三星 Galaxy S5 Neo 智能手机简短评测
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memory
2048 MB
Display
5.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, 电容式，10点触控, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB
, 10.1 GB free
Weight
145 g, Power Supply: 53 g
Price
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 341 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 334 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.84 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.91 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.01
CCT: 6432 K
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -28% | 4% | -15% | -1% | -4% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 334 | 358 7% | 335 0% | 453 36% | 451 35% | 641 92% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 341 | 364 7% | 345 1% | 439 29% | 446 31% | 620 82% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 82 -10% | 89 -2% | 91 0% | 90 -1% | 93 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.28 | 0.3 | 0.4 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.84 | 5.28 -86% | 2.51 12% | 4.7 -65% | 3.84 -35% | 5.37 -89% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.91 | 4.65 -60% | 2.59 11% | 5.03 -73% | 3.97 -36% | 6.01 -107% |
| Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.48 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.46 89% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6432 101% | 7690 85% | 6424 101% | 7439 87% | 7283 89% | 7806 83% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1618 | 1503 | 1603 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 72.04 | 58.07 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 90.14 |
* ... smaller is better
AnTuTu v5 | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | PCMark for Android | Smartbench 2012 | BaseMark OS II | Linpack Android / IOS
| AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Computer Vision score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Storage score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Smartbench 2012 | |
| Gaming Index (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Productivity Index (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Linpack Android / IOS | |
| Multi Thread (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Single Thread (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Huawei P8 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
| OnePlus 2 | |
| Motorola Moto X Play | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.08 Watt |
| Idle |  1.68 / 2.2 / 2.33 Watt |
| Load |
4.09 / 5.92 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 46% | 32% | 6% | 14% | 11% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.68 | 0.3 82% | 0.4 76% | 0.7 58% | 0.6 64% | 0.9 46% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.2 | 0.5 77% | 0.6 73% | 2 9% | 1.7 23% | 1.6 27% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.33 | 1.1 53% | 1.2 48% | 2.1 10% | 1.8 23% | 1.8 23% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.09 | 3.1 24% | 5 -22% | 4.9 -20% | 5.7 -39% | 4.9 -20% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 5.92 | 6.2 -5% | 6.8 -15% | 7.4 -25% | 6 -1% | 7.2 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -20% | -21% | -35% | -29% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 26.9 | 28.3 5% | 21.7 -19% | 13.8 -49% | 23.2 -14% | 19.1 -29% |
| H.264 (h) | 12.9 | 9.3 -28% | 9.7 -25% | 9.7 -25% | 12.4 -4% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.1 | 7.9 -13% | 7.2 -21% | 5.9 -35% | 11.2 23% | |
| Load (h) | 6.7 | 4.2 -37% | 4.6 -31% | 3.6 -46% | 3.8 -43% | 2.9 -57% |
| WiFi (h) | 10.2 | 9.6 |
Pros
+ 坚固的机身
+ 防尘防水
+ 出色的屏幕
+ 优秀的相机
+ 可更换电池
+ microSD卡槽
+ 优秀的电池续航时间
+ 低发热量
Cons
- 性能相比前代产品更弱
- 处理器在持续负载下降频
- 视频拍摄选项较少
- 取消了指纹识别器
三星Galaxy S5 Neo可以说是一种高水平的“废物利用”。上一代的旗舰机型在一些方面得到了改进，不过处理器的性能有所降低，一些功能也被去掉了。
Galaxy S5 Neo的优势依然是坚固的机身，出色的屏幕，完备的软件系统和超长的电池续航。这款智能手机依然防水，不过不再需要烦人的保护盖了。三星也改进了它的相机——最终效果相当不错。只是它的视频拍摄选项十分有限。和最新旗舰S6系列不同的事，你可以更换电池以及通过microSD卡槽拓展存储空间。
三星Galaxy S5 Neo是一款具备优秀核心功能的精致智能手机。如果你会满意它的塑料机身，也不需要最快的性能的话，那么S5 Neo会是很好的选择。
我们没有发现它有任何的严重问题。让人遗憾的是它的3D性能相比前代产品明显落后，而且一些功能也被省去了。我们希望它至少能搭配指纹识别器。不过330欧元（约2339人民币）对于一款这样全面的设备来说依然是十分不错的售价。老款的Galaxy S5在一些店家售价约350到380欧元（约2481人民币到2693人民币），不过如果不是需要额外的功能或玩大型游戏的话，Galaxy S5 Neo还是更胜一筹。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
- 12/04/2015 v4 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
