Oukitel U16 Max 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 417 cd/m²
Contrast: 1986:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 11.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 14.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 12820 K
| Oukitel U16 Max 1280x720, 6" | Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Elephone P8000 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Z6 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG Stylus 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -21% | -16% | 2% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 417 | 312 -25% | 338 -19% | 419 0% | 370 -11% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 405 | 315 -22% | 329 -19% | 408 1% | 374 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 87 -7% | 95 1% | 83 -12% | 92 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.21 | 0.56 -167% | 0.36 -71% | 0.35 -67% | 0.25 -19% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1986 | 557 -72% | 939 -53% | 1197 -40% | 1480 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.9 | 6.8 43% | 9.38 21% | 6.6 45% | 6.1 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.5 | 14 35% | 12.6 41% | 16.5 23% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 14.4 | 7.1 51% | 10.33 28% | 7.9 45% | 7 51% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.77 79% | 2.3 96% | 2.08 106% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 12820 51% | 7402 88% | 10118 64% | 8576 76% | 8350 78% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8163 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 72 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 50 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U16 Max | |
| Ulefone Metal | |
| Elephone P8000 | |
| Acer Liquid Z6 Plus | |
| LG Stylus 2 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Oukitel U16 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Ulefone Metal audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.06 / 0.08 Watt |
| Idle |  0.93 / 2.23 / 2.31 Watt |
| Load |
5.61 / 8.26 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Oukitel U16 Max 4000 mAh | Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh | Elephone P8000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z6 Plus 4080 mAh | LG Stylus 2 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -45% | -36% | 25% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 26.2 | 20.4 -22% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 12.2 | 6.7 -45% | 10.6 -13% | 18.1 48% | 11.1 -9% |
| Load (h) | 5.8 | 2.4 -59% | 5.9 2% | 4.3 -26% | |
| H.264 (h) | 11.6 |
Pros
Cons
如果我们想象有这样一个用户群体，他们希望得到一台大屏幕设备，而不在意较高的机身重量，同时相对较低的价位则会平衡其他方面的弱点。从这个角度来看，我们必须承认Oukitel设计了一台十分引人注目的设备。
这是一台优秀而平衡的设备，可惜相机品质有待改进。
这款智能手机整体表现优秀，搭配了大尺寸屏幕和大容量电池。它的运行速度并不算出色，不过在这个价位上我们也无法要求太高。屏幕的分辨率也有些过时，不过如果不仔细看配置表的话，也不容易察觉到太大的区别。而它的相机中存在的问题则相对较大。很遗憾，它们只能够满足在光线较好的环境下拍摄的需要。如果它们能够有更好的成像质量，而不仅是高分辨率的话，这台设备应该可以更值得推荐。不过作为一台低价位设备，这台设备仍然值得考虑。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Oukitel U16 Max
- 05/26/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar
Price comparison
