Notebookcheck Logo

华硕 Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

选的好,再一次。 华硕在Zenbook UX305的更新版中采用的Skylake m3处理器相比Broadwell处理器并不会带来太大的变化。在其他方面,UX305CA同时继承了前代产品的优点和缺点,这也意味着它依然是一款优秀的设备。这次,我们将测试这台亚笔记本电脑搭配全高清屏幕的版本。
Windows Skylake Laptop / Notebook
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 (Zenbook Series)
Processor
Intel Core m3-6Y30 2 x 0.9 - 2.2 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 850 MHz
Memory
7.9 GB 
, DDR3L 1866 MHz SDRAM
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, no, AU Optronics AUO272D, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2, 256 GB 
, 256 GB
Soundcard
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机插口, Card Reader: 二合一读卡器( SD/ SDXC)
Networking
Intel Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12.3 x 325.1 x 226.1
Battery
45 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Additional features
Speakers: Bang & Olufsen ICEpower®, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.192 kg, Power Supply: 178 g
Price
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

310.6
cd/m²
324.3
cd/m²
305.5
cd/m²
307.9
cd/m²
324.3
cd/m²
303.3
cd/m²
312.9
cd/m²
325.6
cd/m²
308.5
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics AUO272D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 325.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 313.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 324.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1122:1 (Black: 0.289 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.89 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90.36% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
13.30, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13-9350
13.30, 1920x1080
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
13.30, 2560x1440
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
13.50, 3000x2000
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
13.30, 3200x1800
Display
-29%
3%
5%
Display P3 Coverage
64.5
44.53
-31%
66.8
4%
67
4%
sRGB Coverage
90.4
66.8
-26%
92.8
3%
95.8
6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.5
45.97
-30%
67.3
3%
68.9
5%
Response Times
30%
-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37.6 ?(17.2, 20.4)
24 ?(11, 36)
36%
48.4 ?(19.6, 28.8)
-29%
Response Time Black / White *
24.8 ?(6.8, 18)
19 ?(10, 28)
23%
32.8 ?(7.6, 25.2)
-32%
PWM Frequency
201.6 ?(25, 78)
Screen
4%
3%
30%
-23%
Brightness middle
324.3
277.5
-14%
324
0%
430.9
33%
287
-12%
Brightness
314
276
-12%
324
3%
410
31%
280
-11%
Brightness Distribution
93
88
-5%
90
-3%
93
0%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.289
0.191
34%
0.34
-18%
0.254
12%
0.792
-174%
Contrast
1122
1453
30%
953
-15%
1696
51%
362
-68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.03
4.88
19%
4.36
28%
2.06
66%
3.08
49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.89
4.26
46%
4.62
41%
2.22
72%
3.36
57%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.59 85%
2.18 101%
2.13 103%
2.5 88%
CCT
6490 100%
6562 99%
6857 95%
6520 100%
6087 107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.46
41.6
-36%
60
-8%
64
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.36
65.79
-27%
93
3%
96
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-13% / -4%
12% / 7%
1% / 16%
-23% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 201.6 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting
≤ 78 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 201.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % (78 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 201.6 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
0.81 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
0.95 Points +17%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
1.28 Points +58%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1.3 Points +60%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
1.41 Points +74%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
1.79 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
1.74 Points -3%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
3.19 Points +78%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2.7 Points +51%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
3.42 Points +91%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
72 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
82 Points +14%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
116 Points +61%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
113 Points +57%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
122 Points +69%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
200 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
155 Points -22%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
287 Points +44%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
284 Points +42%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
305 Points +53%
wPrime 2.10
1024m (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
864 s *
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
562 s * +35%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
529 s * +39%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
491.4 s * +43%
32m (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
24.1 s *
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
17.83 s * +26%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
17 s * +29%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
15.62 s * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6517 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
7517 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
4210 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
1.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
19.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.81 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
72 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
30.64 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
200 Points
Help
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
4635 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
4001 Points -14%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
4989 Points +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4274 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
4650 Points 0%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
2833 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
2037 Points -28%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
2983 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2633 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
3657 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
2761 Points -25%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
4078 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3721 Points +2%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
3241 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
2526 Points -22%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
3658 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2968 Points -8%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3108 Points -4%
PCMark 7 Score
4635 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2833 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3241 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3657 points
Help
Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
Transfer Rate Minimum: 154.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 360.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 329.4 MB/s
Access Time: 0.073 ms
Burst Rate: 139.1 MB/s
CPU Usage: 3.2 %
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
1151 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
686 Points -40%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
1558 Points +35%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1448 Points +26%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1448 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1344 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
756 Points -34%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
596 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
407 Points -32%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
861 Points +44%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
793 Points +33%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
793 Points +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
740 Points +24%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
428 Points -28%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
3778 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
2958 Points -22%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
5931 Points +57%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
5674 Points +50%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
5674 Points +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4604 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3673 Points -3%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2
37002 Points
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10, SanDisk SD7SN3Q256G1002
27325 Points -26%
Dell XPS 13-9350
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
52625 Points +42%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
51751 Points +40%
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
51751 Points +40%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
42046 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y70, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
35549 Points -4%
3DMark 11 Performance
1151 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
37002 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3778 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
596 points
Help
low med. high ultra
Anno 2070 (2011) 47.3 33.2 19.2 9.6
Max. Load
 26.4 °C32.4 °C34.6 °C 
 23.2 °C26.8 °C28.6 °C 
 22.6 °C23.4 °C24.2 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Average: 26.9 °C
32.8 °C35.2 °C29.2 °C
27.2 °C28.4 °C25.4 °C
25.4 °C25.6 °C24.2 °C
Maximum: 35.2 °C
Average: 28.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.4 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.2 °C / 75.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+4.1 °C / 7.3 F).
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
17h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 35min
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1
45 Wh
Asus ZenBook UX305FA-FB003H
45 Wh
Dell XPS 13-9350
56 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-4104ng
56 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
38 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
69 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro
44 Wh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-13%
31%
-11%
-7%
-34%
Reader / Idle
1052
781
-26%
782
-26%
791
-25%
1070
2%
635
-40%
WiFi v1.3
382
451
18%
500
31%
488
28%
402
5%
Load
215
189
-12%
150
-30%
138
-36%
153
-29%
155
-28%
WiFi
408
379

Pros

+ 坚固的机身
+ 相对价位优秀的机身品质
+ 非常快速的固态硬盘
+ 优秀的整体性能
+ 无风扇设计&低发热量
+ 明亮的抗反射屏幕
+ 轻薄设计

Cons

- 性能受到降频影响
- 电池续航表现一般
- 键盘不支持背光
- 摄像头效果惨淡
- 不支持USB Type-C
In review: Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1. Test model provided by Asus US.
In review: Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1. Test model provided by Asus US.

整体来说,UX305CA相比前代产品Zenbook UX305FA-FB003H并没有太大改变。当然,这不一定是个坏事——除此之外你还能在哪儿找到700美元搭配优秀一体式铝合金机身、酷睿M处理器、8 GB内存,256 GB固态硬盘、全高清屏幕还有不错输入设备的笔记本电脑?当然,UX305CA并不是市场上最快的系统——特别是华硕为它选择了十分激进的降频策略——需要强劲性能的用户最好考虑一下其他设备。这台13.3寸的亚笔记本电脑可以轻松应付文字处理,上网冲浪和相似的应用,而不会变烫或制造任何噪音。遗憾的是它的电池续航时间过短,否则它就可以说是出门旅行的完美设备了。我们还十分希望它能够搭配支持背光的键盘。

在这个价位上,UX305CA-EHM1十分难以超越:它非常轻盈,纤薄,同时设计典雅。它可能不会对所有人都有吸引力,不过仍然是对于在寻找高端超便携设备的用户值得考虑的一个选择。

搭配1080p屏幕的戴尔XPS 13(非触控版本)也是个不错的选择,它售价相比高约50美元,但是仅搭配了4 GB内存和128 GB固态硬盘。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 - 11/24/2015 v4(old)
Bernie Pechlaner

Chassis
86 /  98 → 88%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
53 / 80 → 66%
Weight
73 / 35-78 → 88%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
60 / 68 → 88%
Application Performance
73 / 87 → 84%
Temperature
96 / 91 → 100%
Noise
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Average
76%
85%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 亚笔记本电脑简短评测
Bernie Pechlaner, 2015-12- 5 (Update: 2015-12- 6)