Notebookcheck

华为 Mate 10 Pro 智能手机简短评测

Daniel Schmidt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 11/02/2017
Android ARM Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

惊叹声中有点小唏嘘。作为Mate 10系列中的Pro版本,该机是到目前为止我们做过评测的最强华为智能机。存储能力和摄像头得到了改进,具有2:1规格的OLED屏幕。Kirin 970核心处理器,附加了网络处理器。听起来不错,但华为在某些地方做了让步。

Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Mate 10 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 970
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6 inch 2:1, 2160x1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, FullView, HDR, OLED, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity, acceleration, Hall, and G sensors, barometer, digital compass, Glonass, BeiDou, Infrared sender, OTG, Wifi Direct
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800, and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 18 + TDS band 34 and 39), LTE Cat. 18 (FDD bands: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, and 32; TDD: 34, 38, 39, 40, and 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 154.2 x 74.5
Battery
15.3 Wh, 4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.82 Volt, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 32 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 505 h
Operating System
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix Monochrome + 12 MPix RGB (both f/1.6, RGB sensor with OIS, UHD video, dual-LED flash, four auto-focus systems, 2x Hybridzoom)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, fixed focus, Full HD video)
Additional features
Speakers: two speakers, Keyboard: virtual, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, USB earphones, USB Type-C to headphone jack adapter, quick-start instructions, protective case, EMUI 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, water and dust proof according to IP67, Dual-VoLTE, NPU, fanless
Weight
178 g, Power Supply: 103 g
Price
799 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Huawei Mate 10 Pro: Projection mode / Desktop mode
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: Projection mode / Desktop mode
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
503 MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
501 MBit/s ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
371 MBit/s ∼74% +10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼67%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
259 MBit/s ∼51% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
653 MBit/s ∼100% +190%
OnePlus 5
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
539 MBit/s ∼83% +140%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
494 MBit/s ∼76% +120%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼34%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165 MBit/s ∼25% -27%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OnePlus 5

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: dawn with hybrid zoom
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: low light
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: low light
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: wide angle (27 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: 2x hybrid zoom (54 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: night
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: low light
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: wide angle (27 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: wide angle (27 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: wide angle (27 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: wide angle (27 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: wide angle (27 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: 2x hybrid zoom (54 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: wide angle (27 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: monochrome
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: monochrome (digital zoom: 100 mm)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: both sensors (12 MP)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: both sensors (20 MP)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: monochrome sensors only (20 MP)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: both sensors (12 MP, hybrid zoom)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro: both sensors (12 MP, detail enlargement)
647
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
655
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 659 cd/m² Average: 636.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.71 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 629 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.15
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9
Honor 8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
IPS, 2560x1440, 6.4
Screen
-62%
-44%
-21%
8%
-24%
-119%
-142%
Brightness
636
680
7%
514
-19%
536
-16%
538
-15%
568
-11%
445
-30%
479
-25%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
91
-3%
93
-1%
90
-4%
92
-2%
88
-6%
93
-1%
Black Level *
0.42
0.3
0.38
0.62
0.22
0.482
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.3
-153%
3.2
-88%
2.6
-53%
1.3
24%
2.8
-65%
5.5
-224%
7
-312%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
4.8
-100%
4
-67%
2.7
-13%
1.8
25%
2.8
-17%
7.6
-217%
7.9
-229%
Gamma
2.15 112%
2.33 103%
2.27 106%
2.04 118%
2.25 107%
2.15 112%
2.2 109%
2.34 103%
CCT
6337 103%
7255 90%
7120 91%
6206 105%
6797 96%
6728 97%
7454 87%
7826 83%
Contrast
1657
1803
1471
932
2136
980

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 247.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 247.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 247.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼54% -30%
LG V30
156713 Points ∼69% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
173997 Points ∼76% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
218158 Points ∼96% +23%
Honor 8 Pro
146044 Points ∼64% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points ∼76% -2%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% -22%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% -1%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
85438 Points ∼37% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% -7%
OnePlus 5
177156 Points ∼78% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼67%
Huawei Mate 9
6299 Points ∼61% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5096 Points ∼49% -26%
Honor 8 Pro
6134 Points ∼60% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6433 Points ∼62% -7%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% -25%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼66% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼50% -25%
OnePlus 5
6579 Points ∼64% -5%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼87% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6084 Points ∼71% -28%
Honor 8 Pro
7356 Points ∼86% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7695 Points ∼90% -9%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼61% -38%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼68% -31%
OnePlus 5
7826 Points ∼92% -7%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼63% -13%
LG V30
907 Points ∼53% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1235 Points ∼73% 0%
Honor 8 Pro
1131 Points ∼67% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points ∼73% 0%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% -26%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼72% -1%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
966 Points ∼57% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69% -6%
OnePlus 5
1287 Points ∼76% +4%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼43% +8%
LG V30
5026 Points ∼54% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6121 Points ∼66% +67%
Honor 8 Pro
4070 Points ∼44% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points ∼65% +65%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% +26%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼65% +63%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1623 Points ∼18% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66% +68%
OnePlus 5
6144 Points ∼66% +68%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼87% -7%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼47% -50%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3095 Points ∼70% -25%
Honor 8 Pro
4277 Points ∼97% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points ∼78% -17%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -62%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% -50%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1940 Points ∼44% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% -24%
OnePlus 5
4423 Points ∼100% +7%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼35% -31%
LG V30
4365 Points ∼42% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
5308 Points ∼52% +1%
Honor 8 Pro
4029 Points ∼39% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points ∼57% +12%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -46%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼54% +6%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2297 Points ∼22% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52% +1%
OnePlus 5
5902 Points ∼57% +13%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼73% -12%
LG V30
2540 Points ∼67% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3338 Points ∼88% +6%
Honor 8 Pro
2985 Points ∼79% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points ∼93% +11%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% -34%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% -4%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1626 Points ∼43% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% +5%
OnePlus 5
3790 Points ∼100% +20%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 9
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
8310 Points ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points ∼92% -8%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 5
8005 Points ∼93% -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼27%
Huawei Mate 9
6445 Points ∼26% -5%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼24% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
6744 Points ∼27% -1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼42% +55%
Honor 8 Pro
6245 Points ∼25% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points ∼26% -4%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼26% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼27% -1%
OnePlus 5
6799 Points ∼27% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate 9
1866 Points ∼31% -2%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼32% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2028 Points ∼34% +7%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼72% +125%
Honor 8 Pro
1853 Points ∼31% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points ∼32% 0%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼32% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼34% +6%
OnePlus 5
1973 Points ∼33% +4%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼93%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼69% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2346 Points ∼76% -18%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼69% -27%
Honor 8 Pro
2216 Points ∼72% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points ∼53% -43%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼57% -39%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼92% -1%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
2014 Points ∼65% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼80% -14%
OnePlus 5
3026 Points ∼98% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼53%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼43% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2661 Points ∼49% -6%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼57% +8%
Honor 8 Pro
1746 Points ∼32% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points ∼69% +31%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% -15%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼72% +37%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
755 Points ∼14% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +22%
OnePlus 5
3757 Points ∼70% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼73%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼58% -21%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2584 Points ∼67% -9%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼72% -2%
Honor 8 Pro
1832 Points ∼47% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points ∼75% +2%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼57% -22%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼92% +26%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
877 Points ∼23% -69%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +12%
OnePlus 5
3566 Points ∼92% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points ∼69% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
2342 Points ∼76% -19%
Honor 8 Pro
1896 Points ∼62% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points ∼51% -46%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼53% -43%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼92% -2%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1844 Points ∼60% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼80% -15%
OnePlus 5
3012 Points ∼98% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼43%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points ∼32% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3928 Points ∼51% +17%
Honor 8 Pro
1856 Points ∼24% -45%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points ∼66% +52%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼49% +14%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼76% +75%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1271 Points ∼16% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +43%
OnePlus 5
4765 Points ∼62% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼65%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points ∼48% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3414 Points ∼69% +5%
Honor 8 Pro
1865 Points ∼37% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points ∼68% +5%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼59% -9%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼95% +46%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
1365 Points ∼27% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼80% +22%
OnePlus 5
4219 Points ∼85% +30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼31%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼21% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
22829 Points ∼32% +1%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼36% +13%
Honor 8 Pro
15129 Points ∼21% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points ∼19% -39%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼30% -6%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% -11%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
11364 Points ∼16% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼29% -8%
OnePlus 5
19411 Points ∼27% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼7%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼8% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
36807 Points ∼8% +8%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼25% +233%
Honor 8 Pro
32243 Points ∼7% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points ∼12% +54%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% -2%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% +64%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
21103 Points ∼5% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -3%
OnePlus 5
58001 Points ∼13% +71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼16%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼14% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
32399 Points ∼16% +6%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼33% +111%
Honor 8 Pro
25766 Points ∼13% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points ∼16% +6%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼15% -3%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% +31%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
17727 Points ∼9% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% -4%
OnePlus 5
40229 Points ∼20% +32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼6% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
105 fps ∼8% -6%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼12% +49%
Honor 8 Pro
43 fps ∼3% -62%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps ∼8% -3%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼5% -34%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% -19%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
22 fps ∼2% -80%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% -7%
OnePlus 5
115 fps ∼8% +3%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼26% +99%
Honor 8 Pro
59 fps ∼13% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps ∼13% 0%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% -23%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% -3%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
33 fps ∼7% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% -3%
OnePlus 5
60 fps ∼13% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼6% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
51 fps ∼9% -6%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼13% +31%
Honor 8 Pro
29 fps ∼5% -46%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps ∼9% -13%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% -52%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% -6%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
14 fps ∼3% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% -7%
OnePlus 5
61 fps ∼11% +13%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼15%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
38 fps ∼10% -32%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼22% +41%
Honor 8 Pro
20 fps ∼5% -64%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps ∼13% -18%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% -59%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% -48%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
8.6 fps ∼2% -85%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10% -32%
OnePlus 5
56 fps ∼15% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼9%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼6% -35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
42 fps ∼10% +14%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼12% +32%
Honor 8 Pro
21 fps ∼5% -43%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps ∼8% -5%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% -68%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% -11%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
9.2 fps ∼2% -75%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +14%
OnePlus 5
42 fps ∼10% +14%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼22%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼16% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
23 fps ∼13% -39%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼32% +48%
Honor 8 Pro
13 fps ∼7% -66%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps ∼21% -3%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% -68%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% -61%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
4.7 fps ∼3% -88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% -39%
OnePlus 5
41 fps ∼23% +8%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼6%
Huawei Mate 9
fps ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
25 fps ∼7% +19%
Honor 8 Pro
15 fps ∼4% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps ∼7% +10%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% -29%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼7% +14%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
3.2 fps ∼1% -85%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼7% +19%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼7% +19%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 9
14 fps ∼0% -36%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
13 fps ∼0% -41%
Honor 8 Pro
11 fps ∼0% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps ∼1% +14%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% -62%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼0% -41%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
5.4 fps ∼0% -75%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼0% -41%
OnePlus 5
25 fps ∼1% +14%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21.49 fps ∼56%
Huawei Mate 9
19.14 fps ∼50% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
30.86 fps ∼80% +44%
HTC U11
36.58 fps ∼95% +70%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
8.33 fps ∼22% -61%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25.06 fps ∼65% +17%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
25922 Points ∼59%
Huawei Mate 9
31104 Points ∼71% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
41022 Points ∼93% +58%
HTC U11
38752 Points ∼88% +49%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
15120 Points ∼34% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42335 Points ∼96% +63%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
39033 Points ∼87%
Huawei Mate 9
42176 Points ∼94% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
43464 Points ∼97% +11%
HTC U11
44696 Points ∼99% +15%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
26078 Points ∼58% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
41901 Points ∼93% +7%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 9
699 Points ∼37% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
1295 Points ∼69% +64%
HTC U11
812 Points ∼43% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points ∼68% +62%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
59.7 fps ∼97%
Huawei Mate 9
60.5 fps ∼98% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
59.7 fps ∼97% 0%
HTC U11
60 fps ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
41.7 fps ∼68% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
59.7 fps ∼97% 0%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100% +295%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
71.6 Points ∼32% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
69.57 Points ∼31% +23%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼31% +23%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
68.6 Points ∼31% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼28% +10%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
58.065 Points ∼26% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
50.703 Points ∼23% -10%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
45.084 Points ∼20% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100% +238%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼40% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
13265 Points ∼38% +27%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
11945 Points ∼34% +15%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
11897 Points ∼34% +14%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼33% +13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
10016 Points ∼28% -4%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
8837 Points ∼25% -15%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
5511 Points ∼16% -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
4141 ms * ∼100% -15%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
3597.8 ms * ∼87% -0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼87%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
3156.7 ms * ∼76% +12%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼67% +23%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
2733.7 ms * ∼66% +24%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
2621.7 ms * ∼63% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼54% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
1876.8 ms * ∼45% +48%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼17% +80%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
362 Points ∼100% +129%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼45% +3%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)
161 Points ∼44% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)
159 Points ∼44% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼43% -3%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)
152 Points ∼42% -4%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)
141 Points ∼39% -11%
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
111 Points ∼31% -30%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 10 ProHuawei Mate 9Samsung Galaxy Note 8Honor 8 ProSony Xperia XZ PremiumHTC U11OnePlus 5
AndroBench 3-5
-44%
-23%
2%
-37%
-21%
-21%
Random Write 4KB
164.45
8.77
-95%
14.55
-91%
151.6
-8%
17.2
-90%
79.97
-51%
19.3
-88%
Random Read 4KB
132.27
94.69
-28%
122.48
-7%
166.4
26%
74.1
-44%
91.45
-31%
141
7%
Sequential Write 256KB
208.72
142.92
-32%
205.85
-1%
187.1
-10%
194
-7%
206.41
-1%
201.5
-3%
Sequential Read 256KB
732.46
594.23
-19%
796.96
9%
737.8
1%
687
-6%
717.33
-2%
748
2%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Max. Load
 36.7 °C35.6 °C31.6 °C 
 36.1 °C35.7 °C31.8 °C 
 34.3 °C33.7 °C31.4 °C 
Maximum: 36.7 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
30.7 °C32 °C35.9 °C
30.2 °C31.7 °C32.3 °C
30.5 °C39.8 °C31.8 °C
Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.237.82532.934.23137.235.64031.737.15039.6406328.327.98027.32610026.924.312526.723.71602433.420020.941.225020.951.931519.551.240018.560.350017.55663017.555.980015.755.1100015.865.7125016.669.5160015.874.2200015.477250015.574.931501673.3400015.870.450001670.8630016.373.1800016.372.91000016.273.51250016.468.81600016.455.8SPL28.684.4N1.154.7median 16.4Huawei Mate 10 Promedian 65.7Delta2.110.831.631.325.427.225.326.132.925.133.624.531.62628.4242728.220.828.22234.521.348.320.852.321.257.619.460.119.563.917.767.117.965.517.868.617.372.117.474.616.776.217.278.418.281.117.977.417.672.817.775.417.877.917.970.918.167.118.258.13086.91.369.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy Note 8median 67.11.310.731.636.725.437.925.331.432.932.733.63231.632.328.431.92733.420.824.82227.421.334.820.844.221.253.919.460.519.564.817.768.817.970.617.870.817.369.817.467.516.769.517.270.418.269.517.969.317.663.317.757.617.859.717.960.418.160.318.255.83079.71.345.5median 17.9Sony Xperia XZ Premiummedian 60.51.311.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XZ Premium audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.85 / 1.15 / 1.23 Watt
Load midlight 4.12 / 8.42 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Power Consumption
-37%
-1%
-41%
-42%
-24%
10%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.78
8%
0.73
14%
0.72
15%
0.62
27%
0.73
14%
0.68
20%
0.73
14%
Idle Average *
1.15
2.13
-85%
1.44
-25%
2.45
-113%
2.44
-112%
1.96
-70%
1.13
2%
1.44
-25%
Idle Maximum *
1.23
2.17
-76%
1.53
-24%
2.52
-105%
2.59
-111%
1.98
-61%
1.16
6%
1.5
-22%
Load Average *
4.12
6.32
-53%
4.56
-11%
3.84
7%
4.94
-20%
4.82
-17%
4.69
-14%
6.91
-68%
Load Maximum *
8.42
6.49
23%
5.09
40%
9.02
-7%
7.91
6%
7.15
15%
5.24
38%
8.51
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 04min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
13h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 38min
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
Honor 8 Pro
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
-28%
-8%
-25%
-8%
-32%
-23%
Reader / Idle
1744
1538
-12%
1134
-35%
2085
20%
1378
-21%
1754
1%
1250
-28%
1534
-12%
H.264
642
947
48%
662
3%
733
14%
675
5%
802
25%
498
-22%
623
-3%
WiFi v1.3
818
758
-7%
474
-42%
657
-20%
573
-30%
695
-15%
560
-32%
518
-37%
Load
398
219
-45%
246
-38%
211
-47%
181
-55%
236
-41%
212
-47%
247
-38%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Huawei Mate 9
677 min ∼100% +14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
596 min ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
533 min ∼79% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
495 min ∼73% -17%
HTC U11
476 min ∼70% -20%

Pros

+ 明而准确的彩色OLED显示屏
+ LTE Cat. 18
+ 双的VoLTE
+ 双SIM卡
+ aptX HD
+ 性能强劲
+ 非常好的电池续航
+ 快速充电技术
+ 防水防尘(IP 67)
+ 高品质
+ 好相机
+ 精确定位
+ 优秀的语音质量

Cons

- 无QHD+解决方案
- WLAN不支持多输入多输出
- 不支持Bluetooth 5.0
- 不支持无线充电
- 不支持拓展容量
- 无耳机插口
In the test: Huawei Mate 10 Pro, test unit provided by Huawei Germany
In the test: Huawei Mate 10 Pro, test unit provided by Huawei Germany

华为Mate 10是一台高端的智能手机。而且价格也比其他同类竞品要亲民。屏幕拥有这很好屏占比。除配备 LTE Cat. 18 (最高 1.2 GBit/s)和Dual-VoLTE模块,Mate 10 Pro还拥有其他独到的功能。配合上优秀的性能,良好的摄像头,以及4000毫安时的大容量电池。我们预计华为还会进一步提升容量。在另一方面,在快速充电方面,华为做到了极致。速度惊人。

中国智造:小身材,大智慧!

高解析率的音频芯片听起来很棒,但是,华为却去除了耳机插口。只支持USB接口下的有线连接。另一方面,很高兴可以看到中国制造商开始在Mate 10 Pro上运用aptX HD技术。MicroSD卡读卡器的缺失,使得相对较大的128G容量空间没有提升余地。同时,我们也希望可以有无线充电功能的配置方案,这个功能在桌面模式下非常有用。

我们被高质量的显示效果折服。华为的确在过去也使用了很好的面板,但是现在的OLED屏幕更为优秀。特别是在亮度和色彩准确度方面。Mate 10 Pro甚至比三星的竞品跟优秀。

摄像头同样优秀,虽然现在还没能接达到最高水平。混合变焦,低光照拍摄,和摄影水平都不够好。任何一个人都能用该机拍出优秀的照片。此外,GPS定位也非常准确。防护安全级别认证,让我们不必担心坏天气。

总而言之,华为这款智能机,操作系统流畅,易于使用。而且价格也比较亲民,少于800欧元(约合928美元)。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Huawei Mate 10 Pro - 10/30/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
94%
Keyboard
72 / 75 → 96%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
65 / 60 → 100%
Weight
90%
Battery
94%
Display
91%
Games Performance
63 / 63 → 99%
Application Performance
70 / 70 → 99%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
85%
Average
84%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 Mate 10 Pro 智能手机简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-11- 2 (Update: 2017-11- 2)