Notebookcheck Logo

vivo Y72 5G智能手机评测--拥有高分辨率屏幕的5G中端手机

全程无忧的5G? vivo Y72 5G是一款中档智能手机,它希望通过5G接收、特别高分辨率的主摄像头和良好的存储设备来获得分数。这个挑战者能用它击败欧洲的老牌厂商吗?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G ARM Android Smartphone
vivo Y72 5G
Vivo Y72 5G (Y Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 700 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.58 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 352 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM, UMTS, LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/39/40/41), 5G (n1/n3/n7/n8/n28/n40/n41/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164 x 75.3
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.79, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.99 W/kg (head), 1.2 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
193 g
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Rating Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price from
80 %7
08/2021
Vivo Y72 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
193 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.58"2408x1080
79.2 %7
06/2021
Motorola Moto G50
SD 480, Adreno 619
192 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
83.5 %7
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79.3 %7
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720

外壳、设备和操作--物美价廉的内存

虽然vivo已经成为亚洲最大的智能手机制造商之一,但在欧洲的销售仍然相对较新。Vivo Y72 5G是该制造商希望获得市场份额的设备之一。这是一款中档手机,售价不到300欧元(约353美元),配备5G,而且应该有一个特别高的分辨率摄像头。

从外观上看,这款智能手机有两个版本。Dream Glow,提供从乳白色到紫色和蓝色的颜色渐变,或者Graphite Black,从浅灰色到深灰色的渐变,因此更加隐蔽。在正面,只有一个小的水滴状凹槽用于放置摄像头。

塑料外壳并不依赖大猩猩玻璃(或者说vivo没有获得命名许可)。因此,很难评估显示屏有多大的保护作用,以避免破损。总的来说,机箱看起来很稳定,拿在手里感觉很舒服。

凭借8GB的内存和128GB的UFS 2.1闪存,vivo Y72 5G在存储方面的配置在其价格范围内非常好。还支持用于移动支付服务的NFC。

在移动网络多样性方面,支持5G当然值得注意,也支持一些4G网络,但vivo Y72 5G不是一款真正的手机。Wi-Fi模块支持Wi-Fi 5,因此在vivo Y72 5G的价格范围内实现了良好的传输速率。

Android 11被安装在智能手机上。在测试时,安全补丁是2021年6月的,因此仍然是相当最新的。制造商将自己的Funtouch OS界面放在正常的Android ,不幸的是,还在智能手机上安装了一些广告应用程序,但它们可以很快速和容易地被卸载。

vivo Y72 5G
vivo Y72 5G
vivo Y72 5G
vivo Y72 5G

Size comparison

164.9 mm 74.9 mm 9 mm 192 g164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g164 mm 75.3 mm 8.5 mm 193 g164 mm 76.5 mm 8.1 mm 193 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.8 - 55.3, n=77, last 2 years)
25.7 MB/s ∼100% +60%
Vivo Y72 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
16.1 MB/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.29 MB/s ∼52% -17%
Motorola Moto G50
  (Angelbird V60)
12.3 MB/s ∼48% -24%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Vivo Y72 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø15.4 (11.2-24.2)
Motorola Moto G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø34.9 (24.2-43.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø37.2 (26.8-48.4)
Vivo Y72 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø40.6 (32-44.6)
Motorola Moto G50 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø79.1 (33.6-85.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø83.3 (23.8-89.8)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Vivo Y72 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (333min - 351max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
312 (292min - 320max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Vivo Y72 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
343 (314min - 350max) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s ∼90% -3%
Motorola Moto G50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (256min - 332max) MBit/s ∼87% -8%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (314-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (333-351)

摄像机 - 可惜没有超清视频

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

vivo手机有一个6400万像素的主摄像头,一个800万像素的广角镜头的摄像头,以及一个200万像素的微距摄像头。镜头之间的切换只能通过直接选择来实现,否则只有数字变焦。

主摄像头的照片通常以像素分档方式记录。这意味着每个4个像素被合并成一个像素。这导致了更高的出光率,而且分辨率仍然相当高,为1600万像素。如果你真的想拍摄6400万像素分辨率的照片,还有一种特殊模式。

主摄像头的照片总体上处于较高的水平,但仍然可以有更多的动态和对比度。细节显示得很好。在低光和高亮度的差异中,缺乏动态是特别明显的。在黑暗的地方,几乎没有任何东西可以被识别。至少在非常黑暗的场景中,仍然可以在照片中看到一些东西。

广角摄像头能拍出好照片,但你不应该把它放大太多,但这对其他智能手机也不是一个好主意。

那些想录制超清视频的人将对vivo手机感到失望。只有1080p,最高60帧的视频是可能的。然而,我们非常喜欢这里的质量。自动对焦的反应稍有延迟,但随后迅速而可靠,曝光变化没有明显的梯度。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide-angle lens
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.9 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo Y72 5G: 15.83 ∆E min: 3.87 - max: 29.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
12 ∆E
20 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
22 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo Y72 5G: 18.91 ∆E min: 11.08 - max: 30.75 ∆E

显示屏 - 有点太暗,对比度小

子像素图像
子像素图像

在这个价格范围内,全高清显示屏绝不是理所当然的事。很好,vivo选择了高分辨率的面板。亮度通常足以满足日常使用,但智能手机如 小米Redmi Note 10 Pro实现了更好的峰值亮度,这有助于提高能见度,特别是在户外的晴天。

同时,vivo Y72 5G显示屏的黑值以及由此产生的对比度并不令人信服。因此,颜色看起来有点苍白。另一方面,色彩还原度还算不错。最多,灰度显示出非常轻微的偏蓝。

381
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 419 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 384.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 419 cd/m²
Contrast: 599:1 (Black: 0.7 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.32 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.203
Vivo Y72 5G
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.58
Motorola Moto G50
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Response Times
-52%
91%
-82%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(19, 23)
52 ?(25, 27)
-24%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
93%
66.8 ?(32, 34.8)
-59%
Response Time Black / White *
20 ?(9, 11)
36 ?(21, 15)
-80%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
88%
40.8 ?(19.2, 21.6)
-104%
PWM Frequency
2336000 ?(20)
490.2 ?(54)
Screen
17%
48%
-14%
Brightness middle
419
340
-19%
653
56%
543
30%
Brightness
384
325
-15%
651
70%
512
33%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
98
13%
85
-2%
Black Level *
0.7
0.18
74%
0.63
10%
Contrast
599
1889
215%
862
44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.32
4.75
-43%
1.2
64%
4.9
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.06
7.53
-49%
2.9
43%
8.6
-70%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
3.9
-30%
1.8
40%
6.3
-110%
Gamma
2.203 100%
2.224 99%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
7236 90%
7384 88%
6426 101%
8120 80%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / 4%
70% / 58%
-48% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--其他的持续时间甚至更长

随着 联发科Dimensity 700vivo做了一个很好的选择:评测样本的性能与竞争对手持平,甚至在某些方面还有点高。图形单元也提供了合适的性能率。在大多数情况下,这对于日常使用应该是足够的。只有非常苛刻的应用程序和游戏才会显示其性能限制。

UFS 2.1内存总体上非常快,只有连续写入时有轻微的弱点。

在持续负载后,外壳加热到最高41.5℃(106.7°F)。这仍然在通常的范围内,但在非常高的环境温度下触摸智能手机可能会变得令人不快。

由于vivo的音频增强模式,底部边缘的单声道扬声器在需要时可以变得相当响亮,然后声音足以满足一个正常大小的房间。对于这样一个小的扬声器来说,声音是不错的,但仍然是相当的高音驱动。在我们的测试中,我们倾向于将音量调低一些,这样高音就不会在耳朵里发出令人不快的声音。

外部音频设备可以通过一个3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙连接。然而,没有改善无线音频的aptX。

5,000毫安时的电池在尺寸上与同类产品相当,在WLAN测试中的运行时间也不错,刚刚超过18小时。然而,小米和三星的对比设备仍然可以多用几个小时。运行时间应该足以满足两天的正常使用。充电时,最大功率为18瓦,交货范围内包括一个相应的充电器。当电池为空时,充电只需要不到1:30小时。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
565 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
507 Points ∼78% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points ∼86% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼72% -16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (454 - 574, n=6)
544 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=261, last 2 years)
653 Points ∼100% +16%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1772 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1627 Points ∼76% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points ∼80% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼70% -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1347 - 1775, n=6)
1667 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=261, last 2 years)
2151 Points ∼100% +21%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6783 Points ∼67%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8351 Points ∼82% +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6492 - 10433, n=6)
8201 Points ∼81% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=133, last 2 years)
10130 Points ∼100% +49%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6368 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8688 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points ∼71% -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (6368 - 10981, n=4)
8541 Points ∼98% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=167, last 2 years)
8443 Points ∼97% +33%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3516 Points ∼73%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3647 Points ∼76% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3887 Points ∼81% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼77% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3277 - 3580, n=6)
3506 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=240, last 2 years)
4809 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3612 Points ∼55%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3839 Points ∼58% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4038 Points ∼61% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼60% +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (3435 - 3664, n=6)
3601 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=240, last 2 years)
6610 Points ∼100% +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3216 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3103 Points ∼92% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼90% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2824 - 3393, n=6)
3215 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=238, last 2 years)
3202 Points ∼95% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2419 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2478 Points ∼89% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2783 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼93% +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2343 - 2453, n=6)
2392 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=194, last 2 years)
2565 Points ∼92% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2222 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2338 Points ∼87% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2694 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼94% +14%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2206 - 2313, n=6)
2247 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=194, last 2 years)
2675 Points ∼99% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3508 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3136 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼79% -21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2829 - 3508, n=6)
3106 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=194, last 2 years)
2860 Points ∼82% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2476 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2563 Points ∼65% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2938 Points ∼75% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼68% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2434 - 2497, n=6)
2462 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=244, last 2 years)
3936 Points ∼100% +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2308 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2447 Points ∼51% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2832 Points ∼59% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼54% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2281 - 2336, n=6)
2306 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=244, last 2 years)
4838 Points ∼100% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3325 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3076 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3311 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼87% -13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (2948 - 3355, n=6)
3232 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3212 Points ∼97% -3%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1102 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
986 Points ∼30% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1143 Points ∼35% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼38% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1094 - 1105, n=4)
1101 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=172, last 2 years)
3282 Points ∼100% +198%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1083 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
974 Points ∼29% -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1124 Points ∼33% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼36% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (1074 - 1083, n=4)
1078 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=170, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼100% +211%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
321 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
290 Points ∼29% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (316 - 321, n=3)
319 Points ∼32% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=124, last 2 years)
1000 Points ∼100% +212%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
312 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
284 Points ∼29% -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (309 - 1073, n=3)
565 Points ∼58% +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=121, last 2 years)
978 Points ∼100% +213%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
13 fps ∼43%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼60% +38%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +131%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (13 - 14, n=6)
13.5 fps ∼45% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=258, last 2 years)
27.9 fps ∼93% +115%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps ∼45%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼51% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
21 fps ∼63% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼51% +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (14 - 15, n=6)
14.8 fps ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 257, n=259, last 2 years)
33.4 fps ∼100% +123%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.4 fps ∼44%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼99% +126%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼58% +31%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼89% +102%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (8.1 - 8.9, n=6)
8.5 fps ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=259, last 2 years)
19.1 fps ∼100% +127%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Y72 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.6 fps ∼43%
Motorola Moto G50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6.4 fps ∼50% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.4 fps ∼57% +32%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼48% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 700
  (5.5 - 5.6, n=6)
5.53 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=259, last 2 years)
12.9 fps ∼100% +130%
Vivo Y72 5GMotorola Moto G50Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProSamsung Galaxy A32 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
318%
446%
674%
471%
769%
Sequential Read 256KB
956
392
-59%
512
-46%
858
-10%
776 ?(427 - 1011, n=96)
-19%
897 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=259, last 2 years)
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
13.6
204.4
1403%
268
1871%
381.7
2707%
278 ?(13.6 - 719, n=96)
1944%
435 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=259, last 2 years)
3099%
Random Read 4KB
164.4
89.2
-46%
146.5
-11%
174.6
6%
148.3 ?(92.6 - 239, n=96)
-10%
159.3 ?(13.5 - 325, n=259, last 2 years)
-3%
Random Write 4KB
179.4
131.7
-27%
126.7
-29%
167.1
-7%
126.1 ?(18.2 - 290, n=96)
-30%
151.6 ?(269 - 449, n=260, last 2 years)
-15%

温度

Max. Load
 41.1 °C39.4 °C37.9 °C 
 41.5 °C39.3 °C38.6 °C 
 41.2 °C39.1 °C38.3 °C 
Maximum: 41.5 °C
Average: 39.6 °C
36.5 °C38.3 °C38.2 °C
36.7 °C39 °C40 °C
36.7 °C39.1 °C40 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.740.62536.1373126.930.44032.430.25034.332.6632726.28018.919.610018.424.212517.83416015.143.720014.548.125012.351.431511.355.74009.759.250011.564.963014.565.880015.168.1100015.371.1125012.470.8160011.874.6200010.974.6250011.274.4315015.266.7400017.775.850002080.1630018.677.2800017.169.91000018.166.11250018.369.91600021.856.6SPL28.286.1N0.963.3median 15.1median 66.7Delta3.18.135.944.92942.825.144.231.445.142.446.132.448.52647.821.547.41549.121.350.914.453.81457.513.559.511.964.312.265.512.666.513.471.712.275.712.37812.779.913.580.9138312.885.113.782.313.583.613.881.714.783.313.680.214.2731571.125.793.20.795median 13.5median 73110.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo Y72 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo Y72 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Vivo Y72 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G50
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
1084
1198
11%
753
-31%
1235
14%
904 ?(438 - 1953, n=267, last 2 years)
-17%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
18h 04min

Pros

+ 宽大的内存
+ 良好的性能值
+ 5G和NFC
+ 全高清屏幕

Cons

- 没有超清视频
- 相机图像的低对比度...
- ...和屏幕
- 预装臃肿的软件

结论 - 装备精良的5G中端产品

在审查中。Vivo Y72 5G。测试设备由:
在审查中。Vivo Y72 5G。测试设备由:
数码港.com

vivo Y72 5G提供了良好的存储,5G,高分辨率的屏幕,时尚的外壳,以及在其价格范围内良好的性能率。因此,它满足了人们对中档智能手机的许多要求。

当然,当你看对比设备时,电池应该持续更长的时间,而预装的广告应用程序总是令人讨厌的。相机图片和屏幕的低对比度也会让用户感到厌烦。

vivo用Y72 5G管理了一款装备精良的中档手机,可以超越许多对手。

然而,那些不关心这些细节的人应该仔细看看这款亚洲手机。毕竟,你的钱得到了相当多的东西,我们在审查中没有发现任何重大缺陷。

关于竞争,简单说一下。如果你不需要5G,你会得到一个好的价格与 小米Redmi Note 10 Pro三星Galaxy A32 5G持续时间甚至更长。

价格和可用性

在测试时,vivo Y72 5G在互联网上的价格通常为299欧元(约352美元)。你可以从我们的借贷网站Cyberport获得它。,但也可以在notebooksbilliger.de或其他零售商。

Vivo Y72 5G - 07/22/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
30 / 64 → 46%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
62 / 90 → 69%
Camera
63%
Average
74%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 233204 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18772 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > vivo Y72 5G智能手机评测--拥有高分辨率屏幕的5G中端手机
Florian Schmitt, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)