Notebookcheck

华为 Y6 II Compact 智能手机简短评测

低价的诱惑。 华为认为“售价总还可以降低”,因而降低了Y6 II Compact的定价。这会让消费者感兴趣吗?
Florian Wimmer, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Huawei Y6 II Compact (Y Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距感应器,加速感应器,指南针, WiFi Direct, DLNA, USB OTG, FM 收音机
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20); 带宽 (下载/​上传): 150 MBps / ​50 MBps (LTE), 42 MBps / ​11.5 MBps (UMTS); 辐射值: 0.36 W/kg (耳部), 1.23 W/kg (身体), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.95 x 144.2 x 72.5
Battery
8.4 Wh, 2200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 160 h
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 自动对焦,双LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED闪光灯
Additional features
Speakers: 位于底部的扬声器, Keyboard: 触控键盘, designs, phone manager, HiCare, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
140 g, Power Supply: 46 g
Price
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100% +539%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100% +539%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼16% +5%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s ∼16%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100% +453%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
151 MBit/s ∼52% +188%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼20% +11%
Huawei Y6 II Compact
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.4 MBit/s ∼18%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Underpass
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Overview
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Overview
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Crossing
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Crossing
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Underpass
GPS Huawei Y6 II Compact – Underpass

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
472
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 503 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 486.9 cd/m² Minimum: 15.92 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 546:1 (Black: 0.9 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
Gamma: 2.12
Huawei Y6 II Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
LG K10
IPS, 1280x720, 5.30
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
7%
22%
14%
-5%
Brightness middle
491
370
-25%
375
-24%
515
5%
295
-40%
Brightness
487
355
-27%
376
-23%
498
2%
299
-39%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
91
-1%
93
1%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.9
0.28
69%
0.32
64%
0.49
46%
Contrast
546
1321
142%
1172
115%
1051
92%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.6
6.7
-2%
6
9%
6.2
6%
5.8
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.9
17.8
-38%
9.5
26%
11.4
12%
8.6
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
7.9
-61%
4.5
8%
7.4
-51%
4.8
2%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
1.84 120%
CCT
7090 92%
9072 72%
6975 93%
8664 75%
6252 104%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17031 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
33786 Points ∼12%
LG K10
27383 Points ∼9% -19%
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points ∼8% -30%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼18% +57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points ∼8% -27%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4885 Points ∼2%
LG K10
4339 Points ∼2% -11%
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points ∼2% -13%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼4% +141%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points ∼1% -28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4296 Points ∼1%
LG K10
3774 Points ∼1% -12%
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points ∼1% -10%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% +163%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points ∼0% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
9393 Points ∼10%
LG K10
9106 Points ∼9% -3%
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points ∼7% -30%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼14% +45%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points ∼9% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼2%
LG K10
52 Points ∼0% -74%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼5% +177%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
167 Points ∼1%
LG K10
41 Points ∼0% -75%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼3% +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
826 Points ∼15%
LG K10
730 Points ∼13% -12%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼26% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
192 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
157 Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
848 Points ∼12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
124 Points ∼1%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼2% +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
100 Points ∼1%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼3% +217%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
873 Points ∼15%
LG K10
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼24% +62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15 fps ∼0%
LG K10
9.7 fps ∼0% -35%
HTC Desire 530
8.9 fps ∼0% -41%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼1% +33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps ∼0% -49%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
8.4 fps ∼0%
LG K10
5.2 fps ∼0% -38%
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps ∼0% -43%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼0% +126%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps ∼0% -45%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
6.1 fps ∼2%
LG K10
4.1 fps ∼1% -33%
HTC Desire 530
4 fps ∼1% -34%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼2% +38%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2.8 fps ∼0%
LG K10
1.8 fps ∼0% -36%
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps ∼0% -39%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +182%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
4.1 fps ∼0%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼0% +20%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1.7 fps ∼0%
LG K10
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼0% +165%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
3400 Points ∼17%
LG K10
3999 Points ∼20% +18%
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points ∼15% -14%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼26% +51%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3350 Points ∼17% -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
203 Points ∼2%
LG K10
536 Points ∼6% +164%
HTC Desire 530
149 Points ∼2% -27%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼14% +503%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points ∼5% +108%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1093 Points ∼6%
LG K10
1050 Points ∼5% -4%
HTC Desire 530
742 Points ∼4% -32%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼13% +138%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points ∼6% +4%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
571 Points ∼6%
LG K10
453 Points ∼5% -21%
HTC Desire 530
300 Points ∼3% -47%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼17% +163%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points ∼3% -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
283 Points ∼1%
LG K10
310 Points ∼1% +10%
HTC Desire 530
231 Points ∼1% -18%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼3% +188%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points ∼1% -44%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
10 Points ∼0%
LG K10
562 Points ∼23% +5520%
HTC Desire 530
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼30% +6970%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points ∼24% +5590%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
549 Points ∼8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
1581 Points ∼4%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
795 Points ∼6%

Legend

 
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
13234 ms * ∼22%
LG K10
16638 ms * ∼28% -26%
HTC Desire 530
17470.6 ms * ∼29% -32%
Honor 5C
9111.2 ms * ∼15% +31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13701.5 ms * ∼23% -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2805 Points ∼4%
LG K10
2838 Points ∼4% +1%
HTC Desire 530
1796 Points ∼3% -36%
Honor 5C
4188 Points ∼6% +49%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points ∼4% +1%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
50 Points ∼6%
LG K10
47 Points ∼6% -6%
HTC Desire 530
34 Points ∼4% -32%
Honor 5C
73 Points ∼9% +46%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
39 Points ∼5% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
18.304 Points ∼4%
LG K10
17.478 Points ∼4% -5%
HTC Desire 530
12.1 Points ∼3% -34%
Honor 5C
27.934 Points ∼7% +53%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points ∼4% -11%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
211 MB/s ∼10%
LG K10
131 MB/s ∼6% -38%
HTC Desire 530
126.99 MB/s ∼6% -40%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s ∼13% +25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.42 MB/s ∼3% -69%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
75 MB/s ∼5%
LG K10
78 MB/s ∼5% +4%
HTC Desire 530
55.76 MB/s ∼4% -26%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s ∼5% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s ∼3% -45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
23 MB/s ∼6%
LG K10
9.2 MB/s ∼2% -60%
HTC Desire 530
11.82 MB/s ∼3% -49%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s ∼17% +168%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s ∼5% -27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
15.5 MB/s ∼4%
LG K10
7.5 MB/s ∼2% -52%
HTC Desire 530
8.96 MB/s ∼2% -42%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s ∼4% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s ∼3% -39%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
31.57 MB/s ∼21%
LG K10
75.47 MB/s ∼49% +139%
HTC Desire 530
35.56 MB/s ∼23% +13%
Honor 5C
51.93 MB/s ∼34% +64%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
20.82 MB/s ∼14% -34%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact
17.12 MB/s ∼20%
LG K10
45 MB/s ∼52% +163%
HTC Desire 530
18.22 MB/s ∼21% +6%
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s ∼28% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
18.7 MB/s ∼21% +9%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high24 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high29 fps
Max. Load
 40.5 °C41.8 °C44.7 °C 
 40.1 °C40.5 °C45 °C 
 39.5 °C39.9 °C42.9 °C 
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 41.7 °C
41.2 °C41.5 °C42.2 °C
40.1 °C41 °C41 °C
40.2 °C40.6 °C40.7 °C
Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.436.92531.3343131.733.8402632.85039.434.76336.231.28028.627.910025.424.412521.324.816023.325.920022.530.525022.437.131521.340.240018.444.850017.551.963017.555.680017.261.1100016.867.5125017.368.8160017.465200016.673.6250017.375.5315017.676.1400017.679.2500017.779.5630017.475.7800017.7711000017.967.31250018.161.51600018.142.9SPL29.886.4N1.356.8median 17.7median 61.5Delta1.616.635.432.335.235.428.226.137.828.228.63028.428.630.629.833.830.637.53739.537.529.329.434.329.328.426.927.328.432.229.130.832.238.426.526.238.441.22323.841.246.227.322.946.252.23322.452.2573819.95759.641.220.459.666.748.418.766.768.25117.768.270.25317.970.272.957.21872.973.857.117.873.873.255.11773.276.758.216.976.777.558.217.477.579.359.217.879.377.757.117.577.775.254.217.375.27858.817.3787253.4187264.646.318.364.663.245.517.963.253.33617.953.387.568.330.187.569.722.11.469.7median 68.2median 51median 17.9median 68.210.711.12.410.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Y6 II CompactSamsung Galaxy S7
Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.37 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.53 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 2.82 / 5.69 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Power Consumption
8%
-28%
-79%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.96
-68%
0.89
-56%
1.58
-177%
Idle Average *
1.53
1.14
25%
2.07
-35%
2.59
-69%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.23
23%
2.15
-34%
2.66
-66%
Load Average *
2.82
2.45
13%
3.46
-23%
5.22
-85%
Load Maximum *
5.69
2.92
49%
5.18
9%
5.67
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 42min
Huawei Y6 II Compact
2200 mAh
LG K10
2300 mAh
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
-14%
-16%
17%
Reader / Idle
1175
1123
-4%
1117
-5%
997
-15%
1212
3%
H.264
682
603
-12%
457
-33%
602
-12%
590
-13%
WiFi v1.3
623
453
-27%
425
-32%
584
-6%
502
-19%
Load
222
231
4%
250
13%
156
-30%
433
95%

Pros

+ 不错的机身工艺
+ 低售价
+ 双SIM卡
+ 优秀的触控屏幕
+ 非常明亮的屏幕
+ 优秀的可视角度稳定性
+ 相对较高的性能
+ 优秀的电池续航
+ 高速内部闪存

Cons

- 屏幕对比度较低...
- ...和不准确的色彩还原
- 安卓系统版本较老
- 相机成像模糊
- 扬声器效果差
- microSD读卡器速度慢
- 充电时间长
In review: Huawei Y6 II Compact. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Huawei Y6 II Compact. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

华为的Y6 II Compact有三个非常清晰的核心竞争力:性能,电池续航和售价。我们的测试机在这三个方面表现都十分优秀,不过其他方面像是较弱的相机和低对比度屏幕都不能算是吸引人。

尽管它的机身采用了塑料材质,但有纹理的机背和高品质工艺给了它十足的质感。同时,一些额外功能如双SIM卡、microSD卡槽、USB OTG、收音机和LTE都一应俱全。而较差的扬声器、过时的操作系统和高发热量则背道而驰。

华为这台机型的设计重点很明显——高性价比和优秀电池续航。不过,这台智能手机的其他方面都有所欠缺,其中有几项让人不免难以接受。

喜欢它简洁设计,或者只是需要一台性能优秀、性价比高的智能手机的用户都可以考虑华为的Y6 II Compact。不过,请不要对它的相机期待太高,同样也请也不要期待得到色彩绚丽的屏幕或者优秀的扬声器。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Huawei Y6 II Compact - 09/13/2016 v5.1(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
71%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
41 / 60 → 68%
Weight
93%
Battery
93%
Display
82%
Games Performance
9 / 63 → 15%
Application Performance
31 / 70 → 45%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
44 / 91 → 48%
Camera
56%
Average
66%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 Y6 II Compact 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2016-09-19 (Update: 2016-09-24)