联想 Yoga 910-13IKB 变形本简短评测

Name: Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Brand: Lenovo

银奖。 尽管有着相当高的价格，联想富有野心，长续航的14英寸变形本并没能得到超过90分的分数。尽管如在，这款变形本在很多方面都让我们印象深刻。然而高噪音的风扇系统以及接口的缺乏使得它的得分下降。

Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 01/07/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Tablet Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE (Yoga 910 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1050 MHz, 共享显存, 21.20.16.4481

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 双通道, 板载

Display

13.90 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 317 PPI, 十点触控, AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, IPS, glossy: yes

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, 512 GB

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 14.3 x 323 x 224.5

Battery

78 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4芯, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声 (JBL), Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes

Weight

1.38 kg, Power Supply: 194 g

Price

1699 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	651 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	505 MBit/s -22%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	682 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	526 MBit/s -23%


312 cd/m²	325 cd/m²	298 cd/m²
302 cd/m²	348 cd/m²	287 cd/m²
321 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	277 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 348 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 309.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 348 cd/m²
Contrast: 1392:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 7.86 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 8.25 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
90.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
62.2% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
CCT: 6834 K

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE AU Optronics AUO323D / B139HAN03.2, , 3840x2160, 13.9"	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T AU Optronics AOU272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Chi Mei CMN1367, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14"
Display		4%	3%	-31%
Display P3 Coverage (%)	62.2	64.8 4%	65.4 5%	42.11 -32%
sRGB Coverage (%)	90.1	93.1 3%	90.4 0%	63.3 -30%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)	63.5	66 4%	65.8 4%	43.51 -31%
Response Times		29%	6%	-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	46 ?(14, 32)	29 ?(11, 18) 37%	33.2 ?(16, 17.2) 28%	33.2 ?(14.8, 18.4) 28%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	24 ?(6, 18)	19 ?(7, 12) 21%	28 ?(5.6, 22.4) -17%	31.6 ?(12.8, 18.8) -32%
PWM Frequency (Hz)		50 ?(40)		220 ?(50)
Screen		8%	-1%	-4%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	348	344 -1%	334.6 -4%	238 -32%
Brightness (cd/m²)	310	326 5%	319 3%	243 -22%
Brightness Distribution (%)	80	86 8%	90 13%	88 10%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.25	0.27 -8%	0.336 -34%	0.28 -12%
Contrast (:1)	1392	1274 -8%	996 -28%	850 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.86	5.53 30%	6.21 21%	4.91 38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.43	10.01 25%	12 11%	10.28 23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.25	6.67 19%	7.71 7%	3.72 55%
Gamma	2.05 ^107%	2.43 ^91%	2.36 ^93%	2.54 ^87%
CCT	6834 ^95%	7012 ^93%	6458 ^101%	7091 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%)	58	60 3%	58.6 1%	39.81 -31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%)	90	93 3%	90 0%	62.85 -30%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		14% / 10%	3% / 1%	-12% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 32 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel Core i7-7500U	147 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Intel Core i7-7500U	126 Points -14%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Core i7-6500U	123 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel Core i7-7500U	354 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Core i7-6500U	317 Points -10%
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Intel Core i7-7500U	314 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -19%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

147 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

354 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

49.31 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3795 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3555 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	3435 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S	3034 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4910 Points
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	4315 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Liteonit LCH-256V2S	4199 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3555 points
Help

	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)	HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE Liteonit LCH-256V2S
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-45%	-7%	-51%
Read Seq (MB/s)	1412	452.1 -68%	1376 -3%	499.1 -65%
Write Seq (MB/s)	578	421.3 -27%	571 -1%	287.9 -50%
Read 512 (MB/s)	701	288.6 -59%	679 -3%	283.9 -60%
Write 512 (MB/s)	580	310.7 -46%	571 -2%	287.3 -50%
Read 4k (MB/s)	43.5	28.52 -34%	42.66 -2%	26.38 -39%
Write 4k (MB/s)	159.7	72.1 -55%	137.9 -14%	78.6 -51%
Read 4k QD32 (MB/s)	570	389.6 -32%	535 -6%	301 -47%
Write 4k QD32 (MB/s)	488.7	285.3 -42%	361.2 -26%	250 -49%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512

Sequential Read: 1412 MB/s

Sequential Write: 578 MB/s

512K Read: 701 MB/s

512K Write: 580 MB/s

4K Read: 43.5 MB/s

4K Write: 159.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 570 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 488.7 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1623 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1560 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1489 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1193 Points -26%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	9060 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	7969 Points -12%
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7917 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5310 Points -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1045 Points
HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	964 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	651 Points -38%

3DMark 11 Performance		1801 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7124 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		938 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	15.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	21.8
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	89.6	61.1	24.5	14.3

Noise level

Idle		31.7 / 31.7 / 31.7 dB(A)
Load		38.4 / 34.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.7 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


39.9 °C	40.7 °C	41.4 °C
33 °C	25.6 °C	36 °C
29.8 °C	27.8 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 33.8 °C


29.4 °C	38.5 °C	37.2 °C
34.6 °C	35.1 °C	33.8 °C
30.5 °C	30.5 °C	30.3 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 33.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).

Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.36 / 0.55 Watt
Idle	4.3 / 6.3 / 9 Watt
Load	32.7 / 28.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9"	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit LCH-256V2S, a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption		-14%	-7%	3%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	4.3	6.9 -60%	5.5 -28%	3.6 16%
Idle Average * (Watt)	6.3	7.9 -25%	6.7 -6%	6.9 -10%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	9	8.3 8%	7.1 21%	7.6 16%
Load Average * (Watt)	32.7	30.1 8%	33.1 -1%	28 14%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	28.8	29.6 -3%	35.2 -22%	34.2 -19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 54min

	Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh	HP Spectre x360 13-w023dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 460-20EM000QGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 53 Wh
Battery runtime		-1%	-9%	-28%
Reader / Idle (h)	17.8	19.4 9%	20.6 16%	11.2 -37%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	10.7	9.7 -9%	9.3 -13%	7.6 -29%
Load (h)	2.9	2.8 -3%	2 -31%	2.4 -17%
H.264 (h)				7

Pros

+ 不同模式（平板模式，站立模式）提供了便利性

+ 高端设计以及高端表面材质

+ 抗指纹

+ 坚固的外壳和出色的做工

+ 底壳可以轻松移除

+ 2 x USB Type C

+ 超快 MIMO 2x2 WLAN

+ TPM, 指纹识别

+ 出色的触摸板

+ 高亮度和高对比度的屏幕

+ no PWM

+ fast SSD

+ usable speaker system

+ very frugal, great battery life

Cons

- 贵

- 一些边缘过于锋利

- 进行维护需要先拆机（包括电池）

- 转轴设计不够坚固

- 没有HDMI，没有读卡器，没有Kensington锁槽

- turbo没有很好的工作; 高负载时降频

- 在整个转速范围内风扇都有啸叫声

The Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB, courtesy of: campuspoint

联想的新Yoga 910-13IKB给我们留下了积极的印象。令人厌烦的啸叫的风扇噪声-我们认为的主要缺点-可能只是我们这台笔记本的个例，并不是整个系列笔记本的问题。我们认为不那么锋利的外壳设计也许会使得握持这台变形本更简单，但也可能会使得优雅的设计受到影响。移除底壳从而试图对于内部硬件进行操作可能会对保修造成影响，虽然拆除底壳这个过程本身却很简单。就Yoga的非传统接口来说，它需要用户来决定是否购买必要的转接头。转轴的设计在视觉上是很有冲击力的，但实质上并不那么的坚固，可能会对一些特定的使用模式造成影响。

从好的方面来看，Yoga有着出色的做工，整体设计轻薄但坚固。我们很难找到一台有着同样出色续航能力的轻薄型笔记本，铝制外壳不容易留下指纹的痕迹，所以Yoga 910看上去一尘不染。从配置的角度来看，Yoga也十分让人满意，有着很好的性能。它有着超高速的SSD，Wi-Fi的速度也很快。我们也很喜欢它的指纹识别器，它识别的快而准。触摸板的体验也十分出色，但键盘只能说是“好”，所以它略逊一筹。高亮度和对比度的屏幕表现的非常好，符合我们对这类笔记本的预期，尽管色彩准确度不是那么好。

我们不能完全地推荐Yoga 910，因为它啸叫的风扇。在“缺点”中被提到的其他项目并不是很影响整体的评价。毕竟这个问题地存在我们不能忽视-因为它是可能可以被解决的-但我们必须考虑到那些对于噪音敏感的用户的体验。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE - 12/20/2016 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

82%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

49 / 80 → 61%

Weight