Honor MagicBook Pro 14 与Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5 - 谁是最佳多媒体笔记本电脑？
Honor的新 MagicBook Pro 14 2026它的整体性能非常出色，没有太大的缺点。这也意味着它是Apple 入门级 MacBook Pro 14的竞争对手，后者自去年秋季起就已采用 M5 SoC。我们将在最重要的部分对这两款 14 英寸机型进行比较。
外壳、连接和输入设备
两款机型均采用铝制外壳，质量非常高，但Apple 的一体式机身设计仍占优势。不过，Honor 提供了更好的维护选项（固态硬盘可以升级），显示屏的开口角度也更大。两款设备都配备了 Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI，但只有Honor 才有 USB-A，而 MacBook 可以从两侧充电。两款机型还仅限于使用 Wi-Fi 6E。
Apple 的触摸板更大，而Honor 的键程更长。不过，Honor 还提供触摸屏，这是 MacBook Pro 所不具备的。
显示屏 - OLED 与 Mini-LED
两家制造商采用了不同的显示技术--Honor MagicBook 采用 OLED 技术，Macbook Pro 采用 Mini-LED 技术。首先，这两款设备都能提供出色的主观图像质量，具有完整的 P3 色域、P3 和 sRGB 的准确色彩配置文件和 120 Hz。Honor 提供触摸屏，而Apple 还提供哑光版本。
在亮度方面，Apple 很容易胜出。在激活亮度传感器的 SDR 模式下，亮度可达 1,000 尼特，而Honor 只能达到 500 尼特。AppleOLED 面板在 HDR 内容方面也更胜一筹，最高可达 1,600 尼特（Honor ~770 尼特），我们不得不说，Apple 的 HDR 处理能力与 Windows 相比还是要强得多。OLED 屏幕的优点是响应时间更快（Mini-LED 屏幕毕竟只是普通的 IPS 面板），而且也不会出现花屏。
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 EDO14.55, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 96.3 | 99.5 3% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 85 | 88.8 4% |
| Response Times | -6239% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.55 ? | 49.4 ? -8882% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.51 ? | 47 ? -9116% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 120 ? | 14900 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | 90 -718% |
| Screen | 13% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 519 | 633 22% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 526 | 619 18% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 89 | 92 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | |
| Contrast (:1) | 51900 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 2.2 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.3 28% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6496 100% | 6549 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2075% /
-1552% |
* ... smaller is better
性能 - 英特尔豹湖处理器与Apple M5
性能是一个有趣的问题，因为 M5 与配备快速 Arc B370 GPU 的 Core Ultra 5 338H 之间的差距并不大，尽管Apple 的芯片效率更高，正如我们在《Panther Lake 分析》中清楚看到的那样。 Panther Lake 分析中清楚地看到.两款系统在日常使用中都非常快，而 M5 在 CPU 性能方面显然更胜一筹。尤其是 M5 的单核性能，是目前笔记本电脑中最快的处理器（无论尺寸大小或性能等级）。Arc B370 比 M5 的 GPU 性能更强一些，而选配的 Arc B390 会更快。在原生游戏中，MacBook 的表现也不错，两款机型基本相当，但 MagicBook Pro 14 并不局限于少数游戏。两款机型都仅限于使用 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
CrossMark: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
3DMark: Steel Nomad Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
Cyberpunk 2077: 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Baldur's Gate 3: 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Assassin's Creed Shadows: 1920x1080 Low
| Performance Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Score | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 / Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 / Ultra Preset | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows / Low | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
风扇、扬声器和电池运行时间
Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5 总是采用防御性很强的风扇曲线，因此设备在日常使用时总是非常安静，即使是短时间的峰值负载，通常也无需使用风扇。然而，MacBook Pro 14 M5 只配备了一个风扇，因此在高负载情况下，MacBook Pro 14 的噪音（高达 48 dB(A)）要比Honor （高达 43 dB(A)）大得多。Honor 在日常使用中也能提供安静的散热解决方案，令人信服。在扬声器方面，MagicBook Pro 14 表现不俗，但 MacBook 更胜一筹，音质更好。Honor 在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Apple 的续航时间为 16.7 小时，而Honor 为 14.9 小时，但后者在全 SDR 亮度下的续航时间为 8.8 小时，而 MacBook Pro 仅为 5.6 小时（但Honor 的 SDR 亮度略低，为 500 尼特，而 MacBook Pro 为 640 尼特）。
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.7 | 24.5 5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.7 | 24.5 5% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.7 | 24.5 5% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.7 | 24.5 5% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 30.2 | 25.2 17% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 39.4 | 30 24% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 42.9 | 48 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime | |
| WiFi Websurfing | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
结论--细微之处见真章
