判决
Ugee UT3 主要面向希望使用手写笔和大显示屏工作的创意用户。14.25 英寸面板是它的主要卖点：哑光表面、三种色彩模式和全贴合设计，即使亮度有限且色彩还原校准不完美，也能带来愉悦的书写和绘图体验。手写笔的精确度足以满足素描或记笔记的需要，但延迟明显，无法带来真正的专业感觉。
在制造质量、材料和整体稳定性方面，UT3 给人留下了良好的印象，但其较高的重量和锋利的边缘在一定程度上降低了舒适度。技术基础--基于老化的Helio G99、eMMC 存储和有限的连接性--让人感觉过时。、eMMC 存储和有限的连接功能，感觉已经过时。这款平板电脑在日常任务中没有显示出任何重大问题，但显然仍属于入门级产品。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
UT3 可直接从 Ugee 在线商店购买，也可在亚马逊（德国）上购买。
Ugee 是一家总部位于中国的公司，成立于 1998 年，最初专门生产绘图平板电脑。
这款平板电脑的主要亮点是它的超大显示屏，有三种颜色模式，并支持手写笔。Ugee 的建议零售价为 526 欧元（约合 614 美元），但其售价一直低于 400 欧元（约合 467 美元）。
规格：Ugee UT 3
外壳和功能 - UT3 重 760 克
Ugee UT3 只有灰色，厚度为 6.95 毫米，带摄像头时为 9.45 毫米。这个摄像头相当大，而且位于中间位置，因此在桌面上的晃动有限。
760 克的重量相当高，但双手握持时并不明显。铝合金一体成型机身的硬边比较令人不快。平板电脑的做工令人信服，即使扭动也不会发出嘎吱声。
功能有点过时：蓝牙 5.0、USB 2.0 和不支持伽利略的单频 GNSS。
通信和操作 - Ugee UT3 的 Wi-Fi 网速较慢
Ugee UT3 支持 802.11ac Wi-Fi，这在我们的测试中被证明是始终稳定的，但速度并不高。两个麦克风提供的语音质量一般，没有明显的背景噪声抑制效果。
除了触摸屏外，UT3 还可以使用有源手写笔进行操作，该手写笔支持 4,096 级压力灵敏度，延迟相对较高，达到 20 毫秒。这种延迟在日常使用中很明显，但由于采用了全贴合面板和哑光表面，书写体验还是不错的。不过，书写时的声音常常听起来像是在石板上书写。
没有振动电机，也没有指纹传感器。唯一的生物识别选项是通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。
| Networking | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vale V12X | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性--不确定的未来
Ugee UT3 仍附带Android 14，仅做了极少的视觉调整。目前还不清楚是否会有更新以及更新的时间。在测试时，安全补丁（截至 2025 年 5 月 5 日）已经过时，但 Play 系统更新（截至 2025 年 11 月 1 日）已相当及时。
Ugee 没有提供任何有关可持续性的信息。
相机 - 足够的性能
Ugee UT3 的摄像头成像质量相当一般，但足以满足视频通话和简单文档记录的需要。
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片几乎没有细节，看起来有些暗淡。数码变焦仅限于 4 倍，效果不佳。弱光拍摄的噪点也很严重。
两个摄像头都可以录制高达 2K（30 FPS）的视频。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain camera4/5x zoomLow light
显示屏 - Ugee UT3 上的 TCL NxtVision
Ugee UT3 的 14.25 英寸（36.2 厘米）超大液晶显示屏对比度很高，而且由于采用了哑光涂层，在室外基本没有反光，但亮度并不高。
遗憾的是，该面板的刷新率仅限于 60 赫兹，而且不支持 HDR。好的一面是，它不使用 PWM 进行亮度控制。不过，在最低亮度下，我们用示波器检测到了不规则的闪烁。遗憾的是，我们无法确认这是否是由时间抖动引起的，因为磨砂涂层阻止了对子像素结构的捕捉。
显示模式可以通过一个专用按钮进行更改。除标准模式外，还有一种 "彩纸 "模式，旨在模拟彩纸，使图像更温暖、饱和度更低、色彩更柔和。第三种模式称为墨水纸模式，仅限于单色输出，类似于电子书阅读器。不过，没有真正的 E Ink 显示屏，我们也希望看到更好的色彩还原校准。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 521 cd/m²
Contrast: 1109:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
92.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.99
CCT: 7239 K
| Ugee UT 3 TFT-LCD, 2400x1600, 14.3" | Vale V12X AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ TFT-LCD, 2880x1800, 13.1" | Honor MagicPad 3 LCD, 3200x2136, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -1% | 46% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 521 | 393 -25% | 779 50% | 753 45% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 480 | 381 -21% | 751 56% | 706 47% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 84 | 93 11% | 90 7% | 86 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.47 | 0.43 9% | 1.23 -162% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1109 | 1812 63% | 612 -45% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 6.5 -2% | 1.9 70% | 2.3 64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.5 | 9.27 52% | 5 74% | 5.9 70% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 5 -19% | 2.7 36% | 4.2 -0% |
| Gamma | 1.99 111% | 2.215 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7239 90% | 7298 89% | 6923 94% | 7391 88% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8081 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.66 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.41 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 66.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.36 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 37.77 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - Ugee 平板电脑的 Helio G99 运行缓慢
入门级 联发科 Helio G99早在 2022 年就已推出的入门级联发科 Helio G99 芯片组速度较慢，但仍能满足基本任务的需求。此外，Ugee 只配备了速度较慢的 eMMC 存储器，而且没有提供有关内存类型的任何信息。在散热方面，这款平板电脑表现良好。
尽管有四个扬声器，但音质却相当一般：低音很弱，高音听起来空洞而闷闷不乐。
10,000 毫安时电池为 Ugee UT3 提供了良好的续航能力。使用附带的电源适配器，平板电脑可在两小时内充满电（50%：47 分钟；80%：78 分钟）。
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Average of class Tablet (374 - 7134, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1165 - 1364, n=26) | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (368 - 32525, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1011 - 1340, n=27) | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Wild Life Extreme | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (89 - 9391, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (322 - 378, n=27) | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (99 - 11105, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (323 - 366, n=27) | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 92.8, n=15) | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 17293, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G99 (68.9 - 219, n=4) | |
| Ugee UT 3 | Vale V12X | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 211% | 257% | -15% | 321% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 298.74 | 994.2 233% | 1686.77 465% | 280 ? -6% | 1786 ? 498% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 258.95 | 914.9 253% | 999.78 286% | 220 ? -15% | 1337 ? 416% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 95.88 | 258.5 170% | 228.91 139% | 82.5 ? -14% | 246 ? 157% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 89.12 | 257.1 188% | 211.53 137% | 67 ? -25% | 279 ? 213% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
Ugee UT 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Ugee UT 3 | |
| Vale V12X | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Ugee UT3 是一款大尺寸Android 平板电脑，配备 14.25 英寸磨砂显示屏，支持手写笔。它的三种色彩模式和坚实的制造质量为其加分不少，但其过时的功能设置、薄弱的性能、平庸的摄像头和不确定的更新政策只能部分证明其低价的合理性。
Ugee UT 3
- 01/06/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 73.9%  | Ugee UT 3 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC | List Price: 380€ | 760 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 14.25" 2400x1600 202 PPI TFT-LCD |
2. 77.3%  | Vale V12X Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.90 Case Compatible for VALE V12... 2. $11.90 Case Compatible for VALE V12... 3. $11.90 Case for VALE V12X 12.6-inch... List Price: 449€ | 555 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.60" 2560x1600 240 PPI AMOLED |
3. 81.8%  | Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $429.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 12... 2. $549.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 1... 3. $429.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 12... List Price: 789€ | 664 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 13.10" 2880x1800 259 PPI TFT-LCD |
4. 85.9%  | Honor MagicPad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $19.89 for Honor Magic Pad 3/3 Pro ... 2. $15.58 Clear Case for Honor Magic P... 3. $14.78 BOVUGAC [2 Pack] Screen Prot... List Price: 700€ | 595 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 13.30" 3200x2136 289 PPI LCD |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
