Notebookcheck

OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), 03/18/2019
Touchscreen Smartphone Android ARM

800块你能买到什么? OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款经济实惠的入门级智能手机,它吸引的是那些在预算内寻找时尚设备的人。虽然U25 Pro的内在比它的外观更加诱人,特别是它的1080p显示屏。继续阅读以了解设备在我们的测试中的表现以及它与竞品的对比。

Oukitel U25 Pro (U Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6750T
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
5.5 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式, IPS LCD, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 53 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: 最多128 GB microSD卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,接近传感器, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1900 MHz. 3G: 900, 2,100 MHz. 4G: B1, B3, B7, B8, B20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.8 x 153.8 x 76
Battery
3200 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 2 MPix(索尼IMX135),Camera2 API等级:Legacy
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix Camera2 API级别:Legacy
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, USB线,充电器,USB Type-C至3.5 mm适配器,保护盖, Oukitel UI, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
180 g, Power Supply: 52 g
Price
100欧元(约800元人民币)~ Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

OUKITEL U25 Pro
OUKITEL U25 Pro

Size Comparison

153.8 mm 76 mm 9.8 mm 180 g153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g147.6 mm 71.3 mm 8.4 mm 150 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (min: 657, max: 705) MBit/s ∼100% +651%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=417)
223 MBit/s ∼33% +145%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
91.2 (min: 44, max: 108) MBit/s ∼13%
Wiko Harry 2
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
61 (min: 50, max: 63) MBit/s ∼9% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼9% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼7% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 507, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +675%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=417)
213 MBit/s ∼32% +149%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
85.6 (min: 42, max: 106) MBit/s ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼8% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼8% -38%
Wiko Harry 2
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 57) MBit/s ∼8% -38%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: OUKITEL U25 Pro - Overview
GPS test: OUKITEL U25 Pro - Overview
GPS test: OUKITEL U25 Pro - Lake
GPS test: OUKITEL U25 Pro - Lake
GPS test: OUKITEL U25 Pro - Loop
GPS test: OUKITEL U25 Pro - Loop
Bokeh effect
Bokeh effect
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with HDR mode enabled
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with HDR mode enabled
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Default camera app – filters
Default camera app – filters
Default camera app – Settings
Default camera app – Settings
Default camera app – Viewfinder
Default camera app – Viewfinder
Default camera app – Camera settings
Default camera app – Camera settings
Default camera app – Video settings
Default camera app – Video settings

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
640
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
649
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 667 cd/m² Average: 623.2 cd/m² Minimum: 26.36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 649 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 9.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Oukitel U25 Pro
IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.5
Wiko Harry 2
1440x720, 5.45
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
21%
5%
16%
38%
Brightness middle
649
479
-26%
338
-48%
404
-38%
599
-8%
Brightness
623
491
-21%
327
-48%
400
-36%
593
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
82
-9%
82
-9%
96
7%
Black Level *
0.56
0.2
64%
0.27
52%
0.26
54%
Contrast
1159
2395
107%
1252
8%
1554
34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.1
6.17
13%
5.36
25%
4.28
40%
1.4
80%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.6
11.46
9%
9.77
22%
9.97
21%
3.2
75%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.4
7.1
24%
6.2
34%
3.5
63%
2
79%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.066 106%
2.345 94%
2.213 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
8629 75%
8441 77%
8460 77%
6899 94%
6496 100%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.2

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9438 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2115 Points ∼16%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1131 Points ∼8% -47%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1405 Points ∼11% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1699 Points ∼13% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
13374 Points ∼100% +532%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (1759 - 2115, n=2)
1937 Points ∼14% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=316)
4562 Points ∼34% +116%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2727 Points ∼32%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1652 Points ∼19% -39%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼19% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2471 Points ∼29% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8634 Points ∼100% +217%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (2633 - 2727, n=2)
2680 Points ∼31% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=374)
4587 Points ∼53% +68%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
674 Points ∼29%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
590 Points ∼25% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼27% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
825 Points ∼35% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2333 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (643 - 674, n=2)
659 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=376)
1369 Points ∼59% +103%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
3850 Points ∼46%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2828 Points ∼34% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼38% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8326 Points ∼100% +116%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (3042 - 3850, n=2)
3446 Points ∼41% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=370)
5030 Points ∼60% +31%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5154 Points ∼51%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3977 Points ∼40% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼62% +20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
10052 Points ∼100% +95%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (4012 - 5154, n=2)
4583 Points ∼46% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=538)
5516 Points ∼55% +7%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
915 Points ∼33%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
585 Points ∼21% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
763 Points ∼27% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2802 Points ∼100% +206%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (915 - 920, n=2)
918 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=384)
1832 Points ∼65% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
325 Points ∼7%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
76 Points ∼2% -77%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
260 Points ∼6% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4480 Points ∼100% +1278%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (325 - 343, n=2)
334 Points ∼7% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=384)
1603 Points ∼36% +393%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
397 Points ∼10%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
94 Points ∼2% -76%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
305 Points ∼8% -23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3846 Points ∼100% +869%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (397 - 399, n=2)
398 Points ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=387)
1489 Points ∼39% +275%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
904 Points ∼30%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
584 Points ∼19% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼29% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼26% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3060 Points ∼100% +238%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (904 - 1072, n=2)
988 Points ∼32% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=399)
1809 Points ∼59% +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
496 Points ∼6%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
134 Points ∼2% -73%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼3% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼5% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8245 Points ∼100% +1562%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (491 - 496, n=2)
494 Points ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=399)
2187 Points ∼27% +341%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
551 Points ∼9%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
162 Points ∼3% -71%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼8% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6054 Points ∼100% +999%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (551 - 558, n=2)
555 Points ∼9% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=400)
1860 Points ∼31% +238%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
932 Points ∼35%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
503 Points ∼19% -46%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
828 Points ∼31% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2653 Points ∼100% +185%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (932 - 1054, n=2)
993 Points ∼37% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=460)
1768 Points ∼67% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
82 Points ∼2%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
65 Points ∼2% -21%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
225 Points ∼5% +174%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4223 Points ∼100% +5050%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (82 - 149, n=2)
116 Points ∼3% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=462)
1331 Points ∼32% +1523%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
103 Points ∼3%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
81 Points ∼2% -21%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
268 Points ∼7% +160%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3677 Points ∼100% +3470%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (103 - 184, n=2)
144 Points ∼4% +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=470)
1269 Points ∼35% +1132%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1006 Points ∼31%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
512 Points ∼16% -49%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼28% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼26% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3221 Points ∼100% +220%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (1006 - 1126, n=2)
1066 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=493)
1677 Points ∼52% +67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼1%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
104 Points ∼1% -5%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼1% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼5% +270%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8236 Points ∼100% +7456%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (98 - 109, n=2)
104 Points ∼1% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1804 Points ∼22% +1555%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
136 Points ∼2%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
126 Points ∼2% -7%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼1% -57%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼7% +235%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6118 Points ∼100% +4399%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (123 - 136, n=2)
130 Points ∼2% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=501)
1548 Points ∼25% +1038%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9979 Points ∼28%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9182 Points ∼26% -8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼29% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼39% +42%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35987 Points ∼100% +261%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (8284 - 9979, n=2)
9132 Points ∼25% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼38% +37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
8856 Points ∼11%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2886 Points ∼3% -67%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼7% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼8% -23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83976 Points ∼100% +848%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (8830 - 8856, n=2)
8843 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼24% +128%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9085 Points ∼14%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3405 Points ∼5% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼9% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼12% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
64627 Points ∼100% +611%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (8703 - 9085, n=2)
8894 Points ∼14% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼26% +84%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼11%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5 fps ∼3% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼9% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
152 fps ∼100% +850%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (16 - 17, n=2)
16.5 fps ∼11% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=681)
35.2 fps ∼23% +120%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼27%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
8.2 fps ∼14% -49%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼23% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼32% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +275%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (15 - 16, n=2)
15.5 fps ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=684)
27.1 fps ∼45% +69%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼9%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.2 fps ∼3% -69%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼3% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼8% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
81 fps ∼100% +1041%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (7.1 - 7.1, n=2)
7.1 fps ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=600)
19.4 fps ∼24% +173%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼13%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4.4 fps ∼8% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼11% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼21% +60%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
56 fps ∼100% +647%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (6.7 - 7.5, n=2)
7.1 fps ∼13% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=605)
17.9 fps ∼32% +139%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼8%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.3 fps ∼2% -72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼7% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
59 fps ∼100% +1155%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
 
4.7 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=461)
15.9 fps ∼27% +238%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼10%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼5% -46%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼15% +50%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
50 fps ∼100% +900%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (4.5 - 5, n=2)
4.75 fps ∼10% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=464)
15.3 fps ∼31% +206%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼8%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.61 fps ∼3% -59%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼14% +80%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼100% +1233%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (1.3 - 1.5, n=2)
1.4 fps ∼7% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=164)
8.87 fps ∼44% +491%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
0.9 fps ∼3%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.21 fps ∼1% -77%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼3% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
31 fps ∼100% +3344%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (0.86 - 0.9, n=2)
0.88 fps ∼3% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=164)
6.16 fps ∼20% +584%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼11%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.4 fps ∼7% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼22% +95%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼100% +809%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (2 - 2.2, n=2)
2.1 fps ∼11% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=165)
13.4 fps ∼67% +509%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.3 fps ∼8%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.77 fps ∼3% -67%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼8% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼100% +1204%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (2.3 - 2.3, n=2)
2.3 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=165)
14.7 fps ∼49% +539%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps ∼7%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.7 fps ∼2% -72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼5% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼100% +1300%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (2.5 - 2.5, n=2)
2.5 fps ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=390)
10.7 fps ∼31% +328%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼9%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.2 fps ∼4% -57%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼11% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼100% +971%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (2.4 - 2.8, n=2)
2.6 fps ∼9% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=394)
9.7 fps ∼32% +246%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
54871 Points ∼19%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
39276 Points ∼13% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼21% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
292798 Points ∼100% +434%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (51621 - 54871, n=2)
53246 Points ∼18% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=283)
131330 Points ∼45% +139%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
10 Points ∼1%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
563 Points ∼41% +5530%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼47% +6390%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼53% +7230%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1386 Points ∼100% +13760%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (10 - 10, n=2)
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=613)
744 Points ∼54% +7340%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
641 Points ∼8%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
149 Points ∼2% -77%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼5% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼6% -25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
7891 Points ∼100% +1131%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (641 - 642, n=2)
642 Points ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=613)
1960 Points ∼25% +206%
Memory (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
983 Points ∼26%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
420 Points ∼11% -57%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼13% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼16% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3791 Points ∼100% +286%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (926 - 983, n=2)
955 Points ∼25% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=613)
1465 Points ∼39% +49%
System (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1931 Points ∼24%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1140 Points ∼14% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼15% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼18% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8146 Points ∼100% +322%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (1330 - 1931, n=2)
1631 Points ∼20% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=613)
2881 Points ∼35% +49%
Overall (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
330 Points ∼8%
Wiko Harry 2
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
447 Points ∼10% +35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼15% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼17% +126%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4287 Points ∼100% +1199%
Average Mediatek MT6750T
  (295 - 330, n=2)
313 Points ∼7% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=617)
1432 Points ∼33% +334%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
85.976 Points ∼100% +361%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=515)
39 Points ∼45% +109%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
23.546 Points ∼27% +26%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
18.67 Points ∼22%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (15.7 - 18.7, n=2)
17.2 Points ∼20% -8%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
15.853 Points ∼18% -15%
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71)
15.603 Points ∼18% -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points ∼100% +399%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=674)
6335 Points ∼38% +92%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼26% +31%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
3303 Points ∼20%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (3082 - 3303, n=2)
3193 Points ∼19% -3%
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71)
2775 Points ∼17% -16%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼15% -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71)
17145 ms * ∼100% -18%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
14543.1 ms * ∼85%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (13903 - 14543, n=3)
14116 ms * ∼82% +3%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼81% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=694)
10740 ms * ∼63% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼63% +26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2299.9 ms * ∼13% +84%

* ... smaller is better

Oukitel U25 ProWiko Harry 2Nokia 2.1Xiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Mi Mix 3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-13%
29%
75%
5%
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
54.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
63.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
17%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
4%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=407)
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
71.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
80.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
3%
66.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=407)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
16.76
11.6
-31%
13.45
-20%
52.23
212%
19.54
17%
24.1 (3.4 - 88.2, n=111)
44%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722)
22%
Random Read 4KB
55.95
35.47
-37%
50.46
-10%
33.94
-39%
133.24
138%
54.4 (11.4 - 149, n=111)
-3%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722)
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
195.1
59.13
-70%
51.18
-74%
131.67
-33%
206.76
6%
171 (40 - 246, n=111)
-12%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.34
227.26
-20%
288.26
1%
277.54
-2%
674.98
137%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=111)
-4%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722)
-8%
Max. Load
 35.7 °C35.2 °C32.3 °C 
 35.1 °C34.6 °C32.6 °C 
 33.8 °C32.6 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 35.7 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
28.6 °C30.9 °C32 °C
26.2 °C31.1 °C31.9 °C
24.3 °C29 °C31.5 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 29.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2019.929.62520.223.73121.4264022.925.65026.933.46318.220.78022.820.810019.121.312515.817.516016.52020014.217.725013.326.331515.334.340014.64250014.748.463014.555.780013.765100014.472.7125013.973.8160013.971.1200013.867.3250013.869.3315014.268.9400014.370500014.671.4630014.674.2800014.379.3100001579.7125001573.31600014.759.9SPL26.384.7N0.855median 14.5median 67.3Delta0.716.727.644.427.238.630.434.228.43528.137.42529.217.723.41823.718.323.615.124.91629.115.73513.738.913.346.713.653.312.461.813.167.713.87111.572.611.769.510.867.611.162.810.660.21154.311.849.81259.81165.9116510.754.911.152.960.524.978.512.10.537.2median 12median 54.91.912.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel U25 ProWiko Harry 2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel U25 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 44.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Wiko Harry 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.72 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.47 / 2.88 / 2.96 Watt
Load midlight 4.74 / 5.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Wiko Harry 2
2900 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750T
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
16%
40%
41%
37%
11%
26%
Idle Minimum *
1.47
1.2
18%
0.7
52%
0.7
52%
0.49
67%
1.305 (1.14 - 1.47, n=2)
11%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=750)
40%
Idle Average *
2.88
2
31%
1.2
58%
1.2
58%
0.67
77%
2.44 (1.99 - 2.88, n=2)
15%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=749)
40%
Idle Maximum *
2.96
2.7
9%
1.9
36%
2
32%
0.87
71%
2.5 (2.03 - 2.96, n=2)
16%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=750)
32%
Load Average *
4.74
4.2
11%
3.2
32%
3.4
28%
3.64
23%
4.23 (3.72 - 4.74, n=2)
11%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=744)
14%
Load Maximum *
5.99
5.2
13%
4.8
20%
4
33%
9.04
-51%
5.98 (5.96 - 5.99, n=2)
-0%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=744)
2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 11min
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Wiko Harry 2
2900 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
491
613
25%
809
65%
761
55%
719
46%

Pros

+ 高亮度IPS屏幕
+ 1080p分辨率
+ 时尚的外观
+ 做工结实
+ 主摄素质不错
+ 性价比高

Cons

- Wi-Fi速度慢
- 没有后置双摄
- 只支持蓝牙4.0
- 扬声器一般
- 处理器性能较差
OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of OUKITEL.
OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of OUKITEL.

OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款坚固耐用的廉价智能手机,体现了目前智能手机市场的矛盾所在。虽然制造商在不增加许多新功能的情况下为其旗舰智能手机收取更多费用,但廉价机型开始弥合性能和质量差距,同时保持合理的低价。 U25 Pro有它的缺点,例如它的电池寿命不佳以及毫无意义的第二个后置摄像头,但总的来说,它做得很好。

1080p显示屏非常明亮,具有良好的视角,这对于低于100欧元(800元)的智能手机来说是罕见的,其指纹识别器也是如此。此外,U25 Pro的外观和感觉都很好,同时它在我们的基准测试中提供了不错的性能。

OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款功能强大且价格合理的智能手机,如果您的预算有限,它值得考虑。

然而,扬声器令人失望,删除了耳机插孔似乎与包括辅助后置摄像头的花哨一样没有意义。然而,很少有智能手机能够以低于100欧元(约800元)的价格提供U25 Pro的水平。

Oukitel U25 Pro - 02/16/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
38 / 60 → 64%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
14 / 63 → 23%
Application Performance
41 / 70 → 58%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
56%
Average
69%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-03-18 (Update: 2019-03-18)