黑莓 Priv 智能手机简短评测

Name: BlackBerry Priv
Brand: BlackBerry

烫手智能机。与触控逆向而驰，黑莓依然为它的旗舰机型Priv配备了滑出式的实体键盘。我们的测试将会考量它是否在传统和现代间找到了合理的平衡，同时还带来了其他什么功能。

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 08/30/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen ARM

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

BlackBerry Priv (Blackberry Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 418

Memory

3 GB

Display

5.40 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 544 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, AMOLED, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23.6 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 2 TB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 运动监控仪, 高度计, 加速感应器, 飞行时间计, 陀螺仪, 磁感仪, 近距感应器, Miracast, USB OTG, nano-SIM

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 13, 17, 20, 28, 41), 身体辐射值: 0.432 W/kg, 头部辐射值: 0.471 W/kg, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.4 x 147 x 77.2

Battery

12.9 Wh, 3410 mAh, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 23.9 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 422 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 18 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.2, 2160p 视频拍摄 @ 30 FPS)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix (定焦 f/2.8, 720p 视频拍摄 @ 30 FPS)

Additional features

Speakers: 前置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控和实体, 电源适配器，USB数据线，耳机, Blackberry Messenger, Blackberry Hub, DTEK, Password Keeper, WatchDox, Yahoo Finances, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

188 g, Power Supply: 53 g

Price

729 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Blackberry Priv - front with physical keyboard

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
BlackBerry Priv Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	336 MBit/s
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	303 MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	303 MBit/s -10%
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	249 MBit/s -26%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	92.5 MBit/s -72%
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.8 MBit/s -85%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	290 MBit/s +16%
BlackBerry Priv Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	250 MBit/s
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	205 MBit/s -18%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	151 MBit/s -40%
Sony Xperia XA Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash	83.6 MBit/s -67%
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.3 MBit/s -77%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Blackberry Priv

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

LG G5

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Blackberry Priv

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

LG G5

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Blackberry Priv

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

LG G5

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


432 cd/m²	413 cd/m²	307 cd/m²
430 cd/m²	327 cd/m²	304 cd/m²
432 cd/m²	315 cd/m²	307 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 432 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 363 cd/m² Minimum: 5.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 70 %
Center on Battery: 327 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.01

	BlackBerry Priv AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.40	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50	LG G5 IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.30	Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50	Google Nexus 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70	Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen		51%	-9%	-24%	38%	13%	23%
Brightness middle	327	554 69%	784 140%	361 10%	503 54%	297 -9%	583 78%
Brightness	363	552 52%	774 113%	366 1%	498 37%	297 -18%	560 54%
Brightness Distribution	70	96 37%	91 30%	87 24%	97 39%	93 33%	91 30%
Black Level *			0.43		0.38		0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.1	1.59 61%	6.5 -59%	5.1 -24%	2.09 49%	2.67 35%	3.55 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.1	2.56 68%	11.7 -44%	10 -23%		3.98 51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	2.01 16%	8 -233%	5.5 -129%	2.12 12%	2.81 -17%	3.88 -62%
Gamma	2.01 ^109%	2.01 ^109%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.08 ^106%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	6436 ^101%	6321 ^103%	8699 ^75%	7388 ^88%	6621 ^98%	6379 ^102%	7280 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		82.12	68.08			66.31	59.05
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.98	97.46			99.79	92.8
Contrast			1823		1324		1267

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

235.8 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Grayscale (default settings, target color space: sRGB)

ColorChecker (default settings, target color space: sRGB)

Saturation Sweeps (default settings, target color space: sRGB)

Colorspace (default settings, target color space: sRGB)

Colorspace (default settings, target color space: AdobeRGB)

Grayscale (default settings, target color space: AdobeRGB)

ColorChecker (adapted settings, target color space: sRGB)

Saturation Sweeps (adapted settings, target color space: sRGB)

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	3097 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6480 (6415^min) Points +109%
LG G5	5507 Points +78%
Huawei P9 Plus	6556 Points +112%
Google Nexus 5X	3530 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4429 Points +43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	1143 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2170 (2120^min) Points +90%
LG G5	2396 Points +110%
Huawei P9 Plus	1929 Points +69%
Google Nexus 5X	1246 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2538 Points +122%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	60465 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points +113%
LG G5	124244 Points +105%
Huawei P9 Plus	98413 Points +63%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	94122 Points +56%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	133626 Points +121%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	5334 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points -13%
LG G5	5581 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Plus	7159 Points +34%
Google Nexus 5X	4324 Points -19%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	779 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	994 Points +28%
LG G5	900 Points +16%
Huawei P9 Plus	1049 Points +35%
Google Nexus 5X	769 Points -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	837 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1199 Points +54%
Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	2285 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points -4%
LG G5	4807 Points +110%
Huawei P9 Plus	1512 Points -34%
Google Nexus 5X	2038 Points -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	2040 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4299 Points +88%
System (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	1984 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points +106%
LG G5	2925 Points +47%
Huawei P9 Plus	3932 Points +98%
Google Nexus 5X	1730 Points -13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1386 Points -30%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3925 Points +98%
Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	1385 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points +50%
LG G5	2079 Points +50%
Huawei P9 Plus	2019 Points +46%
Google Nexus 5X	1318 Points -5%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1465 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2206 Points +59%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	26 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	51 fps +96%
LG G5	47 fps +81%
Huawei P9 Plus	43 fps +65%
Google Nexus 5X	38 fps +46%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	18.75 fps -28%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	59 fps +127%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	38 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	81 fps +113%
LG G5	74 fps +95%
Huawei P9 Plus	41 fps +8%
Google Nexus 5X	37 fps -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	27.11 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	78.9 fps +108%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	38 fps +138%
LG G5	42 fps +163%
Huawei P9 Plus	18 fps +13%
Google Nexus 5X	16 fps 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	17.54 fps +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps +140%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	27 fps +170%
LG G5	30 fps +200%
Huawei P9 Plus	19 fps +90%
Google Nexus 5X	17 fps +70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	11.81 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	38.4 fps +284%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps +155%
LG G5	31 fps +182%
Huawei P9 Plus	10 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps +155%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	6.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps +138%
LG G5	17 fps +170%
Huawei P9 Plus	11 fps +75%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps +344%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	7.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps +108%
LG G5	18 fps +150%
Huawei P9 Plus	6.2 fps -14%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	4.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7.9 fps +80%
LG G5	11 fps +150%
Huawei P9 Plus	6.8 fps +55%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	19878 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28671 Points +44%
LG G5	28730 Points +45%
Huawei P9 Plus	19936 Points 0%
Google Nexus 5X	18898 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	27795 Points +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	24864 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	33031 Points +33%
LG G5	32109 Points +29%
Huawei P9 Plus	21807 Points -12%
Google Nexus 5X	22180 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	41615 Points +67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	11680 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	19610 Points +68%
LG G5	20997 Points +80%
Huawei P9 Plus	15331 Points +31%
Google Nexus 5X	12451 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	12854 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	1041 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points +92%
LG G5	1695 Points +63%
Huawei P9 Plus	2336 Points +124%
Google Nexus 5X	831 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1697 Points +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	1841 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points +64%
LG G5	4468 Points +143%
Huawei P9 Plus	1042 Points -43%
Google Nexus 5X	1942 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4557 Points +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	1572 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points +72%
LG G5	3277 Points +108%
Huawei P9 Plus	1188 Points -24%
Google Nexus 5X	1497 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3316 Points +111%

Legend

BlackBerry Priv Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	4481 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2564 ms * +43%
LG G5	3461 ms * +23%
Huawei P9 Plus	2792 ms * +38%
Google Nexus 5X	4734 ms * -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	5553 ms * -24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1743 ms * +61%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	7638 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13191 Points +73%
LG G5	9731 Points +27%
Huawei P9 Plus	12058 Points +58%
Google Nexus 5X	8202 Points +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	8059 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	15967 Points +109%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	95 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	163 Points +72%
LG G5	108 Points +14%
Huawei P9 Plus	130 Points +37%
Google Nexus 5X	107 Points +13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	113 Points +19%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	190 Points +100%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	42.7 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	75.1 Points +76%
LG G5	49.7 Points +16%
Huawei P9 Plus	70 Points +64%
Google Nexus 5X	45 Points +5%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	46 Points +8%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	118.7 Points +178%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	20.98 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	86.7 MB/s +313%
LG G5	89.3 MB/s +326%
Huawei P9 Plus	39.33 MB/s +87%
Google Nexus 5X	24.8 MB/s +18%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	14.6 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15.79 MB/s +8%
LG G5	16.22 MB/s +11%
Huawei P9 Plus	51.2 MB/s +251%
Google Nexus 5X	12.21 MB/s -16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	125 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	145.1 MB/s +16%
LG G5	141.3 MB/s +13%
Huawei P9 Plus	140.4 MB/s +12%
Google Nexus 5X	98.6 MB/s -21%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	221.1 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	487.3 MB/s +120%
LG G5	427.6 MB/s +93%
Huawei P9 Plus	284.3 MB/s +29%
Google Nexus 5X	245.2 MB/s +11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	51.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	50.4 MB/s -2%
LG G5	45.53 MB/s -11%
Huawei P9 Plus	24.95 MB/s -51%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	78.4 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	76.4 MB/s -3%
LG G5	78.5 MB/s 0%
Huawei P9 Plus	62.5 MB/s -20%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
BlackBerry Priv	1042 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points +99%
LG G5	1478 Points +42%
Huawei P9 Plus	2667 Points +156%
Google Nexus 5X	1115 Points +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL	1945 Points +87%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1124 Points +8%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	24 fps
	very low	28 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	47 fps

Max. Load

Idle


40.1 °C	40.7 °C	39.6 °C
41.4 °C	40.3 °C	38.7 °C
40 °C	38.7 °C	39.1 °C

Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 39.8 °C


41 °C	47.4 °C	47.4 °C
40.4 °C	44.3 °C	43.5 °C
40.2 °C	41.9 °C	42.8 °C

Maximum: 47.4 °C
Average: 43.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

BlackBerry Priv audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.31 Watt
Idle	0.85 / 1.46 / 1.47 Watt
Load	6.53 / 9.42 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	BlackBerry Priv 3410 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh	Google Nexus 5X mAh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh	Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh
Power Consumption		17%	-1%	20%	10%	-99%	9%
Idle Minimum *	0.85	0.63 26%	0.55 35%	0.87 -2%	0.55 35%	2.85 -235%	0.5 41%
Idle Average *	1.46	1.1 25%	1.37 6%	1.2 18%	1.44 1%	2.95 -102%	1.9 -30%
Idle Maximum *	1.47	1.56 -6%	2.25 -53%	1.27 14%	1.9 -29%	3.26 -122%	2.2 -50%
Load Average *	6.53	5.95 9%	6.24 4%	4.69 28%	3.36 49%	8.92 -37%	3.2 51%
Load Maximum *	9.42	6.7 29%	9.12 3%	5.63 40%	9.76 -4%	9.39 -0%	6.4 32%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		22h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 04min

	BlackBerry Priv 3410 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh	LG G5 2800 mAh	Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh	Google Nexus 5X mAh	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 3340 mAh	Apple iPhone 6S Plus 2750 mAh
Battery Runtime		42%	2%	10%	-1%	-20%	5%
Reader / Idle	1366	1663 22%	1833 34%	1446 6%	1775 30%	1078 -21%	1655 21%
H.264	656	914 39%	600 -9%	776 18%	555 -15%	611 -7%	714 9%
WiFi v1.3	416	732 76%	387 -7%	530 27%	412 -1%	369 -11%	513 23%
Load	304	392 29%	267 -12%	263 -13%	245 -19%	179 -41%	197 -35%

Pros

+ 实体键盘结合滑出设计

+ 坚固，不滑手的机身

+ 最新安卓棉花糖系统

+ 实用的软件

+ 支持USB OTG，NFC，Slimport和Miracast

+ Micro-SD卡可以作为内部存储

+ 高速无线ac

+ 非常优秀的通话功能

+ 不错的主相机

+ 准确的触控屏幕

+ 高分辨率屏幕

+ 附带高品质耳机

Cons

- 无指纹识别器

- 较差的前置相机

- 不可拆卸电池

- 高发热量，特定情况下会自动降频

- 低于高端设备一般水平的性能

- 敲击机身正面背面时声音空洞

- 仅支持USB 2.0

In review: Blackberry Priv (STV100-4). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

黑莓Priv尽管配置过硬却没能为生产商带来成功。准确的触控屏幕，防滑材质和高分辨率屏幕在日常使用中都是一种享受。多种独特软件和不错的主相机也都十分方便。虽然骁龙808很难与最新竞争机型相抗衡，但为用户提供流畅的使用体验则绰绰有余。采用滑出设计而仍然保证纤薄体型的代价就是较差的散热。另外，这台设备没有像其他旗舰机一样搭配指纹识别器或更好的前置相机。

用户对于物理键盘可能会各执己见。初次接触的用户可能很难相比触控键盘获得更快的输入速度，可能会觉得它有些多余。不过在一段时间之后，在打字时将可以不用一直寻找背光按键的位置，而屏幕也可以省出不小的空间用于显示其他内容。

黑莓的旗舰机Priv不是单纯依赖于最强劲硬件，而是在为日常使用寻找巧妙的解决方案。

尽管这台测试机因为独特的物理键盘没有直接竞争对手，但一些高端智能手机在许多方面（例如性能）都明显优于Priv，它们大多处于650欧元（约4844人民币）的价位上下。特别是三星 Galaxy S7 Edge，将会是最值得考虑的备选方案。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

BlackBerry Priv - 2016-08-19 08/19/2016 v5.1^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

83 / 75 → 100%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

52 / 60 → 86%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

85%

Games Performance

49 / 63 → 78%

Application Performance

53 / 70 → 75%

Temperature

83%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 91 → 84%

Camera

77%

Average

78%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 黑莓 Priv 智能手机简短评测

Andreas Kilian, 2016-08-30 (Update: 2016-09- 3)