Notebookcheck

华硕 ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer (translated by Delta Zhang), 01/18/2017
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

高续航,低性能。 华硕 ZenFone 3 Max 意在以它的高容量电池给用户留下深刻的印象并满足所有追求长续航的用户的需求。但是,在我们的测试中我们发现,为达到长续航的目的,华硕不得不在其他方面做出妥协。

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Zenfone Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6737 1.25 GHz
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
5.2 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 282 PPI, 电容触摸屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: 最大32GB micro-SD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 距离传感器, 罗盘, USB OTG
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20); bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps (LTE); SAR rate: 0.59 W/kg (head), 0.86 W/kg (body), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.55 x 149.5 x 73.7
Battery
15.6 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 30 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 自动对焦, LED 闪光灯, 录像 @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 后置扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, SIM卡工具, 充电器, USB线缆, USB OTG 接口, ZenCircle, Photocollage, ZenSync, Mobile Manager, 12 Months Warranty, FM 收音机, fanless
Weight
148 g, Power Supply: 48 g
Price
219 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
47.4 MBit/s ∼100%
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
47.1 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG X Power K220
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
53.5 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
49.7 MBit/s ∼93%
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Overview
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Crossing
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Crossing
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Bridge
GPS Asus ZenFone 3 Max – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
431
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 507 cd/m² Average: 474.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 507 cd/m²
Contrast: 957:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.25
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei Y6 II Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
LG X Power K220
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Screen
-1%
-9%
-24%
3%
4%
Brightness
474
566
19%
498
5%
487
3%
291
-39%
352
-26%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
93
9%
92
8%
96
13%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.53
0.57
-8%
0.49
8%
0.9
-70%
0.2
62%
Contrast
957
1028
7%
1051
10%
546
-43%
1905
99%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
4.2
11%
6.2
-32%
6.6
-40%
4.7
-0%
7.3
-55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
6.3
-31%
7.4
-54%
4.9
-2%
3
37%
7.4
-54%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.39 100%
2.28 105%
2.12 113%
2.03 118%
2.26 106%
CCT
6441 101%
6614 98%
8664 75%
7090 92%
6291 103%
8417 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4287 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
72 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 40 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
30365 Points ∼13%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
26169 Points ∼11% -14%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼23% +75%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
33786 Points ∼15% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼12% -10%
LG X Power K220
30432 Points ∼13% 0%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1362 Points ∼5%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1581 Points ∼6% +16%
LG X Power K220
1506 Points ∼6% +11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
569 Points ∼10%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
549 Points ∼10% -4%
LG X Power K220
560 Points ∼10% -2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
699 Points ∼23%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼47% +103%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
873 Points ∼29% +25%
LG X Power K220
854 Points ∼28% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
83 Points ∼2%
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼6% +282%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
100 Points ∼2% +20%
LG X Power K220
102 Points ∼2% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
103 Points ∼3%
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼10% +272%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
124 Points ∼3% +20%
LG X Power K220
127 Points ∼3% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
741 Points ∼25%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
719 Points ∼25% -3%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼49% +91%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
826 Points ∼28% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼24% -4%
LG X Power K220
860 Points ∼29% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
128 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
42 Points ∼1% -67%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% +275%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
167 Points ∼2% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼1% -67%
LG X Power K220
165 Points ∼2% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
157 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
53 Points ∼1% -66%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼11% +259%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼4% +29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1% -66%
LG X Power K220
201 Points ∼4% +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
7298 Points ∼11%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
9043 Points ∼13% +24%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +86%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
9393 Points ∼14% +29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼13% +24%
LG X Power K220
10103 Points ∼15% +38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3369 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3767 Points ∼1% +12%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% +236%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4296 Points ∼1% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1% +14%
LG X Power K220
4330 Points ∼1% +29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3827 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
4328 Points ∼2% +13%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% +207%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4885 Points ∼2% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2% +15%
LG X Power K220
4960 Points ∼3% +30%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
5.9 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5.2 fps ∼0% -12%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼1% +222%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
8.4 fps ∼1% +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0% -12%
LG X Power K220
8.4 fps ∼1% +42%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
10 fps ∼2%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +100%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15 fps ∼3% +50%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼2% -3%
LG X Power K220
15 fps ∼3% +50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2.2 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3.8 fps ∼1% +73%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +259%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2.8 fps ∼1% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0% -18%
LG X Power K220
3.1 fps ∼1% +41%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4.7 fps ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4% +79%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
6.1 fps ∼3% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼2% -19%
LG X Power K220
6.6 fps ∼3% +40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1.4 fps ∼0%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼1% +221%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1.7 fps ∼0% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Power K220
2 fps ∼0% +43%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3.4 fps ∼2%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% +44%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4.1 fps ∼2% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
fps ∼0% -100%
LG X Power K220
4.1 fps ∼2% +21%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2517 Points ∼30%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
3691 Points ∼44% +47%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼62% +103%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
3400 Points ∼41% +35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼50% +64%
LG X Power K220
3759 Points ∼45% +49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
703 Points ∼46%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
544 Points ∼35% -23%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% +1%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼36% -22%
LG X Power K220
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
210 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
317 Points ∼4% +51%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% +288%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
283 Points ∼3% +35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼4% +49%
LG X Power K220
290 Points ∼3% +38%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
780 Points ∼18%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
797 Points ∼19% +2%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼35% +93%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
571 Points ∼13% -27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼15% -18%
LG X Power K220
521 Points ∼12% -33%
System (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1041 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
1088 Points ∼17% +5%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% +150%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1093 Points ∼17% +5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼16% +2%
LG X Power K220
1092 Points ∼17% +5%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
588 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
622 Points ∼17% +6%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼33% +108%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼5% -65%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼16% -1%
LG X Power K220
200 Points ∼5% -66%

Legend

 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
2534 Points ∼5%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
2685 Points ∼5% +6%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼8% +65%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
2805 Points ∼6% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
2730 Points ∼6% +8%
LG X Power K220 (Chrome 52)
2657 Points ∼5% +5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
14983 ms * ∼25%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
13524.7 ms * ∼23% +10%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +39%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
13234 ms * ∼22% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
13046 ms * ∼22% +13%
LG X Power K220 (Chrome 52)
13196 ms * ∼22% +12%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
35 Points ∼6%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
73 Points ∼13% +109%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
50 Points ∼9% +43%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼8% +34%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL (Chrome 55)
16.471 Points ∼0%
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL (Chrome Version 50)
17.533 Points ∼0% +6%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼0% +70%
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Chrome 50)
18.304 Points ∼0% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Chrome 50)
16.8 Points ∼0% +2%
LG X Power K220 (Chrome 52)
18.133 Points ∼0% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TLAsus ZenFone Max ZC550KLHonor 5CHuawei Y6 II CompactSamsung Galaxy J5 2016LG X Power K220
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
54%
7%
25%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
29.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-36%
24.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-18%
17.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-42%
46.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
58%
18.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
47.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
38.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
51.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
9%
31.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-34%
79.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
67%
32.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-33%
Random Write 4KB
9.1
3.6
-60%
15.7
73%
15.5
70%
11.6
27%
7.32
-20%
Random Read 4KB
20.9
9.1
-56%
61.7
195%
23
10%
21
0%
18.78
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
65.15
31.1
-52%
75.5
16%
75
15%
72
11%
43.74
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB
174.2
130.6
-25%
263
51%
211
21%
147
-16%
196.81
13%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high15 fps
 very low28 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high27 fps
Max. Load
 36.8 °C37 °C40.4 °C 
 36.9 °C36.1 °C40.3 °C 
 36.1 °C35.8 °C39.2 °C 
Maximum: 40.4 °C
Average: 37.6 °C
33.5 °C34.2 °C35.3 °C
34 °C34 °C35.5 °C
33.9 °C33.7 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6412525.4413125.335.44032.930.55033.633.36331.627.78028.429.61002727.512520.824.21602229.220021.326.725020.834.731521.242.940019.44950019.555.363017.760.880017.967.4100017.874.8125017.379.1160017.479200016.777.3250017.276.2315018.274.1400017.973.5500017.676.6630017.775.4800017.8781000017.9791250018.166.51600018.258.6SPL3088N1.368.5median 17.9Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TLmedian 67.4Delta1.316.631.653.425.432.925.33032.937.233.640.631.640.428.432.42729.220.823.82222.521.327.720.834.621.240.619.448.919.55517.760.417.969.217.874.917.380.117.477.116.773.717.27518.275.517.974.217.674.917.778.717.882.717.97718.166.818.264.83088.51.371.5median 17.9LG X Power K220median 69.21.315.537.727.732.437.722.330.631.322.326.529.131.726.52931.4262932.337.239.432.32927.736.22924.627.628.624.623.223.425.423.228.321.821.328.330.823.223.330.834.52422.534.537.222.922.437.242.126.921.342.147.428.218.447.456.236.117.556.262.641.517.562.670.848.617.270.875.853.716.875.872.450.217.372.470.548.117.470.568.146.716.668.167.245.117.367.268.547.217.668.570.949.417.670.974.953.217.774.976.554.417.476.576.354.717.776.365.242.617.965.251.330.718.151.346.826.118.146.884.162.229.884.156.714.71.356.7median 65.2Samsung Galaxy J5 2016median 42.6median 17.7median 65.213.911.21.613.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.04 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

LG X Power K220 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.39 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.74 / 2.04 / 2.22 Watt
Load midlight 5.57 / 6.59 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Power Consumption
-9%
8%
28%
38%
28%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
1.15
-55%
0.89
-20%
0.57
23%
0.61
18%
0.64
14%
Idle Average *
2.04
2.09
-2%
2.07
-1%
1.53
25%
1.41
31%
1.3
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.22
2.17
2%
2.15
3%
1.6
28%
1.51
32%
1.34
40%
Load Average *
5.57
5.38
3%
3.46
38%
2.82
49%
2.56
54%
4.18
25%
Load Maximum *
6.59
6.08
8%
5.18
21%
5.69
14%
3.1
53%
4.87
26%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 22min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
13h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 01min
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
5000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3100 mAh
LG X Power K220
4100 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-34%
-22%
0%
21%
Reader / Idle
1462
997
-32%
1175
-20%
1599
9%
Load
301
156
-48%
222
-26%
402
34%
365
21%
WiFi v1.3
814
959
18%
584
-28%
623
-23%
643
-21%
987
21%
H.264
845
602
-29%
682
-19%
658
-22%

Pros

+ 坚固纤薄金属机身
+ 优秀的内存配置
+ USB OTG
+ 双SIM卡
+ 相对较快的GPS
+ 低运行温度
+ 出色电池续航能力
+ 低功耗
+ 相对较亮而不泛蓝的屏幕

Cons

- 只有12个月的保修
- 过时的安全更新
- 一些尴尬的软件
- 扬声器有撞击异声
- 低麦克风音量
- 有时性能较低
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Max. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ZenFone 3 Max. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany.

华硕 ZenFone 3 Max  实现了它最重要的承诺:它的电池续航时间真的很长。尽管这很令人愉悦,但我们还是不得不说LG X Power甚至拥有更长的续航时间。我们很喜欢评测样机的外壳:在这个价位上它的制造工艺是极好的,但它也没能从众多的智能手机当中脱颖而出。它的优点还包括:出色的屏幕,低待机功耗和低运行温度。

我们对性能表现并不那么满意。这台设备的运行速度相较于它的竞争对手来说在各方面都相对较慢。这可能和华硕的 ZenUI 界面有关系? 它只合适特定的3D游戏,复杂一些的网站都能够成为问题。

ZenFone 3 Max 在它的价位上提供了很好的内存配置,支持双卡,且轻而薄。对于那些看重续航时间的用户来说,这台手机是一个不错的选择。

和上一代的ZenFone Max相比,我们的评测样机在很多方面都做得更好,尽管牺牲了一部分的续航时间。华硕 ZenFone 3 Max 是一次成功的更新换代,对于它自身来说,他主要合适那些追求续航时间的的用户。其余用户会发现他们在相机,扬声器和通话质量上做出了妥协,但这在这个价格区间也不是不常见。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL - 01/02/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
64 / 75 → 85%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
36 / 60 → 61%
Weight
93%
Battery
96%
Display
84%
Games Performance
6 / 63 → 10%
Application Performance
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 53%
Camera
65%
Average
68%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 ZenFone 3 Max ZC520TL 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2017-01-18)