HTC Desire 530 智能手机简短评测

Name: HTC Desire 530
Brand: HTC

每个人的Desire？HTC为200欧元（约1482人民币）价位手机市场带来了一款新机型。Desire 530希望凭借独特的设计，不错的相机和罕见的优秀音效征服消费者。我们的测试将会告诉你它是否可以凭入门级硬件实现宣传的性能表现。

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 06/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HTC Desire 530 (Desire Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 4 x 1.1 GHz, Cortex-A7

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 304

Memory

1536 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 9.99 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速传感器，近距传感器，陀螺仪, WiFi Direct, nano-SIM

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM 四频 (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G 四频 (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28), Cat4 (最大 150 Mbit/s 下载, 51 Mbit/s 上传), 身体辐射值: 0.314 W/gg, 头部辐射值: 0.375 W/kg, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 146.9 x 70.9

Battery

8.36 Wh, 2200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 14 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 696 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.4, 720p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (定焦 f/2.8, 720p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 前置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，USB数据线，入耳式耳机，腕带, News Republic, Facebook & Facebook Messenger, Instagram, ZOE Video Editor, Themes, HTC Club, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

140 g, Power Supply: 58 g

Price

219 EUR

Links

HTC homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

HTC Desire 530

Huawei P9

iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

HTC Desire 530

Huawei P9

iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

HTC Desire 530

Huawei P9

iPhone 6S Plus

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


354 cd/m²	370 cd/m²	385 cd/m²
383 cd/m²	375 cd/m²	380 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	372 cd/m²	382 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 376.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.82 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 375 cd/m²
Contrast: 1172:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.26
CCT: 6975 K

	HTC Desire 530 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5"	Huawei P8 lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	ZTE Blade V6 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	LG Class IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Microsoft Lumia 650 OLED, 1280x720, 5"
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	375	295 -21%	365 -3%	336 -10%	518 38%	349 -7%
Brightness (cd/m²)	376	299 -20%	353 -6%	315 -16%	492 31%	353 -6%
Brightness Distribution (%)	91	96 5%	93 2%	81 -11%	91 0%	92 1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.32		0.42 -31%	0.39 -22%	0.51 -59%
Contrast (:1)	1172		869 -26%	862 -26%	1016 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6	5.8 3%	5.2 13%	8.29 -38%	5.41 10%	2.6 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.5	8.6 9%			8.76 8%	8.2 14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.5	4.8 -7%	5.85 -30%	8.57 -90%	7.67 -70%	1.8 60%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	1.84 ^120%	2.17 ^101%	1.96 ^112%	2.19 ^100%	2.06 ^107%
CCT	6975 ^93%	6252 ^104%	7252 ^90%	8172 ^80%	8521 ^76%	6542 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%)			70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%)			91.25	89.7

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	2922 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3350 Points +15%
Huawei P8 lite	3717 Points +27%
LG Class	3803 Points +30%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	23561 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	24748 Points +5%
Microsoft Lumia 650	31844 Points +35%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	1007 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	1280 Points +27%
ZTE Blade V6	1807 Points +79%
LG Class	1442 Points +43%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	298 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	405 Points +36%
ZTE Blade V6	626 Points +110%
LG Class	482 Points +62%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	10 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	569 Points +5590%
Huawei P8 lite	616 Points +6060%
ZTE Blade V6	699 Points +6890%
LG Class	696 Points +6860%
Microsoft Lumia 650	546 Points +5360%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	231 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	158 Points -32%
Huawei P8 lite	303 Points +31%
ZTE Blade V6	287 Points +24%
LG Class	312 Points +35%
Microsoft Lumia 650	207 Points -10%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	742 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	1134 Points +53%
Huawei P8 lite	1467 Points +98%
ZTE Blade V6	1200 Points +62%
LG Class	1068 Points +44%
Microsoft Lumia 650	552 Points -26%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	149 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	423 Points +184%
Huawei P8 lite	687 Points +361%
ZTE Blade V6	687 Points +361%
LG Class	561 Points +277%
Microsoft Lumia 650	435 Points +192%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	8.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	7.6 fps -15%
Huawei P8 lite	15.3 fps +72%
ZTE Blade V6	15 fps +69%
LG Class	5.2 fps -42%
Microsoft Lumia 650	5.67 fps -36%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	4.6 fps -4%
Huawei P8 lite	9.9 fps +106%
ZTE Blade V6	8.5 fps +77%
LG Class	9.8 fps +104%
Microsoft Lumia 650	3.25 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	1.7 fps
ZTE Blade V6	2.8 fps +65%
LG Class	1.8 fps +6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4 fps
ZTE Blade V6	5.8 fps +45%
LG Class	4.1 fps +3%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4261 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3535 Points -17%
Huawei P8 lite	5629 Points +32%
ZTE Blade V6	5013 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	3871 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3037 Points -22%
Huawei P8 lite	5167 Points +33%
ZTE Blade V6	4415 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	6583 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	8322 Points +26%
Huawei P8 lite	8206 Points +25%
ZTE Blade V6	9542 Points +45%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	5756 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	7751 Points +35%
Huawei P8 lite	7238 Points +26%
ZTE Blade V6	8390 Points +46%
LG Class	8969 Points +56%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4189 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3453 Points -18%
Huawei P8 lite	5732 Points +37%
ZTE Blade V6	5677 Points +36%
LG Class	4740 Points +13%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	4459 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3938 Points -12%
Huawei P8 lite	6010 Points +35%
ZTE Blade V6	6116 Points +37%
LG Class	5295 Points +19%

Legend

HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	17471 ms *
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	13702 ms * +22%
Huawei P8 lite	15866 ms * +9%
ZTE Blade V6	25141 ms * -44%
LG Class	13980 ms * +20%
Microsoft Lumia 650	18237 ms * -4%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	1796 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	2842 Points +58%
Huawei P8 lite	2483 Points +38%
ZTE Blade V6	2978 Points +66%
LG Class	3028 Points +69%
Microsoft Lumia 650	2574 Points +43%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	34 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	39 Points +15%
Huawei P8 lite	47 Points +38%
LG Class	57 Points +68%
Microsoft Lumia 650	52 Points +53%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	12.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	16.2 Points +34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	8.96 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	9.43 MB/s +5%
Huawei P8 lite	8.32 MB/s -7%
ZTE Blade V6	3.66 MB/s -59%
LG Class	7.7 MB/s -14%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	11.82 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	16.82 MB/s +42%
Huawei P8 lite	18.46 MB/s +56%
ZTE Blade V6	27.08 MB/s +129%
LG Class	9.67 MB/s -18%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	55.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	41.4 MB/s -26%
Huawei P8 lite	52.8 MB/s -5%
ZTE Blade V6	37.37 MB/s -33%
LG Class	74.1 MB/s +33%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	127 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	64.4 MB/s -49%
Huawei P8 lite	139.5 MB/s +10%
ZTE Blade V6	269.3 MB/s +112%
LG Class	128.6 MB/s +1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	18.22 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	18.7 MB/s +3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	35.56 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	20.82 MB/s -41%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530	300 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	315 Points +5%
Huawei P8 lite	816 Points +172%
ZTE Blade V6	922 Points +207%
LG Class	427 Points +42%
Microsoft Lumia 650	575 Points +92%

Real Racing 3
	Settings	Value
	high	20 fps
	low	42 fps

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	13 fps
	very low	21 fps

Max. Load

Idle


37.1 °C	37 °C	36.8 °C
37.2 °C	37 °C	36.4 °C
35.8 °C	36.8 °C	34.5 °C

Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 36.5 °C


33.5 °C	36.3 °C	38.3 °C
33.5 °C	36.3 °C	38.4 °C
32.1 °C	36.1 °C	37.1 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 35.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.73 Watt
Idle	1.58 / 2.59 / 2.66 Watt
Load	5.22 / 5.67 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V6 2200 mAh	LG Class 2050 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Power Consumption		50%	9%	21%	22%	44%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.58	0.96 39%	1.4 11%	1.2 24%	1.2 24%	0.7 56%
Idle Average * (Watt)	2.59	1.14 56%	2.3 11%	1.8 31%	1.9 27%	1.1 58%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.66	1.23 54%	2.5 6%	2.1 21%	2.2 17%	1.18 56%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.22	2.45 53%	3.9 25%	4.1 21%	3.1 41%	4.04 23%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	5.67	2.92 49%	6 -6%	5.1 10%	5.6 1%	4.07 28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		18h 37min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 50)		7h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 10min

	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh	Huawei P8 lite 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V6 2200 mAh	LG Class 2050 mAh	Microsoft Lumia 650 2000 mAh
Battery runtime		32%	-24%	-8%	1%	-10%
Reader / Idle (h)	18.6	20.2 9%	11.9 -36%		16.3 -12%	15.2 -18%
H.264 (h)	7.6	9.8 29%	6.2 -18%	7.1 -7%	10.5 38%	8.5 12%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	7.1	8.4 18%	5.9 -17%	6.7 -6%	7 -1%	5.8 -18%
Load (h)	4.2	7.2 71%	3.2 -24%	3.8 -10%	3.3 -21%	3.6 -14%

Pros

+ micro-SD卡可用作系统存储

+ 最新安卓Marshmallow系统

+ 准确的触控屏幕

+ 可靠的GPS模组

+ 支持LTE

+ 优秀的耳机通话品质

+ 优秀的耳机音质

+ 不错的电池续航

+ 安卓用户界面体验流畅

Cons

- 总体性能不足平均水平

- 相对笨重的机身

- 主相机品质一般

- 麦克风在免提模式下音量较小

- 无线网络仅支持2.4 GHz频段

- 不支持Miracast，MHL或USB OTG

- 无LED指示灯

- 不可更换电池

- 屏幕的可视角度稳定性一般

In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

不论HTC在设计上作出的尝试多么独特，Desire 530能否受到欢迎还要看用户的个人喜好了。除此之外，它的机身品质和实体按键都可以让人满意。不过由于材质的选择所限，它可能很难给人高品质的质感，特别是它作为5寸设备略显笨拙。它搭配了最新的操作系统，支持micro-SD卡扩展，也提供了不错的电池续航，这些都是它的优势。不过，遗憾的是这台设备在相机和屏幕可视角度稳定性上都表现一般。另外，它的整体性能相比同类设备略低。

HTC的Desire 530为份额很大的实惠型安卓设备市场增添了一份不同的色彩。不过这款智能手机在技术参数上几乎没有任何亮点。除非用户喜欢它的独特设计或者新颖的安卓界面，它可能很难在竞争中占据优势。

我们在评测中对比的一些设备都是Desire 530的潜在对手。三星 Galaxy J3 (2016) 目前售价150欧元（约1111人民币），相比这台测试机低35欧元（约259人民币）。它同样有长电池续航，出色的AMOLED屏幕和可更换电池。另一方面，用户将无法得到光线传感器和最新的安卓系统。如果性能更加重要，那么中兴 Blade V6和华为 P8 lite等中端机型则更值得参考。它们的售价已经相比上市时有了大幅降低。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HTC Desire 530 - 06/22/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis

79%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

39 / 60 → 64%

Weight

93%