对荣耀X80 Pro Max的评测结论
一款外观时尚、相对纤薄，却能经受各种恶劣环境考验，且电池续航可达数天的手机——这在几年前似乎还是一个遥不可及的梦想。
然而，凭借荣耀X80 Pro Max，这家中国制造商正将这样一款智能手机推向市场： 它能从3米高处坠落而仅受轻微划痕，可浸入水中，甚至能在多尘环境中使用；此外，其巨大的11,000-mAh电池在我们的Wi-Fi测试中续航时间超过29小时。 当然，鉴于其体积庞大，充电需要一定时间。
这款智能手机价格亲民且性能稳定，但并非高端机型，因此你将无法享受超高速 Wi-Fi 等功能，尤其是多功能摄像头系统：仅配备单颗后置摄像头的设计确实已不合时宜。
然而，对于那些更重视稳定性、亮度高的屏幕以及智能手机电池续航时间的用户来说，目前几乎没有比这更具吸引力的替代品了。
但您不必对从中国进口的产品望而却步，也不应对屏幕上的PWM闪烁过于敏感。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
坚固耐用的荣耀X80 Pro Max目前仅可作为中国进口机型购买，例如通过我们的租赁合作伙伴TradingShenzhen购买，起价为463美元。
- $1,259.00HONOR Magic8 Pro Dual-SIM 512GB ROM + 12GB RAM (GSM Only | No CDMA) Factory Unlocked 5G Smartphone (Sunrise Gold) - International Version
- $1,239.00HONOR Magic8 Pro Dual-SIM 512GB ROM + 12GB RAM (GSM Only | No CDMA) Factory Unlocked 5G Smartphone (Black) - International Version
- $505.00XIAOMI Poco X8 PRO MAX 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB + 12GB) 6.83" 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 2602BPC18G Liberado (White)
规格
案例与特点——非常耐用
尽管配备了超大容量电池并获得了IP69K认证，荣耀X80 Pro Max的外观与其他中端手机并无太大区别：它采用光面金属边框，背盖则有光滑材质或仿皮革材质可选，颜色包括浅米色、红色或灰色。
机身厚度略超过 8 毫米，重量仅为 203 克。做工精良；这款荣耀手机既不会发出吱吱声，也不会出现弯曲变形。据制造商称，该手机经过测试，可承受高达 3 米的跌落，且不会造成明显损坏。
在功能方面，该机型存在一些妥协：例如，仅配备了一个 USB 2.0 接口，而且——由于我们测试的机型来自中国——不支持 eSIM。 不过，它确实配备了NFC和红外传感器。
该机型提供8 GB或12 GB运行内存，以及256 GB或512 GB存储空间。
通信与操作——WiFi 7 网速缓慢
从规格上看，Honor X80 Pro Max 支持 Wi-Fi 7，实际上也通过 6 GHz 频段连接到我们的路由器。不过，其传输速度更接近 Wi-Fi 5 的水平；我们测得的速度仅略高于 500 Mbit/s。这通常足以满足日常使用需求。
该机型支持主流的5G和4G频段，因此在欧洲使用毫无问题。若将其带往其他国家，应确认当地移动运营商要求的频段，因为X80 Pro Max支持的频段范围并不十分广泛。
触摸屏响应非常灵敏，侧边按键的按压反馈清晰，触感明显。
屏幕下方隐藏着指纹传感器；设置完成后，解锁手机既快速又可靠。此外还支持2D人脸识别功能。
| Networking | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Gigaset GS6 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续发展——无法真正保证会发布更新
该机预装 Android 16 系统，并搭载荣耀的 MagicOS 10 系统，其界面设计简洁清爽、毫无冗余。安全补丁更新至 2026 年 8 月，因此截至测试时，系统安全更新相当及时。安全更新计划每季度发布一次。
关于荣耀 X80 Pro Max 没有具体的更新承诺；制造商此前曾宣布，所有设备的安全补丁支持期至少为 2 年——这时间并不算长。
目前尚无关于可持续性的相关信息。
相机——背部单摄
荣耀X80 Pro Max的摄像头系统也开创了新局面：到2026年，平板电脑配备单后置摄像头或许会成为常态，但这在智能手机上其实已不再常见。
主摄像头搭载了5000万像素传感器，能拍摄出相当清晰的照片，不过这些照片看起来经过了大量后期处理。
该机型未配备广角或长焦镜头，因此仅支持最高10倍的数字变焦。得益于AI增强技术，变焦画质尚可。
前置摄像头可拍摄出不错的自拍照片，但不应过度放大，否则细节缺失的问题会变得十分明显。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow Light
显示屏 – 高亮AMOLED
这款荣耀手机的AMOLED屏幕最高可显示每秒120帧，且在其价位段中拥有相当高的分辨率。
重点在于亮度，据荣耀称，该屏幕在HDR模式下最高可达10,000 cd/m²。 我们在测试中虽未完全达到该水平，但 5,358 cd/m² 的数值依然极高。日常使用中，屏幕亮度可达 1,828 cd/m²，足以满足户外使用需求。 色彩还原也非常准确。
不过，用户需要忍受PWM闪烁；我们测得其频率较低，约为60 Hz。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1828 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.73 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.222
CCT: 6734 K
| Honor X80 Pro Max AMOLED, 2788x1280, 6.8" | Honor Magic8 Lite OLED, 2640x1200, 6.8" | Gigaset GS6 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G87 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -68% | 17% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1922 | 1785 -7% | 926 -52% | 3463 80% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 5358 | 5962 11% | 922 -83% | 2845 -47% |
| Response Times | 68% | 61% | 59% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 8.9 ? | 0.68 ? 92% | 1.2 ? 87% | 3.1 ? 65% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 18.5 ? | 1.07 ? 94% | 1.07 ? 94% | 3.1 ? 83% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 | 60 | 485 | 361.6 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 18 | 14.56 19% | 17.65 2% | 13 28% |
| Screen | -74% | -256% | -60% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1828 | 1754 -4% | 810 -56% | 1850 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.73 | 1.5 -105% | 4.5 -516% | 1.21 -66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 3.5 -67% | 6.8 -224% | 4.01 -91% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.4 -118% | 3.6 -227% | 2 -82% |
| Gamma | 2.222 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.229 99% |
| CCT | 6734 97% | 6358 102% | 7131 91% | 6439 101% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1748 | 1813 | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 96 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-9% | -88% /
-108% | 5% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 18 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7659 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这是由于比例缩放所致。信息框中显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航——进步与退步
从某些方面来看，高通骁龙 6 Gen 5 与上一代相比有所倒退；例如，它采用了较旧的处理器架构。在日常使用中，该处理器通常性能充足，能够轻松处理简单任务。UFS 3.1 存储可实现快速的数据传输。
机身发热确实明显，但这并不影响处理器的性能：在所有 3DMark 压力测试中，其性能均保持稳定。
底部边缘的扬声器与听筒相辅相成。 扬声器音量相当大，音质也相当均衡，尽管低音稍显不足。支持无线音频传输所需的主要编解码器。
电池无疑是荣耀X80 Pro Max的一大亮点：在相对纤薄的机身内搭载11,000 mAh电池实属罕见。 在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，该机续航时间超过29小时，显著优于大多数其他手机。这意味着即使在高强度使用下，它也能轻松坚持两天。若谨慎使用电池，续航时间还能进一步延长。
该机支持最高90瓦的快充，但受限于超大电池容量，充满电仍需超过两小时。
| Honor X80 Pro Max | Honor Magic8 Lite | Gigaset GS6 Pro | Motorola Moto G87 | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -46% | -44% | -17% | -1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2001.1 | 1948.54 -3% | 983.23 -51% | 987.6 -51% | 1877 ? -6% | 2283 ? 14% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1852 | 1828.13 -1% | 823.09 -56% | 701.3 -62% | 1397 ? -25% | 1965 ? 6% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 365.2 | 344.19 -6% | 232.28 -36% | 224.6 -38% | 290 ? -21% | 316 ? -13% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 409.5 | 412.87 1% | 243.83 -40% | 302.6 -26% | 344 ? -16% | 362 ? -12% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Gigaset GS6 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Moto G87 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS6 Pro | |
Honor X80 Pro Max audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (135.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Honor Magic8 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.1 / 1.2 / 2.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor X80 Pro Max 11000 mAh | Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh | Gigaset GS6 Pro 5300 mAh | Motorola Moto G87 5200 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -59% | 43% | 0% | 6% | ||
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.1 | 1.36 -24% | 0.55 50% | 1.1 ? -0% | 0.878 ? 20% | |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.2 | 2.68 -123% | 0.9 25% | 1.2 ? -0% | 1.46 ? -22% | |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.1 | 2.76 -31% | 0.98 53% | 2.1 ? -0% | 1.655 ? 21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor X80 Pro Max 11000 mAh | Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh | Gigaset GS6 Pro 5300 mAh | Motorola Moto G87 5200 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -21% | -45% | -40% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 29.1 | 23 -21% | 15.9 -45% | 17.4 -40% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 34.2 | |||
| Load (h) | 5.1 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
纤薄、美观、坚固且耐用——荣耀X80 Max Pro在多方面表现出色。
不过，您需要注意的是，该机型必须从中国进口。
Honor X80 Pro Max
- 09/10/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能替代方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 78.3%  | Honor X80 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 812 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: 1. $1,259.00 HONOR Magic8 Pro Dual-SIM 51... 2. $1,239.00 HONOR Magic8 Pro Dual-SIM 51... 3. $505.00 XIAOMI Poco X8 PRO MAX 5G Ai... List Price: 397€ | 203 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2788x1280 451 PPI AMOLED |
2. 78%  | Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 400€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.79" 2640x1200 427 PPI OLED |
3. 76.3%  | Gigaset GS6 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | List Price: 449€ | 230 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED |
4. 74.6%  | Motorola Moto G87 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.2 | List Price: 400€ | 183 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
