Notebookcheck Logo

Onyx Boox Page 评论 -Android- 便捷电子墨水平板电脑上的应用程序

紧凑实用? Onyx Boox Page 只有 7 英寸,是一款非常方便的电子阅读器,它使用Android 作为操作系统。在显示屏上阅读确实很有趣,但你还能在反应时间很慢的黑白显示屏上使用其他应用程序吗?
Android ARM E-Ink Tablet
Onyx Boox 页面
Onyx Boox Page
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB 
Display
7.00 inch 4:3, 1682 x 1264 pixel 301 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, E-Ink, Carta1200 Screen with AG glass flat cover-lens, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6 x 156 x 137
Battery
2300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, card slot tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
195 g
Price
290 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77.2 %
12/2023
Onyx Boox Page
SD 662, Adreno 610
195 g32 GB eMMC Flash7.00"1682x1264
77.5 %
11/2023
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
SD 680, Adreno 610
430 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash10.30"1240x930
79.4 %
08/2022
Huawei MatePad Paper
Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6
360 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.30"1872x1404
75.2 %
08/2023
Lenovo Smart Paper
RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2
408 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.30"1872x1404

外壳和功能 - 塑料,内存有限

Onyx Boox 提供许多带有电子墨水显示屏的电子阅读器和大型平板电脑。例如,我们最近测试了 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C(亚马逊网站上售价约为 550 欧元(约合 600 美元))或 Tab Ultra C Pro(约合 700 欧元(约合 764 美元),这两款产品均采用彩色显示屏。现在让我们仔细看看 Onyx Boox Page,这款 7 英寸设备的体积更小巧,价格也更便宜:售价仅为 290 欧元(约合人民币 316 元)。虽然它只有一块黑白相间的 Carta 1200 电子墨水显示屏,但却能像它的大哥哥们一样处理Android 应用程序。

Onyx Boox Page 的深灰色塑料外壳设计精美,背面印有触感良好的字母图案。该设备表面光洁,本身很稳定,但按压时力度适中,吱吱作响的声音比较明显。

边框的一侧较宽,这样电子阅读器就可以舒适地单手握持。这里还有两个按钮,可以用来轻松翻阅电子书。该阅读器重 195 克(约 6.9 盎司),与智能手机差不多重,可以舒适地长时间握在手中。

3GB RAM 和 32GB 大容量存储空间对于电子阅读器来说已经足够。不过,由于这款小巧的电子墨水平板电脑还可用于其他活动,如听音乐或Android 应用程序,因此使用 microSD 卡扩展内存也是件好事。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中,读卡器的速度相当快。

可通过蓝牙 5.0 连接外部设备。数据可通过 USB-C 端口直接与电脑交换,该端口还可用于为设备充电。

Onyx Boox 页面
Onyx Boox 页面
Onyx Boox 页面
Onyx Boox 页面

尺寸比较

225.2 mm 182.7 mm 6.65 mm 360 g226 mm 193 mm 5.8 mm 430 g226 mm 195 mm 5.5 mm 408 g156 mm 137 mm 6 mm 195 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Onyx Boox Page
  (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=60, last 2 years)
31.7 MB/s -8%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
  (Angelbird V60)
28.6 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (28.9-51.1)
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.5 (28.7-54.3)
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.2 (31.7-81.3)
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.9 (35.8-86.7)

通信、软件和操作 -Android 作为操作系统

WiFi 5 是 Onyx Boox Page 所配备的最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。因此,这款平板电脑的传输速率在其价格范围内还算不错,但有时会出现明显的下降,尤其是在接收方向。我们在使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 进行测试时就注意到了这一点。遗憾的是,Onyx Boox Page 不支持移动网络。

使用的软件是Android 11,但界面非常符合电子阅读器的要求,因此重点是电子书库。遗憾的是,Onyx Boox Store 不能在欧洲使用,但至少有一些开源的英文书籍。Google Play 商店预装在一个名为 "Apps "的独立版块中,也可用于下载亚马逊 Kindle、Tolino 等第三方供应商提供的阅读器应用程序。几乎所有的Android 应用程序都可以在平板电脑上使用,但由于黑白显示屏的帧率较低,视频或游戏通常用不上。

电源按钮位于底部边缘,屏幕旁边还有滚动按钮。平板电脑没有生物识别保护选项,例如指纹传感器。你只能设置密码来保护数据。触摸屏对我们的输入反应良好,但由于电子墨水显示屏和系统功耗较低,操作时可能会有轻微延迟。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
945 (826min - 958max) MBit/s +164%
Onyx Boox Page
358 (341min - 374max) MBit/s
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
350 (322min - 366max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper
286 (236min - 308max) MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
928 (812min - 949max) MBit/s +222%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
294 (274min - 318max) MBit/s +2%
Onyx Boox Page
288 (161min - 322max) MBit/s
Lenovo Smart Paper
211 (186min - 246max) MBit/s -27%

Legend

 
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Onyx Boox Page; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø287 (161-322)
Onyx Boox Page; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (341-374)

电子阅读 - 多种设置选项

该阅读器可处理以下格式:pdf、djvu、azw、azw3、doc、docm、docx、epub、fb2、fbz、html、mobi、odt、prc、rtf、sxw、trc、txt、chm 和 ppt。不过,由于应用程序的支持,更奇特的格式也不在话下。

打开兼容文件时默认启动的 Neo Reader 提供了多种选项:你可以使用双指手势放大或缩小文本,在一定时间后自动翻页,全面调整文本格式,还可以优化对比度以获得最佳可视性。此外,它还具有与谷歌语音合成技术配合使用的文本到语音功能。预设的语音能可靠地朗读文本,但听起来不是很悦耳,而且在诗歌文本中,重点往往很奇怪。

显示屏 - 带有明亮背光

屏幕特写
屏幕特写

E-Ink-Carta1200 显示屏的像素为 1,682 x 1,264 像素,对角线为 7 英寸。这是一款黑白显示屏。该面板于 2021 年推出,与前代产品相比,对比度更高,响应速度更快。

不过,电子墨水显示屏的特殊功能在这里也同样适用:其响应时间和帧速率无法与 IPS 或 OLED 面板相比,因此几乎无法播放电影或玩快节奏游戏。此外,更新图像后往往会残留之前屏幕内容的重影。

另一方面,在显示文档时,即使没有背光源,在环境光线充足的情况下,屏幕的对比度和可读性也非常出色。图像设置完成后,即使在没有电源的情况下也能保留静态图像。这样既美观又能降低能耗。

Onyx Boox Page 上的照明实际上相当明亮:在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中,我们测得的亮度高达 151 cd/m²。我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁。

129
cd/m²
145
cd/m²
143
cd/m²
137
cd/m²
141
cd/m²
151
cd/m²
139
cd/m²
140
cd/m²
148
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 151 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 141.4 cd/m² Minimum: 0.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 141 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
Onyx Boox Page
E-Ink, 1682x1264, 7.00
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
E-Ink Kaleido 3, 1240x930, 10.30
Huawei MatePad Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30
Lenovo Smart Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30
Response Times
11%
9%
32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
120 ?(47, 73)
121 ?(66.8, 54.2)
-1%
121 ?(61, 60)
-1%
134.4 ?(56.2, 68.2)
-12%
Response Time Black / White *
116 ?(49, 67)
89.3 ?(43.5, 45.8)
23%
94 ?(47, 47)
19%
27.5 ?(14.4, 13.1)
76%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-42%
-40%
-16%
Brightness middle
141
46.5
-67%
61.9
-56%
113
-20%
Brightness
141
47
-67%
60
-57%
106
-25%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
80
-6%
83
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
20.45
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
39.33
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.1
9.1
9.9
Gamma
1.211 182%
2.02 109%
1.371 160%
CCT
6463 101%
6848 95%
7116 91%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -21%
-16% / -20%
8% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
116 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 49 ms rise
↘ 67 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
120 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 47 ms rise
↘ 73 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 动力一般

高通 高通骁龙 662用作 SoC。它来自 2019 年,速度足以让你相当流畅地滚动浏览书籍和菜单。在使用应用程序时,必须考虑到有限的 RAM 和缓慢的数据存储,这意味着电子墨水平板电脑在处理非常复杂的应用程序时很吃力。不过,大多数电子阅读应用程序都能在平板电脑上流畅运行,而且电量通常足以满足日常使用。

上网时,偶尔会遇到加载网页和图片时延迟的问题。如果你只是想在互联网上快速查看一些内容,电量是足够的。但是,如果您在浏览器上花费大量时间,强制暂停可能会让您感到厌烦。

即使在长时间负载的情况下,Onyx Boox Page 的最高发热温度也仅为 29.5 °C(85.1 °F)。处理器的性能在长时间使用后也不会降低。

电子墨水平板电脑配有扬声器,可以直接播放有声读物或音乐。扬声器的音量不大,听起来高音偏重。声音可以听得很清楚,但听起来不是很饱满。外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙连接。这样做没有任何问题,声音输出清晰,中低音也明显增加。

制造商在 Onyx Boox Page 的小巧外壳中内置了 2300 毫安时电池。这意味着电池容量明显低于较大的设备,实际上你不得不使用较短的电池续航时间:在背光极弱的情况下,通过我们的脚本定期翻页,电子墨水平板电脑的续航时间约为 15 小时。这足以满足一天的休闲阅读。

该平板电脑的最大充电功率为 10 瓦,因此电池充满电需要大约 2:30 小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points +141%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
566 Points +106%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
323 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (275 - 316, n=13)
308 Points +12%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
275 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
143 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points +210%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1853 Points +143%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (763 - 1453, n=13)
1299 Points +70%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1287 Points +69%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
763 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
312 Points -59%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points +173%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (3195 - 7554, n=6)
5608 Points +76%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4535 Points +42%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4045 Points +27%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
3195 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2571 Points +127%
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=51, last 2 years)
2019 Points +79%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1231 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1106 - 1905, n=12)
1220 Points +8%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1131 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
567 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2675 Points +168%
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=51, last 2 years)
2126 Points +113%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1077 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (974 - 1074, n=12)
1017 Points +2%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
998 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
517 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=51, last 2 years)
2790 Points +32%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2462 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2108 - 2513, n=12)
2368 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2262 Points +7%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2113 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
858 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4281 Points +479%
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 14235, n=60, last 2 years)
3212 Points +334%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (740 - 1197, n=12)
1135 Points +53%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1079 Points +46%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
740 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
596 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4472 Points +597%
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 24605, n=60, last 2 years)
3812 Points +494%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1191 Points +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (642 - 1081, n=12)
999 Points +56%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
642 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
530 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
3725 Points +135%
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 5751, n=60, last 2 years)
3237 Points +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1588 - 2534, n=12)
2240 Points +41%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1588 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1061 Points -33%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
812 Points -49%
Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1925 Points +405%
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1631 Points +328%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
437 Points +15%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
381 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 391, n=11)
378 Points -1%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
286 Points -25%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 25317, n=66, last 2 years)
2922 Points +677%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1886 Points +402%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
418 Points +11%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
376 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 382, n=8)
370 Points -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
289 Points -23%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 111, n=70, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +162%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
19 fps +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.8 - 15, n=13)
10.5 fps +30%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
8.1 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4.6 fps -43%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3 fps -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 279, n=70, last 2 years)
35.5 fps +355%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
29 fps +272%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.4 - 8.6, n=13)
8.27 fps +6%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
7.8 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps -3%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps -50%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 97.3, n=70, last 2 years)
14.3 fps +198%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
13 fps +171%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.9 - 9.6, n=13)
6.43 fps +34%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
4.8 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps -44%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.9 fps -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 90, n=70, last 2 years)
13.2 fps +355%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
10 fps +245%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2.9 fps 0%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.5 - 2.9, n=13)
2.78 fps -4%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps -52%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 48, n=68, last 2 years)
6.22 fps +465%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4.8 fps +336%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1.3 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)
1.133 fps +3%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1.1 fps
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
0.6 fps -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +144%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
18755 Points +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8893 - 10247, n=14)
9495 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
9440 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6358 Points -33%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5022 Points -47%
Onyx Boox PageOnyx Boox Note Air 3 CHuawei MatePad PaperLenovo Smart PaperAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
159%
151%
-43%
-33%
205%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.1
690.8
149%
880.1
218%
163
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
116.6
384.1
229%
256.2
120%
139
19%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
65
157.7
143%
145.6
124%
25.3
-61%
Random Write 4KB
75.4
160.5
113%
183.1
143%
8.8
-88%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-70%

温度

Max. Load
 22.9 °C23.3 °C24.5 °C 
 23.1 °C23.9 °C29.5 °C 
 22.8 °C23.5 °C25.9 °C 
Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 24.4 °C
29.5 °C26.3 °C24.6 °C
28.9 °C25.5 °C24.1 °C
26 °C24 °C23.6 °C
Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 25.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回
01234567891011Tooltip
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.3 (2.28-2.3)
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.728 (1.71-1.735)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203835.22529.428.83126.324.14032.828.45037.837.86329.724.38022.715.510018.91512520.611.816012.9102009.214.225010.327.23157.332.24006.835.85008.642.663012.34780010.747.810001153.612508.759.916008.757.720009.260.2250010.256.9315011.463.9400013.263.9500014.555.5630014.466.2800015.369.41000016.362.21250016.356.91600017.250.7SPL24.774.1N0.528.6median 11.4median 53.6Delta3.314.833.640.83036.626.328.928.829.234.331.224.723.519.316.722.31722.119.319.72013.92311.536.210.344.98.551.19.256.610.561.313.86511.768.69.672.59.772.210.874.111.273.31470.81367.313.668.413.872.314.567.215.458.216.351.817.235.324.982.50.649.3median 13.6median 61.33.215.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnyx Boox PageOnyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Onyx Boox Page audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle
Average of class Tablet
  (746 - 5003, n=52, last 2 years)
1934 min +116%
Onyx Boox Page
2300 mAh
894 min
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
3700 mAh
1030 min
Huawei MatePad Paper
3625 mAh
963 min
Lenovo Smart Paper
3500 mAh
1056 min
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
14h 54min

Pros

+ 明亮的背光
+ 对比度极高的 E-Ink 面板...
+ ... 高分辨率
+ 支持Android 应用程序
+ 内置扬声器
+ 轻巧方便

Cons

- 屏幕几乎不适合观看视频
- 扬声器声音高音偏重
- 无指纹传感器

结论--由于Android 应用程序,价格不贵且灵活多变

测试中:Onyx Boox 页面。测试设备由:
测试中:Onyx Boox 页面。测试设备由:
KexTech

Onyx Boox Page 本身就是一款不错的 7 英寸电子阅读器,具有明亮的照明、阅读软件中丰富的设置选项、支持多种格式、滚动按钮以及高对比度、高分辨率的电子墨水显示屏。

但它也有一些特殊功能:例如扬声器和蓝牙音频输出,但最重要的是支持Android 应用程序。这使得电子墨水平板电脑的用途更加灵活,同时也减少了对电子书提供商的依赖,因为可以顺利安装其他商店的应用程序。

电池续航时间不如更大(更贵)的电子墨水平板电脑,但也足够浏览一天。扬声器听起来高音有点重,音量也不大,而且设备上的数据无法通过指纹识别进行保护。与采用传统屏幕的平板电脑相比,它的缺点也很明显:在速度较慢的电子墨水显示屏上看电影或玩快节奏游戏都很不过瘾,而且没有摄像头。

Onyx Boox Page 是一款配备 7 英寸显示屏和明亮背光的电子阅读器,由于支持Android 应用程序,其功能可以大大扩展。

如果你想要更大的阅读器,可以购买 联想智能纸配备 10.3 英寸显示屏。它还支持Android 应用程序。价格贵得多,但配有彩色显示屏和金属机身的是 Onxy Boox Note Air 3 C.

价格和供应情况

您可以从我们的租赁商 KEX 购买 Onyx Boox Page。目前的价格约为 270 欧元(约合 295 美元)。您也可以通过 Ebay 从 KEX购买。购买,价格为 290 欧元(约合 316 美元),但免运费。

目前,从其他零售商处购买该阅读器并不容易,但alza.de提供。

Onyx Boox Page - 12/15/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
62 / 80 → 77%
Pointing Device
79%
Connectivity
29 / 70 → 41%
Weight
88 / 40-88 → 100%
Battery
77%
Display
81%
Games Performance
10 / 78 → 13%
Application Performance
40 / 92 → 43%
Temperature
97%
Noise
100%
Audio
49 / 91 → 54%
Average
66%
77%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Onyx Boox Page 评论 -Android- 便捷电子墨水平板电脑上的应用程序
Florian Schmitt, 2023-12-17 (Update: 2023-12-17)