三星Galaxy S10e智能手机评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy S10e
Brand: Samsung

便宜得令人高兴。

三星最新的小旗舰售价近1000欧元（约合1,125美元），这非常令人憎恶。不过S10e具有其更昂贵的兄弟姐妹所具有的许多功能，但三星也做出了一些妥协以降低成本。请继续阅读以了解S10e在我们的测试中的表现以及它是否比Galaxy S10或S10 +提供更好的性价比。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/10/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of www.notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S10e (Galaxy S Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9820 8 x 1.9 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

Memory

6 GB

Display

5.80 inch 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixel 435 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, AMOLED, 第五代康宁大猩猩玻璃, glossy: yes

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: 最多512 GB microSD卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计，气压计，陀螺仪传感器，地磁传感器，霍尔传感器，心率传感器，接近传感器, USB Type-C

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B34, B39. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41, B66., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 142.2 x 69.9

Battery

11.78 Wh, 3100 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 W（三星自适应快速充电/ Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0），12 W无线充电，Qi / PMA可逆无线充电。

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 双像素自动对焦，77°，f / 1.5和f /2.4,1.4μm，OIS。 12 MPix远摄，2倍放大倍率，PDAF，45°，f / 2.4，OIS。 16 MPix超广角，固定焦距，123°，f / 2.2），超高清视频
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix 双像素自动对焦，80°，f / 1.9。 8 MPix，RGB深度，固定焦距，90°，f / 2.2

Additional features

Speakers: 双扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 充电器，USB线，2个OTG适配器，AKG耳机，快速入门指南，安全说明, 24 Months Warranty, SAR值：Body - 1.575 W / kg，Head - 0.582 W / kg，无风扇. IP68 certified, LTE: 2.0 Gbps download and 150 Mbps upload, fanless

Weight

150 g

Price

749 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	644 (578^min - 672^max) MBit/s +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (558^min - 592^max) MBit/s +24%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	474 (241^min - 497^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	468 (351^min - 489^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 (398^min - 508^max) MBit/s -2%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	298 (278^min - 319^max) MBit/s -36%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (612^min - 683^max) MBit/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (561^min - 684^max) MBit/s +22%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	629 (621^min - 638^max) MBit/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	520 (445^min - 571^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	517 (477^min - 528^max) MBit/s -1%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	339 (325^min - 351^max) MBit/s -35%

Samsung Galaxy S10e; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø519 (445-571)

Samsung Galaxy S10e; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø468 (351-489)

GPS test: Samsung Galaxy S10e - Overview

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Photographed with the regular rear-facing camera

Photographed with the wide-angle rear-facing camera

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


433 cd/m²	426 cd/m²	420 cd/m²
434 cd/m²	426 cd/m²	419 cd/m²
435 cd/m²	428 cd/m²	420 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 435 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 426.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 426 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.14 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111
CCT: 6329 K

	Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8"	OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4"	Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"
Screen		-7%	-21%	-22%	-22%	23%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	426	437 3%	492 15%	701 65%	710 67%	672 58%
Brightness (cd/m²)	427	442 4%	475 11%	705 65%	721 69%	641 50%
Brightness Distribution (%)	96	95 -1%	94 -2%	98 2%	97 1%	92 -4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)			0.4			0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.14	2.21 -3%	2.4 -12%	3.7 -73%	3.7 -73%	1.3 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.29	4.27 -30%	5.2 -58%	10.3 -213%	10.3 -213%	2.7 18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	2.1 -17%	3.2 -78%	1.4 22%	1.5 17%	2.2 -22%
Gamma	2.111 ^104%	2.307 ^95%	2.06 ^107%	2.1 ^105%	2.1 ^105%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	6329 ^103%	6353 ^102%	7125 ^91%	6553 ^99%	6611 ^98%	6868 ^95%
Contrast (:1)			1230			1920

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

232 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 232 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 232 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4506 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2384 Points -47%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3314 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4499 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4505 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	4750 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4499 - 4529, n=4)	4510 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9776, n=60, last 2 years)	6216 Points +38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10553 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8995 Points -15%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9868 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10162 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10259 Points -3%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	11276 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10162 - 10553, n=4)	10366 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=60, last 2 years)	18538 Points +76%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10170 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13341 Points +31%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9028 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10128 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10177 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	21070 Points +107%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10128 - 10192, n=4)	10167 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5364 - 28121, n=47, last 2 years)	14784 Points +45%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10008 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10590 Points +6%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12778 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9750 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9793 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (9557 - 10008, n=4)	9777 Points -2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7966 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8487 Points +7%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9243 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7595 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7812 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7595 - 7966, n=4)	7769 Points -2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	56465 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64534 Points +14%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	57073 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55524 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55740 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	77597 Points +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54087 - 56465, n=4)	55454 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	72022 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	84998 Points +18%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67388 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	71292 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	70318 Points -2%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	162695 Points +126%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (66990 - 72022, n=4)	70156 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	32155 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35022 Points +9%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	37164 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	31297 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32302 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	27413 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (31297 - 32308, n=4)	32016 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4015 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6336 Points +58%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4979 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4465 Points +11%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5724 Points +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4015 - 5186, n=3)	4555 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (847 - 6911, n=7, last 2 years)	4355 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4507 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8272 Points +84%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5252 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5303 Points +18%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	7806 Points +73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4507 - 6058, n=3)	5289 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (781 - 9451, n=7, last 2 years)	5149 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	2906 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3483 Points +20%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4214 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2875 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2960 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2875 - 3448, n=3)	3076 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1203 - 3990, n=7, last 2 years)	3172 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4321 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6310 Points +46%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5087 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4052 Points -6%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	7555 Points +75%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4052 - 4766, n=3)	4380 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (953 - 23024, n=24, last 2 years)	13324 Points +208%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4886 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8397 Points +72%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5327 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4449 Points -9%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	14085 Points +188%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4449 - 5307, n=3)	4881 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (879 - 45492, n=24, last 2 years)	24675 Points +405%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3077 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3374 Points +10%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4393 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3087 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2880 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (3077 - 3513, n=3)	3226 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1352 - 8749, n=24, last 2 years)	5654 Points +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4477 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points +6%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4238 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4383 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4452 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3629 Points -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4383 - 4579, n=4)	4473 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (444 - 17553, n=27, last 2 years)	3146 Points -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5206 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5241 Points +1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4256 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5176 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3806 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5152 - 5206, n=4)	5180 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (384 - 29890, n=27, last 2 years)	3562 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3005 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3537 Points +18%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4175 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2854 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2977 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3121 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2854 - 3296, n=4)	3033 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (982 - 7180, n=27, last 2 years)	3271 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4620 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5189 Points +12%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3847 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4551 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points -2%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	4405 Points -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4529 - 4821, n=4)	4630 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (508 - 23762, n=122, last 2 years)	9449 Points +105%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5368 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5877 Points +9%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3718 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5358 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5371 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5061 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5358 - 5418, n=4)	5379 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (453 - 40163, n=122, last 2 years)	14648 Points +173%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3106 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3681 Points +19%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4381 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2981 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2925 Points -6%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3030 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2925 - 3480, n=4)	3123 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=122, last 2 years)	5204 Points +68%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	60 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	58 fps -3%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (58 - 60, n=4)	59.3 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 166, n=150, last 2 years)	90 fps +50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	141 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	152 fps +8%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	118 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	143 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	96 fps -32%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	232 fps +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (96 - 143, n=4)	119.3 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 831, n=150, last 2 years)	371 fps +163%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	59 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -10%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 59, n=4)	54.5 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 166, n=152, last 2 years)	82.3 fps +39%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	85 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -31%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps -21%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	132 fps +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (67 - 85, n=4)	80.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=151, last 2 years)	220 fps +159%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	48 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	30 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps -30%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (30 - 53, n=4)	39.3 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (11 - 166, n=152, last 2 years)	74.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +11%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	50 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps +26%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	88 fps +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 67, n=4)	60 fps +13%
Average of class Smartphone (8.4 - 413, n=151, last 2 years)	160.8 fps +203%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	40 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps -22%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps -42%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	58 fps +45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (23 - 40, n=4)	27.3 fps -32%
Average of class Smartphone (5.5 - 154, n=153, last 2 years)	58.4 fps +46%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	43 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps -19%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	54 fps +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (35 - 43, n=4)	41 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.5 - 216, n=152, last 2 years)	96.3 fps +124%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps +113%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	25 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps +63%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps +269%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 26, n=4)	23.3 fps +46%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=199, last 2 years)	59 fps +269%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	41 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps -10%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	34 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	44 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps +12%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	63 fps +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (41 - 46, n=4)	44.3 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 332, n=199, last 2 years)	112.1 fps +173%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	28 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps -21%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps -43%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps +111%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 28, n=4)	19 fps -32%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=200, last 2 years)	46.3 fps +65%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps -12%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps +6%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	20 fps +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 17, n=4)	16.8 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 129, n=199, last 2 years)	43.7 fps +173%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	38.57 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32.86 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.35 (8.77^min - 77.53^max) fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.5 (9.69^min - 72.94^max) fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)	38.5 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	36.21 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	29.68 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.16 (8.36^min - 61.33^max) fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.18 (8.36^min - 46.5^max) fps -25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)	30.2 fps -17%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	32.64 fps
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35.34 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	33.04 (9.22^min - 75.78^max) fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32.26 (8.31^min - 85.07^max) fps -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3)	32.6 fps 0%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	329444 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	294488 Points -11%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	306296 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	328111 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	333277 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (327454 - 333277, n=4)	329572 Points 0%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	274007 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	228939 Points -16%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	252800 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	269219 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	273655 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (269219 - 283270, n=4)	275038 Points 0%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4716 Score
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4967 Score
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (n=1)	4967 Score

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4548 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4458 Points -2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4746 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4320 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4520 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5721 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4226 - 4548, n=4)	4404 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=143, last 2 years)	7370 Points +62%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7831 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8156 Points +4%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8594 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7476 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8344 Points +7%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	11946 Points +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7476 - 8344, n=4)	7861 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=143, last 2 years)	11096 Points +42%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4474 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4344 Points -3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5616 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4570 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4306 Points -4%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3263 Points -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4306 - 4570, n=4)	4463 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=143, last 2 years)	8365 Points +87%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	8484 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7969 Points -6%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7484 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7361 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8401 Points -1%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	15969 Points +88%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7361 - 8981, n=4)	8307 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=143, last 2 years)	24487 Points +189%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	1439 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1398 Points -3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1404 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1385 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1383 Points -4%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	1722 Points +20%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1012 - 1439, n=4)	1305 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=143, last 2 years)	1665 Points +16%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	1937 Points
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1201 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1927 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1928 Points 0%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2754 Points +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3)	1931 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7731, n=36, last 2 years)	2731 Points +41%

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=196, last 2 years)	47751 Points +155%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	42897 Points +129%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	22500 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20849 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20286 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4)	20121 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	18697 Points
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	16824 Points -10%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	2282 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	2240 ms *
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	2048 ms * +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4)	1961 ms * +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1924 ms * +14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1857 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years)	1207 ms * +46%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	610 ms * +73%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 380, n=41, last 2 years)	172.9 Points
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	161 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	115 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2)	115 Points
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	99 Points

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	343 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	325 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	314 Points +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)	310 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	292 Points
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	263 Points -10%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	260 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S10e	OnePlus 6T	Honor View 20	Samsung Galaxy S10	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-3%	134%	3%	4%	84%	606%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	792	735 -7%	847 7%	832 5%	811 2%	761 ?(427 - 1043, n=115) -4%	2199 ?(270 - 4370, n=186, last 2 years) 178%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	194.1	204.4 5%	250.1 29%	193.2 0%	249.1 28%	296 ?(13.6 - 719, n=115) 52%	1809 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=186, last 2 years) 832%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	136.9	138.5 1%	168.9 23%	137.4 0%	135.2 -1%	154 ?(92.6 - 241, n=115) 12%	293 ?(47.6 - 504, n=186, last 2 years) 114%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	24.1	22 -9%	138.9 476%	24.44 1%	22.7 -6%	130.4 ?(18.2 - 290, n=115) 441%	337 ?(9.4 - 964, n=186, last 2 years) 1298%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (MB/s)	73.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	73 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) 4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (MB/s)	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)			64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) -2%

Samsung Galaxy S10e; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.8 (57-60)

Samsung Galaxy S10e; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.5 (51-60)

Samsung Galaxy S10e; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.17.0: Ø59.4 (56-60)

Samsung Galaxy S10e; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.17.0: Ø59.8 (57-60)

Samsung Galaxy S10e; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.4.3a: Ø28.7 (26-31)

Samsung Galaxy S10e; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.4.3a: Ø29 (27-30)

Max. Load

Idle


42.4 °C	43.3 °C	41.5 °C
42.9 °C	44.7 °C	42.1 °C
44.5 °C	47.1 °C	42.6 °C

Maximum: 47.1 °C
Average: 43.5 °C


35.8 °C	42.4 °C	38.6 °C
36.7 °C	43 °C	38.9 °C
38.4 °C	45.6 °C	40.2 °C

Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 40 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S10e audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.6 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Load	5.2 / 10.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9820	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-2%	-48%	0%	-19%	-28%	-9%	-23%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.6	0.7 -17%	0.97 -62%	0.61 -2%	0.73 -22%	0.61 -2%	0.65 ?(0.6 - 0.73, n=4) -8%	0.856 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=160, last 2 years) -43%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.2	1.1 8%	2.58 -115%	1.27 -6%	1.53 -28%	2.67 -123%	1.455 ?(1.2 - 1.82, n=4) -21%	1.437 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.5	2.1 -40%	2.63 -75%	1.3 13%	2.07 -38%	2.69 -79%	1.675 ?(1.3 - 2.07, n=4) -12%	1.612 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) -7%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.2	4.2 19%	5.24 -1%	6.17 -19%	6.03 -16%	4.34 17%	5.88 ?(5.2 - 6.17, n=4) -13%	7.1 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=140, last 2 years) -37%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	10.2	8.3 19%	8.73 14%	8.55 16%	9.18 10%	5.66 45%	9.44 ?(8.55 - 10.2, n=4) 7%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=140, last 2 years) -10%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		19h 45min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 44min

	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh
Battery runtime		62%	63%	5%	20%	91%
Reader / Idle (h)	19.8	32.3 63%	32.1 62%	21 6%	26 31%	49.5 150%
H.264 (h)	13.3	15.1 14%	15.5 17%	14 5%	15.4 16%	16.9 27%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	6.9	14.4 109%	16.2 135%	7.1 3%	8.1 17%	15.2 120%
Load (h)	2.7	4.4 63%	3.7 37%	2.8 4%	3.1 15%	4.5 67%

Pros

+ 物有所值

+ 准确的GPS模块

+ 功耗低

+ 强大的SoC

+ 颜色准确的屏幕

+ AMOLED面板

+ IP68防水防尘认证

+ 机身紧凑

+ 做工优秀

Cons

- 续航时间短

- 表面温度高

- SoC在满载下有降频现象

- 玩Arena of Valor这款游戏时的触摸屏问题

三星Galaxy S10e智能手机评测. Test devices courtesy of Samsung Germany and notebooksbilliger.de

三星Galaxy S10e是一款一流的智能手机，比更昂贵的Galaxy S10或S10+更值得考虑。不过还是有一些妥协，例如缺少第三个后置摄像头，没有陶瓷背板，但你仍然可以获得耳机插孔，高速LTE，强大SoC和相机等可以与其他旗舰智能手机竞争的配置。

您必须承受较少的存储空间和RAM，但对大多数人来说这应该没什么。但是，如果您在S10e和Galaxy S10之间进行选择，前者较暗的屏幕，较差的续航和较高的表面温度需要三思。我们还发现了玩某些游戏时的触摸屏问题，这是我们在测试期间遇到的，而其他设备则没有任何问题。我们对S10e及其他S10的一点不满是三星拒绝支持aptX HD，这似乎比其他任何东西更具否定性。

S10系列中最便宜的成员是其更昂贵的型号的绝佳替代品。它少了不少噱头，例如屏幕内指纹传感器，但您仍然可以获得一台恰到好处的旗舰智能手机。

总的来说，S10e没有开辟任何新的市场，但S10或S10 +也没有。然而，它提供了坚实的旗舰智能手机体验，并在几乎所有领域表现良好。我们希望看到下一代Galaxy S设备的成像质量实现真正的飞跃，因为竞争已经开始出现在三星的S10系列中，特别是在低光照条件下。简而言之，S10e比Galaxy S10和S10 +更物有所值。

Samsung Galaxy S10e - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

94%

Keyboard

63 / 75 → 84%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 76%

Weight

92%

Battery