Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 智能手机评测--突然长大了

离开 华硕打破了自己的一个传统：第 11 代 Zenfone 不再小巧，名称中加入了 Ultra。但它的旗舰性能依然如故，据说摄像头也得到了改进。我们的评测将揭示这款手机的新尺寸带来了哪些好处。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

近年来，华硕的 Zenfone 系列一直是紧凑型设备中旗舰性能的保证。2024 年，这家制造商抛弃了这一概念。Zenfone 11 的名字中加入了 Ultra 的后缀，它的成长可谓一日千里。而 Zenfone 10的显示屏对角线为 5.9 英寸，而新的 Zenfone 11 Ultra 则达到了 6.78 英寸。

Zenfone 11 Ultra 有两个版本：12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间，或 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间。此外，还有四种颜色可供选择：黑色、灰色、蓝色和橙色。我们的测试机是蓝色的，采用了更大的存储配置。

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra (Zenfone 11 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 491 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerator, E-Compass, Proximity, Gyro (Support ARCore), Hall Sensor, OTG
Networking
Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900MHz; WCDMA: 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100MHz; 4G FDD-LTE: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B29 / B30 / B32 / B66; 4G TDD-LTE: B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B43 / B48; 5G SA&NSA: n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n18 / n20 / n25 / n26 / n29 / n30 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n71 / n77 / n78 / n79, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.8 x 76.8
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix 6-axis Hybrid Gimbal Stabilizer 3.0, 1/1.56”, f/1.9; 13MPix Ultra-Wide, f/2.2, Free-form Lens; 32MP Telezoom, f/2.4, OIS, 3X optical zoom, pixel binning 1.4μm (Actual output photo: 8MP)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix pixel binning 1.4μm (Actual output photo: 8MP)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, Case, USB-Cable, SIM-Needle, Zenfone Version 34.1420.1420.226, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS support GPS (L1/ L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1/ E5a), BeiDou (B1i/ B1c/ B2a), QZSS (L1/ L5) and NavIC; Camera2API Level 3; DRM Widevine L1; HDR10, Amazon HDR, Youtube HDR, fanless, waterproof
Weight
224 g
Price
1099 Euro
Links
Asus homepage
Asus notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.1 %
04/2024
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		224 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2400x1080
88.9 %
11/2023
Google Pixel 8
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		187 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.20"2400x1080
89.8 %
03/2024
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940		196 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"3120x1440
89.8 %
01/2024
Xiaomi 14
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		193 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2670x1200
89.7 %
11/2023
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core		201 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
88.7 %
07/2023
Asus Zenfone 10
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		172 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash5.90"2400x1080

Zenfone 11 Ultra 的边框由金属制成。其显示屏和背面由玻璃保护。显示屏上安装的是大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2，制造商没有说明背面使用的是哪种玻璃。显示屏呈直线，边框棱角分明。

这款智能手机通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证。USB 端口的位置有点不寻常。它没有位于机壳底部的中间，而是在更靠左的位置。其制造质量不错。该设备几乎无法扭曲。在测试阶段，我们从未发现任何划痕。按键的着力点很好，但音量摇杆有点晃动。

相机模块从背面突出了不少，而且位置很高。因此，设备可以稳稳地放在桌面上，只有在显示屏上方输入时才会晃动。背面的装饰只是看得见，摸不着。

尺寸比较

❌
163.8 mm 76.8 mm 8.9 mm 224 g160.9 mm 77.8 mm 7.8 mm 201 g158.5 mm 75.9 mm 7.7 mm 196 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 8.2 mm 193 g150.5 mm 70.8 mm 8.9 mm 187 g146.5 mm 68 mm 9.4 mm 172 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - Zenfone 11 Ultra 配备音频插孔

即使作为旗舰产品，华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 仍配备了 3.5 毫米音频插孔。不过，它的存储空间无法扩展。支持 NFC 和双 SIM 卡。遗憾的是，USB-C 连接仅支持 USB 2.0。结合三星 980 Pro 硬盘，我们测得的传输速度为 31.79 MB/s。在向外部存储设备传输数据时，支持 ExFAT 和 NTFS。

软件 - 支持短板的 Zenfone 11 Ultra

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 预装了Android 14。与原版Android 相比，它的用户界面没有太大变化。在设置手机时，您甚至可以选择安装华硕 UI 或Android 。

手机主要安装了华硕和谷歌的软件，只安装了 Meta 的第三方应用程序。设置手机后，会占用 21 GB 的存储空间。这款智能手机具有高性能模式，在玩游戏或执行基准测试时会自动激活。

华硕只说明了更新交付的较短时间。Zenfone 11 Ultra 将收到两个大型Android 更新和四年的安全补丁。在测试时（2024 年 4 月），该智能手机仍在运行 2023 年 12 月的版本。

制造商提供了一系列额外的选项，比如可以为手机按键分配特殊功能--此外，你还可以通过点击设备背面来激活命令。此外，一些应用程序还支持同时使用两个用户配置文件。边缘工具 "是一个简短的菜单，可以快速访问各种应用程序。

此外，华硕还宣传了一系列人工智能功能。据称，这款智能手机将具备电话实时翻译功能、录音翻译功能以及人工智能生成壁纸功能。不过，这三项功能仍处于测试阶段。这款手机已经具备人工智能支持的噪音抑制和人工智能辅助搜索功能。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Zenfone 11 Ultra 支持 WiFi-7

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 支持 Wi-Fi 7，因此包括 6 GHz 频段。不过，在与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，这款智能手机显示出明显的连接波动。其传输速率也低于前代产品 Zenfone 10.

Zenfone 11 Ultra 也支持 5G。全球版本支持 20 个 5G 频段和 25 个 LTE 频段。这样，即使在旅行中也能确保良好的网络覆盖。Zenfone 11 Ultra 支持双卡双待，使用两张实体 SIM 卡，但不支持 eSIM 卡。

Networking
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
713 (min: 356) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
890 (min: 635) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1137 (min: 656) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
985 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼57%
Google Pixel 8
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1570 (min: 1043) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1521 (min: 1325) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
iperf3 receive AXE11000
648 (min: 582) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1581 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1117 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼64%
Xiaomi 14
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
iperf3 receive AXE11000
749 (min: 725) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
825 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼48%
Asus Zenfone 10
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1492 (min: 1309) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1334 (min: 1068) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
648 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
683 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1537 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1360 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼78%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1137 (656-1299)
Asus Zenfone 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1492 (1309-1602)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1581 (1247-1658)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (563-1194)
Asus Zenfone 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1334 (1068-1407)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (1031-1173)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø700 (356-740)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (582-790)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø890 (635-983)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø846 (401-943)
全球导航卫星系统测量：户外
全球导航卫星系统测量：户外
全球导航卫星系统测量：室内
全球导航卫星系统测量：室内

Zenfone 11 Ultra 的双频模式支持所有常见的卫星系统。我们在一次自行车旅行中测试了它的准确性。结果很好，智能手机精确记录了路线。另一方面，在室内建立可靠的连接需要一些时间。

全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖旅行
全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖旅行
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要

电话功能和通话质量 - Zenfone 的人工智能噪音抑制功能

华硕在 Zenfone 11 Ultra 上使用了自己的电话应用程序。该软件结构清晰，除了人工智能辅助噪音抑制外，没有任何附加功能。Zenfone 在通话过程中没有提供任何特殊功能。用户的声音传输清晰，我们注意到没有背景噪音。当使用扬声器时，设备的声音会变得非常响亮，环境噪声也被很好地过滤掉了。

摄像头 - Zenfone 11 Ultra 配备三组摄像头

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 上的自拍照
华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 上的自拍照
华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 使用纵向模式自拍
华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 使用纵向模式自拍

Zenfone 11 Ultra 的背面比 Zenfone 10 多了一个镜头。新增加的镜头是它的 3200 万像素摄像头，具有 3 倍光学变焦和 OIS 功能。它是对带云台防抖功能的 5000 万像素主摄像头（IMX 890）和 1250 万像素超广角摄像头的补充。

该智能手机具有专业模式，可以手动控制对焦、曝光时间、ISO 和白平衡。使用主摄像头可录制最高 4K 和 24fps 的视频，使用超广角镜头可录制 4K 和 40fps 的视频。此外，还有慢动作、延时摄影和肖像视频模式。

手机前置 3200 万像素镜头。它采用像素二进制，分辨率为 800 万像素。它能以最高 FHD 和 30fps 的速度录制视频。总的来说，它的图像和视频质量都不错。其视频防抖动功能尤为成功，但声音录制会有一些背景噪音。

测试中拍摄的照片看起来很自然，但与其他旗舰产品相比，清晰度稍有欠缺。在弱光环境下，软件对拍摄对象进行了大量增亮处理，但不幸的是，这导致了相当多的噪点。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitLakeUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra: 5.32 ∆E min: 1.19 - max: 10.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
13 ∆E
13 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra: 16.46 ∆E min: 8.61 - max: 24.12 ∆E

配件和保修 - 华硕包括一个机箱，但不包括电源

华硕为 Zenfone 11 Ultra 提供了一条 USB 数据线（USB-C 转 USB-A）和一个黑色固体塑料保护套。此外，它还配有 SIM 卡工具和所有常用说明。不包括电源。在美国，华硕手机提供标准的 12 个月保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 快速解锁 Zenfone 11 Ultra

Zenfone 11 Ultra 没有预装屏幕保护膜。屏幕非常漂亮、平滑，边角输入都能可靠识别。在游戏方面，手机支持高达 144 Hz 的触摸采样率，而在正常使用时，它能以高达 120 Hz 的频率扫描屏幕输入。你可以通过激活所谓的手套模式来提高显示屏的灵敏度。

您可以通过二维面部识别或显示屏内置的光学指纹传感器解锁手机。这两种方式都能非常可靠、快速地工作。您还可以完全跳过锁屏。手机的振动马达也给人留下了很好的印象，既安静又清脆。

华硕使用的是谷歌键盘，运行可靠。由于设备尺寸较大，与前代产品相比，单手操作略显困难。它支持单手模式。

显示屏 - Zenfone 11 Ultra 变得非常明亮

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Zenfone 11 Ultra 配备了一块 6.78 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏，正常使用时刷新率在 1 到 120 Hz 之间。您可以手动将刷新率设置为 60 或 120 Hz。在我们的测量过程中，该面板还显示出令人印象深刻的最大亮度水平。

我们注意到，Zenfone 11 Ultra 的平均亮度为 1673.6 cd/m²，超过了著名的竞争对手，如 三星Galaxy S24+和 iPhone 15 Plus.它的亮度是其前代产品 Zenfone 10.在 APL18 和 HDR 测量中，面板的亮度甚至达到了 2,409 和 2,458 尼特，这意味着它几乎达到了制造商承诺的 2,500 cd/m²。此外，它的照明也很均匀。

在测量过程中，我们注意到屏幕以 486 Hz 的频率闪烁。Zenfone 11 Ultra 提供了一种特殊的屏幕模式，可以减少低亮度时的闪烁。您可以在用户界面中选择 "永远在线 "显示模式。不过，这并不是真正的 AoD，因为它会在几分钟后关闭。

1684
cd/m²		1658
cd/m²		1682
cd/m²
1694
cd/m²		1664
cd/m²		1664
cd/m²
1675
cd/m²		1659
cd/m²		1682
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1694 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1673.6 cd/m² Minimum: 6.19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1664 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.78		Google Pixel 8
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.20		Samsung Galaxy S24+
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.70		Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.36		Apple iPhone 15 Plus
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70		Asus Zenfone 10
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.90
Screen
-33%
-80%
-27%
-27%
-89%
Brightness middle
1664
1450
-13%
1358
-18%
1043
-37%
1044
-37%
797
-52%
Brightness
1674
1410
-16%
1358
-19%
1052
-37%
1040
-38%
789
-53%
Brightness Distribution
98
92
-6%
92
-6%
96
-2%
99
1%
93
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
1.1
-38%
3
-275%
1.1
-38%
1.2
-50%
3.64
-355%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2
4.2
-110%
4.4
-120%
2.8
-40%
2.4
-20%
1.92
4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
2.1
-17%
2.5
-39%
1.9
-6%
2.1
-17%
3.1
-72%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
1.98 111%
2.23 99%
2.14 103%
2.238 98%
CCT
6526 100%
6584 99%
6656 98%
6740 96%
6411 101%
6531 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 486 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 486 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 486 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

Zenfone 11 Ultra 的显示屏校准良好，肉眼基本感觉不到色彩偏差。只有灰度偏差稍大。

色彩精度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（标准配色方案、标准色温、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.338 ms rise
↘ 0.3525 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.612 ms rise
↘ 0.6645 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 的最大亮度非常高，因此在阳光直射下使用也没有任何问题。它的可视角度稳定，即使在极端角度下也能保持内容清晰可辨。

性能 - Zenfone 11 Ultra 性能卓越

在 Zenfone 11 Ultra 上，华硕采用了高通公司最新的顶级处理器，即 骁龙 8 代 3.我们的测试机型还配备了 16GB 内存。因此，Zenfone 完成日常任务的速度与您预期的一样快。它的系统性能非常流畅，打开应用程序的速度也很快。

在基准测试中，Zenfone 11 Ultra 的表现并不突出。虽然它在 Geekbench 5 和 6 以及 PCMark 测试中表现出色，但在 CrossMark 等测试中表现较差。不过，总的来说，它的表现还是非常不错的。

华硕手机在存储基准测试中的表现令人印象深刻。Zenfone 凭借其 UFS-4 存储能力拔得头筹，与 谷歌 Pixel 8相比，Zenfone 的速度有时甚至是后者的两倍。

Geekbench 6.2 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2644 Points +17%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2259 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (2127 - 2329, n=12)
2238 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points -9%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
2021 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1653 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=110, last 2 years)
1370 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7012 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6432 - 7501, n=12)
6991 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
6673 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points -7%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5496 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4225 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=110, last 2 years)
3788 Points -46%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1684 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1679 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1575 - 1702, n=10)
1672 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1567 Points -7%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1462 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1260 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
915 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6307 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=10)
6103 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
5871 Points +3%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
5675 Points
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
4999 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3395 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
3000 Points -47%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1624507 - 2162423, n=11)
2005548 Points +23%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points +9%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1624507 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1391899 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=53, last 2 years)
1245321 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1107295 Points -32%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
20827 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15343 - 21628, n=11)
18565 Points -11%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
17824 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17620 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11846 Points -43%
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
10897 Points -48%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points +15%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1266 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1043 - 1474, n=8)
1227 Points +9%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points +4%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1125 Points
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
955 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=163, last 2 years)
843 Points -25%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
25563 Points +71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=148, last 2 years)
21505 Points +44%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18370 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (13873 - 18370, n=10)
16833 Points +12%
Asus Zenfone 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
15827 Points +6%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14965 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points -24%

Zenfone 11 Ultra 配备了 Adreno 750图形处理器。因此，在 3DMark 测试中，Zenfone 在对比设备中脱颖而出。另一方面，在 GFX Bench 测试中，其竞争对手的表现要好一些。它的屏幕外数值明显偏低，而屏幕内数值却一直很高。

同时，必须手动提高手机的刷新率，才能取得不错的成绩。目前的游戏对智能手机来说不成问题。PUBG Mobile》在超 HDR 和超画质设置下运行流畅。我们的测试设备只通过了 DRM Widevine 3 级认证，但零售版本应该通过了 1 级认证。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5190 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -18%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3717 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2730 Points -47%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2439 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5160 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points -18%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3749 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3099 Points -40%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19488 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12268 Points -37%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8977 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8635 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8774 Points +1%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8683 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8264 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
4347 Points -50%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8765 Points +1%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8712 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8689 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3790 Points -56%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8139 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7939 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7199 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4995 Points -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33152 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32235 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23545 Points -29%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13546 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19699 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19187 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15675 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9813 Points -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +6%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +5%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +4%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps +185%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
481 fps +154%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
474 fps +151%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
317 fps +68%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
189 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +14%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +12%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +131%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps +117%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
254 fps +78%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -32%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +42%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +40%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps +193%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps +171%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps +148%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
191 fps +112%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps +2%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +24%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +9%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +5%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps +117%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
130 fps +103%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
113 fps +77%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +16%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -22%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -43%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -53%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps +74%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps +44%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
52 fps +21%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43 fps
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -31%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -38%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps +125%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps +91%
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
155 fps +68%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
140 fps +52%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps +8%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
22 fps -35%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -53%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)
228.264 Points +40%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points +32%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra (Chrome 123)
163 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.2 - 241, n=13)
158.3 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points -15%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
136.238 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
107.8 Points -34%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
104.25 Points -36%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (112 - 196, n=10)
158.8 Points +5%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra (Chrome 123)
151 Points
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
139 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
101 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
94 Points -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)
75718 Points +58%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 70135, n=11)
54354 Points +14%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra (Chrome 123)
47863 Points
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
47776 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
42998 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33565 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=170, last 2 years)
1545 ms * -72%
Asus Zenfone 10 (Chrome 114)
1009 ms * -12%
Google Pixel 8 (chrome 116)
998 ms * -11%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra (Chrome 123)
897.7 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (624 - 1154, n=11)
800 ms * +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * +30%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * +31%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus (Safari Mobile 17)
450.2 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Asus Zenfone 11 UltraGoogle Pixel 8Samsung Galaxy S24+Xiaomi 14Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
-67%
-42%
-31%
-19%
-50%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
3168 ?(3.0.4061)
1627 ?(3.0.4061)
-49%
2327 ?(3.0.4061)
-27%
2452 ?(3.0.4061)
-23%
2647 ?(1661 - 3429, n=10)
-16%
1515 ?(274 - 3429, n=66, last 2 years)
-52%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
3112 ?(3.0.4061)
570 ?(3.0.4061)
-82%
1201 ?(3.0.4061)
-61%
2817 ?(3.0.4061)
-9%
2531 ?(1201 - 3236, n=10)
-19%
1294 ?(94.2 - 3236, n=66, last 2 years)
-58%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
62.1 ?(3.0.4061)
16 ?(3.0.4061)
-74%
50 ?(3.0.4061)
-19%
29.6 ?(3.0.4061)
-52%
56.1 ?(28.5 - 67.7, n=10)
-10%
38.8 ?(16 - 67.7, n=66, last 2 years)
-38%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
120.3 ?(3.0.4061)
39.7 ?(3.0.4061)
-67%
66.7 ?(3.0.4061)
-45%
62.9 ?(3.0.4061)
-48%
86.3 ?(31.7 - 136.2, n=10)
-28%
59.9 ?(22.2 - 136.2, n=66, last 2 years)
-50%
Storage 2.0
63116 ?(3.0.4061)
24572 ?(3.0.4061)
-61%
25276 ?(3.0.4061)
-60%
49601 ?(3.0.4061)
-21%
47833 ?(25276 - 63116, n=16)
-24%
30071 ?(6296 - 63116, n=125, last 2 years)
-52%

排放 - 华硕将热量控制在一定范围内

温度 - Snapdragon 发热但不烫手

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 在日常使用中始终保持凉爽。在高强度游戏过程中，它也会发热，但并不烫手。在 "Burnout "基准测试中，在极端负载情况下，我们测得顶部最高温度为 43.2 摄氏度，底部最高温度为 43.9 摄氏度。在稳定性测试中，由于发热，

，但与对比设备大致处于同一水平。

Max. Load
 37.4 °C41 °C42.1 °C 
 38.6 °C41.4 °C43.2 °C 
 39 °C42.4 °C41.2 °C 
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
32.7 °C43.4 °C36 °C
41.5 °C43.2 °C43.8 °C
38.4 °C43.3 °C43.9 °C
Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % +20%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.4 % +1%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
82 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus Zenfone 10
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % +65%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +65%
Google Pixel 8
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % +60%
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
73.3 % +48%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.4 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
74.4 % +116%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 % +106%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % +72%
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34.5 %
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (15.4-31.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.1 (20.9-25.6)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø99.5 (91.4-110.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.3 (71.1-86.7)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø113.8 (108.9-116.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø83.2 (72.3-89.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.3 (17.7-29.7)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.7 (9.96-28.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.7 (17.5-29.4)

扬声器 - Zenfone 11 Ultra 拥有出色的立体声音效

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 的扬声器表现非常出色。扬声器的音量很大，但声音不会失真，而且能发出均衡的立体声。在高音量时，我们注意到边框和背部有一些振动，但这些振动从未分散过我们的注意力。耳机可以通过音频插孔连接到 Zenfone，但其信噪比非常低，仅为 67.79 dBFS。

在我们的测试中，蓝牙耳机可以顺利配对。Zenfone 11 Ultra 支持以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、aptX Adaptive audio、LC3 和 Opus。这款智能手机预装了音频助手。其中包括一个均衡器，可针对不同的终端设备进行调整。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.338.62526.235.33125.931.84029.238.25035.6406325.936.18022.138.310017.84212517.146.816018.153.320014.253.525014.155.331510.757.34001158.250012.86763011.1688001273.7100011.776.512501278.7160012.877200012.480.8250012.382.2315013.384.140001382.7500013.578.6630013.276.1800013.874.51000013.772.81250013.4621600013.354.3SPL24.991.5N0.683.9median 13.2median 73.7Delta111.736.239.330.733.825.638.926.736.336.738.324.63917.641.518.741.418.247.615.954.917.357.615.258.814.160.713.458.613.864.714.36513.770.112.475.812.777.212.177.312.980.512.581.512.28312.883.513.182.713.581.713.17913.778.51469.813.366.625.292.10.788.6median 13.5median 75.81.210.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenfone 11 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 华硕，你可以做得更好

功耗 - Zenfone 11 Ultra 的空闲功耗较高

与其他厂商相比，华硕对 Zenfone 11 Ultra 内的骁龙 8 代 3 的调校略有不同。华硕的骁龙处理器在负载情况下功耗较低，但基本功耗较高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.85 / 1.43 / 1.55 Watt
Load midlight 3.34 / 3.53 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
5500 mAh		Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh		Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Plus
4383 mAh		Asus Zenfone 10
4300 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-42%
-68%
-42%
-34%
-64%
-70%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.56
34%
0.43
49%
0.51
40%
0.71
16%
0.9
-6%
0.818 ?(0.51 - 1, n=9)
4%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Average *
1.43
1.08
24%
0.84
41%
0.89
38%
2.09
-46%
1.1
23%
1.196 ?(0.89 - 1.52, n=9)
16%
1.448 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.55
1.17
25%
0.95
39%
0.92
41%
2.11
-36%
1.5
3%
1.279 ?(0.91 - 1.6, n=9)
17%
1.621 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
-5%
Load Average *
3.34
8.01
-140%
6.76
-102%
9.08
-172%
4.32
-29%
7.6
-128%
9.25 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=9)
-177%
5.59 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-67%
Load Maximum *
3.53
8.89
-152%
16.42
-365%
9.11
-158%
6.25
-77%
11
-212%
10.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=9)
-209%
8.38 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
-137%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.56 (1.062-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.59 (0.609-16.5)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.898 (0.814-0.974)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.595 (0.552-1.054)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.24 (3.17-3.34)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.2 (6.53-14.6)
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.898 (0.814-0.974)
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.595 (0.552-1.054)

运行时间 - Zenfone 未能达到预期效果

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 为电池长时间运行提供了理想的条件：它拥有 5,500 毫安时电池和配备 LTPO 的 AMOLED 显示屏。在我们进行的实际 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中，Zenfone 仅在 16.5 小时后就耗尽了电池。这本身就很超值。

然而，除了 谷歌 Pixel 8之外，所有对比设备的续航时间都更长--尽管其中一些设备的电池容量要小得多。华硕表示，这款手机支持最大功率为 65 瓦的快速充电以及 Quick Charge 5.0。遗憾的是，随机并没有提供合适的电源适配器。使用 Anker Powerhouse 555 时，我们的最大充电功率为 32 瓦。在测试中，Zenfone 11 Ultra 充满电需要大约 80 分钟。Zenfone 还支持最高 15 瓦的 Qi 无线充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 28min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
5500 mAh
988 min
Google Pixel 8
4575 mAh
814 min
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
1009 min
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
1092 min
Apple iPhone 15 Plus
4383 mAh
1102 min
Asus Zenfone 10
4300 mAh
837 min

Pros

+ 快速的系统性能
+ 明亮、色彩准确的显示屏
+ 良好的立体声扬声器
+ 音频插孔

Cons

- USB 2.0
- 摄像头不是最好的
- 软件支持时间短

评语：Zenfone 大屏幕功能突出，但并不出众

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 评测。测试样品由华硕德国公司提供。
华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 评测。测试样品由华硕德国公司提供。

华硕的 Zenfone 11 Ultra 开辟了一条新的道路。它的新尺寸对手机的显示屏、电池续航时间和扬声器都产生了积极影响。至于安装第三颗摄像头是否只是因为背面空间更大，目前还不得而知。不过，Zenfone 也失去了其独特的卖点，使其面临更多的竞争。

Zenfone 11 Ultra 的超亮显示屏和均衡的显示效果令人印象深刻。再加上其出色的扬声器，它为视频和游戏提供了非常愉悦的视听体验。它的性能毋庸置疑：它配备了顶级处理器、内存和存储空间，因此工作速度极快。

在摄像头方面，你不得不做出一些妥协：虽然与前代产品相比，它有了长足的进步，但仍无法与其他顶级智能手机相媲美，如 谷歌 Pixel 8, 小米 14或 Apple iPhone 15 Plus在细节描绘方面，谷歌 Pixel 8、小米 14 或 iPhone 15 Plus 都不尽如人意。它的照片虽然不差，但还不能跻身顶级智能手机的行列。在更新方面，华硕也需要弥补不足。谷歌和三星提供的支持时间要长得多。

华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 是一款出色的智能手机，没有任何真正的缺陷。不过，它已经失去了自己的独特卖点，在小细节方面也无法与最好的产品相媲美。

如果你正在寻找一款特别小巧的高端智能手机，那么你应该看看小米 14 或三星Galaxy S24。谷歌 Pixel 8 拥有更好的摄像头和更长的更新支持。此外，它已经在市场上销售了很长时间，因此价格要便宜很多。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

Zenfone 11 Ultra 的最高售价为 899.99 美元，可通过亚马逊等主要在线零售商购买。

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra - 04/22/2024 v7
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 78%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
94%
Games Performance
72 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
92 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
76%
Average
83%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra (Zenfone 11 Series)

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 Zenfone 11 Ultra 智能手机评测--突然长大了
Benedikt Winkel, 2024-04-28 (Update: 2024-04-28)