Razer Edge 评测--可变身为游戏掌上电脑的小型平板电脑

Name: Razer Edge
Brand: Razer

微型游戏设备 Razer Edge 是一款基于Android 的游戏平板电脑，可通过 Kishi V2 Pro 控制器变成掌上电脑。与基于 Windows 的掌上电脑相比，它不仅重量更轻，最关键的是价格也更实惠。我们对 Edge 进行了深入了解。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/21/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Gaming Handheld Touchscreen

游戏专家 Razer 通过 Edge 平板电脑提供了一种相对实惠的掌上设备，其目标用户不仅是那些喜欢Android 游戏的用户，还包括借助 Steam Link、GeForce Now 和其他流媒体解决方案的要求更高的人群。

实际上，Razer Edge 更像是一个小巧的平板电脑，可以通过附带的 Kishi V2 Pro 控制器变身为掌上电脑。Razer 将仅 Wi-Fi 版的零售价定为大约 500 欧元（400 美元），而 5G 版仅在美国销售。在撰写这篇评论时，价格已经大幅下降，这使得 Razer 平板电脑成为一个极具吸引力的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Edge

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 660

Memory

6 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.80 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 387 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 95.94 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Rotation, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 10.8 x 167.8 x 84.5

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, 1080p Video up to 60 FPS)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, THX Spatial Audio, Keyboard: Onscreen, Razer Kishi V2 Pro Controller (Wired powered via USB-C instead, 2 joystick, 8 button, 1 D-pad, 2 triggers, 2 bumpers, 2 programmable buttons, haptics, audio jack 3.5 mm), 12 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L3; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10 ; Bluetooth audio codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS , LDAC

Weight

264 g

Price

500 Euro

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.6 %	04/2024	Razer Edge SD G3x Gen 1, Adreno 660	264 g	10.8 mm	6.80"	2400x1080
85.2 %	01/2024	Ayaneo Kun R7 7840U, Radeon 780M	942 g	22 mm	8.40"	2560x1600
84.9 %	01/2024	Lenovo Legion Go Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M	845 g	41 mm	8.80"	2560x1600
88.6 %	02/2024	Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750	225 g	8.9 mm	6.78"	2400x1080
85.9 %	06/2022	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	210 g	8.5 mm	6.67"	2400x1080

外壳 - Razer Edge 采用大量塑料包裹

Razer Edge 的显示屏相当小巧，但却相当厚重。我们说的不仅是相当厚的机身，还有相当过时的屏占比，仅为 79%。不过，至少没有打孔摄像头来干扰屏幕上的内容。

Edge 做工精良。磨砂铝边框感觉非常高档，整齐地包裹着显示屏，显示屏由康宁大猩猩 6 号玻璃保护。背面由哑光塑料制成，但会留下指纹。虽然后盖整体非常贴合，但它与边框之间的缝隙可以更均匀一些。背面还有用于散热风扇的排气口。这款平板电脑的防护等级为 IP52，这意味着当机身倾斜达 15°时，它可以防止有限的灰尘进入和滴水。不过，在附带的说明中，Razer 补充说该设备可以在短时间浸入浅水后安然无恙。

随附的岸V2 Pro游戏控制器完全由塑料制成，从材质上看，外观和手感都相当不错。按键的移动距离相差很大，但启动点非常精确。Razer 平板电脑只需卡入控制器并通过 USB 端口连接即可。虽然这样做效果不错，但安装起来感觉有点摇晃。连接控制器后，Razer Edge 的尺寸为 265.6 x 92.2 x 33.9 毫米（约 10.5 x 3.6 x 1.3 英寸），重 402 克（约 0.89 磅）。

尺寸比较

规格 - 支持 USB 3.2 和 microSD

Razer Edge 配备了一个 USB 3.2 Gen 2 端口，纸面传输速度可达 10 Gbit/s。但在拷贝测试中，我们只达到了 246.77 MB/s。该接口支持 OTG，也兼容 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式的存储驱动器。Edge 既不支持 NTFS，也不支持有线视频输出。

顶部：音量控制、电源按钮、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt） — 顶部：音量控制、电源按钮、麦克风

右：扬声器、USB 端口（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特） — 右侧：扬声器、USB 端口

底部：麦克风、microSD 插槽（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特） — 底部麦克风、microSD 插槽

microSD 读卡器

microSD 插槽兼容所有传统的存储卡型号。不过，它不支持 exFAT 文件系统，只能用于移动存储。这意味着应用程序不能直接安装在 microSD 卡上，不过你可以进入开发者选项，强制设备允许这样做。

对于Android 设备来说，读卡器的速度相当一般，仅在复制测试中表现平平。不过，基于 Windows 的竞争对手在这方面要快得多。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	146.02 MB/s +918%
Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB	132.46 MB/s +824%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	14.34 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB	191.7 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101	144.57 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø24 (14.4-50.6)

Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.7 (31-81.2)

软件 -Android 12，无 DRM 认证

Razer Edge 装有谷歌Android 12，尚未升级到Android 13（更不用说 14）。在撰写本文时，安全补丁的日期为 2024 年 2 月 1 日，Play 更新的日期为 2024 年 3 月。因此，两者都是最新的。现在还不清楚 Edge 还能支持多久的更新。Razer 尚未对此作出回应。一旦收到他们的回复，我们将立即更新本文。

Razer 大部分时间都在使用

Android ，几乎没有安装任何第三方应用程序。设备上只预装了GeForce Now、Parsec、Steam Link 和公司自己的 Nexus 应用程序，并可根据需要轻松卸载。

系统方面还启用了用户帐户控制。

连接性和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备三频 Wi-Fi 的 Razer 手持设备

Razer Edge 支持 Wi-Fi 6E，包括 6GHz 频段。这在同价位产品中并不常见，但考虑到该设备的用途，它具有巨大的优势。当连接到我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000）时，该平板电脑提供了很高且稳定的传输速率。

Wi-Fi 版不支持卫星导航。

Networking
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	908 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	801 (min: 371) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1480 (min: 1022) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1448 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼81%
Ayaneo Kun Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
iperf3 receive AXE11000	981 (min: 888) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1607 (min: 1530) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1753 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Go Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1711 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1561 (min: 1318) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1615 (min: 1509) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1789 (min: 1485) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	815 (min: 767) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	941 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1734 (min: 1577) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1505 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	824 (min: 405) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	902 (min: 875) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1768 (min: 1697) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1342 (min: 580) MBit/s ∼75%

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1480 (1022-1671)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1768 (1697-1848)

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1324-1573)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1320 (580-1521)

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (397-985)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø810 (405-844)

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø789 (371-869)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø902 (875-928)

前置摄像头 - 500 万像素全高清

Razer Edge 背面没有任何摄像头，只配备了一个 500 万像素的前置摄像头。用这枚摄像头拍摄的照片看起来有点太暗，光线稍弱时已经开始出现明显的噪点。

这里的重点可能是视频通话和流媒体。在视频模式下（最大 1080p 和 60 fps），摄像头的裁剪系数较高，但质量相当不错，包括 HDR。两个麦克风确保了极佳的语音清晰度，但会让用户听起来有些刺耳。

配件和保修 - 包括岸 V2 Pro

在包装盒内，您会发现一个 Kishi V2 Pro 游戏控制器、一条 USB-C 电缆和一套 Razer Edge 附带的贴纸。

该设备提供为期 12 个月的保修服务，但无论如何，法定保修条款均适用。

输入设备和操作 - 关注基本要素

Edge 上的电容式触摸屏可同时检测多达十个触摸输入，并能快速、精确地作出反应。Razer 没有提供有关显示屏触摸采样率的任何信息，但我们使用一个应用程序测得的数值高达 380Hz。

生物识别安全对于游戏平板电脑来说是一个陌生的概念。屏幕锁只有基本的保护功能。我们希望该设备至少能支持人脸识别。线性振动电机提供了清晰的反馈。

在软件功能方面，Edge 还算基本。但至少岸控制器提供了一些额外的功能。除了众多控制选项外，你还可以找到一个 Nexus 应用程序专用按钮和一个截图按钮。

显示屏 - AMOLED，频率高达 144Hz

Razer Edge 显示屏本身的尺寸与智能手机上的显示屏相似，拥有全高清+分辨率。系统没有采用自适应刷新率，用户可以在固定的 60、90、120 和 144Hz 之间进行选择。

在显示纯白背景时，显示器的平均峰值亮度为 445 cd/m²。无论是否启用环境光传感器，亮度都不会有太大变化。当明暗表面均匀分布时，峰值亮度高达 622 cd/m²（APL18）。在播放 YouTube 上的 HDR 视频时，面板亮度高达 647 cd/m²。

。

在最低亮度下，OLED 闪烁在 240Hz 左右徘徊，有点不稳定，振幅曲线相当平缓。对闪烁敏感的人在使用屏幕时可能会遇到问题。


439 cd/m²	447 cd/m²	457 cd/m²
438 cd/m²	449 cd/m²	451 cd/m²
434 cd/m²	442 cd/m²	448 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 457 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 445 cd/m² Minimum: 2.05 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 449 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Razer Edge AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.80	Ayaneo Kun IPS, 2560x1600, 8.40	Lenovo Legion Go IPS, 2560x1600, 8.80	Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.78	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen		7%	-0%	119%	60%
Brightness middle	449	680 51%	411 -8%	1699 278%	807 80%
Brightness	445	678 52%	413 -7%	1698 282%	806 81%
Brightness Distribution	95	91 -4%	80 -16%	98 3%	99 4%
Black Level *		0.5	0.42
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.8	4 17%	5.94 -24%	1.9 60%	1.2 75%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.1	9 -11%	10.56 -30%	4.7 42%	3.1 62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.5	9 -64%	0.92 83%	2.8 49%	2.2 60%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2 ^110%	1.93 ^114%	2.26 ^97%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7538 ^86%	7188 ^90%	8064 ^81%	6648 ^98%	6439 ^101%
Contrast		1360	979
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		1	2.95

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

244 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 244 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 244 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

无法为 Razer Edge 创建其他色彩配置文件。在默认设置下，这款游戏平板电脑的白平衡偏冷，饱和度较高。尽管如此，色彩仍能准确再现。只有绿色在这方面略显突出。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3975 ms rise
0.74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.338 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.97 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4965 ms rise
0.97 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.469 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

如果要确保屏幕在户外清晰可读，阳光就不能太强烈。亮度储备太低，显示屏无法在阳光直射下使用。

Edge 的可视角度很好。从锐利的角度观察屏幕时，只有轻微的亮度衰减和轻微的绿色色调。

性能 - 配备 Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 的 Razer Edge

Razer Edge 配备了高通游戏 SoC - Snapdragon G3x Gen 1。骁龙 888+ 5G的缩减版。无论如何，我们几乎看不出任何不同之处：CPU、连接模块和主板完全相同，GPU 运行速度稍快，高达 900MHz。它可能缺少了许多相机功能，在人工智能基准测试中的表现也要差 40% 以上。

与此同时，骁龙 888+ 已经有三年多的历史，因此不再是什么高端芯片。尽管 G3x 仍领先于目前的中端 SoC。

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Go	10990 Points +193%
Lenovo Legion Go	10872 Points +189%
Ayaneo Kun	7778 Points +107%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	7357 Points +96%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	7193 Points +91%
Razer Edge	3757 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	3757 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)	2592 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=46, last 2 years)	2260 Points -40%
Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Go	2538 Points +59%
Lenovo Legion Go	2530 Points +59%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	2318 Points +45%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	2258 Points +41%
Ayaneo Kun	2194 Points +37%
Razer Edge	1596 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	1596 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)	1128 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=46, last 2 years)	805 Points -50%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Go	1898 Points +62%
Lenovo Legion Go	1896 Points +62%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	1672 Points +43%
Ayaneo Kun	1355 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	1298 Points +11%
Razer Edge	1170 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	1170 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)	890 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=70, last 2 years)	661 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Go	9803 Points +176%
Lenovo Legion Go	9589 Points +170%
Ayaneo Kun	8389 Points +136%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	6415 Points +81%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	3624 Points +2%
Razer Edge	3553 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	3553 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=70, last 2 years)	2341 Points -34%
Nothing Phone (2a)	2177 Points -39%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	2162423 Points
Nothing Phone (2a)	693939 Points
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 1936538, n=20, last 2 years)	410993 Points
Razer Edge	Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	1650926 Points +123%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	978273 Points +32%
Razer Edge	740704 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	740704 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)	580983 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=53, last 2 years)	449757 Points -39%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	21385 Points +32%
Razer Edge	16261 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	16261 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	13827 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (2a)	10924 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=67, last 2 years)	8773 Points -46%

CrossMark - Overall
Razer Edge	987 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	987 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)	695 Points -30%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=53, last 2 years)	665 Points -33%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	10235 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	6849 Points +1%
Razer Edge	6797 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	6797 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)	4115 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=54, last 2 years)	3605 Points -47%
System
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	13729 Points +21%
Razer Edge	11334 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	11334 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	9473 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (2a)	6734 Points -41%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=54, last 2 years)	6530 Points -42%
Memory
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	11263 Points +59%
Razer Edge	7081 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	7081 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	7037 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (2a)	4567 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=54, last 2 years)	4248 Points -40%
Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	34464 Points +117%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	19984 Points +26%
Razer Edge	15906 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	15906 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)	10646 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=54, last 2 years)	6508 Points -59%
Web
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	2059 Points +23%
Razer Edge	1672 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	1672 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	1663 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=54, last 2 years)	1208 Points -28%
Nothing Phone (2a)	876 Points -48%

AImark - Score v3.x
Nothing Phone (2a)	11407 Points +1183%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=40, last 2 years)	5199 Points +485%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	1456 Points +64%
Razer Edge	889 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	889 Points 0%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Nothing Phone (2a)	26315 Points +40%
Razer Edge	18822 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	18822 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	17748 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=51, last 2 years)	8717 Points -54%

Legend

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB

Lenovo Legion Go AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1

Average of class Tablet

图形处理由集成的 Adreno 660.同样，它不再处于最前沿，但仍能提供出色的性能。特别是，它与中端 GPU 相比，优势明显。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5185 Points +259%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2537 Points +75%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1446 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1156 Points -20%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5226 Points +242%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2578 Points +69%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1526 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1153 Points -24%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	19690 Points +242%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9837 Points +71%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5750 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4259 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5817 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4140 Points -29%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	8672 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	8655 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	19803 Points +116%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9873 Points +8%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9182 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5966 Points -35%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	33376 Points +179%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16937 Points +42%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11965 Points
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6935 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	8172 Points +61%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5062 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4182 Points -17%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4006 Points -21%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	165 fps +15%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps -16%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	498 fps +94%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	398 fps +55%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	257 fps
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	257 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	159 fps -38%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	165 fps +35%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	122 fps
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	122 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps -24%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -51%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	314 fps +118%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	209 fps +45%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	158 fps +66%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps +20%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -40%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	248 fps +132%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	136 fps +27%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	107 fps
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	107 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -37%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	117 fps +109%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +32%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -39%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	131 fps +102%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps +29%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps +53%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps +40%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +143%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +32%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps -25%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -5%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps -6%
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	183 fps +135%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +38%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -32%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	37 fps +185%
Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13 fps
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.4 fps -28%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)	162.37 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	156.4 Points 0%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)	156.36 Points
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	94.153 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=61, last 2 years)	84.7 Points -46%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	76.624 Points -51%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)	171 Points +5%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)	163 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	163 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	125 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=59, last 2 years)	85.6 Points -47%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Lenovo Legion Go (Chrome 82)	300 Points +49%
Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82)	228 Points +13%
Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82)	188.4 Points -6%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)	201 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	201 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)	194 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	185 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	137 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=43, last 2 years)	121 Points -40%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)	180 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	180 runs/min 0%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)	166 runs/min -8%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)	104 runs/min -42%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=54, last 2 years)	77 runs/min -57%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	64.38 runs/min -64%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)	63669 Points +20%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)	53177 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	53177 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	30884 Points -42%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=74, last 2 years)	23023 Points -57%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	18562 Points -65%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=61, last 2 years)	3173 ms * -309%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)	1569.6 ms * -102%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	1323.4 ms * -70%
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro (Edge 121.0.2277.84)	852.3 ms * -10%
Razer Edge (Chrome 123)	776.2 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 ()	776 ms * -0%
Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82)	746 ms * +4%
Ayaneo Kun (Chrome 82)	565 ms * +27%
Lenovo Legion Go (Chrome 82)	556 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

	Razer Edge	Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	Nothing Phone (2a)	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		189%	62%	9%	3%	-35%
Sequential Read 256KB	1442.83	4016.67 178%	1832.34 27%	1028.37 -29%	1599 ?(1030 - 3134, n=56) 11%	847 ?(163 - 3414, n=70, last 2 years) -41%
Sequential Write 256KB	692.3	3153.4 355%	1482.42 114%	952 38%	777 ?(233 - 1332, n=56) 12%	530 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=70, last 2 years) -23%
Random Read 4KB	264.67	434.63 64%	328.58 24%	273.19 3%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=56) -8%	167.7 ?(18.4 - 451, n=70, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	252.12	648 157%	457.69 82%	311.8 24%	245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=56) -3%	151.6 ?(8.23 - 503, n=70, last 2 years) -40%

游戏 - 不仅为Android 游戏奠定坚实基础

我们首先使用 GameBench 分析工具和选定的游戏对 Razer Edge 的常规游戏性能进行了测试。在测试过程中，这款游戏平板电脑表现出了很高的性能，但也达到了技术极限。玄心冲击》运行相当流畅，但无法使用 120 fps 模式，这在意料之中。英雄联盟》虽然只有在降低设置的情况下才能稳定地达到如此高的帧率。相比之下，《PUBG Mobile》只缺少 90 帧模式，但在其他方面都能在较高设置下流畅运行。

Kishi V2 Pro 游戏手柄的一大优势，尤其是在第一人称射击游戏或平台游戏中。你不仅可以用它来玩兼容的游戏，还可以通过 Nexus 应用程序在显示屏上执行虚拟触摸手势，以最大限度地扩大可视面积。遗憾的是，设置这个功能需要一些时间。

您还可以在 Razer Edge 上使用 Xbox Cloud Gaming、Steam Link、GeForce Now 或 PS Remote Play，在平板电脑上玩主机或 PC 游戏。对于本地解决方案（如 Steam Link），必须使用高速 Wi-Fi 连接（最低 Wi-Fi 6），否则可能会出现视觉故障和卡顿。

Razer Edge; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø59.3 (30-61)

Razer Edge; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø58.8 (45-61)

Razer Edge; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø55.6 (42-61)

Razer Edge; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition; 5.1.0.7895: Ø119.2 (108-122)

Razer Edge; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max; 5.1.0.7895: Ø60.2 (58-61)

Razer Edge; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.1.0: Ø59.3 (52-61)

Razer Edge; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.1.0: Ø59 (51-61)

Razer Edge; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.1.0: Ø39.5 (31-41)

排放 - 带风扇的 Razer 平板电脑

噪音排放

如有需要，Razer Edge 将使用主动风冷。当设备运行正常的系统进程时，风扇通常听不到声音或完全空转。但在加载时，尤其是游戏时，风扇会发出很大的声音。尽管声音不会太大（在我们的测试中略高于 41 dB(A)），但在安静的环境中还是会让人分心。如果负载不足，风扇就会开始以脉冲方式运转，有时会非常烦人。

温度

在负载情况下，Razer Edge 某些位置的表面温度可能会超过 47°C (116.6°F)。游戏时，左手所在区域也会明显发热。这并不令人担忧，但肯定会造成困扰。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，我们看到了明显的性能下降。虽然这种下降在合理范围内，但考虑到它采用了主动散热技术，我们原本期望它能提供更稳定的性能。例如摩托罗拉 Edge 30 Fusion的性能与之相当，而 ROG Phone 5s则更加稳定（两者都配备了骁龙 888+).

Max. Load

Idle


47.7 °C	43.4 °C	36.1 °C
47.5 °C	46.7 °C	37.1 °C
45.6 °C	44.7 °C	38.1 °C

Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 43 °C


35.1 °C	37.3 °C	38.1 °C
34.7 °C	35.9 °C	37.8 °C
35.8 °C	35.1 °C	35.1 °C

Maximum: 38.1 °C
Average: 36.1 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø30.2 (26.7-34.8)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.8 (103.3-111.5)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø96.1 (86.1-111.7)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.1 (27.7-54.9)

Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)

Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.07 (7.68-9.12)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.07 (7.07-15.3)

Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)

Razer Edge Adreno 660, SD G3x Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø30.7 (27.8-35.1)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.6 (24.1-28.9)

Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.7 (24.3-29.1)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Razer Edge	84.2 (7.68^min - 9.12^max) %
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	46.2 (7.07^min - 15.3^max) % -45%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Razer Edge	76.9 (26.7^min - 34.8^max) %
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	50.4 (27.7^min - 54.9^max) % -34%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Razer Edge	79.2 (27.8^min - 35.1^max) %

Legend

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 660, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

发言人

Razer Edge 的两个扬声器并没有带来令人惊叹的音频体验，反而相当平庸。中音过于突出，导致高音听起来略显空洞，而低音则很弱。

在平板电脑模式下，USB-C 端口可用作音频输出。将设备插入游戏控制器后，您就可以使用专用音频插孔（3.5 毫米；信噪比：78.5 dBFS）和 USB 端口。如果您想使用无线耳机或扬声器，还可使用蓝牙 5.2。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Ayaneo Kun audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 22% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 19%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - Razer 游戏掌上电脑的 5,000 毫安时电池

耗电量

Razer Edge 的功耗并无异常。高耗电值（对于Android 设备而言）是我们使用 Burnout Benchmark 的结果，而我们比较的其他两款Android 设备则使用了同时过时的稳定性测试进行分析。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.09 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.33 / 1.37 Watt
Load	12.16 / 15.14 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Razer Edge 5000 mAh	Ayaneo Kun mAh	Lenovo Legion Go mAh	Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 5500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 4700 mAh
Power Consumption		-988%	-671%	33%	19%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	14 -1067%	11.5 -858%	0.82 32%	1 17%
Idle Average *	1.33	17.56 -1220%	12 -802%	0.96 28%	1.53 -15%
Idle Maximum *	1.37	27 -1871%	17.4 -1170%	1.19 13%	1.57 -15%
Load Average *	12.16	38.1 -213%	45 -270%	7.3 40%	4.39 64%
Load Maximum *	15.14	101 -567%	54 -257%	7.3 52%	8.1 46%
Witcher 3 ultra *		83.5	42.6

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1: Ø6.89 (1.233-13.1)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.97 (1.137-14)

Leistungsaufnahme: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.1 (10.4-12.7)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13 (12.3-13.9)

Razer Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.112 (0.917-1.302)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.211 (0.976-1.435)

电池寿命

Razer 承诺 Edge 平板电脑及其 5,000 毫安时电池可提供长达 10 小时的视频流。在我们进行的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中，在屏幕亮度调节到 150 cd/m²、刷新率固定为 144Hz 的情况下，该设备持续了近 9 个小时。这意味着，如果降低亮度或刷新率，10 个小时应该没问题。尽管如此，Edge 在续航时间方面并没有成为真正的猛兽。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 123)		8h 53min

Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3 (sort by value)
Razer Edge 5000 mAh	533 min
Ayaneo Kun mAh	602 min
Lenovo Legion Go mAh	358 min
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro 5500 mAh	929 min
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 4700 mAh	747 min
Witcher 3 ultra (sort by value)
Ayaneo Kun mAh	101 min

Pros

+ 快速 144Hz AMOLED 显示屏

+ 附带岸 V2 Pro 控制器

+ 带视频输出的 USB 3.2

+ 可扩展存储

+ 三频 Wi-Fi

Cons

- 冷却风扇

- 未通过 DRM 认证

- 不支持 exFAT 的 microSD

- 不支持未知更新

结论：功能强大的小型游戏平板电脑

Razer Edge 评测：评测设备由 Razer 德国公司友情提供。(照片：Daniel Schmidt，生成内容：Adobe Firefly) — Razer Edge 评测：评测设备由 Razer 德国公司友情提供。

Razer Edge 首先是一款完全专注于游戏的微型平板电脑。虽然骁龙 G3x 1 代虽然其内部的骁龙 G3x Gen 1 已经不再是最前沿的技术，但仍能提供高水平的性能。附带的 Kishi V2 Pro 控制器可卡在 Edge 上，使其成为一个完全成熟的游戏掌上设备。此外，这款平板电脑比基于 Windows 系统的竞争对手要轻巧得多，价格也便宜得多。

Razer Edge 以其超高的性价比脱颖而出，很好地满足了市场需求。

除了可以运行Android 游戏外，Edge 还可以让你从云端串流 PC 游戏，也完全可以从家用游戏机或 PC 本地串流游戏。特别是，Razer 平板电脑的速度应该足以在自己的网络内进行流媒体传输。遗憾的是，Razer 决定放弃 DRM 认证，这意味着 Edge 并不完全适合作为媒体流平台，尽管它能够通过电缆输出视频信号。由于不支持 exFAT，板载 microSD 插槽的功能大打折扣。

如果能有一个内置脚架就更好了，风扇控制有时也很烦人。总的来说，我们希望主动散热风扇能发挥更大的作用。支持更新的时间也很短。显示屏也可以稍大一些。

在这个价位段，很难找到真正能替代 Razer Edge 的产品。充其量，像 Poco F5等智能手机能提供类似的性能，但不带任何控制器。经济型平板电脑并不是游戏串流的真正选择，因为它们缺乏这种使用情况所需的快速 Wi-Fi 功能。

由于 Razer Edge 是作为平板电脑进行评测的，而噪音排放与此产品类别并不相关，因此我们决定对风扇脉动进行扣分。

价格

Razer Edge Wi-Fi 可直接从购买，价格约为 500 欧元（400 美元）。.5G 版本仅在美国有售，售价约为 600 美元。在撰写本评论时，该设备在亚马逊等在线零售商的售价要便宜得多（德国为 360 欧元，美国为 300 美元）。

对于有意为智能手机购买游戏手柄的用户，Kishi V2 Pro 可以单独购买，并与许多Android 手机兼容。亚马逊的售价约为123 欧元（或130 美元）。

Razer Edge - 2024-04-16 04/16/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

67 / 80 → 83%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

56 / 70 → 80%

Weight

87 / 40-88 → 98%

Battery

85%

Display

86%

Games Performance

62 / 78 → 79%

Application Performance

89 / 92 → 97%

Temperature

87%

Noise

80%

Audio

76 / 91 → 84%

Add Points

-2%

Average

73%

87%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 151 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 392846 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Razer Edge 评测--可变身为游戏掌上电脑的小型平板电脑

Daniel Schmidt, 2024-04-21 (Update: 2024-04-21)