LG Class (H650E) 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 518 cd/m²
Contrast: 1016:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.41 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 7.67 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 8521 K
| LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -20% | 5% | -1% | 3% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 518 | 312 -40% | 418 -19% | 349 -33% | 534 3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 492 | 314 -36% | 407 -17% | 353 -28% | 503 2% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 91 0% | 95 4% | 93 2% | 82 -10% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.51 | 0.49 4% | 0.57 -12% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 1016 | 853 -16% | 937 -8% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.41 | 6.28 -16% | 3.92 28% | 5.22 4% | 5.65 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.76 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.67 | 8.24 -7% | 3.81 50% | 3.96 48% | 3.69 52% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.27 97% | 2.08 106% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 8521 76% | 8145 80% | 7361 88% | 7308 89% | 7289 89% |
* ... smaller is better
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| 3DMark - 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| BaseMark OS II - Overall (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| ZTE Blade V6 | |
| LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | ZTE Blade V6 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy J5 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 9% | 47% | 51% | 15% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 128.6 | 131.4 2% | 269.3 109% | 235.5 83% | 145.5 13% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 74.1 | 22.33 -70% | 37.37 -50% | 49.31 -33% | 39.4 -47% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 9.67 | 22.79 136% | 27.08 180% | 16.31 69% | 19.25 99% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 7.7 | 5.11 -34% | 3.66 -52% | 14.22 85% | 7.2 -6% |
| Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| ZTE Blade V6 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| ZTE Blade V6 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| ZTE Blade V6 | |
| HTC Desire 626G dual sim | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| LG Class | |
| Allview E4 | |
| OnePlus X | |
| Samsung Galaxy J5 | |
| Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 | |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| LG Class Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash | HTC Desire 626G dual sim Mali-450 MP4, MT6592, 8 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Allview E4 Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -5% | 22% | 29% | -18% | |
| H.264 (h) | 10.5 | 8.3 -21% | 11.3 8% | 8.6 -18% | 7.6 -28% |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7 | 6.6 -6% | 8.8 26% | 9.2 31% | 5.3 -24% |
| Load (h) | 3.3 | 3.7 12% | 4.4 33% | 5.7 73% | 3.2 -3% |
Pros
Cons
我们获得了测试LG的新Class的机会,它确实兑现了一些承诺。它机身的铝合金后盖给人雅致硬朗的感觉。它外观最有特点的是圆滑的屏幕边缘。遗憾的是,它并不完美。在很多细节上它缺少磨砺。不过,在这个价位上只有很少的几款产品可以提供水平相近的材质。智能手机的核心功能仍然需要得到重视:拨打接听电话。我们希望它的通话品质和麦克风效果可以在以后得到改进。它的扬声器让我们也很惊诧。除此之外,LG的Class在测试中和同类产品表现相当。它的明亮屏幕提供了养眼的显示效果,也可以适合户外的明亮阳光下使用
它的硬件配置属于中端,测试分数中规中矩。最后一项重要测试是电池续航;这台测试机在这方面表现十分一般。
整体上,LG的Class达到了它的设计定位:一台采用高品质机身的实用中端智能手机。
我们很难抉择是否应该在这个价位上期待更高一些。需要更多性能或者减少预算的用户可以考虑一下OnePlus X。不过,它的其他的竞争对手也表现相当。因此,摩托罗拉的Moto G和同类产品也值得考虑。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
LG Class
- 01/05/2016 v4.1 (old)
Nino Ricchizzi
















