Notebookcheck Logo

HTC Desire 530 智能手机简短评测

每个人的Desire?HTC为200欧元(约1482人民币)价位手机市场带来了一款新机型。Desire 530希望凭借独特的设计,不错的相机和罕见的优秀音效征服消费者。我们的测试将会告诉你它是否可以凭入门级硬件实现宣传的性能表现。
ARM Android Touchscreen Smartphone
HTC Desire 530 (Desire Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 4 x 1.1 GHz, Cortex-A7
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 304
Memory
1536 MB 
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.99 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速传感器,近距传感器,陀螺仪, WiFi Direct, nano-SIM
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM 四频 (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G 四频 (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28), Cat4 (最大 150 Mbit/s 下载, 51 Mbit/s 上传), 身体辐射值: 0.314 W/gg, 头部辐射值: 0.375 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 146.9 x 70.9
Battery
8.36 Wh, 2200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 14 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 696 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.4, 720p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (定焦 f/2.8, 720p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 前置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,入耳式耳机,腕带, News Republic, Facebook & Facebook Messenger, Instagram, ZOE Video Editor, Themes, HTC Club, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
140 g, Power Supply: 58 g
Price
219 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front
Front
Front
Speaker
Rear
Rear
Primary camera
Card slots
Card slots
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Route
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning point
HTC Desire 530 - Route
HTC Desire 530 - Route
HTC Desire 530 - Underpass
HTC Desire 530 - Underpass
HTC Desire 530 - Turning point
HTC Desire 530 - Turning point
Camera app: Modes
Camera app: Modes
Camera app: Photo
Camera app: Photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
354
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 376.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.82 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 375 cd/m²
Contrast: 1172:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.26
HTC Desire 530
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.00
Huawei P8 lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
ZTE Blade V6
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
LG Class
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Microsoft Lumia 650
OLED, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
Brightness middle
375
295
-21%
365
-3%
336
-10%
518
38%
349
-7%
Brightness
376
299
-20%
353
-6%
315
-16%
492
31%
353
-6%
Brightness Distribution
91
96
5%
93
2%
81
-11%
91
0%
92
1%
Black Level *
0.32
0.42
-31%
0.39
-22%
0.51
-59%
Contrast
1172
869
-26%
862
-26%
1016
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6
5.8
3%
5.2
13%
8.29
-38%
5.41
10%
2.6
57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.5
8.6
9%
8.76
8%
8.2
14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
4.8
-7%
5.85
-30%
8.57
-90%
7.67
-70%
1.8
60%
Gamma
2.26 97%
1.84 120%
2.17 101%
1.96 112%
2.19 100%
2.06 107%
CCT
6975 93%
6252 104%
7252 90%
8172 80%
8521 76%
6542 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25
89.7

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
2922 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3350 Points +15%
Huawei P8 lite
3717 Points +27%
LG Class
3803 Points +30%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
23561 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
24748 Points +5%
Microsoft Lumia 650
31844 Points +35%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1007 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1280 Points +27%
ZTE Blade V6
1807 Points +79%
LG Class
1442 Points +43%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
298 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
405 Points +36%
ZTE Blade V6
626 Points +110%
LG Class
482 Points +62%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
10 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
569 Points +5590%
Huawei P8 lite
616 Points +6060%
ZTE Blade V6
699 Points +6890%
LG Class
696 Points +6860%
Microsoft Lumia 650
546 Points +5360%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
231 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
158 Points -32%
Huawei P8 lite
303 Points +31%
ZTE Blade V6
287 Points +24%
LG Class
312 Points +35%
Microsoft Lumia 650
207 Points -10%
System (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
742 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
1134 Points +53%
Huawei P8 lite
1467 Points +98%
ZTE Blade V6
1200 Points +62%
LG Class
1068 Points +44%
Microsoft Lumia 650
552 Points -26%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
149 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
423 Points +184%
Huawei P8 lite
687 Points +361%
ZTE Blade V6
687 Points +361%
LG Class
561 Points +277%
Microsoft Lumia 650
435 Points +192%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
8.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7.6 fps -15%
Huawei P8 lite
15.3 fps +72%
ZTE Blade V6
15 fps +69%
LG Class
5.2 fps -42%
Microsoft Lumia 650
5.67 fps -36%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
4.6 fps -4%
Huawei P8 lite
9.9 fps +106%
ZTE Blade V6
8.5 fps +77%
LG Class
9.8 fps +104%
Microsoft Lumia 650
3.25 fps -32%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1.7 fps
ZTE Blade V6
2.8 fps +65%
LG Class
1.8 fps +6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4 fps
ZTE Blade V6
5.8 fps +45%
LG Class
4.1 fps +3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4261 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3535 Points -17%
Huawei P8 lite
5629 Points +32%
ZTE Blade V6
5013 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
3871 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3037 Points -22%
Huawei P8 lite
5167 Points +33%
ZTE Blade V6
4415 Points +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
6583 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8322 Points +26%
Huawei P8 lite
8206 Points +25%
ZTE Blade V6
9542 Points +45%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
5756 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
7751 Points +35%
Huawei P8 lite
7238 Points +26%
ZTE Blade V6
8390 Points +46%
LG Class
8969 Points +56%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4189 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3453 Points -18%
Huawei P8 lite
5732 Points +37%
ZTE Blade V6
5677 Points +36%
LG Class
4740 Points +13%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
4459 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
3938 Points -12%
Huawei P8 lite
6010 Points +35%
ZTE Blade V6
6116 Points +37%
LG Class
5295 Points +19%

Legend

 
HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V6 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG Class Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
17471 ms *
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
13702 ms * +22%
Huawei P8 lite
15866 ms * +9%
ZTE Blade V6
25141 ms * -44%
LG Class
13980 ms * +20%
Microsoft Lumia 650
18237 ms * -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
1796 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2842 Points +58%
Huawei P8 lite
2483 Points +38%
ZTE Blade V6
2978 Points +66%
LG Class
3028 Points +69%
Microsoft Lumia 650
2574 Points +43%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
34 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
39 Points +15%
Huawei P8 lite
47 Points +38%
LG Class
57 Points +68%
Microsoft Lumia 650
52 Points +53%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
12.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.2 Points +34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
8.96 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.43 MB/s +5%
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s -7%
ZTE Blade V6
3.66 MB/s -59%
LG Class
7.7 MB/s -14%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
11.82 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
16.82 MB/s +42%
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s +56%
ZTE Blade V6
27.08 MB/s +129%
LG Class
9.67 MB/s -18%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
55.8 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
41.4 MB/s -26%
Huawei P8 lite
52.8 MB/s -5%
ZTE Blade V6
37.37 MB/s -33%
LG Class
74.1 MB/s +33%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
127 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
64.4 MB/s -49%
Huawei P8 lite
139.5 MB/s +10%
ZTE Blade V6
269.3 MB/s +112%
LG Class
128.6 MB/s +1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
18.22 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
18.7 MB/s +3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
35.56 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
20.82 MB/s -41%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
HTC Desire 530
300 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
315 Points +5%
Huawei P8 lite
816 Points +172%
ZTE Blade V6
922 Points +207%
LG Class
427 Points +42%
Microsoft Lumia 650
575 Points +92%
Real Racing 3
 SettingsValue
 high20 fps
 low42 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high13 fps
 very low21 fps
Max. Load
 37.1 °C37 °C36.8 °C 
 37.2 °C37 °C36.4 °C 
 35.8 °C36.8 °C34.5 °C 
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
33.5 °C36.3 °C38.3 °C
33.5 °C36.3 °C38.4 °C
32.1 °C36.1 °C37.1 °C
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Heat map HTC Desire 530 front
Heamap HTC Desire 530 rear
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.73 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.58 / 2.59 / 2.66 Watt
Load midlight 5.22 / 5.67 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2200 mAh
LG Class
2050 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Power Consumption
50%
9%
21%
22%
44%
Idle Minimum *
1.58
0.96
39%
1.4
11%
1.2
24%
1.2
24%
0.7
56%
Idle Average *
2.59
1.14
56%
2.3
11%
1.8
31%
1.9
27%
1.1
58%
Idle Maximum *
2.66
1.23
54%
2.5
6%
2.1
21%
2.2
17%
1.18
56%
Load Average *
5.22
2.45
53%
3.9
25%
4.1
21%
3.1
41%
4.04
23%
Load Maximum *
5.67
2.92
49%
6
-6%
5.1
10%
5.6
1%
4.07
28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 37min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 50)
7h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 10min
HTC Desire 530
2200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
2600 mAh
Huawei P8 lite
2200 mAh
ZTE Blade V6
2200 mAh
LG Class
2050 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
2000 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
-24%
-7%
0%
-10%
Reader / Idle
1117
1212
9%
715
-36%
976
-13%
910
-19%
H.264
457
590
29%
369
-19%
424
-7%
628
37%
510
12%
WiFi v1.3
425
502
18%
351
-17%
400
-6%
422
-1%
345
-19%
Load
250
433
73%
194
-22%
230
-8%
196
-22%
213
-15%

Pros

+ micro-SD卡可用作系统存储
+ 最新安卓Marshmallow系统
+ 准确的触控屏幕
+ 可靠的GPS模组
+ 支持LTE
+ 优秀的耳机通话品质
+ 优秀的耳机音质
+ 不错的电池续航
+ 安卓用户界面体验流畅

Cons

- 总体性能不足平均水平
- 相对笨重的机身
- 主相机品质一般
- 麦克风在免提模式下音量较小
- 无线网络仅支持2.4 GHz频段
- 不支持Miracast,MHL或USB OTG
- 无LED指示灯
- 不可更换电池
- 屏幕的可视角度稳定性一般
In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HTC Desire 530. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

不论HTC在设计上作出的尝试多么独特,Desire 530能否受到欢迎还要看用户的个人喜好了。除此之外,它的机身品质和实体按键都可以让人满意。不过由于材质的选择所限,它可能很难给人高品质的质感,特别是它作为5寸设备略显笨拙。它搭配了最新的操作系统,支持micro-SD卡扩展,也提供了不错的电池续航,这些都是它的优势。不过,遗憾的是这台设备在相机和屏幕可视角度稳定性上都表现一般。另外,它的整体性能相比同类设备略低。

HTCDesire 530为份额很大的实惠型安卓设备市场增添了一份不同的色彩。不过这款智能手机在技术参数上几乎没有任何亮点。除非用户喜欢它的独特设计或者新颖的安卓界面,它可能很难在竞争中占据优势。

我们在评测中对比的一些设备都是Desire 530的潜在对手。三星 Galaxy J3 (2016) 目前售价150欧元(约1111人民币),相比这台测试机低35欧元(约259人民币)。它同样有长电池续航,出色的AMOLED屏幕和可更换电池。另一方面,用户将无法得到光线传感器和最新的安卓系统。如果性能更加重要,那么中兴 Blade V6华为 P8 lite等中端机型则更值得参考。它们的售价已经相比上市时有了大幅降低。

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

HTC Desire 530 - 06/22/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
79%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
39 / 60 → 64%
Weight
93%
Battery
89%
Display
82%
Games Performance
5 / 63 → 8%
Application Performance
20 / 70 → 29%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
49 / 91 → 54%
Camera
58%
Average
66%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > HTC Desire 530 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2016-06-30 (Update: 2016-07- 2)