Moto G72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
359 (338min - 372max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
358 (334min - 374max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
352 (339min - 360max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
realme 10
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (316min - 353max) MBit/s ∼98%
Motorola Moto G72
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
333 (307min - 348max) MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
330 (304min - 343max) MBit/s ∼94% -5%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
realme 10; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (316-353)
realme 10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø370 (345-381)

照相机。与其他中档手机相比,灵活性较差

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

后面有两个相机镜头。然而,你实际上只能使用其中一个,即5000万像素的主摄像头,用于拍照。它通常通过像素分选将四个像素各合成一个,从而形成一个12.5MP的图像,具有更高的感光度。第二个摄像头只收集深度信息,以支持人像拍摄中的模糊,而且分辨率很低。

这种相机配置其实已经不是最新的了,因为对比设备至少还提供了一个微距相机,部分甚至还有一个广角镜头,以提高灵活性。

不过,图片质量好吗?主摄像头的传感器来自三星,拍摄的照片还不错,可以有更好的亮度。如果能有更多的细节就更好了,在高对比度的情况下,动态范围还有待提高,这意味着较亮的区域被掩盖,而较暗的区域缺乏细节。

视频可以在最大分辨率为1080p和30帧的情况下记录,但类似价格的 摩托罗拉Moto G72提供60帧的录像。在光线良好的情况下,视频质量足以满足家庭使用,曝光调整反应迅速且相当准确,但自动对焦不时地明显跳动,以找到正确的焦点。

一个1600万像素的自拍相机位于智能手机前面的一个冲孔中。它可以更好地照亮黑暗区域,但只要你不过度放大,照片对于社交媒体来说是相当可用的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker realme 10: 6.42 ∆E min: 1.36 - max: 15.51 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.1 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
29 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
48 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker realme 10: 35.15 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 48.37 ∆E

显示。PWM,但响应时间低

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

realme 10的OLED屏幕为6.4英寸,比许多竞争手机的屏幕要小一些,所以手机感觉更方便一些。尽管如此,它提供了2400 x 1080像素的同类标准分辨率,90赫兹刷新率,而且还显示出平均553 cd/m²的良好亮度。然而,摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉Moto G72显示,在这个价格范围内,具有HDR功能的980 cd/m²亮度的屏幕也是可能的。

realme 10的屏幕亮度一般来说足够在户外使用,但你可能会发现自己在阳光直射下不得不退到阴凉处,否则屏幕反射会覆盖在画面上。

在很低的亮度下,屏幕闪烁的频率为409赫兹,这可能是由于调光的PWM。这个频率相当高,但敏感的人应该在购买前测试一下屏幕。响应时间非常短,这应该会让游戏玩家满意。

在用CalMAN进行的显示测试中,我们看到有轻微的蓝色偏光,在红色色调中与目标色彩空间有明显的偏差。

563
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 575 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 552.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 553 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.23 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
realme 10
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Motorola Moto G72
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.59
Response Times
-52%
-2100%
-1850%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
1.5 ?(0.8, 0.7)
-50%
18 ?(10, 8)
-1700%
27 ?(15, 12)
-2600%
Response Time Black / White *
1 ?(0.5, 0.5)
1.5 ?(0.8, 0.7)
-50%
26 ?(13, 13)
-2500%
12 ?(8, 4)
-1100%
PWM Frequency
409
180
-56%
Screen
32%
-29%
-18%
Brightness middle
553
992
79%
447
-19%
590
7%
Brightness
553
980
77%
428
-23%
561
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
92
1%
86
-5%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.31
0.38
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.23
4.56
-8%
5.54
-31%
5.15
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.83
7.96
27%
10.04
7%
10.35
4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.6
3.1
14%
7.3
-103%
7.1
-97%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.233 99%
2.03 108%
2.143 103%
CCT
7171 91%
7098 92%
8853 73%
8540 76%
Contrast
1442
1553
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-10% / 4%
-1065% / -547%
-934% / -476%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 409 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 409 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 409 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19466 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

0% 亮度
0% 亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命。realme 10持续时间长

realme 10智能手机的核心是 联发科Helio G99这款SoC具有合适的中端性能,可以跟上竞争。你不应该期望有巨大的性能潜力,但动力足以让你在系统和日常应用程序中顺利导航。即使是那些喜欢玩游戏的人也能毫无问题地运行大多数游戏,但对非常高的帧率的期望应该有所缓和。

UFS内存快速传输数据,所以加载时间保持得很短。

我们在较长时间的负载下测得的最高温度为43.6℃,这显然是明显的,但没有问题。当手机在高环境温度下使用时,表面温度可能有所不同。

小巧的单声道扬声器在听觉上很难创造一个清晰的声场,通常听起来有点闷。即使realme的广告噱头,即音量可以增加到200%而不是100%,也不能改变这种情况。至少,在最大声压级时,扬声器听起来更清晰一些,但随后变得非常重的高音。总而言之,realme 10的内部扬声器绝对不适合发烧友。

也就是说,仍然可以选择通过3.5毫米端口或蓝牙连接耳机。这在工作中没有任何问题,许多编解码器可用于无线传输,包括高保真声音,即SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX TWS+、aptX Adaptive、LDAC和LHDC。

在我们的标准WLAN测试中,5000毫安时的电池使其运行时间刚刚超过16小时。这是一个很好的比率,尽管它也明显被一些对比设备所超越。然而,电池容量应该足以满足两个工作日的适度使用。这款手机的充电功率为33W,这意味着它最多可以在1:30小时内充满。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=264, last 2 years)
759 Points ∼100% +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
687 Points ∼91% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
680 Points ∼90% +18%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
576 Points ∼76%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (540 - 576, n=4)
556 Points ∼73% -3%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
540 Points ∼71% -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (291 - 5538, n=264, last 2 years)
2445 Points ∼100% +38%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1998 Points ∼82% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1997 Points ∼82% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1767 - 1924, n=4)
1848 Points ∼76% +5%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1810 Points ∼74% +2%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1767 Points ∼72%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10589 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=222, last 2 years)
10342 Points ∼98% 0%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10328 Points ∼98%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (9475 - 10589, n=4)
9995 Points ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9742 Points ∼92% -6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9363 Points ∼88% -9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2917 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2856 Points ∼98% +3%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2769 Points ∼95%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2535 - 2769, n=4)
2622 Points ∼90% -5%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2600 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 7890, n=150, last 2 years)
2273 Points ∼78% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2809 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2733 Points ∼97% +4%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2632 Points ∼94%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2356 - 2632, n=4)
2458 Points ∼88% -7%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2433 Points ∼87% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 9814, n=150, last 2 years)
2254 Points ∼80% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3388 - 3450, n=4)
3426 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3425 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3393 Points ∼99% 0%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3388 Points ∼99%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3370 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 4679, n=150, last 2 years)
2824 Points ∼82% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 16067, n=227, last 2 years)
4613 Points ∼100% +62%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3086 Points ∼67% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2994 Points ∼65% +5%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2843 Points ∼62%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2618 - 2843, n=4)
2688 Points ∼58% -5%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2648 Points ∼57% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 25350, n=226, last 2 years)
6139 Points ∼100% +131%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼48% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2899 Points ∼47% +9%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2653 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2413 - 2653, n=4)
2492 Points ∼41% -6%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2459 Points ∼40% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3798 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3622 - 3798, n=4)
3716 Points ∼98% -2%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3622 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3561 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 7042, n=226, last 2 years)
3400 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3383 Points ∼89% -11%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (254 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3160 Points ∼100% +132%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1364 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1183 - 1364, n=4)
1247 Points ∼39% -9%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1206 Points ∼38% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1198 Points ∼38% -12%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1183 Points ∼37% -13%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (247 - 14002, n=224, last 2 years)
4181 Points ∼100% +212%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1340 Points ∼32%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1155 - 1340, n=4)
1236 Points ∼30% -8%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1232 Points ∼29% -8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1201 Points ∼29% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1196 Points ∼29% -11%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3751, n=206, last 2 years)
1138 Points ∼100% +201%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
378 Points ∼33%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
360 Points ∼32% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
355 Points ∼31% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (342 - 378, n=4)
353 Points ∼31% -7%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
347 Points ∼30% -8%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 3707, n=198, last 2 years)
1137 Points ∼100% +211%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
366 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
351 Points ∼31% -4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
351 Points ∼31% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (323 - 366, n=4)
339 Points ∼30% -7%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
337 Points ∼30% -8%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 113, n=260, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼100% +113%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼56% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼53% +13%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
16 fps ∼47%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps ∼41% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (12 - 16, n=4)
14 fps ∼41% -12%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 142, n=261, last 2 years)
42.1 fps ∼100% +134%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22 fps ∼52% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
21 fps ∼50% +17%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
18 fps ∼43%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps ∼38% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (14 - 18, n=4)
16 fps ∼38% -11%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 86, n=261, last 2 years)
24 fps ∼100% +140%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
12 fps ∼50% +20%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
12 fps ∼50% +20%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10 fps ∼42%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8.4 - 10, n=4)
9.03 fps ∼38% -10%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.9 fps ∼37% -11%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 56, n=261, last 2 years)
16.1 fps ∼100% +148%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8.1 fps ∼50% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.7 fps ∼48% +18%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6.5 fps ∼40%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.9 fps ∼37% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 6.5, n=4)
5.9 fps ∼37% -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (3905 - 74261, n=197, last 2 years)
27455 Points ∼100% +29%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
22285 Points ∼81% +5%
realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
21308 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20787 Points ∼76% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (17228 - 21308, n=4)
18583 Points ∼68% -13%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
18237 Points ∼66% -14%
realme 10Motorola Moto G72Samsung Galaxy A23 5GOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
-24%
-26%
-17%
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
881
868.5
-1%
485.1
-45%
509.21
-42%
716 ?(303 - 999, n=38)
-19%
1040 ?(90.5 - 3557, n=256, last 2 years)
18%
Sequential Write 256KB
530.1
497.5
-6%
487.4
-8%
482.15
-9%
499 ?(105.3 - 884, n=38)
-6%
611 ?(11.9 - 2723, n=256, last 2 years)
15%
Random Read 4KB
200.5
231.4
15%
188.2
-6%
179.02
-11%
175.8 ?(89.3 - 253, n=38)
-12%
190.1 ?(13.5 - 543, n=256, last 2 years)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
257.7
230.2
-11%
163.1
-37%
147.46
-43%
175.4 ?(113.8 - 258, n=38)
-32%
194.5 ?(13 - 552, n=257, last 2 years)
-25%

温度

Max. Load
 43.5 °C35.8 °C32.1 °C 
 41.9 °C35.8 °C32.1 °C 
 41.2 °C35.2 °C32.7 °C 
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 36.7 °C
32.3 °C35.4 °C43.6 °C
32.7 °C35.9 °C41.9 °C
32.7 °C35.9 °C41 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 36.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


热图 - 正面
热图 - 正面
热图 - 背面
热图 - 背面
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 (7.19min - 7.22max) % ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 (7.21min - 7.23max) % ∼100% 0%
realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 (8.16min - 8.21max) % ∼100%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.1 (6.59min - 6.79max) % ∼97% -2%

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.443.12539.139.43131.531.94029.8335033.437.26326.627.78022.32410020.524.712515.62016014.721.820011.426.42501037.63158.846.7400953.350010.559.863012.264.280014.369.2100011.669.212501268.9160010.274.6200010.472.8250011.168315012.768.6400014.471.3500014.273.5630014.774.5800015.6731000016.572.81250016.566.31600017.357.9SPL25.483.4N0.654.7median 12.7median 68Delta2.513.343.942.434.535.827.731.428.530.133.233.326.328.623.417.222.519.715.418.814.629.212.338.313.346.611.650.27.555.511.462.315.26414.767.311.870.6127110.3729.36910.86814.762.514.370.214.970.31567.815.467.616.861.516.167.61751.225.980.70.747.4median 14.6median 64210.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme 10OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
5000 mAh
1099 min ∼42% +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
1064 min ∼40% +10%
realme 10
5000 mAh
966 min ∼37%
Motorola Moto G72
5000 mAh
929 min ∼35% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=263, last 2 years)
883 min ∼33% -9%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 06min

Pros

+ 方便、轻巧、别致
+ 良好的内存配置
+ 专用的microSD读卡器
+ NFC
+ 快速充电
+ 许多蓝牙编解码器

Cons

- 平庸的相机设置
- 扬声器声音低沉
- 4G频率少
- 更新情况不清楚

评语。大量的内存,但没有相机明星

回顾:realme 10。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。
回顾:realme 10。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。

有一点是明确的:realme 10不会赢得中端最佳相机设备的奖项。毕竟,它缺乏微距和/或广角镜头,主摄像头拍摄的照片总体上是可用的,但没有别的。竞争对手提供了更好的设置,有更多的摄像头,部分甚至有光学图像稳定功能。

除此以外,realme 10提供了一个良好的整体包装。大量的存储空间,良好的运行时间,快速充电,NFC,专用的microSD读卡器,以及快速的Wi-Fi 5。90赫兹的OLED屏幕可以用体面的亮度来说服人,有许多蓝牙音频编解码器支持,也有一个成熟的指纹传感器。

板载扬声器的声音不太有说服力,但realme 10比对比设备更方便、更轻巧。它的耀眼的背面和棱角分明的设计看起来也非常好。

如果你正在寻找一款轻巧漂亮的带NFC的4G手机,并且不需要顶级相机,你会在realme 10中找到一个令人信服的整体包装。

这款手机 摩托罗拉Moto G72是一个强有力的竞争者,因为它提供了更多的摄像头和一个更明亮的OLED屏幕选项。这款手机三星Galaxy A23 5G甚至支持5G和相机的光学图像稳定器。

价格和可用性

由于专利纠纷,在测试时,realme 10只在网上的少数零售商处有售。在amazon.de,你目前支付约300欧元购买该手机。

realme 10 - 01/20/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
86%
Games Performance
25 / 64 → 39%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 90 → 56%
Camera
54%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme 10 智能手机评测。时髦而轻巧的中档手机
Florian Schmitt, 2023-01-24 (Update: 2023-01-24)