Notebookcheck Logo

微软Surface Laptop Go 2评测--旧硬件的紧凑型伴侣

还是太贵了。 微软保留了紧凑的Surface Laptop Go,为第二代产品配备了英特尔的Tiger Lake CPU。虽然性能足以应付日常任务,外壳和显示屏也很体面,但价格太高,而且没有键盘照明。
Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows

通过Surface Laptop Go,微软从Surface笔记本电脑的世界中提供了一个紧凑的入门级设备,第二代产品接受了英特尔Tiger Lake 代的更快的Core i5处理器。然而,在笔记本电脑的基本设计上没有任何改变。新的Surface Laptop Go 2的价格正式从约600欧元(约602美元)开始,配备酷睿i5-1135G7,4GB内存和128GB固态硬盘,但这个型号目前只能从微软直接购买。

我们的测试设备是最昂贵的型号,建议零售价为869欧元(约872美元),提供8GB内存和256GB PCIe SSD。在这一点上,微软已经降低了价格,我们的模型现在可以从微软直接购买679欧元(约681美元)。

Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Processor
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 25 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x-4266, dual channel, onboard
Display
12.40 inch 3:2, 1536 x 1024 pixel 149 PPI, capacitive, LP125WX112403, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, 256 GB 
, 198 GB free
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 278 x 206
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 39W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.135 kg, Power Supply: 209 g
Price
869 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.3 %
08/2022
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.1 kg16 mm12.40"1536x1024
87.7 %
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.2 kg16 mm13.30"1920x1080
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.30"2560x1600
86.3 %
04/2022
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
892 g17.8 mm12.50"1920x1080
84.6 %
10/2020
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.1 kg15.69 mm12.40"1536x1024

案件和设备

微软保持了Surface Laptop Go的外壳设计。 笔记本电脑没有做任何改变。它仍然是一个高质量的产品,可以轻松与明显更昂贵的竞争对手竞争。在这方面,与更昂贵的Surface机型也没有区别。金属外壳(铝制盖子和由铝和塑料制成的基本单元)的稳定性非常好,只是铰链可以变得稍微硬一些,因为它无法完全防止一些晃动。最大开启角度为135度。

我们的测试装置的颜色被称为冰蓝,看起来不错。另外,还有铂金色、鼠尾草色和砂岩色可供选择。我们喜欢这个带有锥形底座装置的紧凑型设备的视觉印象。只有显示屏边框(尤其是显示屏下面)看起来有点宽。但总体而言,Surface Laptop Go 2仍然是一个有吸引力的设备。然而,它仍然是一个很大的缺点,即终端用户几乎不可能(通过设计)进行任何维护。

内部结构(图片:微软)

尺寸比较

304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg302 mm 199 mm 16 mm 1.2 kg287 mm 205 mm 17.8 mm 892 g278 mm 206 mm 16 mm 1.1 kg278.18 mm 205.67 mm 15.69 mm 1.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

在连接方面也没有变化,微软继续使用不实用的Surface Connector。另一方面,这也让你可以使用其他配件。你也可以通过USB-C为Surface Laptop Go 2充电,而且也可以通过这种方式连接外部显示器。虽然你必须在没有Thunderbolt或快速标准的情况下生活,但在日常使用中你可以从普通的USB-A连接中受益。 网络摄像头仍然是一个720p的传感器,其质量很难令人信服。

左边:USB-A 3.2 Gen.1,USB-C 3.2 Gen.1(充电和显示端口ALT模式),3.5毫米立体声
左边:USB-A 3.2 Gen.1,USB-C 3.2 Gen.1(充电和显示端口ALT模式),3.5毫米立体声
对。表面连接
对。表面连接

在WLAN模块方面,微软继续使用英特尔的AX201卡。它支持Wi-Fi-6网络,在与我们的华硕参考路由器的测试中达到非常高和稳定的传输速率。在我们的测试期间,我们没有遇到任何问题。蓝牙5.1也被支持。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1223 (898min - 1430max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1107 (539min - 1219max) MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (606 - 1339, n=3, last 2 years)
1056 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
940 (858min - 985max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
552 (257min - 620max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1492 (1304min - 1621max) MBit/s
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1460 (1361min - 1505max) MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1374 (1205min - 1438max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (623 - 1690, n=3, last 2 years)
1258 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
672 (614min - 682max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1598 (1412min, 1423.6P1 - 1690max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (438 - 1715, n=66)
1307 MBit/s -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 1824, n=47, last 2 years)
1263 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1588 (1481min, 1488.54P1 - 1635max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=71)
1437 MBit/s -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (353 - 1775, n=47, last 2 years)
1407 MBit/s -11%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1588 (1481-1635)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1598 (1412-1690)
ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5: 7.65 ∆E min: 0.84 - max: 13.71 ∆E

输入设备--微软没有键盘照明装置

Surface Laptop Go 2的键盘提供了良好的打字体验,也允许你毫无问题地输入更长的文本。正如已经发生的情况一样,这里与更昂贵的Surface笔记本电脑没有明显的区别。然而,你会注意到缺乏键盘照明,考虑到原来的建议零售价,这显然是一个负面的观点。

ClickPad工作起来无懈可击,与许多其他笔记本电脑相比,点击的声音也不是太大。另外,你也可以使用电容式触摸屏进行输入,工作起来也没有任何问题。

输入设备
输入设备

显示屏 - Surface Laptop Go,3:2 IPS触摸屏

12.4英寸的3:2格式显示屏在生产力方面提供了一些优势,因为你有更多的垂直空间可以使用。然而,与16:9或16:10显示屏相比,那些喜欢看电影或电视剧的人不得不忍受顶部和底部一些较大的黑条。IPS面板的分辨率仍然是相对较低的1,536 x 1,024像素(148 DPI),但就图像清晰度而言,主观的图像印象还是可以。由于有亮度传感器,面板的亮度可以自动调整。

在我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行的测量中,平均亮度为400cd/m²,比前代产品亮了约50cd/m²,尽管使用的是同样的面板。另一方面,黑值和由此产生的对比度变差,新的Surface Laptop Go 2几乎没有错过1000:1的对比度。在50%或更低的亮度水平下,我们测量到频率为9.7 kHz的PWM闪烁,但这不应该导致任何问题。响应时间不明显,IPS面板的可视角度也很好。

子像素网格
子像素网格
没有可见的光晕
没有可见的光晕
视角稳定
视角稳定
402
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LP125WX112403 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 409 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 400.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 406 cd/m²
Contrast: 990:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
LP125WX112403, IPS, 1536x1024, 12.40
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Sharp SHP14AE, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Chi Mei N125HCG-GQ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
LG Philips LP125WX112403, IPS, 1536x1024, 12.40
Display
4%
31%
6%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
63.6
66.3
4%
98.6
55%
67.6
6%
64.4
1%
sRGB Coverage
93.8
97.1
4%
100
7%
99.2
6%
94.6
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65
67.1
3%
85.9
32%
69.4
7%
65.7
1%
Response Times
-44%
380%
-55%
43%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 ?(20.9, 18.1)
55 ?(25, 30)
-41%
31 ?(14, 17)
21%
60 ?(28.8, 31.2)
-54%
34.8 ?(19.6, 15.2)
11%
Response Time Black / White *
26.9 ?(16, 10.9)
27 ?(10, 17)
-0%
26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2)
3%
41.6 ?(19.6, 22)
-55%
29.2 ?(17.2, 12)
-9%
PWM Frequency
9700 ?(50)
996 ?(20)
-90%
118000 ?(49, 155)
1116%
21930 ?(51)
126%
Screen
-12%
7%
23%
5%
Brightness middle
406
486
20%
417
3%
384.8
-5%
354.3
-13%
Brightness
401
446
11%
395
-1%
361
-10%
353
-12%
Brightness Distribution
95
77
-19%
91
-4%
90
-5%
95
0%
Black Level *
0.41
0.4
2%
0.39
5%
0.18
56%
0.29
29%
Contrast
990
1215
23%
1069
8%
2138
116%
1222
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
2.54
-41%
1.12
38%
1.54
14%
1.41
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.3
4.34
-32%
2.71
18%
2.95
11%
2.96
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.3
1.04
20%
0.77
41%
0.96
26%
1.44
-11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
2.34
-95%
1.7
-42%
1.2
-0%
1.2
-0%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.28 96%
2207 0%
2.1 105%
2.26 97%
CCT
6662 98%
6864 95%
6870 95%
6419 101%
6600 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
60.2
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
94.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-17% / -15%
139% / 87%
-9% / 8%
16% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

通过我们自己的校准(可从上面的链接免费下载配置文件),偏差甚至可以进一步降低,尽管这并不是真正必要的。不幸的是,该面板甚至不能完全覆盖小型sRGB色彩空间。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN灰度(已校准)
CalMAN灰度(已校准)
CalMAN饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN ColorChecker(已校准)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(已校准)。
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 10.9 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.9 ms rise
↘ 18.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 9700 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 9700 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 9700 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM 60%的亮度
PWM 60%的亮度
PWM 50%的亮度
PWM 50%的亮度
PWM 40%的亮度
PWM 40%的亮度
PWM 30%的亮度
PWM 30%的亮度
PWM 20%的亮度
PWM 20%的亮度
PWM 10%的亮度
PWM 10%的亮度
PWM 0%的亮度
PWM 0%的亮度

在户外,你总是会与触摸屏的反光作斗争,你应该尽量避免背后有直接的光源。

在阳光下
在阳光下

性能 - IntelTiger Lake Core i5

Surface Laptop Go 2的所有型号都配备了 英特尔酷睿i5-1135G7.考虑到未来几年的可用性,我们不会推荐只有4GB内存的基本型号。工作内存是焊接的,不能升级。

 
 

测试条件

微软没有实施任何额外的性能配置文件。在下面的基准测试和测量中,我们使用了最佳性能的Windows模式。然而,特别是对于简单的任务,你也可以毫无顾虑地保持推荐预设,因为性能总体上处于相当低的水平,然后风扇会保持稍微安静的状态(但后面会有更多介绍)。

处理器 - 酷睿i5-1135G7

芯片酷睿i5-1135G7是英特尔老一代的四核芯片Tiger Lake ,所以它不再是真正的最新产品。此外,微软在TDP限制方面相当保守,因为该芯片被允许最多消耗25瓦,然后迅速平移到15瓦。相应地,处理器的性能也不是特别好。虽然与处理器相比有30%左右的优势,但Surface Laptop Go 2仍然不适合执行高要求的任务。但至少,在电池运行中,性能并没有进一步降低。关于更多的CPU基准测试,我们建议你到 我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø530 (512.05-672.11)
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø650 (584.31-733.42)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P Intel Core i5-1155G7: Ø835 (713.48-858.35)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 Intel Core i5-1035G1: Ø470 (466.1-527.11)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook
 
85.7 pt
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry -1!
Apple M1
69.1 pt
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
62 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
 
54.7 pt
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD -2!
Intel Core i5-1135G7
53.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
49.4 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5 -2!
Intel Core i5-1035G1
36.7 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2485 - 16201, n=71, last 2 years)
10131 Points +157%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7409 (6401.39min - 7409.31max) Points +88%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
5612 (5453.54min - 5611.63max) Points +42%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5447 (4192.8min - 5447.26max) Points +38%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (2786 - 6136, n=55)
4724 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
3948 Points
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (598 - 1934, n=71, last 2 years)
1615 Points +23%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1496 Points +14%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
1419 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (1062 - 1373, n=53)
1322 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1316 Points
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1308 Points -1%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (810 - 6314, n=67, last 2 years)
3899 Points +157%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
2173 Points +43%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1863 Points +23%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1863 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (979 - 2382, n=62)
1827 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1519 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1178 Points -22%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (216 - 738, n=67, last 2 years)
606 Points +20%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
550 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (375 - 527, n=62)
507 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
506 Points
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
504 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
413 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
401 Points -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=73, last 2 years)
1728 Points +157%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1020 (817min - 1020max) Points +52%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
858 (713.48min - 858.35max) Points +28%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (431 - 941, n=65)
792 Points +18%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
733 (584.31min - 733.42max) Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
672 (512.05min - 672.11max) Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
527 (466.1min - 527.11max) Points -22%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=65, last 2 years)
235 Points +21%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
210 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
208 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (141.4 - 205, n=61)
194.4 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
193.7 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
161 Points -17%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
944 Seconds * -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
840 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
710 Seconds * +15%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (499 - 1044, n=60)
662 Seconds * +21%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
630 Seconds * +25%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
540 Seconds * +36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (201 - 1600, n=69, last 2 years)
390 Seconds * +54%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16223 - 67444, n=60, last 2 years)
43704 MIPS +140%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
34614 MIPS +90%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
24992 MIPS +37%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
24447 MIPS +34%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (14745 - 24873, n=62)
21407 MIPS +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
18197 MIPS
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
13715 MIPS -25%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
5441 MIPS +19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2197 - 6403, n=61, last 2 years)
5299 MIPS +16%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
4949 MIPS +8%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3924 - 4921, n=62)
4674 MIPS +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4586 MIPS
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4579 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3932 MIPS -14%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4213 - 12580, n=69, last 2 years)
8865 Points +107%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7578 Points +77%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
5654 Points +32%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
5233 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3475 - 5472, n=58)
4663 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4274 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3522 Points -18%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1727 Points +28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=69, last 2 years)
1683 Points +25%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
1473 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (1147 - 1428, n=58)
1373 Points +2%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1360 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1348 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
1144 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1.5 - 19.4, n=59, last 2 years)
11.8 fps +139%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
7.49 fps +52%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3.57 - 7.6, n=57)
5.93 fps +20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4.94 fps
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
3.89 fps -21%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
64.5 s * -12%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
58.8 s * -2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
57.8 s *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (40.1 - 120.5, n=60, last 2 years)
53.2 s * +8%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (44.2 - 62.9, n=60)
52.8 s * +9%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
52.7 s * +9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
12.88 s * +78%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1
0.743 sec * -14%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
0.732 sec * -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.653 sec *
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.651 sec * -0%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (0.619 - 0.727, n=59)
0.642 sec * +2%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7
0.615 sec * +6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.4397 - 1.236, n=60, last 2 years)
0.525 sec * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
672 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
86.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
193.7 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook
 
95.9 pt
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
78.7 pt
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
 
61.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
52.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 25961, n=60, last 2 years)
9976 KRay/s +87%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
8007 KRay/s +50%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (4313 - 7952, n=45)
6445 KRay/s +21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
5346 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11867 - 111109, n=60, last 2 years)
51830 Points +131%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
32838 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (19402 - 32283, n=45)
26975 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
22472 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Subnotebook
  (453 - 4646, n=60, last 2 years)
2344 MB/s +61%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2183 MB/s +50%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (1316 - 2172, n=45)
1832 MB/s +25%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1460 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15447 - 115300, n=60, last 2 years)
78811 Points +102%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
52181 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (39000 - 46951, n=45)
45742 Points +17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
39000 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1223 - 14944, n=60, last 2 years)
7573 Points +108%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4997 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (3497 - 4445, n=45)
4218 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3635 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6379 - 59053, n=60, last 2 years)
27272 Points +99%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
19716 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (12569 - 19635, n=45)
16302 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
13695 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
76781 MB/s +165%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (28988 - 67977, n=45)
58975 MB/s +103%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=60, last 2 years)
53930 MB/s +86%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
28988 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook
  (270 - 1123, n=60, last 2 years)
656 MB/s +132%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
425 MB/s +50%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (265 - 373, n=51)
289 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
283 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook
  (204 - 14018, n=60, last 2 years)
5205 KRay/s +85%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4211 KRay/s +50%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (2226 - 4291, n=45)
3424 KRay/s +22%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2807 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
39951 MPixel/s +20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7622 - 53954, n=60, last 2 years)
35591 MPixel/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33194 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (9004 - 45366, n=45)
23085 MPixel/s -30%

系统性能

在实践中,对性能的印象是不错的,由于采用了固态硬盘,在日常操作中没有出现加载时间较长或卡顿的问题。然而,我们的测试装置通常在基准测试中被竞争对手超越。但对于常规任务,如文本输入、上网和流媒体视频,其性能很容易满足。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4384 - 7428, n=58, last 2 years)
5848 Points +33%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5136 Points +17%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4692 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (4026 - 4952, n=53)
4613 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4384 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
3474 Points -21%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10354 Points +15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8890 - 11168, n=58, last 2 years)
10213 Points +14%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9514 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (8149 - 9917, n=53)
9310 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
8995 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
7975 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6213 - 10279, n=58, last 2 years)
7852 Points +26%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6622 Points +7%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6265 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (5040 - 6619, n=53)
6218 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
6213 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
4872 Points -22%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4093 - 9749, n=58, last 2 years)
6847 Points +67%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5364 Points +31%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4703 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (3548 - 5255, n=53)
4612 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
4093 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
2930 Points -28%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook
  (718 - 1876, n=63, last 2 years)
1540 Points +33%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1355 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1058 - 1293, n=11)
1170 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1154 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (685 - 1829, n=63, last 2 years)
1498 Points +27%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1274 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1148 - 1332, n=11)
1243 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1180 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (776 - 2210, n=63, last 2 years)
1673 Points +42%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1593 Points +35%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1177 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (895 - 1263, n=11)
1111 Points -6%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Subnotebook
  (652 - 1899, n=63, last 2 years)
1321 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (923 - 1320, n=11)
1149 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1014 Points
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1004 Points -1%
PCMark 10 Score
4384 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
63230 MB/s +19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22781 - 95353, n=60, last 2 years)
60876 MB/s +15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
53093 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (17443 - 63889, n=45)
36640 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
59710 MB/s +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23831 - 86433, n=60, last 2 years)
57109 MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
54405 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (19716 - 63705, n=45)
40897 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
66893 MB/s +15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23474 - 93382, n=60, last 2 years)
64142 MB/s +10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
58060 MB/s
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (18722 - 66778, n=45)
41742 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.8 - 172, n=55, last 2 years)
103.8 ns * -5%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
98.6 ns *
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
95 ns * +4%
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7
  (68.3 - 107, n=51)
72.5 ns * +26%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网冲浪、播放YouTube 4K视频、CPU负载),我们的测试装置在其当前BIOS版本中显示出一些轻微的限制,因此并不适合使用实时音频应用程序。

LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1224.3 μs *
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
868 μs * +29%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
530 μs * +57%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
12.3 μs * +99%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

微软使用了东芝的PCIe 3.0 x4固态硬盘,存储容量为256GB,其中只有198GB在首次启动后仍可供用户使用。传输速率是足够的。然而,用户无法更换SSD,因为机箱无法打开。你可以找到更多的固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2339.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1580.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 357.81 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 322.18 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.18 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.35 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 344.91 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 688.55 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
97.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
66.3 pt
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
48.8 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
40.9 pt
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
 
30.1 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
28.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4027 (2994.41min - 4027.16max) MB/s +132%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (452 - 4501, n=61, last 2 years)
2847 MB/s +64%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2040 (2028.5min - 2040.32max) MB/s +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1733 (1685.29min - 1733.41max) MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (947 - 1770, n=8)
1531 MB/s -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
973 (832.58min - 972.6max) MB/s -44%
seq write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3415 (3262.96min - 3414.79max) MB/s +166%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153.3 - 5344, n=62, last 2 years)
2745 MB/s +114%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1283 (1167.69min - 1283.04max) MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1148 (1138.36min - 1147.77max) MB/s -11%
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (311 - 1390, n=8)
1090 MB/s -15%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
650 (625.17min - 649.95max) MB/s -49%
seq q8 t1 read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6727 (5857.11min - 6727.42max) MB/s +187%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (558 - 7134, n=60, last 2 years)
4945 MB/s +111%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3539 (3191.24min - 3538.73max) MB/s +51%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
2347 (2059.33min - 2347.42max) MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (1769 - 2407, n=8)
2253 MB/s -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
1905 (1447.5min - 1905.47max) MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4358 (4315.13min - 4358.09max) MB/s +177%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (60 - 6751, n=61, last 2 years)
3722 MB/s +136%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1575 (1464.65min - 1574.75max) MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (215 - 1588, n=8)
1202 MB/s -24%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1146 (1005.79min - 1146.32max) MB/s -27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
796 (698.28min - 795.57max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
92.9 (91.63min - 92.87max) MB/s +70%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.6 - 141.9, n=61, last 2 years)
63.2 MB/s +16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
54.7 (53.72min - 54.65max) MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (40.2 - 55.7, n=8)
48.3 MB/s -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
38.6 (38.35min - 38.57max) MB/s -29%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
37.6 (37.47min - 37.63max) MB/s -31%
4k q1 t1 write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
241 (236.8min - 240.93max) MB/s +85%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 360, n=61, last 2 years)
155.9 MB/s +19%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
131 (129.69min - 130.52max) MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
130.5 (125.43min - 130.5max) MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (31.3 - 139, n=8)
98.7 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
89 (88.35min - 88.96max) MB/s -32%
4k q32 t16 read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2837 (2817.58min - 2836.71max) MB/s +330%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (283 - 4286, n=61, last 2 years)
1233 MB/s +87%
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (459 - 872, n=8)
664 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
660 (650.99min - 659.77max) MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
633 (611.31min - 633.18max) MB/s -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
408 (402.61min - 407.79max) MB/s -38%
4k q32 t16 write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1995 (1949.88min - 1995.26max) MB/s +462%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (157 - 4189, n=61, last 2 years)
895 MB/s +152%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
402 (398.76min - 402.14max) MB/s +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
355 (303.76min - 354.58max) MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (173 - 385, n=8)
314 MB/s -12%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
264 (245.36min - 264.37max) MB/s -26%
AS SSD
Score Total
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7113 Points +197%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (707 - 8892, n=59, last 2 years)
4434 Points +85%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3573 Points +49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
2398 Points
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (1714 - 2826, n=10)
2197 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
1458 Points -39%
Score Read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2948 Points +206%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (253 - 3307, n=59, last 2 years)
1476 Points +53%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1360 Points +41%
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (833 - 1288, n=10)
1088 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
964 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
656 Points -32%
Score Write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2758 Points +181%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3972, n=59, last 2 years)
2263 Points +130%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1567 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
983 Points
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (267 - 983, n=10)
592 Points -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
498 Points -49%
Seq Read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5546 MB/s +186%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (508 - 5546, n=59, last 2 years)
3783 MB/s +95%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2629 MB/s +35%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
1942 MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (1423 - 1972, n=10)
1752 MB/s -10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
1347 MB/s -31%
Seq Write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3332 MB/s +329%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (386 - 4961, n=59, last 2 years)
2331 MB/s +200%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1270 MB/s +63%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
777 MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (324 - 1130, n=10)
720 MB/s -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
491 MB/s -37%
4K Read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
84.8 MB/s +55%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
65.2 MB/s +19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.8 - 96.2, n=59, last 2 years)
59.9 MB/s +10%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
54.67 MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (37.3 - 56.7, n=10)
47.3 MB/s -13%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
38.08 MB/s -30%
4K Write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
215.1 MB/s +30%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
182.5 MB/s +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (65.5 - 256, n=59, last 2 years)
172.8 MB/s +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
165.43 MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (74.8 - 176.4, n=10)
118.6 MB/s -28%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
98.2 MB/s -41%
4K-64 Read
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2310 MB/s +223%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (187.3 - 2682, n=59, last 2 years)
1038 MB/s +45%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1032 MB/s +44%
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (585 - 1048, n=10)
866 MB/s +21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
715.5 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
483.1 MB/s -32%
4K-64 Write
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2210 MB/s +199%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (223 - 3410, n=59, last 2 years)
1854 MB/s +151%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1257 MB/s +70%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
739.5 MB/s
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (107.3 - 740, n=10)
402 MB/s -46%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
350.9 MB/s -53%
Access Time Read
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (0.036 - 0.172, n=10)
0.1034 ms * -152%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.07 ms * -71%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.021 - 0.257, n=59, last 2 years)
0.06125 ms * -49%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
0.057 ms * -39%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
0.041 ms *
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.035 ms * +15%
Access Time Write
Average Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
  (0.156 - 0.619, n=10)
0.3076 ms * -80%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
0.171 ms *
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
0.105 ms * +39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.016 - 0.523, n=59, last 2 years)
0.07439 ms * +56%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.06 ms * +65%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.023 ms * +87%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5: Ø2383 (2230.32-2415.3)

图形卡

GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80 EUs)
GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80 EUs)

集成显卡是著名的Iris Xe Graphics G7,有80个EUs,它也继续用于目前的Alder Lake处理器中。只要你不对游戏性能有任何夸大的期望,iGPU在日常操作中也能取得非常好的成绩。它甚至可以毫无问题地处理高分辨率视频的播放,但由于显示屏分辨率低,即使是1080p的视频也不能以其原始分辨率播放。

但是,如果你仍然想玩一些游戏,我们推荐较老的游戏,这样在低分辨率和较低的细节设置下运行也是可以接受的(例如,DOTA 2)。此外,GPU也会保持稳定,因为Surface Laptop Go 2甚至可以在99.7%的情况下顺利通过苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试,没有任何问题。在电池运行中也没有性能限制。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的GPU基准测试 我们的技术部分.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Subnotebook
 
100 pt
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1155G7
82 pt
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD -1!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
73.1 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
 
64.7 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
57.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
29.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2979 - 16904, n=57, last 2 years)
8185 Points +97%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
5978 Points +44%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1155G7
5962 Points +43%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (2246 - 6477, n=105)
5167 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
4162 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
2280 Points -45%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13768 - 65911, n=42, last 2 years)
29375 Points +41%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1155G7
28952 Points +39%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (6361 - 30894, n=92)
21769 Points +4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
20851 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
11894 Points -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2837 - 12349, n=62, last 2 years)
5959 Points +72%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1155G7
4847 Points +40%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
4705 Points +35%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (1560 - 5305, n=107)
3782 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
3474 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
1713 Points -51%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (811 - 4773, n=61, last 2 years)
2007 Points +99%
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1155G7
1511 Points +50%
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
1351 Points +34%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
  (561 - 1511, n=104)
1170 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1135G7
1008 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G1
440 Points -56%
3DMark 11 Performance
4589 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
15140 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3226 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1131 points
Help
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 43 35
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 77.1 70.4 41.1 36.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 30.7 14 8.19
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 19.5 25.4 26.4

排放和电源管理

噪声排放

在日常操作中,风扇经常保持非常安静,只是偶尔打开。然而,在更大的负载下,风扇的高频噪音绝对是引人注目的,在极端情况下,其水平几乎达到42 dB(A)。考虑到低性能水平,我们发现这个噪音水平总体上也太响了。在这里,你应该坚持使用推荐的电源模式,因为即使在压力测试中,我们也只能测到近37 dB(A)的最大噪音水平。在我们的测试中,我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音(如线圈啸叫)。

Noise Level

Idle
24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A)
Load
33.1 / 41.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.733.524.826.425.8252525.332.127.728.230.327.9312431.426.126.424.434.34026.929.624.927.226.929.75024.831.32627.628.831.3632527.522.223.921.729.7802628.324.724.624.132.61002323.823.521.920.622.612527.323.121.320.419.820.916021.121.619.319.819.420.520021.420.718.918.416.819.225021.720.418.718.115.919.131523.422.221.117.914.820.840026.122.922.119.713.521.650026.523.924.320.611.323.563027.223.222.720.411.123.480027.523.621.618.411.422.7100027.223.821.520.710.522.7125029.224.726.120.61124.7160032.526.426.423.510.725.5200029.425.426.622.911.325.7250031.827.325.421.611.426.6315031.827.227.223.511.727.1400031.626.926.422.412.627500030.626.525.620.212.626.3630027.821.92116.212.821.7800023.817.417.314.81317.2100002015.315.213.912.8151250018.614.314.313.512.414.11600014.912.81312.81212.5SPL41.837.136.733.124.336.8N3.72.52.41.70.62.4median 27.2median 23.2median 21.6median 20.2median 12.6median 22.6Delta4.32.73.42.61.72.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMicrosoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1155G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i5-1035G1, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Noise
0%
-24%
-9%
off / environment *
24.3
26
-7%
23.2
5%
26.4
-9%
Idle Minimum *
24.3
26
-7%
30.7
-26%
26.4
-9%
Idle Average *
24.3
26
-7%
30.8
-27%
26.4
-9%
Idle Maximum *
24.3
26
-7%
30.8
-27%
26.4
-9%
Load Average *
33.1
33.5
-1%
48.3
-46%
36.9
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
36.7
33.5
9%
46.4
-26%
Load Maximum *
41.8
33.5
20%
50.3
-20%
44.2
-6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲操作时,紧凑的Surface Laptop Go 2的温度就已经比预期的略高。但这并没有导致任何限制。这也适用于要求较高的情况,我们在底部测得的最高温度几乎达到47℃(117°F)。然而,由于热点在设备的中心,即使在那个时候,你仍然可以把笔记本放在你的腿上。

在压力测试期间,处理器的功耗很快就达到了15瓦的水平。大约一小时后,即使这个数值也进一步下降到14瓦。 此时,GPU时钟速度的强烈变化非常突出。

压力测试期间的CPU/iGPU数值
压力测试期间的CPU/iGPU数值
Max. Load
 40.9 °C41.4 °C35.8 °C 
 41 °C41.4 °C36.3 °C 
 32.3 °C30.2 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 36.6 °C
44.7 °C46.7 °C45.7 °C
41.1 °C46.6 °C45.4 °C
29.4 °C31.8 °C32 °C
Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 40.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
表面温度-顶部(压力测试)
表面温度-顶部(压力测试)
表面温度-底部(压力测试)
表面温度-底部(压力测试)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
Intel Core i5-1155G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
Intel Core i5-1035G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Heat
6%
5%
17%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.4
43.5
-5%
44
-6%
30.4
27%
42
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
46.7
44.8
4%
44
6%
44.4
5%
51
-9%
Idle Upper Side *
28.5
26.2
8%
27
5%
21.8
24%
30
-5%
Idle Bottom *
31.5
26.4
16%
27
14%
28
11%
34.6
-10%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

从主观上讲,这款扬声器产生了一个体面的声音,虽然缺乏一些声压。然而,高频是非常平衡的,这对声音的再现是有益的。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2025.828.62530.331.63124.428.34026.9295028.830.46321.726.68024.131.410020.633.312519.836.916019.439.320016.848.225015.951.331514.856.640013.559.950011.360.263011.159.480011.462.8100010.566.812501170160010.769.2200011.369.1250011.464315011.764.3400012.663.7500012.658.7630012.861.880001362.91000012.859.21250012.457.2160001255.2SPL24.377.5N0.639.2median 12.6median 59.9Delta1.7633.436.621.721.82020.62223.522.434.225.730.422.435.717.747.122.457.921.161.615.859.7156213.462.416.168.113.169.211.463.110.766.910.165.510.468.31168.71167.111.266.811.567.511.670.611.967.111.968.711.965.512.162.811.862.41160.623.979.60.547.3median 11.9median 65.523.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMicrosoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

与前代产品相比,空闲运行时的功耗略有增加,这是由于最大亮度更高。在负载下,我们确定最大约为40瓦,因此达到了39瓦电源的极限。然而,由于消耗量随后不断下降,电源只是勉强够大。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.46 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.8 / 7.8 / 8.6 Watt
Load midlight 29.8 / 39.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

05101520253035Tooltip

Power Consumption With External Monitor

05101520253035Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø30.7 (26.4-37.3)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø35.3 (29.2-37.7)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø24.7 (21.6-33.8)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø30.7 (27.1-37)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø23.8 (22.7-27.4)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø24.8 (23.7-27.5)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø6.17 (5.35-7.87)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面,新的Surface Laptop Go 2被所有的对比设备甚至是它的前辈所超越。在150cd/m²亮度的WLAN测试中,我们确定的运行时间约为7.5小时,在全亮度下,仅有4.5小时。尽管电池容量相当低,只有41Wh,但考虑到低显示分辨率,结果还是有点低。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 101)
7h 33min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 101)
4h 26min
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 41 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9305 Core i5 FHD
i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 52 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh
VAIO SX12 VJS124X1011P
i5-1155G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 53 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop Go Core i5
i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 39 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
453
554
22%
960
112%
803
77%
481
6%
626 ?(303 - 1144, n=66, last 2 years)
38%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳
+ 良好的键盘
+ 合适的显示屏
+ 色彩偏差小
+ 快速的无线网络
+ 足够的性能满足日常工作

Cons

- 没有维护选项
- 没有键盘照明
- 高频率的风扇
- 处理器性能低于其潜力
- 只有一年的保修期

结论 - Surface Laptop Go 2显示了一些弱点

测试微软Surface Laptop Go 2。测试装置由数码港提供。
测试微软Surface Laptop Go 2。测试装置由数码港提供。

微软并没有真正进一步开发第二代Surface Laptop Go 2,而只是为其配备了一个稍微强大的Core i5处理器。然而,性能总体上仍然处于相当低的水平,但对于许多用户来说,绝对应该仍然能够满足日常任务。但价格仍然是个问题,因为原建议零售价近900欧元(约903美元)实在是太高了,甚至不能用高质量的机箱来证明,它根本不提供任何维护选项。另一方面,价格在发布后仅几周就已经下降,现在你必须为配备8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘的配置支付大约700欧元(约合702美元)。考虑到较低的显示分辨率,特别是缺乏键盘照明,这个价格对我们来说仍然略高。

即使有更强大的Tiger Lake 处理器,Surface Laptop Go 2的性能水平仍然很低。考虑到功能的缺乏,微软的建议零售价显然定得太高。在日常操作中,我们特别想念键盘照明。

除了高质量的外壳,我们喜欢良好的打字体验,也喜欢交货状态下体面的色彩还原。WLAN性能很好,在日常操作中的连接通常是足够的,即使你不得不在没有当前标准(如雷电)的情况下生活。如果价格还能再降一点,你可以开始考虑购买。Surface Laptop Go 2在700欧元(约702美元)的价格上其实没有任何竞争对手。虽然 戴尔XPS 13 9305采用旧的16:9显示屏,提供更多的设备功能,但它目前的价格至少是800欧元(约803美元)。目前,你几乎找不到Apple MacBook Air M1价格低于1000欧元(约合1004美元)。然而,这两个竞争对手都有一些优势,也是总体上更好的设备。

价格和可用性

Surface Laptop Go 2的价格略有不同,取决于供应商。从 570美元起,从微软直接购买,该设备是最实惠的,你也可以从亚马逊购买,起价为600美元,例如。

Microsoft Surface Laptop Go 2 Core i5 - 08/18/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
50 / 75 → 66%
Weight
73 / 20-75 → 97%
Battery
77%
Display
88%
Games Performance
62 / 78 → 79%
Application Performance
84 / 85 → 99%
Temperature
89%
Noise
84%
Audio
75 / 91 → 83%
Camera
31 / 85 → 37%
Average
74%
83%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微软Surface Laptop Go 2评测--旧硬件的紧凑型伴侣
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-08-23 (Update: 2022-08-23)