Poco F9 Ultra 评测：超长续航与强劲音效碰撞出彩ેણ

Name: Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Brand: Xiaomi

全速前进，Poco。

Poco F9 Ultra 惊艳亮相：持久耐用的电池、令人惊叹的显示屏、出人意料地强劲的扬声器，以及充足的性能，都让我们颇感兴趣。不过，在持续高负载下，这款智能手机会变得非常烫手。我们的评测将揭晓它的相机、功能和整体表现能否达到旗舰水准。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/02/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Android Touchscreen

Poco F9 Ultra 评测结论

Poco F9 Ultra 凭借出色的续航能力、卓越的性能、令人印象深刻的显示屏，以及对于智能手机而言强劲非凡的音响系统脱颖而出。总体而言，它的功能配置和做工也相当扎实。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

然而，Poco 是以较高的温度为代价，才实现了这种持续性能。更明显的缺点包括主摄像头的退步、缺少 LTPO 面板，以及软件更新支持有限。鉴于价格大幅上涨，这些妥协更难被忽视。

因此，F9 Ultra 整体表现出色，但并未全面超越前代机型。

Pros

+ 出色的电池续航能力和快速充电

+ 配备专用低音炮的强劲扬声器系统

+ 快速可靠的超声波指纹传感器

+ IP68 认证

+ 高性能 Snapdragon SoC

Cons

- 主摄像头降级了

- 没有真正的 LTPO 显示屏

- 仅提供四次主要 Android 版本更新

- 没有 6 GHz Wi-Fi、UWB 或气压计

- 系统广告

- 没有 LTPO 面板

价格和库存情况

Poco F9 Ultra 可直接从 Xiaomi 购买，也可通过 Amazon 购买。

$797.99
XIAOMI Poco F8 Ultra 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB + 12GB) Ai 2K 6.9" Bose Sound 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 2510DPC44G (Black)
$849.99
XIAOMI Poco F8 Ultra 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB + 12GB) Ai 2K 6.9" Bose Sound 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 25102PCBEG (Denim Blue)
$349.99
XIAOMI Poco X8 PRO 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB + 8GB) 6.59" 50MP Gamers Phone NFC Dual sim Unlocked Model 2511FPC34G Liberado (Black)

Poco F9 Ultra 评测结论
小米 Poco F9 Ultra 规格参数
机身 - Poco F9 Ultra 具备 IP 防护等级
连接性 - 少数功能缺失
软件 - 纯净的 HyperOS 3.0，提供四年更新
连接性与 GNSS – Poco 旗舰机仍缺少 6-GHz Wi-Fi
手机功能和语音质量
摄像头 – 主传感器尺寸更小，像素更多
配件与保修——Poco 再次附赠保护壳
输入设备和操作 – F9 Ultra 上的超声波指纹传感器
显示屏 – 最高可达 10,000 cd/m²，但…
性能——Poco 再次采用相同的 SoC
排放——Poco 再次采用 Bose 2.1 音效
续航时间 - 超大容量 8,050 mAh 电池
Notebookcheck 综合评分
对可能的替代方案进行比较

Poco 通过推出 F9 Ultra，让其旗舰产品线焕然一新。与 F8 Ultra 相比，最大的升级在于电池和显示屏：电池容量从 6,500 mAh 大幅提升至 8,050 mAh，最高刷新率则从 120 Hz 提升至 185 Hz。

这款手机还配备了焕新的音响系统和全新的 2 亿像素主摄。不过，后者并非各方面都有所提升，因为其传感器比前代更小。我们的评测将揭示，在这种情况下，更多像素是否真的能带来更好的画质。

Poco 还大幅提高了智能手机的售价。入门款配备 12 GB RAM 和 256 GB 存储空间，建议零售价为 799 美元（F8 Ultra：729 美元，+10%）；16 GB / 512 GB 版本售价为 949 美元（F8 Ultra：799 美元，+19%）。产品线还新增了 16 GB / 1 TB 版本，售价为 1,199 美元。

小米 Poco F9 Ultra 规格参数

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra (Poco F9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x (9600 Mbps)

Display

6.90 inch 19.56:9, 2608 x 1200 pixel 416 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 12 Bit Color depth, Refresh rate: 30 - 185 Hz, Scratch resistance on Mohs hardness scale: 5; Screen-body-ratio: 92 %, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 185 Hz

Storage

1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash, 1024 GB

, 989.7 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color, OTG, IR-Blaster, Xiaomi-Offline-Communication

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 950, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 (70M)), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 (70M), 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.74 x 163.49 x 77.94

Battery

8050 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode, 16 % silicon-carbon content, 809 Wh/L, Battery charge time: 50 %: 22 min, 80 %: 41 min, 100 %: 53 min; Battery charge cycles: 1000

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.68, 24 mm, 6P, OIS) + 50 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/3.0, 120 mm, 4P, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra wide, f/2.4, 17 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 22 / 27 mm, FF)

Additional features

Speakers: 2.1 audio system：dual 1115D + 1620 independent subwoofer, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB-C-Cable, Case, SIM-Tool, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, LDAC, LC3; ASHA, Auracast | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 683.48 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 0.991 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.980 W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 50 W (wireless)
Biometric security: ultra sonic fingerprint, 2D facial recognition | Vibration motor: linear (x-axis) | Telephony features: Dual-Nano-SIM, Dual-eSIM, Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE, Vo5G
Update Policy: 4 years Android-Updates (till 09/2030), 6 years security patches (till 09/2032), fanless, waterproof

Released

09/01/2026

Weight

235 g

Price

1200 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机身 - Poco F9 Ultra 具备 IP 防护等级

Poco F9 Ultra 有黑色和暗樱桃色可选。它重 8.29 盎司，确实不算轻。小米标注这款手机厚 0.344 英寸，不过我们测得仅为 0.337 英寸。加上摄像头模组后，最厚处达到 0.498 英寸。

做工令人印象深刻，接缝紧密均匀，握持舒适，表面也能有效防止指纹。在扭转测试中，Poco F9 Ultra 表现得相当坚固，不过确实发出了一些轻微的吱嘎声。

得益于 IP68 评级，这款智能手机完全防尘，并可在水中持续浸泡而不受损。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Xiaomi 17T Pro Nothing Phone (3) Motorola Signature DIN A6 ❌

连接性 - 少数功能缺失

在功能方面，Poco 支持 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 6.0、eSIM、NFC 和超声波指纹传感器。它的 USB 3.2 接口支持向外接显示器输出视频，但没有桌面模式。它还支持无线充电和反向无线充电。

考虑到这款手机价格高昂，我们尤其遗憾它没有 UWB、气压计，以及能够将刷新率降至低至 1 Hz 的 LTPO 显示屏。

软件 - 纯净的 HyperOS 3.0，提供四年更新

Poco F9 Ultra 搭载 Google Android 16 和 HyperOS 3.0。与前代产品不同，它没有采用外观经过定制的 Poco UI，而是搭载了完整的 HyperOS，并提供全面的 HyperAI 功能。

版本更新仅提供四年，安全补丁则会额外提供两年。虽然广告比平价智能手机上的广告更少打扰，但仍然存在。点击此处，了解如何尽可能关闭这些广告。Poco 还预装了一些第三方应用，但这些应用都可以彻底卸载。

可持续性

在可持续性方面仍有改进空间。对于这个价位的智能手机来说，仅提供四次 Android 大版本更新，并保证电池可循环充电 1,000 次，实在算不上有雄心。此外，EPREL 数据库仅将这款手机的可维修性评为 C 级。

目前，Poco F9 Ultra 尚未列入 Xiaomi 的自助维修计划，不过很可能会在不久后加入。Poco 未提供有关其碳足迹或所用再生材料比例的具体信息。

连接性与 GNSS – Poco 旗舰机仍缺少 6-GHz Wi-Fi

在我们的测试中，Poco F9 Ultra 的 Wi-Fi 传输速率快速且稳定。遗憾的是，小米仍未支持 6 GHz 频段。

在大都市地区，蜂窝网络接收效果良好，但支持的频段范围还可以更广。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2187 (min: 1044) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2194 (min: 2072) MBit/s ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	946 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	927 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1844 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1619 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2017 (min: 1945) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2173 (min: 1784) MBit/s ∼50%
Xiaomi 17T Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	3845 (min: 3505) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	4387 (min: 3333) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Signature 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	772 (min: 566) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1513 (min: 1099) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	897 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1489 (min: 1425) MBit/s ∼92%
Nothing Phone (3) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	980 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	834 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1856 (min: 1764) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1577 (min: 1279) MBit/s ∼97%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1507 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1961 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2241 (min: 396) MBit/s ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	656 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	687 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1258 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1413 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1576 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1722 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼39%

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1813 (911-1876) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1324-1681) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø930 (475-968) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (879-939) MBit/s

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø2170 (1044-2289) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø2016 (1945-2080) MBit/s

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø2194 (2072-2258) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø2178 (1784-2273) MBit/s

这款智能手机能够相当快速、准确地锁定卫星信号，即使在室内也是如此。

骑行时，我们将它的定位精度与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。整个路线下来，两者的差距仅为 66 英尺。不过，仔细观察后发现，绕湖骑行时，Poco 手机的追踪表现略有不足。另一方面，它在市中心的表现更好。

手机功能和语音质量

Poco F9 Ultra 的通话音质不错，听起来相当自然，不过通话另一端的人觉得我们的声音有些发闷。它能有效过滤背景噪音，但在非常嘈杂的环境中，这款智能手机的表现就会受到限制。

它支持使用两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM，也可以将两者组合使用。

摄像头 – 主传感器尺寸更小，像素更多

Xiaomi 没有更换 Poco F9 Ultra 的前置摄像头。它配备一颗不进行像素合并的 3200 万像素传感器，在日光下自拍效果不错。不过，在低光照条件下，图像质量会迅速下降。视频录制最高支持 30 FPS 的 Ultra HD。

背面的三摄系统基本没有变化，超广角摄像头和潜望式长焦摄像头与 F8 Ultra 上的完全相同。不过，Poco 对主摄进行了重大改动。尽管这颗未公布型号的传感器分辨率高达 2 亿像素，但尺寸明显小于 F8 Ultra 使用的 Light Fusion 950 传感器。更糟的是，Poco 还将玻璃镜头替换为全塑料六片式镜头系统。F9 Ultra 在日光下仍能拍出不错的照片，但在低光照条件下，图像质量不如前代产品。实时取景画面也更暗，导致主体更难看清。这款智能手机拍摄和处理 2 亿像素图像所需的时间也相对较长。

视频录制最高支持 30 FPS 的 8K，或最高 60 FPS 的 Ultra HD。如果需要更高的帧率，可以使用慢动作模式，该模式支持最高 1,920 FPS 的 Full HD。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide-angle camera 5x zoom Low-light photo

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修——Poco 再次附赠保护壳

Poco F9 Ultra 随附一根 USB 线（Type-A 转 Type-C）、一个半磨砂透明保护壳和一枚取卡针。不附带电源适配器。

保修和 Xiaomi Care 保障因市场和零售商而异。由于 Poco F9 Ultra 未通过小米在美国的官方零售渠道销售，因此可能无法提供美国保修和保险选项。

输入设备和操作 – F9 Ultra 上的超声波指纹传感器

Poco F9 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏能够精准、可靠地响应触控操作。即使贴有出厂预装的屏幕保护膜，表面摸起来也很顺滑，不过直接触摸玻璃时明显更加顺滑。

显示屏配备了快速可靠的超声波指纹传感器，可用于生物识别解锁。此外，在光线充足的环境下，通过前置摄像头进行面部识别也很迅速。线性振动马达的反馈清脆悦耳，不过在某些情况下力度可能稍弱。

一项新功能是超低音扬声器周围的状态 LED 灯环，它支持多种灯光效果，甚至可以随着音乐节奏闪烁。

显示屏 – 最高可达 10,000 cd/m²，但…

与其前代机型不同，Poco F9 Ultra 的显示屏现在支持最高 185 Hz 的刷新率，不过这一刷新率仅限游戏模式。除此之外，刷新率会在 60 至 120 Hz 之间运行，并在息屏显示时降至 30 Hz。遗憾的是，Poco 仍未配备完整的 LTPO 显示屏。

新显示屏的亮点是其宣称的最高亮度可达 10,000 cd/m²。不过，这一亮度只能在非常小的区域内实现。遗憾的是，我们的测量设备最高只能测到 8,500 cd/m²；超过这一数值时，设备只会显示错误提示，因此我们将该数值录入数据库。在更贴近日常使用的 APL18 测量中，我们测得的亮度仅为 2,435 cd/m²，低于 F8 Ultra 的测试结果。

在亮度控制方面，F9 Ultra 使用 DC 调光。不过，在最低亮度下，我们的测量结果显示，该面板的表现更像是采用了高频 PWM 调光。


1231 cd/m²	1211 cd/m²	1153 cd/m²
1239 cd/m²	1219 cd/m²	1157 cd/m²
1241 cd/m²	1220 cd/m²	1164 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1241 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1203.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1219 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
CCT: 6504 K

	Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Xiaomi 17T Pro AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Motorola Signature AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"	Nothing Phone (3) AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Display		-27%	-9%	-30%	-61%	-7%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	2435	2713 11%	3507 44%	2120 -13%	1517 -38%	3519 45%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	8500	2975 -65%	3295 -61%	4542 -47%	1475 -83%	3458 -59%
Response Times		-40%	-46%	-47%	-405%	-22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	0.63 ?(0.2945, 0.3385)	0.84 ?(0.451, 0.3885) -33%	1.13 ?(0.547, 0.5865) -79%	1.2 ?(0.6, 0.6) -90%	7.86 ?(0.9615, 6.902) -1148%	0.86 ?(0.433, 0.427) -37%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	0.64 ?(0.3185, 0.321)	1.25 ?(0.5915, 0.6615) -95%	1.01 ?(0.4925, 0.5165) -58%	1.1 ?(0.6, 0.5) -72%	1.17 ?(0.5895, 0.5825) -83%	0.87 ?(0.4395, 0.433) -36%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	120	240	120	120.2	90	120
PWM Amplitude * (%)	15.31	13.99 9%	15.46 -1%	12 22%	12.96 15%	14.02 8%
Screen		-16%	-4%	-1%	-32%	15%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1219	1339 10%	1068 -12%	1561 28%	1548 27%	1771 45%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1204	1381 15%	1060 -12%	1547 28%	1535 27%	1773 47%
Brightness Distribution (%)	93	94 1%	97 4%	99 6%	98 5%	99 6%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	2.5 -108%	1.3 -8%	1.46 -22%	2.2 -83%	1.3 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3	3.8 -27%	2.5 17%	3.63 -21%	5.5 -83%	2.8 7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	1.7 15%	2.2 -10%	2.5 -25%	3.7 -85%	2.1 -5%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.05 ^107%	2.26 ^97%	2.144 ^103%	2.26 ^97%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6504 ^100%	6498 ^100%	6875 ^95%	6612 ^98%	6787 ^96%	6452 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-28% / -24%	-20% / -16%	-26% / -19%	-166% / -139%	-5% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 15.31 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7614 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量序列（虽然最低亮度下的振幅看起来是平的，但这是缩放造成的。您可以在信息框中查看最低亮度下放大的振幅。）

使用原始 Color Pro 色彩方案并设置为暖色温时，色彩还原非常自然。不过，出厂默认设置呈现的色彩明显偏冷且更加鲜艳。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3185 ms rise
0.64 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.321 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.2945 ms rise
0.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3385 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).

在户外，Poco F9 Ultra 的表现相当不错，不过在阳光直射下，它的亮度不如前代产品。要获得最高亮度，应使用自动模式，因为手动模式的亮度上限为 850 cd/m²。

可视角度稳定性非常好。即使在较大的可视角度下，亮度损失也很小，反光是主要的潜在干扰因素。

性能——Poco 再次采用相同的 SoC

与前代一样，Poco F9 Ultra 搭载了Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5。这款 SoC 的速度极快，但 Poco 继续采用同一款芯片，再次偏离了为其旗舰机型配备最新、性能最强 SoC 的做法。

Geekbench 7.0
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3142 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1601 - 3140, n=6)	2202 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2096 Points
Average of class Smartphone (514 - 3156, n=39, last 2 years)	1522 Points -27%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	1507 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	10398 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	8955 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (6695 - 10953, n=6)	8620 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	6283 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1368 - 10953, n=39, last 2 years)	5347 Points -40%

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3759 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3462 - 3831, n=24)	3628 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3602 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3269 Points -9%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	2908 Points -19%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	2212 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3759, n=189, last 2 years)	1860 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11337 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9631 - 12383, n=24)	10941 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10922 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	10042 Points -8%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	9678 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	7161 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12298, n=189, last 2 years)	5654 Points -48%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	24396 Points +25%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19586 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9790 - 28557, n=14)	19508 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	19499 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	15928 Points -19%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	15312 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=133, last 2 years)	15063 Points -23%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	15076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5640 - 16690, n=17)	13071 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11953 Points -21%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	10533 Points -30%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	9953 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=113, last 2 years)	8084 Points -46%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	7369 Points -51%
System
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20509 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	17435 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9356 - 21153, n=17)	17161 Points -16%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	15456 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=113, last 2 years)	11700 Points -43%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	11169 Points -46%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	9722 Points -53%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20319 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5531 - 24052, n=17)	15939 Points -22%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	13961 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	10780 Points -47%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	10713 Points -47%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=113, last 2 years)	9567 Points -53%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	6586 Points -68%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	51696 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9859 - 62351, n=17)	51022 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	47299 Points -9%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	37773 Points -27%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	33672 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=113, last 2 years)	25230 Points -51%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	23930 Points -54%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2398 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2297 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1561 - 2587, n=17)	2197 Points -8%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	1968 Points -18%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	1924 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	1869 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=113, last 2 years)	1752 Points -27%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	25289 Points +32%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	22592 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24487, n=13)	20981 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19172 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 66164, n=99, last 2 years)	18908 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	17213 Points -10%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2895 Points -85%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=66, last 2 years)	13598 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (774 - 2381, n=7)	1683 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	1474 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	704 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=23)	639 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	500 Points
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 4471, n=133, last 2 years)	494 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	451 Points -10%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	409 Points -18%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	293 Points -41%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 35139, n=133, last 2 years)	1368 Points +175%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	679 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=23)	624 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	497 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	451 Points -9%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	410 Points -18%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	317 Points -36%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 48271, n=133, last 2 years)	2164 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	1530 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1987, n=23)	1446 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1149 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	997 Points -13%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	895 Points -22%
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	820 Points -29%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=18, last 2 years)	371 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	175 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	22672 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	21071 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1098 - 22780, n=12)	18588 Points -18%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	17520 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=79, last 2 years)	6280 Points -72%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	5828 Points -74%

Adreno 840作为集成图形处理器，支持所有现代特性，并跻身目前速度最快的移动 GPU 之列。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8053 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	7369 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7005 Points -5%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5533 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4490 Points -39%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7735 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash (Press-Version)	7194 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6932 Points -4%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5613 Points -22%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4529 Points -37%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30624 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	27055 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	21283 Points -21%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	21167 Points -22%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17885 Points -34%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14321 Points +12%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13753 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	12752 Points
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9725 Points -24%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8357 Points -34%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14996 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14525 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	12917 Points
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9698 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8624 Points -33%

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Score
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1432 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	1316 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1196 Points -9%

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	1330 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1179 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1124 Points -15%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3088 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2815 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2731 Points -3%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2032 Points -28%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1775 Points -37%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3084 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2825 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2519 Points -11%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2078 Points -26%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1784 Points -37%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	184 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -35%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -67%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	893 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	835 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	813 fps -3%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	684 fps -18%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	585 fps -30%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	184 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -35%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -67%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	489 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	428 fps
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	420 fps -2%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	359 fps -16%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	332 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	184 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -35%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -67%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	385 fps +16%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	336 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	331 fps
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	283 fps -15%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	253 fps -24%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	162 fps
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps -35%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	104 fps -36%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -63%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	198 fps
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	174 fps -12%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	167 fps -16%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	143 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	154 fps
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps -29%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	105 fps -32%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Vulkan)	60 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps +10%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	125 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	115 fps
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	95 fps -17%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Vulkan)	79 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	185 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps -35%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps -35%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Vulkan)	60 fps -68%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	355 fps +17%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	344 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	304 fps
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	240 fps -21%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Vulkan)	208 fps -32%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	55 fps
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42 fps -24%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (vulkan)	35 fps -36%

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	422.954 Points +170%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	232.968 Points +49%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	180.603 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 409, n=10)	180.3 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=116, last 2 years)	157.4 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra (Chrome 153)	156.484 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Edge 149)	117.209 Points -25%
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Opera 100)	115.56 Points -26%
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Chrome 150)	101.916 Points -35%
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Mi Browser V14)	97.56 Points -38%
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Firefox 152)	74.321 Points -53%
2.2 Total
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	429.726 Points +164%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=17)	285 Points +75%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	251.163 Points +54%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=104, last 2 years)	204 Points +25%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	165.391 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra (Chrome 153)	162.724 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Edge 147)	118.918 Points -27%
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Chrome 147)	108.028 Points -34%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	105762 Points +169%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (39303 - 126661, n=16)	79121 Points +101%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	71875 Points +83%
Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 126661, n=135, last 2 years)	50757 Points +29%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	39707 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra (Chrome 153)	39303 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Chrome 150)	27638 Points -30%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Chrome 150)	1334.6 ms * -32%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra (Chrome 153)	1014.1 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (281 - 2718, n=120, last 2 years)	852 ms * +16%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	816.8 ms * +19%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	521.2 ms * +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 1014, n=20)	494 ms * +51%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	283.6 ms * +72%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (29 - 104, n=5)	72.4 Points +150%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 104, n=26, last 2 years)	51.8 Points +79%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra (Chrome 153)	29 Points
Xiaomi 17T Pro (Chrome 150)	24 Points -17%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra	Xiaomi 17T Pro	Motorola Signature	Nothing Phone (3)	Average 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-35%	-41%	3%	-13%	-9%	-44%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3907.08	3626.09 -7%	3021.51 -23%	4049.69 4%	3720.79 -5%	3348 ?(2789 - 3907, n=2) -14%	2278 ?(270 - 4370, n=181, last 2 years) -42%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3938.71	1658.91 -58%	2770.02 -30%	3774.28 -4%	3270.73 -17%	3461 ?(2983 - 3939, n=2) -12%	1971 ?(152.2 - 4113, n=181, last 2 years) -50%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	556.92	513.44 -8%	414.44 -26%	613.85 10%	438.57 -21%	471 ?(385 - 557, n=2) -15%	317 ?(47.6 - 614, n=181, last 2 years) -43%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	628.46	207.16 -67%	108.71 -83%	628.08 0%	585.11 -7%	662 ?(628 - 695, n=2) 5%	362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=181, last 2 years) -42%

排放——Poco 再次采用 Bose 2.1 音效

温度

Poco 大幅改进了 SoC 的散热。现在所有 3DMark 压力测试都能运行至完成，而且热降频情况也比竞品设备轻微。

另一方面，持续负载下机身表面温度会相当高。

Max. Load

Idle


49.8 °C	50.4 °C	50 °C
50.1 °C	50.2 °C	50 °C
50.1 °C	48.7 °C	45.4 °C

Maximum: 50.4 °C
Average: 49.4 °C


47.4 °C	49.1 °C	48 °C
45.9 °C	49.4 °C	48.9 °C
45.6 °C	47.5 °C	46 °C

Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 47.5 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	73.2 %
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	66.6 % -9%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63.8 % -13%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61.9 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.4 % -30%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	75.1 %
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64.8 % -14%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61.9 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 % -28%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	77.2 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	76.4 %
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	65.9 % -14%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	65.3 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.2 % -29%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	81.4 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	80.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.5 % -2%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	79.7 %
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	67.4 % -15%
Xiaomi 17T Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	59.5 % -25%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.9 % -27%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.5 % -28%

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø35.2 (32.6-43.4) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø30.3 (25.3-46.9) %

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø125.5 (112.6-153.8) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø108.4 (86.9-168.9) %

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø35.1 (32.6-42.7) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø31.3 (25.1-46.4) %

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.84 (7.38-9.18) %

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.3.6: Ø7.91 (7.65-9.39) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.3.6: Ø5.73 (5.09-6.48) %

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø17.6 (16.7-21) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø15.5 (13-22.6) %

扬声器

在 F9 Ultra 上，Poco 再次与 Bose 合作，为这款设备配备了两个扬声器和一个背部低音炮。

得益于极高的最大音量，F9 Ultra 不仅声音格外响亮，对于一款智能手机来说，低频的层次感也出乎意料地丰富。中频和高频的表现清晰饱满，整体较为均衡，不过在最高频段，音量下降得更加明显。总的来说，F9 Ultra 的声音强劲而饱满，在音质较好的智能手机中名列前茅。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

Nothing Phone (3) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

续航时间 - 超大容量 8,050 mAh 电池

功耗

功耗相对较高，尤其是在空闲状态下。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 0.43 Watt
Idle	1.18 / 2.28 / 2.34 Watt
Load	11.96 / 14.56 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra 8050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 17T Pro 7000 mAh	Motorola Signature 5200 mAh	Nothing Phone (3) 5150 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	33%	15%	61%	35%	30%	31%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.18	0.56 53%	0.89 25%	0.8 32%	0.4 66%	0.87 26%	0.882 ?(0.52 - 1.4, n=18) 25%	0.901 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=137, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Average * (Watt)	2.28	1.18 48%	1.67 27%	1.3 43%	0.7 69%	1.29 43%	1.373 ?(0.74 - 2.28, n=18) 40%	1.483 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=137, last 2 years) 35%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.34	1.33 43%	1.73 26%	1.7 27%	1.21 48%	1.33 43%	1.586 ?(0.75 - 2.34, n=18) 32%	1.677 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=137, last 2 years) 28%
Load Average * (Watt)	11.96	14.91 -25%	6.27 48%	11.8 1%		8.84 26%	8.01 ?(4.2 - 12, n=14) 33%	6.82 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=89, last 2 years) 43%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	14.56	16.58 -14%	8.63 41%	18.7 -28%		9.15 37%	11.4 ?(6.97 - 15.3, n=14) 22%	10.8 ?(4.75 - 22, n=89, last 2 years) 26%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.84 (1.288-14.6) Watt

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.37 (0.963-9.17) Watt

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.353 (1.288-1.801) Watt

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319) Watt

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.3 (13.7-14.6) Watt

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.08 (9.02-9.14) Watt

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.353 (1.288-1.801) Watt

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319) Watt

运行时

得益于超大容量电池，Poco F9 Ultra 的续航表现出色。

然而，如果能效更高，它本可以多续航几个小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 153)		28h 12min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra 8050 mAh	28.2 h
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	17.9 h
Xiaomi 17T Pro 7000 mAh	26 h
Motorola Signature 5200 mAh	19.7 h
Nothing Phone (3) 5150 mAh	18.4 h
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh	21.9 h

Notebookcheck 综合评分

Poco F9 Ultra 拥有出色的续航能力、强劲的音效和出色的性能。然而，其价格明显更高，同时还存在一些本可避免的妥协。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra - 09/30/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 99%

Weight

87 / 50-100 → 75%

Battery

95%

Display

91%

Games Performance

50 / 55 → 90%

Application Performance

79 / 85 → 93%

AI Performance

34%

Temperature

79%

Noise

100%

Audio

89 / 90 → 99%

Camera

77%

Average

68%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
60%

Power Use
92.8%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
89%

Total Sustainability Score: 47%

对可能的替代方案进行比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89.3%	Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1200€	235 g	1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED
2. 89.8%	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1449€	214 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3. 85.7%	Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: $785.00 List Price: 1000€	219 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
4. 87.9%	Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1000 Euro	186 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.80" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED
5. 84.8%	Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 899 Euro	218 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67" 2800x1260 460 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Poco F9 Ultra 评测：超长续航与强劲音效碰撞出彩ેણ

全速前进，Poco。

Poco F9 Ultra 评测结论

Pros

Cons

价格和库存情况

Table of Contents

小米 Poco F9 Ultra 规格参数

机身 - Poco F9 Ultra 具备 IP 防护等级

尺寸比较

连接性 - 少数功能缺失

软件 - 纯净的 HyperOS 3.0，提供四年更新

可持续性

连接性与 GNSS – Poco 旗舰机仍缺少 6-GHz Wi-Fi

手机功能和语音质量

摄像头 – 主传感器尺寸更小，像素更多

配件与保修——Poco 再次附赠保护壳

输入设备和操作 – F9 Ultra 上的超声波指纹传感器

显示屏 – 最高可达 10,000 cd/m²，但…

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能——Poco 再次采用相同的 SoC

排放——Poco 再次采用 Bose 2.1 音效

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra audio analysis

Nothing Phone (3) audio analysis

续航时间 - 超大容量 8,050 mAh 电池

功耗

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

运行时

Notebookcheck 综合评分

对可能的替代方案进行比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles