关于 OPPO Reno15 Pro 5G 的评价
事实证明，Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G 是一款做工精良的中高端智能手机，在制造质量、功能和电池续航时间方面优势明显。其紧凑的机身、峰值亮度接近 2,000 cd/m² 的高对比度 AMOLED 显示屏以及六年更新的承诺，使其成为日常使用的可靠伙伴。
强大的相机性能，尤其是 200 万像素主传感器和光学变焦的性能，为整机锦上添花。在性能方面，联发科 Dimensity 8450 提供了稳定的结果。6,500 毫安时的大容量电池以出色的续航时间和快速充电速度给人留下了深刻印象，但缺少无线充电功能和 USB 2.0 仍是明显的不足。总的来说，Reno15 Pro 在日常可用性、设计和技术方面都有令人信服的表现。不过，799 欧元的售价也让它面临着 Poco F8 Ultra 和Galaxy S26 等竞争对手的激烈竞争。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
雷诺 15 Pro 可直接从 OPPO 在线商店购买，也可通过以下零售商购买 亚马逊.
- $8.49YBFJCE Case for Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G PU Leather Wallet Cover,Flip Folio Case with Card Holders,Magnetic Phone Cover Compatible with Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G,Yellow Brown
- $13.80Elubugod Compatible with Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G Leather Case,PU Leather flip Cover Compatible with Oppo Reno 15 Pro 5G CPH2813 Case Cover Brown
- $8.00MTRIEBA [3 Pack] Compatible for Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G Tempered Glass Screen Protector [9H hardness][High Definition,Scratch-resistant and shatterproof]
Reno15 Pro 是 Oppo 中高端产品系列中的顶级机型，旨在以大电池和高品质的摄像头配置给人留下深刻印象。这款手机的命名有点令人困惑，因为在其他地区测试的机型被称为 Oppo Reno15 Pro Mini。
该机的零售价为 799 欧元，不仅要与本文所选的对比设备竞争，至少在纸面上还要与以下机型竞争 小米 17和三星Galaxy S26 等外形相似的机型竞争。
规格 - Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
外壳和功能 - Reno15 Pro 通过 IP68 保护认证
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G 是一款相对小巧的智能手机，其背面设计与 iPhone 16 Pro 有几分相似。 iPhone 16 Pro.不过，在颜色方面，Oppo 采用了不同的方法，提供了黄昏黑（实际看起来更像棕色）和极光蓝（我们的测试机）两种与众不同的选择。
磨砂铝边框可防指纹，显示屏则由大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护。虽然后面板由塑料制成，但做工精良，视觉效果极佳。总体而言，这款智能手机的制造质量令人信服，而且通过了 IP68 认证，具有防尘和防水功能。
在功能方面，该机没有重大遗漏。不过，也有一些不足之处，如 USB 2.0 标准相对较慢，以及缺少 UWB 和无线充电功能。
连接和操作 - 配备 6 GHz Wi-Fi 的 Oppo 智能手机
顾名思义，Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G 支持当前的 5G 移动标准，不过与价格更高的设备相比，其频段覆盖范围略显有限。但实际上，这只有在前往较远的国家时才会产生影响。
手持 Reno15 Pro 时，通话质量清晰自然。在大多数情况下，背景噪声抑制效果也很好，不过在非常嘈杂的环境中，手机也会达到极限。
说到 Wi-Fi，Reno15 Pro 给人带来了惊喜：根据规格表，它只支持 Wi-Fi 6，但它也可以使用 6 GHz 频谱，即 Wi-Fi 6E。传输速率也相应较高，而且保持稳定。
| Networking | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性--六年来的更新
雷诺 15 Pro 已经安装了谷歌Android 16 和 ColorOS 16，Oppo 承诺将对Android 进行五次重大更新。此外，这款智能手机还将在六年内收到安全补丁。
这款智能手机采用超薄包装，避免使用明显的塑料。关于可持续发展的信息很少，仅在规格中列出了金属含量的几个数字。该设备不打算由用户自行维修。
摄像头 - Oppo 智能手机具有良好的图像稳定功能
前置摄像头得益于集成的自动对焦功能，采用像素二进制技术，效果令人满意。它甚至能以高达 60 fps 的速度录制超高清视频。
后置三摄像头设置使用了一个具有光学图像稳定（OIS）功能的 2 亿像素主传感器。虽然在光线条件较差的情况下可能会出现镜头耀斑，但它拍摄的照片效果不错。超广角摄像头和 3 倍光学变焦对该配置进行了补充，数码变焦最高可达 120 倍。超广角摄像头的边缘会出现畸变，景深效果也不突出，而变焦摄像头的效果相当不错，包括在数码变焦范围内。
主摄像头还能以 60 帧/秒的速度进行 4K 拍摄，并具有非常出色的图像稳定功能。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - Oppo Reno15 Pro 达到近 2,000 cd/m²
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G 的 6.3 英寸（16 厘米）AMOLED 显示屏支持 60 到 120 Hz 的刷新率和所有常见的 HDR 标准。
亮度分布非常均匀。不过，在纯白屏幕上，亮度始终略低于 1,300 cd/m²，即使缩小白色区域，亮度也几乎不会增加。只有在 HDR 播放时，显示屏才会变亮，亮度最高可达 1,967 cd/m²。在室外，智能手机在大多数情况下仍然易于阅读。
面板显示的 OLED 典型闪烁频率相对较低，这意味着尽管 Oppo 还使用了 2,160 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光，但敏感用户仍可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1281 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6330 K
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9" | Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -75% | -2% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1281 | 1136 -11% | 1771 38% | 1537 20% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1280 | 1132 -12% | 1773 39% | 1523 19% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 98 0% | 99 1% | 96 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 3.5 -250% | 1.3 -30% | 1.4 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 5.5 -90% | 2.8 3% | 2.6 10% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.4 -85% | 2.1 -62% | 2.1 -62% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.02 109% | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6330 103% | 6322 103% | 6452 101% | 6754 96% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90 Hz Amplitude: 17.24 % Secondary Frequency: 2000 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7962 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4905 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5105 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4535 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5935 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms). | ||
性能、废气排放和电池续航时间 - 配备稳固扬声器的 Reno15 Pro
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G 配备了 联发科 Dimensity 8450搭配 12GB LPDDR5x 内存。这颗 SoC 定位于中端，但能提供良好的日常性能，也能为游戏提供足够的动力。但遗憾的是，Oppo 仍在使用较老的 UFS 3.1 存储系统。
在负载情况下，表面温度明显升高，但仍保持在安全范围内。不过，3DMark 压力测试中的节流现象非常明显。
扬声器音质不错，但低频有些闷和弱。目前不支持 Auracast。
雷诺 15 Pro 5G 的电池容量为 6,500 毫安时，不仅容量大，而且续航时间也很不错。使用合适的充电器，手机充电功率可达 80 瓦。在这种情况下，充满电仅需 51 分钟（50%：22 分钟，80%：37 分钟）。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8450 (n=1) | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | Vivo X300 | Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 89% | 240% | 187% | 82% | 90% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1748.66 | 3756.44 115% | 4064.33 132% | 2056.87 18% | 1876 ? 7% | 2098 ? 20% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1701.38 | 2450.19 44% | 3987.65 134% | 1997.76 17% | 1366 ? -20% | 1797 ? 6% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 237.39 | 382.44 61% | 575.86 143% | 332.61 40% | 289 ? 22% | 293 ? 23% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 84.58 | 198.68 135% | 551.82 552% | 654.09 673% | 354 ? 319% | 347 ? 310% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| Vivo X300 | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
OPPO Reno15 Pro 5G 凭借其强大的显示屏、超长的电池续航时间、功能强大的摄像头和慷慨的更新政策给人留下了深刻印象，但在性能、存储和功能方面还存在不足。
Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G
- 03/23/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 82.6%  | Oppo Reno15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8450 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 799€ | 188 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.32" 2640x1216 460 PPI AMOLED |
2. 85.6%  | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 809€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 382 PPI AMOLED |
3. 88.2%  | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 900€ | 220 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED |
4. 88%  | Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 1049€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
