Onyx Boox Note Air 3 评论：漂亮的电子墨水平板电脑，支持应用程序，甚至黑白两色

Name: Onyx Boox Note Air 3
Brand: Onyx Boox

阅读Android. Onyx Boox Note Air 3 配备了笔输入、Android 操作系统和时尚的金属外壳，旨在赢得那些希望购买功能强大的电子墨水平板电脑的买家的青睐。我们很喜欢之前的彩色显示屏版本，现在我们来看看黑白 E-Ink Carta 显示屏版本是否同样令人信服。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/29/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM E-Ink Tablet

Test device courtesy of Kex GmbH

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Onyx Boox Note Air 3

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

4 GB

Display

10.30 inch 4:3, 1872 x 1404 pixel 227 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, E-Ink, Carta , glossy: no

Storage

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: G-sensor, hall sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.8 x 226 x 193

Battery

3700 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 12

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers, Stylus, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

430 g

Price

449 Euro

Links

Onyx Boox homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung	Datum	Modell	Gewicht	Laufwerk	Groesse	Aufloesung
79 %	01/2024	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 SD 680, Adreno 610	430 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10.30"	1872x1404
77.5 %	11/2023	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C SD 680, Adreno 610	430 g	64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10.30"	1240x930
75.2 %	08/2023	Lenovo Smart Paper RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2	408 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	10.30"	1872x1404
79.4 %	08/2022	Huawei MatePad Paper Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6	360 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10.30"	1872x1404

机箱和设备：出色但沉重的铝制机箱

在试用了奥尼克斯 Boox Note Air 3 C彩色显示屏之后，我们现在来看看没有 "C "字样但配备黑白电子墨水显示屏的 Onyx Boox Note Air 3。该平板电脑的外壳与彩色版本相同，都是经典的黑灰色，并带有橙色亮点，机身厚度仅为 5.8 毫米。

这款平板电脑重 430 克，与彩屏版一样重，因此对于 10.3 英寸屏幕的电子墨水平板电脑来说相对较重。

制造商采用缟玛瑙玻璃对显示屏进行保护，使正面平整。总体而言，该产品的制造质量和稳定性都达到了较高的标准。不过，屏幕周围有一个缝隙，在上面移动时感觉有些不舒服。

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 配备 64GB UFS 2.1 内存和 4GB RAM，可提供与同类电子墨水平板电脑类似的文件空间。

此外还配备了 microSD 读卡器，我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行了测试。在复制测试和 CPDT 基准测试中，读卡器的表现略好于 Note Air 3 C在复制测试和 CPDT 基准测试中，读卡器的表现略好于 Note Air 3 C，文件传输的整体速度也不错。不过，读卡器无法充分发挥 microSD 卡的速度潜力。

USB-C 端口用于数据传输和充电以及连接外围设备。不过，它只能按照 USB 2.0 标准连接，因此速度不是最快的。

尺寸比较

Huawei MatePad Paper Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Lenovo Smart Paper DIN A5 ❌

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 (Angelbird V60)	36.2 MB/s
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years)	31.3 MB/s -14%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C (Angelbird V60)	28.6 MB/s -21%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.5 (28.7-54.3)

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.9 (35.8-86.7)

通信、软件和操作：基于Android 12

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 只使用 WiFi 5 标准，因此平均速度介于 300 到 350 Mbps 之间，这正是您所期望的。华为华为 MatePad Paper显示，在这个价格范围内，Wi-Fi 6 的速度甚至可以更高。因此，Onyx Boox Air 3 并不能充分利用千兆互联网连接，但仍能为日常使用提供不错的吞吐量。

这款电子墨水平板电脑的软件基于Android 12，并预装了 Google Play Store，以便下载应用程序。在绝大多数情况下，这都能顺利运行，要求不高的应用程序也能在设备上流畅运行。不过，需要注意的是，由于黑白屏反应较慢，只有 16 种灰度，因此电子阅读器并不适合快节奏的游戏和视频。

主菜单的布局也与传统的Android 平板电脑截然不同：电子书库、商店和便签功能显然是针对电子阅读器的特殊功能和主要用途而设计的。说到商店：你不应该对它抱有过高的期望。至少在欧洲，你不能购买书籍，只能下载开源书籍。

触摸屏反应稳定，但比 OLED 或 IPS 显示屏慢得多。你必须习惯这一点，在键盘上快速键入时也要有耐心。可以设置密码或口令来保护数据。此外，Onyx Boox Note Air 3 还可以使用集成在待机键上的指纹扫描仪进行生物解锁。手指首次注册后，即可安全快速地进行解锁。

这款电子墨水平板电脑配有一支手写笔，可用来手写笔记或绘图。Google Play 商店中的应用程序也可用于此目的，不会出现任何兼容性问题。触控笔也是一种精确的操作工具，尤其是在操作屏幕上的小按钮时。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper	945 (826^min - 958^max) MBit/s +188%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C	350 (322^min - 366^max) MBit/s +7%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3	328 (266^min - 366^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Smart Paper	286 (236^min - 308^max) MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper	928 (812^min - 949^max) MBit/s +201%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3	308 (267^min - 325^max) MBit/s
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C	294 (274^min - 318^max) MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Smart Paper	211 (186^min - 246^max) MBit/s -31%

Legend

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Onyx Boox Note Air 3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø308 (267-325)

Onyx Boox Note Air 3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (266-366)

电子阅读：全面支持笔输入

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 支持多种文档格式，如亚马逊书籍的 AZW3、TXT、HTML、CBR、CBZ、RTF、FB2、DOC、DOCX、PRC、MOBI、CHM 和 EPUB。此外，由于支持Android 应用程序，还可以在平板电脑上轻松安装和使用其他阅读器应用程序。

Neo Reader 是预装的电子阅读应用程序：它可以让你快速滚动浏览书籍，预览下一页，通过进度条跳转到书籍或文档中完全不同的位置，还提供自动翻页功能，允许你单独设置到下一页的时间。如果需要，文本转语音功能还可以朗读书籍。

该软件还全面支持手写笔，可用于做标记或笔记。屏幕还可以分割，这样您就可以将注释保存在单独的文档中，而图书文本则是可见的。

显示屏高分辨率电子墨水卡塔

采用的是分辨率为 1,872 x 1,404 像素的电子墨水卡塔显示屏。我们在联想智能纸和华为 MatePad Paper.电子墨水平板电脑的工作原理与传统的 OLED 或 IPS 显示屏截然不同：它有一个哑光表面和实际的黑白彩色颗粒，这些颗粒带有不同的电子电荷。现在，这些粒子可以被激活或停用，以组成图像。图像还可以保持静态，无需额外能量。

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 的显示屏可显示 16 种灰度，采用 LED 照明，亮度可达 121 cd/m²。由于对比度很高，而且图像实际上是由物理微粒构成的，因此在环境光下完全可以省去内置照明。

灰度很少，无法过于准确地表现亮度的细微差别，但一旦设置好，图像也不会闪烁。只有前景照明可能会闪烁，因为它是 LED 解决方案。不过，制造商承诺会通过直流电源来解决这个问题。

图像生成需要一些时间，快速运动看起来更像是幻灯片放映。


114 cd/m²	120 cd/m²	121 cd/m²
108 cd/m²	109 cd/m²	115 cd/m²
98 cd/m²	100 cd/m²	100 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 121 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 109.4 cd/m² Minimum: 0.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 109 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.024

	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C E-Ink Kaleido 3, 1240x930, 10.30	Lenovo Smart Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30	Huawei MatePad Paper E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30
Response Times		28%	46%	26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	154.5 ?(66.4, 88.1)	121 ?(66.8, 54.2) 22%	134.4 ?(56.2, 68.2) 13%	121 ?(61, 60) 22%
Response Time Black / White *	133.2 ?(61.7, 71.5)	89.3 ?(43.5, 45.8) 33%	27.5 ?(14.4, 13.1) 79%	94 ?(47, 47) 29%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-29%	1%	-21%
Brightness middle	109	46.5 -57%	113 4%	61.9 -43%
Brightness	109	47 -57%	106 -3%	60 -45%
Brightness Distribution	81	91 12%	83 2%	80 -1%
Black Level *
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.8	11.1 -13%	9.9 -1%	9.1 7%
Gamma	2.024 ^109%	1.211 ^182%	1.371 ^160%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	8885 ^73%	6463 ^101%	7116 ^91%	6848 ^95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *		20.45
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *		39.33
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / -10%	24% / 16%	3% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
133.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 61.7 ms rise
133.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 71.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
154.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 66.4 ms rise
154.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 88.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能、排放和电池寿命良好的续航能力，适合晚上阅读

高通高通骁龙 680是 2020 年推出的一款略显老旧的 SoC。它采用相对节能的 6 纳米工艺制造，提供八个处理器内核，主频高达 2.4 GHz。在阅读书籍和文档时，它能提供比廉价电子阅读器更强的动力，让你获得流畅的体验。

骁龙 680 处理器一般足以支持 Google Play 商店中的应用程序。不过，您也不要对它抱有过高的期望，应避免使用非常复杂的应用程序，否则会导致体验迟缓。尽管如此，如果你只是想写个信息或上上网，速度还是足够的。

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 配备了用于数据存储的 UFS 2.1 闪存。这可以实现快速数据传输，缩短应用程序的加载时间。

Onyx 在平板电脑的一侧安装了两个扬声器，因此横向使用时会产生轻微的立体声效果。有声读物或收音机可以清晰地播放，但声音非常低沉，高音偏重，因此音乐甚至电影的音效都比较弱。

您可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。这样做没有任何问题，而且音效明显更好。

平板电脑的电池容量为 700 毫安时。将屏幕亮度调至较低时，您可以浏览一本书长达 17:32 小时，然后才需要插入电子阅读器。因此，即使在冬季长时间阅读，也不会因电池寿命问题而受到影响。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)	664 Points +90%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	566 Points +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (323 - 384, n=14)	373 Points +7%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	349 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	323 Points -7%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	143 Points -59%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)	2362 Points +73%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	1853 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1287 - 1738, n=14)	1580 Points +16%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1366 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1287 Points -6%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	312 Points -77%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)	812 Points +89%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	436 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	430 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (413 - 436, n=4)	424 Points -1%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	203 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)	2287 Points +148%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (865 - 1450, n=4)	1169 Points +27%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	921 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	865 Points -6%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	493 Points -46%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)	8736 Points +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4535 - 8730, n=14)	6497 Points +41%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4622 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4535 Points -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	4045 Points -12%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	2571 Points +93%
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=51, last 2 years)	2019 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1231 - 1441, n=13)	1342 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1334 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1231 Points -8%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	567 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	2675 Points +125%
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=51, last 2 years)	2126 Points +79%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1191 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1077 - 1273, n=13)	1170 Points -2%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1077 Points -10%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	517 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=51, last 2 years)	2790 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2301 - 2930, n=13)	2708 Points +18%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2462 Points +7%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2301 Points
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	2262 Points -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	858 Points -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	4281 Points +1503%
Average of class Tablet (267 - 14235, n=60, last 2 years)	3212 Points +1103%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (267 - 1429, n=14)	1264 Points +373%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1079 Points +304%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	596 Points +123%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	267 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	4472 Points +1763%
Average of class Tablet (240 - 24605, n=60, last 2 years)	3812 Points +1488%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1191 Points +396%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (240 - 1309, n=14)	1130 Points +371%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	530 Points +121%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	240 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	3725 Points +745%
Average of class Tablet (441 - 5751, n=60, last 2 years)	3237 Points +634%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (441 - 2853, n=14)	2386 Points +441%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1061 Points +141%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	812 Points +84%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	441 Points
Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	1925 Points +290%
Average of class Tablet (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)	1631 Points +231%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	493 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (437 - 589, n=14)	461 Points -6%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	437 Points -11%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	286 Points -42%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (289 - 25317, n=66, last 2 years)	2922 Points +575%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	1886 Points +336%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (417 - 574, n=14)	448 Points +3%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	433 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	418 Points -3%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	289 Points -33%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Tablet (75 - 6919, n=66, last 2 years)	837 Points +615%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	625 Points +434%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	130 Points +11%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	117 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (22 - 130, n=15)	115.6 Points -1%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	75 Points -36%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (72 - 6909, n=64, last 2 years)	887 Points +582%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	609 Points +368%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	130 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	125 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (112 - 130, n=13)	122.4 Points -6%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	72 Points -45%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3 - 111, n=70, last 2 years)	21.2 fps +159%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	19 fps +132%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (4.6 - 17, n=14)	9.51 fps +16%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	8.2 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4.6 fps -44%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	3 fps -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 279, n=70, last 2 years)	35.5 fps +318%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	29 fps +241%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (5.1 - 9.8, n=14)	9.08 fps +7%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	8.5 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	7.6 fps -11%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	3.9 fps -54%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 97.3, n=70, last 2 years)	14.3 fps +192%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	13 fps +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (2.7 - 11, n=14)	5.65 fps +15%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4.9 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2.7 fps -45%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1.9 fps -61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 90, n=70, last 2 years)	13.2 fps +326%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	10 fps +223%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3.1 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.4 - 3.3, n=14)	3.07 fps -1%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2.9 fps -6%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1.4 fps -55%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.4 - 48, n=68, last 2 years)	6.22 fps +315%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	4.8 fps +220%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1.5 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (1.3 - 1.5, n=9)	1.4 fps -7%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1.3 fps -13%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	0.6 fps -60%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)	23028 Points +237%
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096	18755 Points +175%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6358 - 14279, n=11)	11432 Points +67%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6832 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6358 Points -7%
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	5022 Points -26%

	Onyx Boox Note Air 3	Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C	Lenovo Smart Paper	Huawei MatePad Paper	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		1%	-80%	1%	-25%	17%
Sequential Read 256KB	687.4	690.8 0%	163 -76%	880.1 28%	696 ?(392 - 895, n=52) 1%	850 ?(163 - 3414, n=68, last 2 years) 24%
Sequential Write 256KB	381	384.1 1%	139 -64%	256.2 -33%	224 ?(132.7 - 512, n=52) -41%	532 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=68, last 2 years) 40%
Random Read 4KB	151.7	157.7 4%	25.3 -83%	145.6 -4%	137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52) -10%	167 ?(18.4 - 451, n=68, last 2 years) 10%
Random Write 4KB	164.2	160.5 -2%	8.8 -95%	183.1 12%	84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52) -48%	150.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=68, last 2 years) -8%

温度

Max. Load

Idle


22.7 °C	23 °C	23.1 °C
23 °C	23 °C	23.1 °C
23.6 °C	23.8 °C	23.8 °C

Maximum: 23.8 °C
Average: 23.2 °C


24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
23.9 °C	23.9 °C	24.1 °C
24.1 °C	24.1 °C	24.1 °C

Maximum: 24.1 °C
Average: 24 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.768 (0.691-0.864)

Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.447 (0.4391-0.4529)

Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.93 (2.93-2.94)

Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.728 (1.71-1.735)

Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)

扬声器

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad Paper audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle
Average of class Tablet (746 - 5003, n=52, last 2 years)	1934 min +84%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 3700 mAh	1052 min
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C 3700 mAh	1030 min
Lenovo Smart Paper 3500 mAh	1056 min
Huawei MatePad Paper 3625 mAh	963 min

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)

17h 32min

Pros

+ 哑光表面的电子墨水显示屏

+ 可简单使用Android 应用程序

+ 具有多种功能的阅读器软件

+ 快速内存，可通过 microSD 扩展

+ 待机键上的指纹传感器

+ 别致的金属设计

+ 支持手写笔

+ 无 PWM 闪烁

Cons

- 相当重

- 无摄像头

- 屏幕反应慢

- 几乎不能用于游戏和视频

评语支持应用程序，灵活的电子墨水平板电脑

就像色彩斑斓的 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C一样，黑白屏幕的 Onyx Boox Note Air 3 也是一款非常时尚、多功能、存储容量大的电子墨水平板电脑。它还提供通过 microSD 扩展存储空间的选项，采用坚固的金属外壳，作为一款电子阅读器，它具有相当不错的性能和稳定的无线局域网连接。

手写笔还能让平板电脑轻松用作虚拟记事本。然而，最重要的是，该平板电脑能够快速、方便地安装和使用Android 应用程序，这使其具有了专有软件阅读器所不具备的灵活性。

电子墨水屏非常适合阅读文档，由于有照明功能，在黑暗环境中使用也不会有任何问题。不过，它很难用于视频和其他快节奏的内容。不过，显示屏不会闪烁，对比度也很高。

通过 Onyx Boox Note Air 3，制造商提供了一款高品质的电子阅读器，其Android 应用支持和较长的运行时间给人留下了深刻印象"。

联想和华为等知名制造商现在也涉足价格更高的电子墨水平板电脑领域。联想联想智能纸不过，它配备的处理器速度非常慢，而华为的 MatePad Paper安装应用程序。

价格和供应情况

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 可在我们的租赁商 Kex的网上商店购买，价格为 450 欧元。售价 450 欧元。也可通过Ebay上有售，价格高出 20 欧元。

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 在德国亚马逊上的售价为 450 欧元。

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 - 2024-01-25 01/25/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

60 / 80 → 76%

Pointing Device

77%

Connectivity

28 / 70 → 39%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 92%

Battery

86%

Display

79%

Games Performance

13 / 78 → 17%

Application Performance

68 / 92 → 74%

Temperature

98%

Noise

100%

Audio

66 / 91 → 73%

Average

70%

79%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Onyx Boox Note Air 3 评论：漂亮的电子墨水平板电脑，支持应用程序，甚至黑白两色

Florian Schmitt, 2024-01-29 (Update: 2024-01-29)