OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测

Name: Oukitel U25 Pro
Brand: Oukitel

800块你能买到什么？ OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款经济实惠的入门级智能手机，它吸引的是那些在预算内寻找时尚设备的人。虽然U25 Pro的内在比它的外观更加诱人，特别是它的1080p显示屏。继续阅读以了解设备在我们的测试中的表现以及它与竞品的对比。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 03/18/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone Android ARM

Test device courtesy of Oukitel

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Oukitel U25 Pro (U Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6750T 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memory

4 GB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式, IPS LCD, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 53 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: 最多128 GB microSD卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，接近传感器, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1900 MHz. 3G: 900, 2,100 MHz. 4G: B1, B3, B7, B8, B20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.8 x 153.8 x 76

Battery

3200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 2 MPix（索尼IMX135），Camera2 API等级：Legacy
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix Camera2 API级别：Legacy

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, USB线，充电器，USB Type-C至3.5 mm适配器，保护盖, Oukitel UI, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

180 g, Power Supply: 52 g

Price

100 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (507^min - 704^max) MBit/s +675%
Oukitel U25 Pro Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash	85.6 (42^min - 106^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 6A PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 (52^min - 59^max) MBit/s -35%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 (27^min - 58^max) MBit/s -38%
Wiko Harry 2 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 (27^min - 57^max) MBit/s -38%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	685 (657^min - 705^max) MBit/s +651%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +312%
Oukitel U25 Pro Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash	91.2 (44^min - 108^max) MBit/s
Wiko Harry 2 PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	61 (50^min - 63^max) MBit/s -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash	59.6 (56^min - 61^max) MBit/s -35%
Nokia 2.1 Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 (29^min - 54^max) MBit/s -47%

Oukitel U25 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø86.8 (44-108)

Oukitel U25 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø85.6 (42-106)

Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with HDR mode enabled

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


640 cd/m²	667 cd/m²	610 cd/m²
622 cd/m²	649 cd/m²	606 cd/m²
603 cd/m²	607 cd/m²	605 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 667 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 623.2 cd/m² Minimum: 26.36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 649 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 9.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1

	Oukitel U25 Pro IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.50	Wiko Harry 2 1440x720, 5.45	Nokia 2.1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.50	Xiaomi Redmi 6A IPS, 1440x720, 5.45	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen		21%	5%	16%	38%
Brightness middle	649	479 -26%	338 -48%	404 -38%	599 -8%
Brightness	623	491 -21%	327 -48%	400 -36%	593 -5%
Brightness Distribution	90	87 -3%	82 -9%	82 -9%	96 7%
Black Level *	0.56	0.2 64%	0.27 52%	0.26 54%
Contrast	1159	2395 107%	1252 8%	1554 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.1	6.17 13%	5.36 25%	4.28 40%	1.4 80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.6	11.46 9%	9.77 22%	9.97 21%	3.2 75%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	9.4	7.1 24%	6.2 34%	3.5 63%	2 79%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.066 ^106%	2.345 ^94%	2.213 ^99%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	8629 ^75%	8441 ^77%	8460 ^77%	6899 ^94%	6496 ^100%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		98.2

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 27 ms rise
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	674 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	590 Points -12%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	636 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	825 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2333 Points +246%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (643 - 674, n=2)	659 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +676%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	2727 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1652 Points -39%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1602 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2471 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8634 Points +217%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (2633 - 2727, n=2)	2680 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +415%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	2115 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1131 Points -47%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1405 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1699 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	13374 Points +532%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (1759 - 2115, n=2)	1937 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +414%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	5154 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3977 Points -23%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6194 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	10052 Points +95%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (4012 - 5154, n=2)	4583 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +193%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	3850 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2828 Points -27%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3146 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8326 Points +116%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (3042 - 3850, n=2)	3446 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +182%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	9085 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	3405 Points -63%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6133 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	7671 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	64627 Points +611%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (8703 - 9085, n=2)	8894 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	8856 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2886 Points -67%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5487 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6785 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	83976 Points +848%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (8830 - 8856, n=2)	8843 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	9979 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	9182 Points -8%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10427 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	14128 Points +42%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35987 Points +261%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (8284 - 9979, n=2)	9132 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	136 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	126 Points -7%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	58 Points -57%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	456 Points +235%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6118 Points +4399%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (123 - 136, n=2)	129.5 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +2669%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	109 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	104 Points -5%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	46 Points -58%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	403 Points +270%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8236 Points +7456%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (98 - 109, n=2)	103.5 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +3740%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	1006 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	512 Points -49%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	892 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	840 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3221 Points +220%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (1006 - 1126, n=2)	1066 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +206%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	551 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	162 Points -71%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	297 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	494 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6054 Points +999%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (551 - 558, n=2)	555 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +1597%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	496 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	134 Points -73%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	250 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	445 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8245 Points +1562%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (491 - 496, n=2)	494 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +3197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	904 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	584 Points -35%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	885 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	807 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3060 Points +238%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (904 - 1072, n=2)	988 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +390%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	103 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	81 Points -21%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	268 Points +160%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3677 Points +3470%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (103 - 184, n=2)	143.5 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +2575%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	82 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	65 Points -21%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	225 Points +174%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4223 Points +5050%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (82 - 149, n=2)	115.5 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +3255%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	932 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	503 Points -46%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	828 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2653 Points +185%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (932 - 1054, n=2)	993 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +239%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	397 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	94 Points -76%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	305 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3846 Points +869%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (397 - 399, n=2)	398 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +1597%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	325 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	76 Points -77%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	260 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4480 Points +1278%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (325 - 343, n=2)	334 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +2892%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	915 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	585 Points -36%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	Points -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	763 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2802 Points +206%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (915 - 920, n=2)	918 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +362%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	16 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	8.2 fps -49%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	14 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	19 fps +19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	60 fps +275%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (15 - 16, n=2)	15.5 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +429%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	16 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	5 fps -69%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	13 fps -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	152 fps +850%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (16 - 17, n=2)	16.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +1444%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	7.5 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4.4 fps -41%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6.1 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	12 fps +60%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	56 fps +647%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (6.7 - 7.5, n=2)	7.1 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +863%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	7.1 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2.2 fps -69%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	2.7 fps -62%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.3 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	81 fps +1041%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (7.1 - 7.1, n=2)	7.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +1880%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	5 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2.7 fps -46%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	7.5 fps +50%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	50 fps +900%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (4.5 - 5, n=2)	4.75 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +1118%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	4.7 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.3 fps -72%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	59 fps +1155%
Average Mediatek MT6750T ()	4.7 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +2006%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	2.8 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.2 fps -57%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.2 fps +14%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	30 fps +971%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (2.4 - 2.8, n=2)	2.6 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +1450%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	2.5 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.7 fps -72%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.9 fps -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35 fps +1300%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (2.5 - 2.5, n=2)	2.5 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +2296%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	2.2 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1.4 fps -36%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.3 fps +95%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	20 fps +809%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (2 - 2.2, n=2)	2.1 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +1900%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	2.3 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.77 fps -67%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.3 (4.3^min) fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	30 fps +1204%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (2.3 - 2.3, n=2)	2.3 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +2696%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	1.5 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.61 fps -59%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.7 fps +80%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	20 fps +1233%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (1.3 - 1.5, n=2)	1.4 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +2087%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	0.9 fps
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	0.21 fps -77%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	fps -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	0.85 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	31 fps +3344%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (0.86 - 0.9, n=2)	0.88 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +2744%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	54871 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	39276 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	61753 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	292798 Points +434%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (51621 - 54871, n=2)	53246 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	330 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	447 Points +35%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	643 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	745 Points +126%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4287 Points +1199%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (295 - 330, n=2)	313 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +1645%
System (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	1931 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1140 Points -41%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1228 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1434 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8146 Points +322%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (1330 - 1931, n=2)	1631 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +401%
Memory (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	983 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	420 Points -57%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	502 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	607 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3791 Points +286%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (926 - 983, n=2)	955 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +538%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	641 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	149 Points -77%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	428 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	482 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	7891 Points +1131%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (641 - 642, n=2)	642 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +2118%
Web (sort by value)
Oukitel U25 Pro Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096	10 Points
Wiko Harry 2 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	563 Points +5530%
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	649 Points +6390%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	733 Points +7230%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	1386 Points +13760%
Average Mediatek MT6750T (10 - 10, n=2)	10 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +14850%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +459%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	86 Points +361%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	23.55 Points +26%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)	18.67 Points
Average Mediatek MT6750T (15.7 - 18.7, n=2)	17.2 Points -8%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	15.85 Points -15%
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71)	15.6 Points -16%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +914%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	16489 Points +399%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	4332 Points +31%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)	3303 Points
Average Mediatek MT6750T (3082 - 3303, n=2)	3193 Points -3%
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71)	2775 Points -16%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	2503 Points -24%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Wiko Harry 2 (Chrome 71)	17145 ms * -18%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)	14543 ms *
Average Mediatek MT6750T (13903 - 14543, n=3)	14116 ms * +3%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)	13821 ms * +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)	10740 ms * +26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	2300 ms * +84%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

	Oukitel U25 Pro	Wiko Harry 2	Nokia 2.1	Xiaomi Redmi 6A	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-22%	-13%	29%	75%	16%	692%
Sequential Read 256KB	284.3	227.3 -20%	288.3 1%	277.5 -2%	675 137%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=201) -4%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 430%
Sequential Write 256KB	195.1	59.1 -70%	51.2 -74%	131.7 -32%	206.8 6%	176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201) -9%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 473%
Random Read 4KB	56	35.47 -37%	50.5 -10%	33.94 -39%	133.2 138%	59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=201) 6%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 341%
Random Write 4KB	16.76	11.6 -31%	13.45 -20%	52.2 211%	19.54 17%	31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=201) 89%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 1523%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	71.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	80.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	79.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 15%		77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144) 8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	54.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	63.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 17%	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21%		58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) 8%

Max. Load

Idle


35.7 °C	35.2 °C	32.3 °C
35.1 °C	34.6 °C	32.6 °C
33.8 °C	32.6 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 35.7 °C
Average: 33.6 °C


28.6 °C	30.9 °C	32 °C
26.2 °C	31.1 °C	31.9 °C
24.3 °C	29 °C	31.5 °C

Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 29.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oukitel U25 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 44.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Wiko Harry 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 57.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.72 Watt
Idle	1.47 / 2.88 / 2.96 Watt
Load	4.74 / 5.99 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Oukitel U25 Pro 3200 mAh	Wiko Harry 2 2900 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6750T	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		16%	40%	41%	37%	11%	16%
Idle Minimum *	1.47	1.2 18%	0.7 52%	0.7 52%	0.49 67%	1.305 ?(1.14 - 1.47, n=2) 11%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 39%
Idle Average *	2.88	2 31%	1.2 58%	1.2 58%	0.67 77%	2.44 ?(1.99 - 2.88, n=2) 15%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 50%
Idle Maximum *	2.96	2.7 9%	1.9 36%	2 32%	0.87 71%	2.5 ?(2.03 - 2.96, n=2) 16%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 45%
Load Average *	4.74	4.2 11%	3.2 32%	3.4 28%	3.64 23%	4.23 ?(3.72 - 4.74, n=2) 11%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -17%
Load Maximum *	5.99	5.2 13%	4.8 20%	4 33%	9.04 -51%	5.98 ?(5.96 - 5.99, n=2) -0%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -39%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		8h 11min

	Oukitel U25 Pro 3200 mAh	Wiko Harry 2 2900 mAh	Nokia 2.1 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 6A 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	491	613 25%	809 65%	761 55%	719 46%

Pros

+ 高亮度IPS屏幕

+ 1080p分辨率

+ 时尚的外观

+ 做工结实

+ 主摄素质不错

+ 性价比高

Cons

- Wi-Fi速度慢

- 没有后置双摄

- 只支持蓝牙4.0

- 扬声器一般

- 处理器性能较差

OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of OUKITEL.

OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款坚固耐用的廉价智能手机，体现了目前智能手机市场的矛盾所在。虽然制造商在不增加许多新功能的情况下为其旗舰智能手机收取更多费用，但廉价机型开始弥合性能和质量差距，同时保持合理的低价。 U25 Pro有它的缺点，例如它的电池寿命不佳以及毫无意义的第二个后置摄像头，但总的来说，它做得很好。

1080p显示屏非常明亮，具有良好的视角，这对于低于100欧元（800元）的智能手机来说是罕见的，其指纹识别器也是如此。此外，U25 Pro的外观和感觉都很好，同时它在我们的基准测试中提供了不错的性能。

OUKITEL U25 Pro是一款功能强大且价格合理的智能手机，如果您的预算有限，它值得考虑。

然而，扬声器令人失望，删除了耳机插孔似乎与包括辅助后置摄像头的花哨一样没有意义。然而，很少有智能手机能够以低于100欧元（约800元）的价格提供U25 Pro的水平。

Oukitel U25 Pro - 2019-02-16 02/16/2019 v6^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

38 / 60 → 64%

Weight

90%

Battery

91%

Display

82%

Games Performance

14 / 63 → 23%

Application Performance

41 / 70 → 58%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

57 / 91 → 63%

Camera

56%

Average

69%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2019-03-18 (Update: 2019-03-18)

OUKITEL U25 Pro智能手机评测

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Oukitel U25 Pro audio analysis

Wiko Harry 2 audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare