Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto E32评测 - 入门级手机中的现代内存

价格低廉,屏幕为90赫兹。 摩托罗拉Moto E32的价格并不高,但仍然配备了快速的屏幕。制造商还改进了充电技术。然而,摩托罗拉本身就有更快、更便宜的竞争对手。这款廉价手机到底值不值?
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
摩托罗拉Moto E32
Motorola Moto E32 (Moto E Series)
Processor
UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 54 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1 TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164 x 74.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.420W/​kg Head, 1.430W/​kg Body, IP52-certified, notification LED (front), fanless
Weight
184 g
Price
149 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
76.4 %
09/2022
Motorola Moto E32
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
184 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.50"1600x720
77.1 %
11/2021
Motorola Moto E40
Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2
198 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
74.8 %
07/2022
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
T612, Mali-G52 MP1
182 g32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"1600x720
76.6 %
07/2022
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.71"1650x720

外壳和设备 - 具有IP保护的角形塑料设计

摩托罗拉在200欧元以下也有很好的代表,有廉价的E系列手机。今年的Moto E32价格为149欧元,配备4GB内存和64GB大容量存储。因此,这款智能手机的存储配置与该价格范围内的其他手机相当。

外壳由塑料制成,背面是普通的深色或浅色的灰色。两者都能折射出相机模块周围的光线。该设计显然不如Moto E40的圆形。 摩托E40而Moto E32在没有保护罩的情况下,手感相当好,但材料的过渡和一个或另一个边缘是明显的。摩托罗拉授予这款廉价手机IP52认证,证明其具有防泼水和相当好的防尘性能。

就其尺寸而言,这款手机相对较轻,只有184克。智能手机中安装了两个SIM卡插槽,前面还有一个通知LED。

微型SD读卡器是独立的,所以你不必为它放弃一个SIM卡插槽。在与我们的参考microSD Angelbird V60的测试中,它实现了良好的传输率,但也显示了个别的下降。在复制测试中,智能手机如 红米10C提供了几乎两倍的速度。

摩托罗拉Moto E32
摩托罗拉Moto E32
摩托罗拉Moto E32
摩托罗拉Moto E32
摩托罗拉Moto E32

尺寸比较

169.6 mm 76.6 mm 8.3 mm 190 g165.1 mm 75.6 mm 9.1 mm 198 g164.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 182 g164 mm 74.9 mm 8.5 mm 184 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
  (Angelbird V60)
34.9 MB/s +90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=84, last 2 years)
28.9 MB/s +57%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
  (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s +12%
Motorola Moto E32
  (Angelbird V60)
18.4 MB/s
Motorola Moto E40
  (Angelbird V60)
11.8 MB/s -36%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Motorola Moto E32 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø29.3 (14.6-45.5)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø24.6 (14.6-35.2)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.9 (21.1-40.1)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (26.4-46.1)
Motorola Moto E32 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.6 (41.3-85.5)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.2 (42-85.8)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.3 (31.8-83.1)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.7 (28.6-82.6)

通信、软件和操作 - 只有WiFi 4,没有NFC

Moto E32是一款4G智能手机,为中欧地区提供所有重要的LTE频段。然而,你不应该期望更多,所以它不是国际使用的首选。在我们审查期间的随机测试中,信号强度也被证明是相当平庸的,一次又一次。

事实上,Moto E32只有WiFi 4,对于其价格范围来说是可以的,但是 红米10C显示,这里也可以提供具有明显更高传输速率的WiFi 5。当我们用参考路由器华硕ROG AXE11000检查Wi-Fi速度时,我们的审查样本在传输速率方面相当善变。然而,总体而言,除了红米之外,它的速度与同类手机相似。

这款手机配备了相当先进的蓝牙5.0,但没有NFC,所以不能使用移动支付服务。

摩托罗拉在手机上安装了一个相当纯粹的Android 11。我们的Moto E32在测试时有2022年7月的安全补丁,所以应该很快会有更新。根据早期Moto E-Phones的经验,应该会有Android 12的更新,但何时更新还不确定。很好的是,摩托罗拉没有预装任何广告应用程序。

这款手机的触摸屏很容易使用,即使是在角落里。这款手机将指纹传感器隐藏在侧面略微凸起的待机按钮中。它对曾经被识别的手指作出及时和可靠的反应,并允许解锁手机或访问应用程序的敏感区域。通过人脸识别解锁也是可能的,而且工作可靠,但只有在环境光线良好的情况下才能进行。此外,由于软件解决方案的原因,这种方法并不那么安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto E40
802.11 b/g/n
86.9 (78min - 93max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto E40
802.11 b/g/n
87.2 (46min - 105max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (269min - 336max) MBit/s +446%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
802.11 b/g/n
62.6 (58min - 74max) MBit/s +8%
Motorola Moto E32
802.11 b/g/n
57.7 (25min - 71max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
222 (194min - 242max) MBit/s +385%
Motorola Moto E32
802.11 b/g/n
45.8 (23min - 57max) MBit/s
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
802.11 b/g/n
44.3 (22min - 58max) MBit/s -3%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Motorola Moto E32; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø45.7 (23-57)
Motorola Moto E32; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø57.7 (25-71)

摄像机--无像素分选

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

相比之下 摩托E40相比,Moto E32中简单的1600万像素传感器可以被看作是一种退步。事实上,Moto E32的主摄像头的额定感光度也较低。尽管如此,就其价格范围而言,我们的测试设备拍摄的低光照亮度相当好,但仔细观察,它们看起来相当粗糙。即使在正常的白天,你也不应该把海力士相机传感器提供的照片放大太多。曝光和动态效果让我们很满意,但颜色看起来有点冲淡了。

没有广角镜头,只有一个微距摄像头,以及一个支持模糊效果的摄像头。用主摄像头可以录制1080p和30fps的视频。曝光补偿工作迅速而可靠,自动对焦偶尔会有点慢,但大多是准确的。一般来说,图片质量还不错,但在大屏幕上观看时,个别细节的显示太不准确,这一点变得很明显。

三星的800万像素前置摄像头拍摄的照片也有些粗糙,其中较大的颜色区域缺乏细微差别。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
15.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E32: 9.85 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 16.87 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
53 ∆E
38 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
61.8 ∆E
53.6 ∆E
33.5 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
74 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
82.4 ∆E
69.2 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto E32: 45.47 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 82.39 ∆E

显示屏 - 90-Hz屏幕是一个独特的卖点

子像素结构
子像素结构

这款手机采用IPS屏幕,分辨率提高到720p。价格相近的智能手机也提供同样的设备。

屏幕并不像Moto E40那样明亮。 摩托E40它的最大亮度为375cd/m²,即使在同类产品中也是比较暗的,所以在阳光下使用它是很困难的。作为一项特殊功能,该屏幕可根据要求提供90赫兹的帧率,从而实现流畅滚动和更快的操作。

黑值比其他智能手机略高,导致只有适度的对比度和有些苍白的颜色。屏幕的颜色配置文件可以选择,手动白平衡也可以分几步进行,所以你仍然可以调整。

我们没有注意到任何PWM的闪烁,但响应时间很慢,至少对游戏玩家来说是这样。

337
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 375 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 339.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 375 cd/m²
Contrast: 721:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.97
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.275
Motorola Moto E32
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Motorola Moto E40
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
IPS, 1650x720, 6.7"
Response Times
-15%
23%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(22, 18)
44 ?(23, 21)
-10%
34 ?(19, 15)
15%
33 ?(17, 16)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
27 ?(13, 14)
32 ?(15, 17)
-19%
19 ?(9.5, 9.5)
30%
21 ?(9, 12)
22%
PWM Frequency
Screen
15%
-3%
41%
Brightness middle
375
452
21%
365
-3%
511
36%
Brightness
339
431
27%
354
4%
478
41%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
83
-1%
84
0%
Black Level *
0.52
0.46
12%
0.45
13%
0.42
19%
Contrast
721
983
36%
811
12%
1217
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.41
4.15
6%
4.58
-4%
1.51
66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.55
6.47
1%
8.81
-35%
2.53
61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.6
4
13%
5.2
-13%
2.9
37%
Gamma
2.275 97%
2.157 102%
2.28 96%
2.266 97%
CCT
7641 85%
7557 86%
7929 82%
6443 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 9%
10% / 2%
31% / 37%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17560 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--用18瓦特充电将是可能的...

这款 Unisoc Tiger T606是一个相当简单的SoC,它被用于许多其他入门级手机,如 诺基亚G21三星Galaxy A03所用。然而,它提供的计算能力远远低于,比如说 摩托E40或甚至是 红米10C是可用的。这在日常使用中也很明显:虽然你通常可以相当顺畅地浏览菜单,但在需要更多性能时就会出现问题。然后你就不得不忍受停顿和延迟。

令人高兴的是,摩托罗拉在Moto E32中偏离了eMMC存储,安装了UFS内存,速度更快,缩短了加载时间。

这款智能手机的最高温度为40℃,仍然在限制范围内,只有在环境温度非常高的情况下才可能成为问题。

小型单声道扬声器通常做得足够好,这样你就可以不时地听音乐。然而,你会很快注意到,在更密集的段落中,它的工作达到了极限。声音部分不精确,而且在高音部分似乎也略微过度强调了。aptX和aptX HD支持,但aptX Adaptive等较新的变体不支持。

这款廉价的Moto手机的充电功率高达18瓦,比Moto E40的充电功率要大得多。 摩托E40.然而,我们的测试设备只配备了一个10瓦的充电器,这不仅降低了充电功率,而且如果客户想再买一个18瓦的充电器,还可能导致更多的电子垃圾。这是因为,有了强大的充电器,充电时间从2个多小时下降到1:30小时,即使是短时充电来度过接下来的几个小时,也会使电池水平明显增加。

在我们的WLAN测试中,5000毫安时的全电池持续时间比在 摩托E40,但仍能很好地完成15:47小时的工作。因此,充满电应该足够使用2天或更长时间。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
312 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
356 Points +14%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
347 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
377 Points +21%
Average UNISOC T606
  (273 - 313, n=19)
306 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2138, n=193, last 2 years)
938 Points +201%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1186 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1393 Points +17%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1326 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1644 Points +39%
Average UNISOC T606
  (708 - 1324, n=19)
1206 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=193, last 2 years)
3124 Points +163%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
7815 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8743 Points +12%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
7705 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5884 Points -25%
Average UNISOC T606
  (6637 - 8303, n=19)
7338 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=192, last 2 years)
12163 Points +56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
956 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points +55%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
997 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1353 Points +42%
Average UNISOC T606
  (361 - 974, n=18)
910 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=91, last 2 years)
2950 Points +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
812 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1309 Points +61%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
841 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points +45%
Average UNISOC T606
  (290 - 829, n=18)
772 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=91, last 2 years)
3080 Points +279%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2524 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2821 Points +12%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2858 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2831 Points +12%
Average UNISOC T606
  (2379 - 2577, n=18)
2499 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=91, last 2 years)
3237 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
970 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1554 Points +60%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
987 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points +39%
Average UNISOC T606
  (959 - 989, n=18)
975 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=166, last 2 years)
7216 Points +644%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
821 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1368 Points +67%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
830 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1175 Points +43%
Average UNISOC T606
  (814 - 834, n=18)
825 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=165, last 2 years)
10457 Points +1174%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2664 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points +11%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2940 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2825 Points +6%
Average UNISOC T606
  (2484 - 2697, n=18)
2625 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=165, last 2 years)
4419 Points +66%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
395 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
729 Points +85%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
415 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points +14%
Average UNISOC T606
  (394 - 432, n=18)
416 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 13896, n=119, last 2 years)
2784 Points +605%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
394 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
722 Points +83%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
410 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
438 Points +11%
Average UNISOC T606
  (392 - 424, n=18)
413 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=183, last 2 years)
6780 Points +1621%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
111 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
184 Points +66%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
114 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points +10%
Average UNISOC T606
  (85 - 118, n=18)
107.3 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5226, n=187, last 2 years)
1826 Points +1545%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
110 Points
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
183 Points +66%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
111 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points +11%
Average UNISOC T606
  (99 - 121, n=15)
107.7 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=184, last 2 years)
1826 Points +1560%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
9.9 fps
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19 fps +92%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
10 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps +72%
Average UNISOC T606
  (5.1 - 11, n=18)
8.83 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=205, last 2 years)
46 fps +365%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.3 fps
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps +108%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
5.3 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.5 fps +79%
Average UNISOC T606
  (1.9 - 5.5, n=18)
5.22 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=205, last 2 years)
69 fps +1202%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.2 fps
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps +94%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
6.4 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
10 fps +61%
Average UNISOC T606
  (0.85 - 7.3, n=18)
5.34 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=205, last 2 years)
34.3 fps +453%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E32
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1.9 fps
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps +95%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1.9 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.2 fps +68%
Average UNISOC T606
  (0.85 - 2.1, n=18)
1.925 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=205, last 2 years)
27.7 fps +1358%
Motorola Moto E32Motorola Moto E40Realme Narzo 50i PrimeXiaomi Redmi 10CAverage 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-59%
34%
44%
-27%
180%
Sequential Read 256KB
664.3
265
-60%
658.2
-1%
927.7
40%
513 ?(272 - 687, n=18)
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB
250.7
156.3
-38%
445.6
78%
510.2
104%
175.2 ?(80.4 - 251, n=18)
-30%
Random Read 4KB
139.1
56
-60%
161.8
16%
120.2
-14%
117.1 ?(60.6 - 167.2, n=18)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
134.3
30.7
-77%
189.8
41%
195.2
45%

温度

Max. Load
 38.1 °C32.4 °C30.6 °C 
 37.4 °C32 °C30.6 °C 
 36.9 °C32.1 °C30.6 °C 
Maximum: 38.1 °C
Average: 33.4 °C
30.6 °C32.7 °C38.6 °C
30.8 °C33.3 °C40 °C
31.4 °C34.1 °C39.1 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.236.22540.336.23131.5314030.3345033.732.26323.726.18022.43110022.722.812515.521.31601931.320015.336.225014.341.431513.94840015.253.750015.759.563015.361.280018.362100017.168.312501870.5160014.870.1200014.366.6250014.264.1315014.963.7400015.367.850001666.8630016.958.3800016.262.61000017.163.51250016.266.11600016.657.5SPL28.178.3N140.3median 15.7median 62Delta1.110.636.736.735.738.527.330.233.331.237.432.225.226.718.219.820.520.413.52017.33113.535.413.541.713.14612.950.313.358.815.462.514.165.612.969.19.669.910.668.510.368.21167.812.666.415.264.416.865.316.461.916.565.616.671.815.972.316.654.726.379.30.743median 13.5median 64.42.411.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E32Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E32 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 10C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto E40
5000 mAh
995 min +5%
Motorola Moto E32
5000 mAh
947 min
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 2844, n=207, last 2 years)
933 min -1%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
5000 mAh
921 min -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
5000 mAh
908 min -4%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 47min

Pros

+ 快速的90-Hz屏幕
+ 现代设计
+ 快速充电技术
+ 几乎纯粹Android
+ 专用的microSD插槽
+ 迅捷的指纹传感器

Cons

- 包装中只有一个10瓦的充电器
- 材料过渡明显
- 功率相对较小
- 相当粗糙的相机照片
- 没有NFC
- 亮度低

评语--体面的入门级设备,屏幕速度快

在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto E32。测试设备由:
在审查中。摩托罗拉Moto E32。测试设备由:
数码港.com

摩托罗拉推出的Moto E32是一款智能手机,它将自己牢牢地置于入门级市场,而且还以快速内存、现代设计和长电池寿命而显得很有时代感。然而,用户不得不使用简单的相机,而在像 小米红米10C,你会得到更多的性能。

我们喜欢相当纯粹的软件,专用的microSD插槽,以及我们评测样品的快速充电选项,尽管附带的电源适配器,不幸的是,没有使用它。

摩托罗拉的Moto E32是一款可靠的手机,拥有90赫兹的屏幕和快速充电技术,但它也有缺点,即屏幕昏暗和缺少NFC。

与仍然可用的Moto E40相比,摩托罗拉的Moto E32有一些改进,但也有一些退步。因此,重要的是要知道你想设定哪些优先事项:你能否用已有的充电器使用Moto E32的更高充电性能,你是否想从Moto E32的更快内存中获益,那么它是一个不错的选择。

小米红米10C 摩托E40另一方面,它提供了明显更多的动力和略微更符合人体工程学的设计。在amazon.de这个替代品目前的价格比Moto E32高一些,但也可以在cyberport.de上以较低的价格买到。.

红米10C红米10C在Wi-Fi速度和系统功率方面要好得多,而且你可以得到NFC,但没有90Hz的屏幕。

价格和可用性

在测试时,摩托罗拉Moto E32可以直接从制造商那里获得,价格略低于150欧元。https://www.motorola.de/smartphones-moto-e-32/p#只需不到150欧元。我们的借阅者cyberport.de和amazon.deamazon.de有这个价格的设备提供。

然而,在一些地方也可以找到价格更低的智能手机。

Motorola Moto E32 - 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
40 / 70 → 57%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
82%
Games Performance
12 / 64 → 18%
Application Performance
55 / 86 → 64%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 90 → 60%
Camera
54%
Average
70%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto E32评测 - 入门级手机中的现代内存
Florian Schmitt, 2022-09- 2 (Update: 2022-09- 2)