Notebookcheck Logo

三星 Galaxy View 平板电脑简短评测

白色巨人。 得力于18.4寸的屏幕,三星Galaxy View在众多平板中独树一帜。不过这也影响了它的重量和尺寸。这样一台平板能够适合实际使用吗?
Android ARM Tablet Touchscreen
Samsung Galaxy View
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
18.40 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 120 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.06 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米立体声接口, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 128 GB, Brightness Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.9 x 451.8 x 275.8
Battery
64.6 Wh, 5700 mAh
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Webcam: 全高清 (定焦 f/2.2, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器, Microsoft Apps, Galaxy Apps, Smart Manager, SideSync, S Console, Family Square, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
2.65 kg, Power Supply: 303 g
Price
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front (Video-App view)
Front (Video-App view)
Rear
Front (home screen)
Logo
Buttons
Ports
microSD-card slot
Power adapter
451.8 mm 275.8 mm 11.9 mm 2.7 kg305.7 mm 220.6 mm 6.9 mm 723 g292 mm 202 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg247 mm 179 mm 4.68 mm 665 g237.3 mm 169 mm 5.6 mm 387 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g
Samsung Galaxy ViewChuwi Hi12Wiko Lenny 3Samsung Galaxy S7 EdgeOnePlus 3
Networking
-78%
-79%
32%
21%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
254
44.8
-82%
303
19%
286
13%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
200
43
-78%
49.2
-75%
290
45%
256
28%
414
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 488 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 468 cd/m²
Contrast: 821:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
Gamma: 2.45
Samsung Galaxy View
IPS, 1920x1080, 18.40
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
Super AMOLED, 2048x1536, 9.70
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.90
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.10
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30
Screen
11%
21%
37%
6%
26%
Brightness middle
468
334
-29%
358
-24%
399
-15%
429
-8%
389.2
-17%
Brightness
435
341
-22%
357
-18%
393
-10%
434
0%
392
-10%
Brightness Distribution
80
91
14%
86
8%
92
15%
82
3%
92
15%
Black Level *
0.57
0.22
61%
0.35
39%
0.27
53%
Contrast
821
1814
121%
1226
49%
1441
76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5
2.84
43%
1.78
64%
2.96
41%
4.61
8%
3.61
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.3
9.28
-27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
2.91
50%
1.38
76%
3
48%
6.64
-14%
3.8
34%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.01 109%
2.24 98%
2.21 100%
2.42 91%
2.16 102%
CCT
7676 85%
6432 101%
6366 102%
7049 92%
6929 94%
5969 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71.15
63
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.87
97

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21878 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.9 ms).
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4131 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4134 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
5565 Points ∼28% +35%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
5152 Points ∼26% +25%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
42156 Points ∼14%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
184346 Points ∼63% +337%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
70385 Points ∼24% +67%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
3754 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3330 Points ∼4% -11%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
732 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
721 Points ∼15% -2%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
601 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
733 Points ∼31% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
648 Points ∼27% +8%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1091 Points ∼46% +82%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
872 Points ∼36% +45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
486 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
488 Points ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1385 Points ∼5% +185%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
8422 Points ∼29% +1633%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1886 Points ∼7% +288%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
1877 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
2095 Points ∼11% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
2867 Points ∼15% +53%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
6230 Points ∼32% +232%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1643 Points ∼8% -12%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
803 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
808 Points ∼10% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
1103 Points ∼13% +37%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3282 Points ∼39% +309%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1325 Points ∼16% +65%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
14 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
14 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
29 fps ∼1% +107%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
59.3 fps ∼2% +324%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
20 fps ∼1% +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
13 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
14 fps ∼0% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
38 fps ∼0% +192%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
163.2 fps ∼1% +1155%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
34 fps ∼0% +162%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4.7 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps ∼0% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17 fps ∼1% +262%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
80.1 fps ∼6% +1604%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
18 fps ∼1% +283%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4.9 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
4.8 fps ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
12 fps ∼3% +145%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33.3 fps ∼9% +580%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
8.5 fps ∼2% +73%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
3.1 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.1 fps ∼0% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
83 fps ∼2% +2577%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
11 fps ∼0% +255%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
3.4 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
54.3 fps ∼2% +1497%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
5.8 fps ∼0% +71%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
8072 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
8030 Points ∼2% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
19867 Points ∼6% +146%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33812 Points ∼10% +319%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
20081 Points ∼6% +149%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
7457 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
7536 Points ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
20482 Points ∼3% +175%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
51124 Points ∼7% +586%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
21327 Points ∼3% +186%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
11358 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
10424 Points ∼9% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
17981 Points ∼15% +58%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
15473 Points ∼13% +36%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
16673 Points ∼14% +47%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy View Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
 
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30, Intel HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
11146 ms * ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11603 ms * ∼14% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6483 ms * ∼8% +42%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1499 ms * ∼2% +87%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
4472 ms * ∼5% +60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
1556 ms * ∼2% +86%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
4022 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3627 Points ∼4% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
6885 Points ∼7% +71%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
19852 Points ∼21% +394%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
8197 Points ∼8% +104%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
69 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
68 Points ∼8% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
79 Points ∼10% +14%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
215 Points ∼27% +212%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
111 Points ∼14% +61%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
24.4 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
23.1 Points ∼5% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
41.12 Points ∼9% +69%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
142 Points ∼31% +482%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
41 Points ∼9% +68%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
21.35 MB/s ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
22.57 MB/s ∼6% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
25.56 MB/s ∼7% +20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23.7 MB/s ∼6% +11%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
10.66 MB/s ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11.07 MB/s ∼2% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
9.82 MB/s ∼2% -8%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
10.57 MB/s ∼2% -1%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
49.97 MB/s ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
57.9 MB/s ∼4% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
49.37 MB/s ∼3% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
51 MB/s ∼3% +2%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
218.8 MB/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
215.9 MB/s ∼11% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
248.2 MB/s ∼12% +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
153.7 MB/s ∼8% -30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
51 MB/s ∼59%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
15.93 MB/s ∼18% -69%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
77.9 MB/s ∼51%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
56.4 MB/s ∼37% -28%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy View
760 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
569 Points ∼6% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
590 Points ∼7% -22%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
2027 Points ∼22% +167%
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
1141 Points ∼13% +50%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Real Racing 3
 SettingsValue
 high35 fps
 low58 fps
Max. Load
 35.1 °C35.1 °C36.2 °C 
 29.2 °C32.9 °C36.5 °C 
 31.4 °C33.4 °C35.5 °C 
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
33.9 °C35.1 °C35.8 °C
41.2 °C33.9 °C29.3 °C
40.3 °C34.7 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
Heat distribution front
Heat distribution rear
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.73 / 17.09 / 17.19 Watt
Load midlight 18.71 / 20.41 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy View
64.6 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
22 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
39 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
38 Wh
Power Consumption
77%
59%
38%
7%
Idle Minimum *
4.73
1.68
64%
2.3
51%
2.69
43%
8.6
-82%
Idle Average *
17.09
2.2
87%
4.5
74%
10.95
36%
11.26
34%
Idle Maximum *
17.19
2.33
86%
5
71%
11.14
35%
11.3
34%
Load Average *
18.71
4.09
78%
9.4
50%
11.54
38%
14.57
22%
Load Maximum *
20.41
5.92
71%
10.4
49%
12.8
37%
14.9
27%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
17h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 51)
8h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 54min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 49min
Samsung Galaxy View
64.6 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE
22 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
39 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Tab 3 Pro 10 YT3-X90L
23 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
38 Wh
Battery Runtime
37%
-3%
27%
16%
-27%
Reader / Idle
1026
1615
57%
918
-11%
1933
88%
1261
23%
791
-23%
H.264
534
773
45%
651
22%
630
18%
644
21%
WiFi v1.3
521
546
5%
393
-25%
695
33%
558
7%
488
-6%
Load
289
402
39%
291
1%
195
-33%
323
12%
138
-52%

Pros

+ 大尺寸触控屏幕
+ 高速microSD卡槽
+ 支持USB-OTG和App2SD
+ 高速无线网
+ 明亮的屏幕可视角度范围大
+ 不错的电池续航
+ 集成支架...

Cons

- ...只能提供两个角度
- 机身采用硬质塑料
- 不支持Miracast或MHL
- 仅可用横屏模式
- 视频应用不太适用
- 仅210万像素摄像头
- 按键较为粗糙
- 不均匀的屏幕亮度分布
- 遥控器功能仅支持部分型号
In review: Samsung Galaxy View (SM-T670). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy View (SM-T670). Test model courtesy of Samsung Germany.

三星的Galaxy View是一款与众不同的超大尺寸18.4寸触控平板电脑。它的触控屏幕也是它最引人注目的功能:它的便携性受到高重量、大尺寸和无法简单取下的支架的限制;同时它也受到这个特点的限制,只能在横屏模式使用、没有后置相机。尽管稳定性不错,但由于硬质塑料的材质和粗糙的按键,它的机身使用起来并不是特别舒适。

三星调整了Galaxy View软件的一些部分,它们对于已有的安卓用户界面并没有很大的帮助。它搭配独立的数字键盘区的触控键盘十分实用,而新的主屏幕和格子设计显得不是很精致。用户不能添加新服务也无法移除无用的链接。

它的优势包括高速无线模组,高速microSD卡槽,尽管屏幕很大也有不错的电池续航。这台设备因此主要对多媒体爱好者比较有趣,作为可以一定程度上移动的网络视频播放设备,由于控制界面较大也十分易于使用,也不是总需要连接充电器,能够吸引较小的一个用户群体。

由于较高的重量和较大的尺寸,三星Galaxy View主要为可以接受牺牲功能性和便携性换取大尺寸触控屏幕设计。

如果你可以接受较小的屏幕尺寸,可以考虑一下三星 Galaxy Tab S2 9.7。它更加强大,更轻也更精致,搭配了优秀的AMOLED屏幕,售价也更加实惠。 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Samsung Galaxy View - 07/20/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
72%
Keyboard
82 / 80 → 100%
Pointing Device
79%
Connectivity
31 / 65 → 47%
Weight
59 / 40-88 → 40%
Battery
91%
Display
81%
Games Performance
15 / 68 → 23%
Application Performance
40 / 76 → 53%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
55 / 85 → 65%
Average
66%
71%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy View 平板电脑简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2016-08- 4 (Update: 2016-08-11)