摩托罗拉Moto E20智能手机评测--蜂窝状设计的轻量级手机

Name: Motorola Moto E20
Brand: Motorola

廉价的动力棒。 摩托罗拉的Moto E20以不到100欧元的价格提供了良好的性能和低重量。另一方面，你必须在电池寿命等方面做出让步。这款廉价的智能手机真的值得吗？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/10/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto E20 (Moto E Series)

Processor

UNISOC T606 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 25 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, UMTS, LTE, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164.8 x 75.5

Battery

4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 11

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, depth of field (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, Videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps, FM radio, IP52-certified, fanless

Weight

184 g

Price

100 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible competitors in comparison

Bewertung	Datum	Modell	Gewicht	Laufwerk	Groesse	Aufloesung
74.9 %	12/2021	Motorola Moto E20 T606, Mali-G57 MP2	184 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
76.3 %	07/2021	Nokia G10 Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320	197 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
73.2 %	09/2021	Motorola Moto E7i Power SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322	200 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
75.3 %		Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320	194 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	6.53"	1600x720

箱子和设备 - 做工精良的塑料

摩托罗拉今年对其Moto G系列进行了相当程度的扩展，但Moto E系列的入门级手机仍有空间。此前，我们曾对 Moto E40配备了90赫兹的屏幕，今天我们将看看Moto E20，它的售价不到100欧元。

在这个价位上很难期待比塑料机身更多的东西，但摩托罗拉至少创造了某种质量，背部和边框之间几乎无缝过渡。Moto E20采用哑光处理和浅色蜂巢图案，设计相当别致。海岸蓝和石墨灰是可用的颜色选择。这款智能手机相对较薄，只有8.5毫米，184克的重量也明显比这个价格范围内的其他手机轻。

SD卡读卡器在写入速度方面并不是最快的，但在读取方面做得比较好。

Size comparison

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=98, last 2 years)	28.4 MB/s +99%
Motorola Moto E20 (Angelbird V60)	14.29 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Motorola Moto E20 Mali-G57 MP2, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø21.5 (8.36-35.8)

Nokia G10 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G25, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø29.3 (21.8-38.1)

Motorola Moto E7i Power GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø35.1 (24.3-48.4)

Motorola Moto E20 Mali-G57 MP2, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø75.7 (45.7-80)

Nokia G10 PowerVR GE8320, Helio G25, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø59.1 (31.5-63.8)

Motorola Moto E7i Power GE8322 / IMG8322, SC9863A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø69.3 (42.3-77.4)

通信、软件和操作 - 快速Wi-Fi，但没有NFC

你必须使用Wi-Fi 4，但Moto E20设法从旧的Wi-Fi标准提供体面的传输速率。因此，最大可能的互联网速度是这个价格范围内其他智能手机的两倍。然而，缺乏NFC是一个不利因素，这意味着用户失去了使用移动支付服务的能力。

纯粹的，预装了股票Android ，但在测试时，安全补丁是2021年8月的，因此已经过时了。由于价格低廉，你不应该期望有太多的安全更新。

背面有一个物理指纹传感器。它的工作有轻微的延迟，但总体上能可靠地解锁智能手机。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto E20 802.11 b/g/n	95.9 (86^min - 101^max) MBit/s
Nokia G10 802.11 b/g/n	47.6 (21^min - 67^max) MBit/s -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT 802.11 b/g/n	46.4 (21^min - 78^max) MBit/s -52%
Motorola Moto E7i Power 802.11 b/g/n	44.7 (32^min - 59^max) MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto E20 802.11 b/g/n	80.1 (45^min - 94^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT 802.11 b/g/n	52.6 (24^min - 74^max) MBit/s -34%
Nokia G10 802.11 b/g/n	52.1 (30^min - 72^max) MBit/s -35%
Motorola Moto E7i Power 802.11 b/g/n	48.5 (44^min - 54^max) MBit/s -39%

Motorola Moto E20; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø80.1 (45-94)

Motorola Moto E20; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø95.9 (86-101)

照相机 - 锐度和细节低

在智能手机的背面有两个相机镜头和一个LED闪光灯，但其中只有一个可以真正用于拍照。Moto E20的主摄像头的分辨率为1300万像素，第一眼看去能拍出不错的照片，但在细节上有些冲淡了。

此外，相机的亮度不高，所以明亮的地方被掩盖了，而黑暗的地方则不那么详细。在我们的照片测试中，在1勒克斯的照度下看不到细节。

Moto E20录制的视频最大分辨率为1080p，每秒30帧。曝光调整得相当快，但自动对焦总是需要一秒钟，直到它适应新的情况，然后迅速作出反应，不需要长时间的对焦搜索。

500万像素的前置摄像头可以为家庭使用拍摄体面的自拍照，但你不应该放大太多，因为细节处理相当平庸。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

显示器 - 平均亮度

1,600 x 720的显示屏在分辨率和亮度方面与该级别的其他手机相当。相比之下，显示屏亮度明显高于摩托E7i Power.黑色水平也很好；因此，对比度很好，颜色看起来更生动一些。

我们在很低的亮度下测量PWM，这种屏幕闪烁可能会给一些人带来问题。如果你在使用过程中喜欢不那么明亮的屏幕，你应该在购买之前仔细看看这个屏幕。


355 cd/m²	365 cd/m²	390 cd/m²
353 cd/m²	403 cd/m²	367 cd/m²
359 cd/m²	409 cd/m²	365 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 409 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 374 cd/m² Minimum: 4.43 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 403 cd/m²
Contrast: 1612:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26

	Motorola Moto E20 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50	Nokia G10 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50	Motorola Moto E7i Power IPS, 1600x720, 6.50	Xiaomi Redmi 9AT IPS LCD , 1600x720, 6.53
Response Times		9034%	4510%	11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	60 ?(31, 29)	66 ?(37, 29) -10%	58 ?(29, 29) 3%	55 ?(31, 24) 8%
Response Time Black / White *	42 ?(25, 17)	38 ?(21, 17) 10%	32 ?(17, 15) 24%	36 ?(19, 17) 14%
PWM Frequency	367.6 ?(5)	100000 27103%	50000 13502%
Screen		22%	-4%	-21%
Brightness middle	403	485 20%	324 -20%	374 -7%
Brightness	374	458 22%	314 -16%	345 -8%
Brightness Distribution	86	89 3%	92 7%	85 -1%
Black Level *	0.25	0.2 20%	0.2 20%	0.46 -84%
Contrast	1612	2425 50%	1620 0%	813 -50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.31	3.61 16%	4.62 -7%	3.86 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.11	8.32 -17%	7.57 -6%	8.07 -14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	2.1 60%	5.6 -8%	5.7 -10%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.195 ^100%	2.482 ^89%	2.307 ^95%
CCT	7895 ^82%	6850 ^95%	7524 ^86%	6932 ^94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		4528% / 2480%	2253% / 1227%	-5% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 31 ms rise
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

367.6 Hz

≤ 5 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 5 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 入门级手机，功率很大

该 Unisoc Tiger T606已经是一个两年前的SoC。像诺基亚G10 ，稍微昂贵的竞争者被证明是相当强大的。当然，这款廉价的手机无法跟上中端甚至高端智能手机的步伐，但它足以在日常使用中流畅地浏览菜单和简单应用。

即使经过较长时间的负载，暖气也很难察觉。扬声器的声音很大，但似乎听起来很薄。也就是说，高音几乎没有过度强调的情况。aptX高清编解码器可用于蓝牙连接。

4000毫安时的电池容量似乎有点低，这在电池运行时间上很明显--在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，14:27小时还可以，但类似价格的竞争对手持续时间更长。然而，你不必每天都适度使用电源。小型电源适配器最多可提供10瓦，这意味着充电可能需要近2小时。

Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	273 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	151 Points -45%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	131 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	132 Points -52%
Average UNISOC T606 (273 - 313, n=15)	306 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +234%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	708 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	809 Points +14%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	472 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	466 Points -34%
Average UNISOC T606 (708 - 1324, n=15)	1196 Points +69%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points +323%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	7155 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	5405 Points -24%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	4436 Points -38%
Average UNISOC T606 (6637 - 7912, n=15)	7227 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11787 Points +65%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	1440 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	907 Points -37%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	738 Points -49%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	808 Points -44%
Average UNISOC T606 (1414 - 1508, n=4)	1449 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +549%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	1285 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	844 Points -34%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	672 Points -48%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	774 Points -40%
Average UNISOC T606 (1255 - 1342, n=4)	1287 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +1173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	2489 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1231 Points -51%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1124 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	987 Points -60%
Average UNISOC T606 (2489 - 2673, n=4)	2592 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	963 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	468 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	413 Points -57%
Average UNISOC T606 (361 - 974, n=14)	893 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	823 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	398 Points -52%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	354 Points -57%
Average UNISOC T606 (290 - 827, n=14)	757 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +234%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	2389 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1206 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1125 Points -53%
Average UNISOC T606 (2379 - 2577, n=14)	2494 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	969 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	528 Points -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	456 Points -53%
Average UNISOC T606 (959 - 989, n=14)	973 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +595%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	825 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	454 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	409 Points -50%
Average UNISOC T606 (814 - 830, n=14)	823 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +1079%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	2484 Points
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1227 Points -51%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	956 Points -62%
Average UNISOC T606 (2484 - 2687, n=14)	2618 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +70%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	Points
Average UNISOC T606 (394 - 432, n=14)	413 Points
Average of class Smartphone (395 - 9839, n=135, last 2 years)	2555 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	Points
Average UNISOC T606 (392 - 424, n=14)	410 Points
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 20068, n=203, last 2 years)	6280 Points

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	9.6 fps
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	7.4 fps -23%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	5.8 fps -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	7.9 fps -18%
Average UNISOC T606 (5.1 - 11, n=14)	8.75 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +358%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	5.2 fps
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4 fps -23%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	3.3 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.6 fps -31%
Average UNISOC T606 (1.9 - 5.5, n=14)	5.14 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +1137%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	6.1 fps
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	4.7 fps -23%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	3.5 fps -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.6 fps -25%
Average UNISOC T606 (3.2 - 7.2, n=14)	5.57 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +438%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E20 UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP2, 2048	1.9 fps
Nokia G10 Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 3072	1.4 fps -26%
Motorola Moto E7i Power UNISOC SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322, 2048	1.2 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 9AT Mediatek Helio G25, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.4 fps -26%
Average UNISOC T606 (0.85 - 2.1, n=14)	1.904 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +1247%

	Motorola Moto E20	Nokia G10	Motorola Moto E7i Power	Xiaomi Redmi 9AT	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-25%	-51%	-25%	-29%	508%
Sequential Read 256KB	263.2	245.6 -7%	90.5 -66%	266.4 1%	242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247) -8%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 473%
Sequential Write 256KB	105.4	120 14%	117 11%	84.2 -20%	100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247) -5%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 961%
Random Read 4KB	72.3	43.6 -40%	28.6 -60%	46.49 -36%	43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247) -40%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 242%
Random Write 4KB	59.8	20 -67%	7.6 -87%	33.53 -44%	22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247) -63%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 355%

温度

Max. Load

Idle


35.7 °C	32 °C	32.6 °C
35.6 °C	31.7 °C	33.1 °C
35.2 °C	32.4 °C	32.8 °C

Maximum: 35.7 °C
Average: 33.5 °C


31.8 °C	32.6 °C	36.3 °C
31.4 °C	31.7 °C	36.3 °C
30.6 °C	32.2 °C	35.5 °C

Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 33.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 36.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

扬声器

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Moto E20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 9AT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

	Motorola Moto E20 4000 mAh	Nokia G10 5050 mAh	Motorola Moto E7i Power 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 9AT 5000 mAh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing	867	1068 23%	1125 30%	1145 32%	914 ?(424 - 2844, n=228, last 2 years) 5%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		14h 27min

Pros

+ 相对更强大的

+ 在这个价格范围内的快速Wi-Fi

+ 重量低

+ 做工尚可

Cons

- 无NFC

- 亮度很低的PWM

- 相机清晰度和细节都很低

- 声音平淡

- 电池寿命相对较短

结论--重量轻，运行时间短

摩托罗拉Moto E20用很少的钱提供了很大的能量，重量较轻，并具有过时但快速的WLAN。如果这些方面很重要，那么这款廉价的设备可能会引起你的兴趣。

尽管如此，购买者应该知道，他们不能期望以低于100欧元的价格获得锐利的相机照片、非常明亮的屏幕或快速存储。Moto E20并不提供所有这些，所以它更适合那些偶尔使用智能手机，完全不需要某些功能或只需要非常少的用户。大多数入门级手机都是这样的。

与竞争对手相比，摩托罗拉不得不用较短的运行时间来换取手机的低重量，但在我们的WLAN测试中，14:27小时的运行时间仍足以满足日常使用。

摩托罗拉的Moto E20是一款快速、轻便、非常实惠的智能手机，但电池运行时间略短。

如果耐力比纯粹的性能和重量更重要，你应该看看小米红米9AT.如果你想用很少的钱买一个90赫兹的屏幕，那么摩托罗拉Moto E40是一个更合适的选择。

价格和可用性

你可以直接从制造商那里获得摩托罗拉Moto E20https://www.motorola.de/smartphones-moto-e-20/p.在测试的时候，互联网零售商已经有一些优惠，如亚马逊（美国）。.

Motorola Moto E20 - 2021-12-06 12/06/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

80%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

39 / 70 → 55%

Weight

89%

Battery

90%

Display

84%

Games Performance

9 / 64 → 15%

Application Performance

64 / 86 → 75%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

62 / 90 → 69%

Camera

42%

Average

70%

75%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto E20智能手机评测--蜂窝状设计的轻量级手机

Florian Schmitt, 2021-12-10 (Update: 2021-12-10)

摩托罗拉Moto E20智能手机评测--蜂窝状设计的轻量级手机

Possible competitors in comparison

箱子和设备 - 做工精良的塑料

Size comparison

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

通信、软件和操作 - 快速Wi-Fi，但没有NFC

照相机 - 锐度和细节低

显示器 - 平均亮度

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 入门级手机，功率很大

温度

扬声器

Motorola Moto E20 audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi 9AT audio analysis

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论--重量轻，运行时间短

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare