Acer Aspire V3-372 亚笔记本电脑简短评测
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK (Aspire V3 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 1050 MHz, DDR3, 10.18.15.4279
Memory
8 GB
, DDR3 1600 MHz, 双通道，四个内存槽两个已占用
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU, 256 GB
Weight
1.55 kg, Power Supply: 154 g
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Display LP133WF2-SPL3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 261 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 246.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 250 cd/m²
Contrast: 581:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.51 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.18 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
39.05% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
CCT: 6743 K
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 60% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 39.05 | 64.5 65% | 35.87 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 58.7 | 90.4 54% | 54 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 40.35 | 65.5 62% | 37.06 -8% |
| Response Times | 8% | -28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 46 ? | 37.6 ? 18% | 54.4 ? -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 24 ? | 24.8 ? -3% | 32.8 ? -37% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 201.6 ? | 192 ? | |
| Screen | 16% | -72% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 250 | 324.3 30% | 212 -15% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 247 | 314 27% | 205 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 93 7% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.43 | 0.289 33% | 0.71 -65% |
| Contrast (:1) | 581 | 1122 93% | 299 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.51 | 6.03 -34% | 12.06 -167% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.18 | 7.89 -148% | 13.41 -322% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.08 106% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 6743 96% | 6490 100% | 15382 42% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 37 | 65.46 77% | 34.3 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 58 | 90.36 56% | 54.2 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 28% /
24% | -36% /
-52% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5197 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3209 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4155 points | |
Help | ||
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU
Sequential Read:
522 MB/s
Sequential Write:
447.4 MB/s
512K Read:
392.3 MB/s
512K Write:
388 MB/s
4K Read:
21.1 MB/s
4K Write:
71.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
248 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
212.9 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1487 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 56687 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5833 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 28.7 | 22.6 | 14.4 | |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 39.8 | 28.2 | 18.6 | 5.6 |
| Thief (2014) | 24.8 | 14.2 | 11.7 | |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 29.8 | 19 | 10 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12 | 8.1 | ||
| Mad Max (2015) | 20.5 | 10 | ||
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 32.2 | 16.2 | 6.4 | |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 32.6 | 19.1 |
Noise level
| Idle |
| 31.5 / 31.5 / 31.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 32.4 / 32.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance) | ||
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2 | HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 28% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 49.3 | 34.6 30% | 42.1 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 53.3 | 35.2 34% | 44.1 17% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28.2 | 22.6 20% | 31.1 -10% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 32.6 | 23.4 28% | 32.9 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.3 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+5.2 °C / 9.4 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.3 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23 °C / 73.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+5.2 °C / 9.4 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 3.8 / 5.8 / 8.1 Watt |
| Load |
30.2 / 32.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-EHM1 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2 | HP ProBook 430 G3 P5T00ES HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 28% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 15.1 | 17.5 16% | 7.5 -50% |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.8 | 6.4 10% | 6.3 9% |
| Load (h) | 2.3 | 3.6 57% | 2 -13% |
Pros
+ 震撼的代表性纤薄设计
+ 坚固的优质机身
+ USB C型接口
+ 非常优秀的色彩准确度和可视角度稳定性
+ 无屏幕闪烁
+ 完美的加速利用
+ 异常安静
+ 对笔记本电脑来说非常优秀的音效
Cons
- 一些部分很容易沾染指纹
- 不理想的屏幕转轴
- 接口较少
- 不完全打开底盖无法更换电池以及更新升级部件
- 不足一半水平的键盘，空格键损坏
- 点击触控版和键盘有工艺瑕疵
- 低色域覆盖度
- 在待机和关机模式下的功耗高
-
不便的维护功能在一款没有搭配独立显卡的亚笔记本电脑中还算是可以接受。不过，Acer在廉价感十足的键盘上则没有给自己和用户留下台阶。就算是空格键可以正常使用，它的键盘也只能算是将将及格，很难与这台笔记本电脑的价位相称。它的转轴也让人十分恼火，因为它无法让屏幕保持稳定，特别是在移动笔记本时。它的屏幕并不算最好的IPS屏幕，亮度略暗。不过，测试者对它十分满意，没有什么意见。
除了完全得到利用的性能，它最大的优势在于亮眼、坚固、无暇的机身，非常优秀的音响效果，长续航时间，以及安静近乎无声的运行。考虑到采用的处理器，这可以算是个独特的卖点。
如果Acer可以为它搭配更好的键盘和屏幕的话，Aspire V3-372-50LK应该可以得到我们的推荐。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Acer Aspire V3-372-50LK
- 12/22/2015 v4 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Price comparison
