Notebookcheck Logo

小米Poco X5智能手机评测--你需要的一切？

完整的包装。 Poco X5有一个明亮的120Hz屏幕，一个4800万像素的摄像头，5G，甚至还有一个快速充电电源。NFC、通过microSD卡扩展存储的能力和耳机插孔完成了这一设置。我们的审查将显示Poco X5是否是一个完美的设备。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Poco X5是Poco的一款中档设备。它高于Poco的M系列但低于F系列.在X5 5G的旁边，还有一款配置更好的X5 Pro 5G.波克公司提供不同版本的X5，有的配备128GB内存和6GB内存，有的配备256GB内存和8GB内存。

目前，较小的机型价格为226美元，如果想获得更多的内存，你将额外支付不到50美元。X5有三种颜色：黑色、蓝色和绿色。所有的颜色都是相对低调和哑光的。我们的测试机型是具有较小内存的那款。

Xiaomi Poco X5 (Poco X5 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 101 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS ( Band 1/2/4/5/8), LTE (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/66; UL 1710-1780, DL: 2110-2180; 38/40/41), 5G (Sub6G n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.98 x 165.88 x 76.21
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12 µm) + 2 MPix (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.5)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: OnScreen, Keyboard Light: yes, Charging cable, power supply, SIM-eject-Tool, case, MIUI 14, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1) / Glonass (G1) / Galileo (E1) / Baidou (E1); Widevine L1; Camera2API Level 3; SAR-Head: 0.521 W/kg, SAR-Body: 0,769 W/kg, fanless
Weight
190 g, Power Supply: 110 g
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.4 %
05/2023
Xiaomi Poco X5
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		190 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80.3 %
10/2022
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		197 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
79.1 %
03/2023
Motorola Moto G53
SD 480+, Adreno 619		183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
82 %
05/2023
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		175 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80.1 %
05/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610		188 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78.2 %
04/2023
Telekom T Phone Pro
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2		215 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.82"1640x720

Poco X5的背面是由塑料制成的。相机模块有点挤压--如果你在桌子上打字时，手机会轻微晃动。它的结构很好--按钮有一个清晰的压力点。这款手机通过了IP53认证，意味着它至少是防水的。框架和背面都是磨砂的，没有显示指纹的倾向。当你试图扭转它时，该设备会发出噪音。

尺寸比较

❌
173.9 mm 77.4 mm 8.9 mm 215 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 188 g165.88 mm 76.21 mm 7.98 mm 190 g165.4 mm 76.9 mm 8.4 mm 197 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 183 g161.6 mm 73.9 mm 7.9 mm 175 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - Poco X5有NFC和一个microSD

Poco X5依靠的是坚实的硬件。其安装的骁龙695 5G并不是完全最新的，但这并不是在这个价格类别中退缩的任何理由。一个积极的方面是，这款手机有一个音频插孔，你可以通过microSD卡扩展存储。该设备甚至有一个红外线端口和NFC。

这款手机还具有双卡功能--但只有在没有安装microSD卡的情况下，因为它是一个混合端口。它的USB-C连接只有一个USB 2.0的传输标准。

左边：混合SIM卡插槽
左边：混合SIM卡插槽
右边：带指纹扫描仪的电源键和音量摇杆
右边：带指纹扫描仪的电源键和音量摇杆
底部：麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
底部：麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
顶部：麦克风、红外线喷射器、耳机插孔
顶部：麦克风、红外线喷射器、耳机插孔

微型SD卡读卡器

小米Poco X5有一个内置的microSD读卡器，可接受高达1TB的容量。该设备也有exFAT功能。在我们使用Angelbird AV Pro V60作为参考卡的测试中，手机的传输速度还算不错。

X5的速度略高于Redmi Note 12的速度，并大大超过了Telekom T-Phone Pro.但三星Galaxy A23在传输数据方面的速度大约是其两倍。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
45.7 MB/s +68%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
27.13 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
23.6 MB/s -13%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
17.72 MB/s -35%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40 (29.3-50.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.3 (27.4-50)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.4 (32.4-80)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (28-82.5)

软件 - X5运行Android 13

Poco X5交付时安装了Android 12 - 但在设置手机后，它直接为你提供了更新到Android 13的选项。制造商依靠MIUI 14作为一个覆盖层。在第一次设置了128GB版本的手机后，有101GB可供使用。在测试的时候，安全补丁是从2023年3月1日开始的。

前工作，手机预装了相当多的应用程序--从Poco应用程序和小米及谷歌软件，一直到第三方应用程序，如TikTok、AliExpress、Booking、Amazon、Bing和Agoda。也有不少游戏已经安装。值得庆幸的是，所有这些应用程序都可以轻松删除。

目前，关于Poco X5的软件和安全更新将提供多长时间的信息还没有。

通信和GNSS - X5具有稳定的传输速率

Poco手机使用Wifi-5作为其WLAN连接。使用华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000作为我们的参考路由器，传输工作正常，我们测试中的速率保持稳定。在速度方面，X5在这个价格范围内是平均水平。这次比较中的所有其他手机都提供了类似的速度。

当涉及到蜂窝网络连接时，这款手机的表现同样不起眼。它能够实现5G，其覆盖范围很好，所有最重要的频段都被覆盖。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)
655 MBit/s +90%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
370 (362min - 371max) MBit/s +8%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
357 (172min - 378max) MBit/s +4%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (317min - 350max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 (173min - 351max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 (304min - 343max) MBit/s -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
286 (267min - 310max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)
692 MBit/s +90%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
373 (364min - 385max) MBit/s +2%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
369 (337min - 380max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
364 (183min - 386max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 (334min - 374max) MBit/s -2%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
358 (319min - 374max) MBit/s -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
325 (290min - 347max) MBit/s -11%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø338 (173-351)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (267-310)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (183-386)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (290-347)

在室外，Poco X5通过卫星快速而可靠地建立了连接。在室内，连接就不那么稳定了，其定位也相当不准确。Poco有一个单声道GNSS连接，但它支持SBAS。

我们在一次自行车旅行中使用Garmin Venus 2作为参考设备测试了卫星连接的准确性。Poco X5在定位方面做得很好，它的半径显示也很好。在日常使用中，使用谷歌地图等服务进行导航应该没有问题。

全球导航卫星系统的测量：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统的测量：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统的测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统的测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统的测量：摘要
全球导航卫星系统的测量：摘要

电话和通话质量--Poco可以实现清晰的对话

在Poco X5上打电话时，没有什么惊喜。听筒里传出的声音足够清晰和响亮。你的声音可以可靠地传输--尽管它可以更好地过滤背景噪音。使用扩音器打电话也很好。最大音量是足够的--尽管扬声器有一点响动的倾向。

Poco没有使用他们自己的电话应用程序--相反，他们依赖谷歌软件。该应用程序结构良好，不会造成任何混乱。

照相机 - X5的主相机能够胜任工作

在Poco X5的背面可以找到一个三合一的摄像头。它的主摄像头最大分辨率为4800万像素--虽然，一般来说，它使用像素分选法，实际分辨率为1200万像素。你可以使用一个单独的模式，使用完整的48MPix拍摄照片。

在良好的照明条件下，照片是不错的。它的色彩描写很自然--尽管，照片可以更清晰一点。在较暗的光线条件下，清晰度急剧下降，照片开始显得有点冲淡。

超广角镜头产生的锐度和细节效果要差很多。仔细观察，图像相当有颗粒感，根本无法与使用主摄像头拍摄的图像相提并论。微距相机的分辨率为200万像素--如果有足够的光线，用这个镜头拍摄的照片还算不错。

X5可以在所有镜头上以最大的1080p和30FPS录制视频。视频防抖工作良好--尽管，图像有时会有相当大的冲刷和污损。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera rabbitLakeUltra-wide angle lens5x ZoomLow-light
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下，X5能提供清晰的照片--在中间和边缘都是如此。在光线较弱的情况下（1勒克斯），你仍然可以看到一些细节，但图像受到相当多的噪音影响。

在受控的照明条件下，色彩的描绘很好--但照片有一种描绘得有点太亮的倾向。这在较深的绿色调中最为明显。

ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X5: 7.63 ∆E min: 1.39 - max: 15.9 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
64.6 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
75.5 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
87 ∆E
69.6 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X5: 45.52 ∆E min: 12.64 - max: 87.03 ∆E

附件和保修 - Poco公司提供了一个33瓦的电源。

Poco X5 5G配备了一个33瓦的电源
Poco X5 5G配备了一个33瓦的电源

Poco X5不仅配有一条USB线（USB-A到USB-C），而且还配有一个合适的33瓦的电源。包装中还包括一本说明手册、一个SIM卡弹出工具以及一个透明保护套。前期工作，手机的屏幕也安装了屏幕保护膜。

在德国（本评论进行的地方），Poco X5有两年的保修期。

输入设备和操作 - X5以闪电般的速度解锁

Poco为这款手机采用了谷歌的GBoard键盘，这意味着打字感觉很顺畅，你不必担心很多错误的输入。即使有屏幕保护膜，屏幕也有很好的滑行感觉。触摸输入可以被可靠地识别--即使是在屏幕的角落里。

X5可以通过电源按钮上的指纹扫描仪解锁，但你也可以通过2D面部识别来解锁。这两种方法都能快速可靠地工作--X5每次都能以闪电般的速度解锁。

单手模式被整合到MIUI中，每次都能发挥作用，使单手使用手机成为一种愉快的体验。

显示屏 - 亮度超过1,000尼特和120赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

X5的显示屏尺寸为6.67英寸，比例为20：9。其AMOLED面板允许刷新率高达120赫兹。波克公司宣传该手机的最大亮度为1,200尼特。在我们现实的APL 18测试中，我们不太能达到这些数字--但在1,035 cd/m²的情况下，屏幕仍然很好很亮。这个数字是通过激活环境光传感器实现的--在没有这个传感器的情况下，我们取得了432cd/m²的最大亮度。

与这个级别的其他设备相比，Poco X5确实赢得了一些分数。只有新的Honor Magic5 Lite管理了更高的亮度水平，并有略微更准确的颜色。与其他竞争对手相比，Poco领先很多。

然而，在120赫兹的情况下，我们的测量结果也显示，从54%的亮度开始，出现了持续的PWM--据推测，这是OLED闪烁。在较低的亮度水平，这种闪烁在151和486赫兹之间波动。

X5的设置确实提供了一个永远在线的显示选项，但它不是真正的AOD。显示屏可以自定义，但它并不是一直开着的--相反，它在屏幕完全关闭之前会显示几分钟。

681
cd/m²		683
cd/m²		691
cd/m²
679
cd/m²		674
cd/m²		689
cd/m²
679
cd/m²		677
cd/m²		690
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 691 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 682.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.47 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 674 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Poco X5
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67		Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60		Motorola Moto G53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50		Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67		Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67		Telekom T Phone Pro
IPS, 1640x720, 6.82
Screen
-102%
-23%
24%
12%
-96%
Brightness middle
674
447
-34%
587
-13%
846
26%
650
-4%
436
-35%
Brightness
683
428
-37%
559
-18%
853
25%
658
-4%
392
-43%
Brightness Distribution
98
86
-12%
91
-7%
88
-10%
97
-1%
85
-13%
Black Level *
0.31
0.4
0.28
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
5.54
-246%
2.6
-63%
1.3
19%
1.55
3%
5.2
-225%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.3
10.04
-89%
5.62
-6%
2.7
49%
2.59
51%
9.5
-79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
7.3
-192%
3.3
-32%
1.7
32%
1.8
28%
7
-180%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.03 108%
2.463 89%
2.19 100%
2.194 100%
2.29 96%
CCT
6346 102%
8853 73%
6288 103%
6570 99%
6316 103%
8585 76%
Contrast
1442
1468
1557

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 486 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 486 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 486 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25％的显示亮度
25 %
50 %的显示亮度
50 %
75％的显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

用固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度水平进行一系列的测量

由于屏幕的类型，它肯定会以其完美的黑值和巨大的对比度给人留下深刻印象。它的色彩平衡总体上是好的，而且偏差大多在一个难以察觉的区域内。使用ColorChecker，我们只在一些灰色调中看到较大的偏差--不过仍然没有什么太引人注目的。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5735 ms rise
↘ 0.6055 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7165 ms rise
↘ 0.791 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Poco X5的显示屏在户外使用时足够明亮。当环境光传感器被激活时，手机确实比停用时要轻得多--这在我们的测量中已经确定。

Poco X5得益于巨大的可视角度稳定性。颜色保持不变，你可以从几乎任何角度阅读内容，没有任何问题。

性能 - X5能胜任日常工作

Poco选择了一款骁龙6955G作为X5的SoC。这意味着该手机在我们的测试领域处于有利地位。看一下基准测试，就会发现波克公司在决定SoC时做得很好--在大多数情况下，X5取得的分数超过了使用该处理器的智能手机的平均值。

在日常使用中，该设备表现得很流畅。UI没有任何加载时间或丢帧的问题--在应用程序之间切换也证明对手机来说没有问题。然而，很明显，Poco X5对其内存的管理非常严格--后台进程关闭得相当快。举个例子：如果你在听音乐时使用X5导航，然后决定要拍照，那么一旦你打开相机应用，Spotify就会在后台关闭。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
914 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
680 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
674 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
666 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
558 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
442 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
2997 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1997 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1963 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points -3%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1891 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1632 Points -17%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +44%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
898 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (888 - 898, n=2)
893 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
888 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
734 Points -17%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
664 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
477 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +78%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2067 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1918 - 2067, n=2)
1993 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1918 Points
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1756 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1690 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1498 Points -22%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +85%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
398336 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 - 416086, n=18)
389461 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
344344 Points -14%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
334015 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
317725 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
289659 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=212, last 2 years)
11756 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10634 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10093 Points -5%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10071 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9742 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9421 Points -11%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
7854 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)
835 Points +41%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
597 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
591 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (521 - 606, n=18)
583 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
546 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
521 Points -12%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
520 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
454 Points -23%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 - 3848, n=19)
3648 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3333 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3236 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3171 Points -5%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2779 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2737 Points -18%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 - 8231, n=19)
7725 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6958 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6789 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6157 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6155 Points -12%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4888 Points -30%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 - 4836, n=19)
4227 Points +17%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3782 Points +4%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3685 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3623 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3254 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3167 Points -13%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +255%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3975 - 4426, n=19)
4340 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4166 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3975 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2876 Points -28%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2599 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2334 Points -41%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points +21%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1274 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1263 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 - 1434, n=19)
1253 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1232 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1232 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1128 Points -8%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)
21860 Points +278%
Telekom T Phone Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9243 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (5442 - 9348, n=15)
6775 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5785 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5242 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4445 Points -23%

Poco X5的Snapdragon配备了一个阿德雷诺619图形单元--凭借这一点，该手机与竞争对手相比表现良好。不幸的是，我们不可能让所有的基准测试在X5上运行。

3DMark: 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3537 Points +4%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
3532 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3392 Points
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3387 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3383 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points -21%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2899 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2412 Points -19%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2329 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1436 Points -52%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3106 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3069 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2994 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2638 Points -14%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2520 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1558 Points -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
59 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps -3%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps -14%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
62 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68 fps +62%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
56 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps -13%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
38 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps +83%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
45 fps +50%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -53%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13 fps -62%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps +71%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
23 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps -15%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps +67%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
17 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.9 fps +11%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps -4%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
6 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps +63%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
26 fps +37%
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.2 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -5%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -18%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15 fps -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10.1 fps -54%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X5
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4 fps
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.5 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2.9 fps -27%
Telekom T Phone Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps -62%

我们的浏览器基准测试显示了与其他基准测试类似的结果。与我们测试的所有设备的平均值相比，X5表现良好，没有出现任何意外。各项基准之间的偏差是正常的，是可以预期的。

在日常使用中，在智能手机上冲浪并没有发现任何问题。页面加载很快，你可以顺利地滚动浏览。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)
105.8 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)
71.2 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
69.475 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
68.36 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
67.19 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58.945 Points -14%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
52.47 Points -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)
54 runs/min +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
50.9 runs/min +15%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
47.78 runs/min +8%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (chrome 113)
44.3 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chome 106)
40.6 runs/min -8%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)
99.9 Points +37%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
77 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)
74.3 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
73 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
60 Points -18%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
59 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58 Points -21%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)
101 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
87 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
74 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)
33573 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
22881 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G (Chrome 112)
22847 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
20938 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
20787 Points -9%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
17266 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
15695 Points -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
2534.5 ms * -36%
Telekom T Phone Pro (Chrome 112)
2349 ms * -26%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
1948.1 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Poco X5 (Chrome 113)
1860 ms *
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
1829.3 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)
1769 ms * +5%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)
1599 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Poco X5内置了一个UFS 2.2存储设备。它提供平均的数据传输速度--只有Redmi Note 12在所有类别中都快得多。

Xiaomi Poco X5Samsung Galaxy A23 5GMotorola Moto G53Honor Magic5 Lite 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GTelekom T Phone ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-22%
-10%
51%
13%
12%
102%
Sequential Read 256KB
522.64
485.1
-7%
474.6
-9%
486.17
-7%
954.87
83%
948
81%
708 ?(303 - 1038, n=61)
35%
1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years)
188%
Sequential Write 256KB
497.38
487.4
-2%
243.87
-51%
420.44
-15%
709.51
43%
455
-9%
517 ?(105.3 - 903, n=61)
4%
1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years)
124%
Random Read 4KB
185.09
188.2
2%
166.24
-10%
171.13
-8%
261.09
41%
141
-24%
188 ?(89.3 - 297, n=61)
2%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years)
33%
Random Write 4KB
168.49
163.1
-3%
139.83
-17%
149.12
-11%
231.57
37%
173
3%
182.5 ?(68.8 - 419, n=61)
8%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years)
61%

游戏 - 你可以在X5上玩最新的游戏

虽然SoC和图形单元并不完全是高端组件，但Poco X5仍然能够流畅地运行最新的游戏，如PUBG Mobile。不幸的是，你无法获得比高清更好的分辨率，而且X5只能达到30FPS。反过来，它的图像刷新率是稳定的--这一点在GameBench测量结果显示。

不太激烈的游戏，如《死亡扳机2》，对X5来说很容易--在这里，它能达到100以上的帧率。这款手机的屏幕和单声道扬声器都给人留下了良好的印象，使人感到游戏的乐趣。

死亡扳机2
死亡扳机2
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Armajet: Ø86.5 (26-119)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.25: Ø113.9 (102-119)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Dead Trigger 2: Ø65.9 (58-116)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.6 (22-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø25 (24-26)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.6.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

排放 - Poco保持冷静

温度

Poco X5总体上在任何时候都保持凉爽。即使在满载的情况下，我们在设备的正面只测量到31.7摄氏度的最高温度--背面实际上只测量到30.6摄氏度。即使在游戏时，手机的温度也不会超过简单的触摸温度。

不幸的是，我们无法在这款手机上运行3DMark Wild Life压力测试。

Max. Load
 31.7 °C30.6 °C28.9 °C 
 31.1 °C31.6 °C29.1 °C 
 30.5 °C30.3 °C28.9 °C 
Maximum: 31.7 °C
Average: 30.3 °C
28.3 °C30.2 °C30.2 °C
28.4 °C29.7 °C30.6 °C
28.3 °C30.1 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 30.6 °C
Average: 29.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

扬声器 - X5的声音响亮而清晰

在Poco X5的底部可以找到一个单声道扬声器。在93分贝左右，它确实可以变得很响。即使在全音量下，该设备也没有任何振动。在中音和高音部分，X5有一个平衡和线性的音调。无可否认，这款手机缺乏低音，甚至缺乏中低频。

反过来，Poco手机确实有一个3.5毫米的插孔，具有76.91dBFS的良好信噪比。你也可以轻松地将蓝牙耳机连接到该设备上。其支持的编解码器范围很广：SBC、AAC、aptX/HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+ LDAC、LHDC（1-5）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.642.9253043.83124.537.74025.840.85037.543.36325.240.38020.247.510020.445.912517.547.816014.450.820014.351.225015.251.831511.956.940013.561.650012.166.163012.466.380011.771100011.876.6125011.478.1160012.377.1200012.279.3250012.180.6315012.283.9400012.985.7500013.484630013.282.5800012.979.61000013.678.91250013.476.91600013.265.3SPL24.893N0.691.7median 12.9median 76.9Delta0.99.636.434.428.230.326.624.926.627.132.43122.521.71717.325.526.721.228.419.136.11541.514.746.513.752.111.359.914.760.816.269.516.574.114.374.112.167.411.654.411.159.913.666.721.469.524.872.82868.623.466.123.165.120.870.723.470.82258.733.581.31.549.7median 16.5median 65.14.49.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X5Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - X5令人惊讶的弱点

消耗功率

我们的功耗测量显示了Poco如何专业地平衡X5。在空闲模式和负载模式下，X5取得了良好的成绩，略高于同级别的平均水平。这Redmi Note 12在空闲模式下可能会更节俭一些，但它在负载时使用的功率要大得多。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.49 / 1.53 Watt
Load midlight 3.52 / 4.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Poco X5
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh		Telekom T Phone Pro
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-18%
-8%
-13%
-14%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
1
-4%
0.8
17%
0.8
17%
0.61
36%
0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18)
8%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Average *
1.49
1.5
-1%
1.5
-1%
1
33%
2.05
-38%
1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18)
-18%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.53
2
-31%
2
-31%
1.5
2%
2.15
-41%
1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18)
-25%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-6%
Load Average *
3.52
3.6
-2%
4.6
-31%
4.8
-36%
3.34
5%
3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18)
-10%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-58%
Load Maximum *
4.32
5.3
-23%
6.3
-46%
6.7
-55%
5.4
-25%
5.45 ?(4.32 - 9.92, n=18)
-26%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
-92%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.03 (1.085-5.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.51 (0.839-6.72)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.183 (1.111-1.285)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.12.32.62.833.23.43.63.84Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.13 (2.92-3.86)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.82 (2.47-4.26)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.183 (1.111-1.285)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

运行时间

在测量了这么好的功耗值之后，我们看到运行时间的结果，感到很惊讶。与我们测试的所有其他设备相比，Poco没有机会。只有在满载的情况下，X5才达到与其竞争对手相似的运行时间。在所有其他方面，Poco都远远落后于竞争对手。三星Galaxy A23和摩托罗拉Moto G53.

得益于其5000毫安时的电池，这款手机仍能轻松维持一整天--即使它被大量使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 42min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 04min
Xiaomi Poco X5
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh		Telekom T Phone Pro
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
46%
35%
19%
29%
Reader / Idle
1482
2586
74%
2301
55%
1512
2%
H.264
896
1289
44%
1165
30%
1402
56%
WiFi v1.3
662
1099
66%
1035
56%
719
9%
851
29%
Load
304
305
0%
297
-2%
327
8%

Pros

+ 在良好的照明条件下有良好的主摄像头
+ 快速、明亮的显示屏
+ 可选择通过microSD扩展存储空间
+ 包括33瓦的电源

Cons

- 相比之下，电池寿命平平
- 超广角镜头照片有颗粒感
- 更新政策不明确

结论 - 只有X5的运行时间有改进的余地

Poco X5 5G评测。测试设备由Notebooksbilliger.de提供。
Poco X5 5G评测。测试设备由Notebooksbilliger.de提供。

Poco X5 5G是一款不错的中档设备。它在我们的测试中给人留下了深刻的印象，这要归功于它完美的构造和完整的功能，包括NFC、红外线爆破器、可通过microSD扩展存储和耳机插孔。

此外，这款智能手机有一个明亮、校准良好的120赫兹OLED屏幕，以及足够好的性能，适合日常使用和玩一两个游戏。

Poco X5为一款中端设备提供了一个很好的整体包装。

它的主摄像头也给我们留下了良好的印象。在良好的照明条件下，你可以拍出清晰、细致的照片。在较暗的条件下，该手机接近其极限--但对于这个价格，这是可以预期的。它的超广角镜头也可以被看作是在没有其他选择时使用的东西。

X5可能仍然配备了Android 12，但Android 13可供下载。该软件运行平稳，你可以删除预装的臃肿软件。手机从未出现过任何过热的问题。

目前，我们对该手机的唯一问题是它的电池寿命--至少与竞争对手相比是这样。其他设备，如三星Galaxy A23或摩托罗拉Moto G53从5,000毫安时的电池中提供了更好的运行时间。在这个阶段，Poco肯定可以通过更新来纠正这个问题。

价格和可用性

配备6GB内存和128GB存储的Poco X5 5G可以在亚马逊上以226美元购买。

配备8GB内存和256GB存储的版本可以以272.99美元的价格购买。

Xiaomi Poco X5 - 05/19/2023 v7
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
78%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
91%
Games Performance
33 / 64 → 52%
Application Performance
72 / 86 → 84%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
58%
Average
76%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Poco X5智能手机评测--你需要的一切？
Benedikt Winkel, 2023-05-24 (Update: 2023-05-24)