Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy S10+智能手机评测

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zoltan), 04/13/2019
Android ARM Galaxy S Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

盖世 - 三星Galaxy S的这10年。S10 +只是韩国制造商在其Galaxy UNPACKED活动中宣布的五款智能手机之一,但它也是目前最大的Galaxy S10型号。S10 +有一个几乎没有边框的大型AMOLED屏幕,以及一个打孔前置摄像头。 新的旗舰产品有着性能更强的SoC,更多更好的相机,并配备高达1 TB的内部存储空间。 请继续阅读,以了解三星是否已经做得足够好来创造一款值得庆祝Galaxy S系列10周年纪念的智能手机。

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9820
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.4 inch 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, 电容屏, 10点触控, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glossy: yes
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 462.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米组合耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: 最多512 GB microSD卡; 支持FAT,FAT32和exFAT文件系统, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计,气压计,陀螺仪传感器,地磁传感器,霍尔传感器,心率传感器,接近传感器, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE Cat. 20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 157.6 x 74.1
Battery
15.79 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Ion, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Qi 无线充电
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 主摄像头:12 MPix,双像素自动对焦,77°,f / 1.5和f /2.4,1.4μm,OIS。 12 MPix远摄,2倍放大倍率,PDAF,45°,f / 2.4,OIS。 16 MPix超广角,固定焦距,123°,f / 2.2),超高清视频
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix 双像素自动对焦,80°,f / 1.9。 8 MPix,RGB深度,固定焦距,90°,f / 2.2
Additional features
Speakers: 双扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 充电器,USB线,2个OTG适配器,AKG耳机,快速入门指南,安全说明, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证,SAR值:Body - 1.582 W / kg,Head - 0.516 W / kg, fanless
Weight
198 g, Power Supply: 57 g
Price
8699元 ~ Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 236 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g158 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 184 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 (min: 315, max: 645) MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼94%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼73% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=392)
221 MBit/s ∼33% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼93% +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼86% +32%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼80% +21%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼68% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼66%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 (min: 429, max: 468) MBit/s ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=392)
212 MBit/s ∼30% -54%
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Curves
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Curves
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Roundabout
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Roundabout
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Overview
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Curves
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Curves
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Roundabout
GPS Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Roundabout

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2
Taking a photo with the wide-angle camera
Taking a photo with the default camera
Taking a photo with the wide-angle camera
Taking a photo with the wide-angle camera
Taking a photo with the wide-angle camera
Taking a photo with the default camera
Taking a photo with the telephoto lens
Taking a photo with the wide-angle camera
Taking a photo with the telephoto lens
Taking a photo with the wide-angle camera
Taking a photo with the wide-angle camera
Taking a photo with the telephoto lens
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
A photo of our test chart taken with the ultra-wide-angle lens
A photo of our test chart taken with the telephoto lens
715
cd/m²
719
cd/m²
729
cd/m²
726
cd/m²
710
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
726
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 732 cd/m² Average: 721.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 710 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Google Pixel 3 XL
AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Screen
4%
13%
15%
-6%
5%
-3%
Brightness middle
710
565
-20%
576
-19%
656
-8%
410
-42%
567
-20%
437
-38%
Brightness
721
571
-21%
582
-19%
659
-9%
413
-43%
559
-22%
442
-39%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
90
-7%
88
-9%
97
0%
89
-8%
95
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.7
2.3
38%
1.3
65%
1.7
54%
3.16
15%
3.3
11%
2.21
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.3
4.8
53%
3.5
66%
2.8
73%
5.5
47%
6.1
41%
4.27
59%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.9
-27%
1.6
-7%
1.7
-13%
1.7
-13%
1.1
27%
2.1
-40%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
1.998 110%
2.219 99%
2.46 89%
2.307 95%
CCT
6611 98%
6332 103%
6561 99%
6487 100%
6653 98%
6495 100%
6353 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9548 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6202 Points ∼43% -39%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13519 Points ∼94% +33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points ∼62% -12%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼93% +31%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
10876 Points ∼75% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14417 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10128 - 10177, n=3)
10158 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=294)
4519 Points ∼31% -56%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
8963 Points ∼80% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8687 Points ∼77% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points ∼89% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼80% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8292 Points ∼74% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8522 Points ∼76% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10162 - 10553, n=3)
10325 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=348)
4470 Points ∼40% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3776 Points ∼79% -16%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2397 Points ∼50% -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points ∼71% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼50% -47%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2325 Points ∼49% -48%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2457 Points ∼51% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4499 - 4506, n=3)
4503 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=349)
1326 Points ∼28% -71%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5319 Points ∼58% -32%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8141 Points ∼88% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼92% +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9029 Points ∼98% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8178 Points ∼89% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7595 - 7966, n=3)
7791 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 10450, n=341)
4920 Points ∼53% -37%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5822 Points ∼46% -41%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10361 Points ∼83% +6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼84% +8%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11180 Points ∼89% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9858 Points ∼79% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (9750 - 10008, n=3)
9850 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 14439, n=509)
5369 Points ∼43% -45%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2546 Points ∼58% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2809 Points ∼64% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points ∼100% +49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼62% -7%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼84% +26%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3676 Points ∼84% +26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2713 Points ∼62% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2925 - 3106, n=3)
3004 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=357)
1811 Points ∼41% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3792 Points ∼65% -29%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4133 Points ∼70% -23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points ∼72% -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼82% -10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼100% +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5789 Points ∼99% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5651 Points ∼96% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5358 - 5371, n=3)
5366 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=357)
1547 Points ∼26% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3420 Points ∼66% -24%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3741 Points ∼72% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points ∼82% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼79% -9%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼100% +15%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5133 Points ∼99% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4555 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4529 - 4620, n=3)
4567 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=360)
1445 Points ∼28% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2561 Points ∼58% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points ∼65% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points ∼100% +43%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼67% -4%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼77% +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3280 Points ∼74% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2721 Points ∼62% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (3077 - 3087, n=2)
3082 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=372)
1786 Points ∼41% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4797 Points ∼46% +8%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6024 Points ∼58% +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points ∼56% +32%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% +133%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼81% +89%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8380 Points ∼81% +88%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7609 Points ∼73% +71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4449 - 4886, n=2)
4668 Points ∼45% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=372)
2136 Points ∼21% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4018 Points ∼60% -1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4842 Points ∼73% +19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points ∼82% +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼100% +65%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼95% +56%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6228 Points ∼93% +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5438 Points ∼82% +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4052 - 4321, n=2)
4187 Points ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=373)
1818 Points ∼27% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2469 Points ∼59% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2740 Points ∼66% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points ∼100% +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼85% +19%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3605 Points ∼86% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3620 Points ∼87% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2854 - 3005, n=3)
2945 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=433)
1740 Points ∼42% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3582 Points ∼68% -31%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4275 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points ∼80% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼71% -28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5089 Points ∼97% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5190 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5176 - 5206, n=3)
5189 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=435)
1278 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3256 Points ∼69% -27%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3802 Points ∼80% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points ∼89% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼75% -20%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4662 Points ∼98% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4383 - 4477, n=3)
4437 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=443)
1224 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2496 Points ∼60% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2731 Points ∼66% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points ∼100% +44%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼65% -6%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼84% +21%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3594 Points ∼87% +25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2541 Points ∼61% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2875 - 2906, n=2)
2891 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=466)
1647 Points ∼40% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4637 Points ∼56% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6439 Points ∼78% +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points ∼64% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼85% +33%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼100% +56%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7780 Points ∼94% +47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8219 Points ∼99% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4507 - 5303, n=2)
4905 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=466)
1746 Points ∼21% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3895 Points ∼61% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4947 Points ∼78% +11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points ∼79% +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼82% +17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +42%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6180 Points ∼98% +38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5492 Points ∼87% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4015 - 4465, n=2)
4240 Points ∼67% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=474)
1499 Points ∼24% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
26226 Points ∼71% -19%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30418 Points ∼83% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼75% -14%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼95% +8%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
15614 Points ∼42% -52%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36762 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (31297 - 32302, n=3)
31918 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=625)
13502 Points ∼37% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46610 Points ∼29% -34%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
79818 Points ∼50% +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points ∼42% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +127%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼53% +21%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
53794 Points ∼34% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
81502 Points ∼51% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (70318 - 72022, n=3)
71211 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=625)
19473 Points ∼12% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
39745 Points ∼51% -29%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58651 Points ∼76% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points ∼74% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼83% +16%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
34855 Points ∼45% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64152 Points ∼83% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (55524 - 56465, n=3)
55910 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=626)
16287 Points ∼21% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
147 fps ∼65% +53%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
105 fps ∼46% +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps ∼53% +25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +135%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼67% +58%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
140 fps ∼62% +46%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼66% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (96 - 143, n=3)
127 fps ∼56% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=651)
34 fps ∼15% -65%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼98% +3%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (58 - 60, n=3)
59.3 fps ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=654)
26.4 fps ∼43% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
74 fps ∼69% +10%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼55% -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps ∼68% +9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +60%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼55% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
56 fps ∼52% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼66% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (67 - 85, n=3)
79 fps ∼74% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=570)
18.6 fps ∼17% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
45 fps ∼76% -15%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼56% -38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps ∼71% -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps ∼63% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 59, n=3)
55 fps ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=575)
17.3 fps ∼29% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
47 fps ∼68% -30%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼42% -57%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼85% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
45 fps ∼65% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼84% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 67, n=3)
57.7 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=432)
15.5 fps ∼22% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼41% -35%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼36% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps ∼44% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼90% +43%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
25 fps ∼42% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼95% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (30 - 53, n=3)
40 fps ∼68% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=435)
14.8 fps ∼25% -60%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼37% -25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps ∼59% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +101%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼69% +38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
25 fps ∼78% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 28, n=3)
20 fps ∼62% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=136)
8.85 fps ∼28% -45%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 17, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=136)
6.1 fps ∼36% -64%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
16 fps ∼34% -38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps ∼38% -31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +81%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼72% +31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
40 fps ∼85% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 26, n=3)
22.3 fps ∼47% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=137)
13.2 fps ∼28% -49%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30 fps ∼65% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
38 fps ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (41 - 46, n=3)
43.7 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=136)
14.7 fps ∼32% -68%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼65% -35%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼60% -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼81% -19%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
33 fps ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼81% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (35 - 43, n=3)
40.3 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=361)
10.5 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
14 fps ∼38% -39%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼35% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps ∼43% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼84% +35%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼84% +35%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
18 fps ∼49% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +61%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (23 - 40, n=3)
28.7 fps ∼78% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=365)
9.41 fps ∼25% -59%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼91%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼82% -10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35.34 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (32.3 - 33, n=3)
32.6 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 651, n=57)
27 fps ∼76% -16%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼90%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼56% -38%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29.68 fps ∼98% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)
30.2 fps ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 606, n=53)
23.6 fps ∼78% -13%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32.86 fps ∼85% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)
38.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 739, n=52)
29.1 fps ∼76% -24%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
250577 Points ∼75% -25%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
270884 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼88% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
285269 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
246366 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (328111 - 333277, n=3)
330277 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63421 - 374820, n=253)
127177 Points ∼38% -62%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
273655 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
222290 Points ∼81% -19%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
229374 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼84% -16%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
215632 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
226124 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (269219 - 274007, n=3)
272294 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=460)
83838 Points ∼31% -69%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4716 Score ∼94% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
4967 Score ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 5025, n=54)
1981 Score ∼39% -60%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1109 Points ∼64% -20%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1228 Points ∼71% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points ∼82% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼81% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1176 Points ∼68% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1400 Points ∼81% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1383 - 1439, n=3)
1402 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=583)
732 Points ∼42% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6370 Points ∼41% -24%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6726 Points ∼43% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points ∼40% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +86%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼51% -5%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7989 Points ∼51% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7743 Points ∼49% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7361 - 8484, n=3)
8082 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=583)
1887 Points ∼12% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2625 Points ∼42% -39%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2910 Points ∼46% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points ∼100% +46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼29% -58%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼69% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2825 Points ∼45% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3704 Points ∼59% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4306 - 4570, n=3)
4450 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=583)
1408 Points ∼22% -67%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6413 Points ∼55% -23%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6717 Points ∼58% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points ∼74% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +40%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼70% -2%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4417 Points ∼38% -47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8418 Points ∼72% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7476 - 8344, n=3)
7884 Points ∼68% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=583)
2792 Points ∼24% -67%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3302 Points ∼67% -27%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3565 Points ∼73% -21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points ∼96% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼91% -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3291 Points ∼67% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4288 Points ∼88% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4320 - 4548, n=3)
4463 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=587)
1385 Points ∼28% -69%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1481 Points ∼62% -23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1571 Points ∼65% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1201 Points ∼50% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1927 - 1937, n=3)
1931 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=95)
717 Points ∼30% -63%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +197%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼40% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=2)
87.9 Points ∼32% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 23832, n=490)
86.8 Points ∼32% -5%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼32% -6%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
82.61 Points ∼30% -10%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
75.8 Points ∼28% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼25% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +107%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼48%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=3)
19944 Points ∼46% -4%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39% -19%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
16228 Points ∼38% -22%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
15906 Points ∼37% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼34% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=645)
6101 Points ∼14% -71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=664)
10917 ms * ∼100% -488%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼29% -71%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
2785 ms * ∼26% -50%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
2361 ms * ∼22% -27%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼21% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼19% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1857 - 2240, n=3)
2007 ms * ∼18% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼18% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +68%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼80% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼74%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
115 Points ∼74% 0%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
100 Points ∼65% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
94 Points ∼61% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points ∼48% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼41% -44%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=117)
63.6 Points ∼41% -45%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼96% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
314 Points ∼90%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)
310 Points ∼89% -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
287 Points ∼83% -9%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
267 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼75% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼47% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=324)
119 Points ∼34% -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 71)
58.6 runs/min ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54 - 56, n=2)
55 runs/min ∼94% -2%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
46.4 runs/min ∼79% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=61)
33.6 runs/min ∼57% -40%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S10 PlusSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusLG V40 ThinQHuawei Mate 20 ProOnePlus 6TGoogle Pixel 3 XLSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumAverage 512 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-0%
-2%
105%
-7%
111%
-24%
47%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
19%
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-50%
60.7
0%
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=391)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
14%
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
73
0%
66.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=391)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
22.7
22.74
0%
23.36
3%
157.84
595%
22
-3%
132.7
485%
21.75
-4%
87.4 (22.7 - 152, n=2)
285%
19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=694)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
135.16
129.68
-4%
130.13
-4%
157.42
16%
138.5
2%
120.8
-11%
135.99
1%
138 (135 - 142, n=2)
2%
43.8 (1.59 - 175, n=694)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
249.06
204.94
-18%
203.92
-18%
196.39
-21%
204.4
-18%
228.6
-8%
170.98
-31%
246 (243 - 249, n=2)
-1%
90.2 (2.99 - 392, n=694)
-64%
Sequential Read 256KB
811.17
818.69
1%
689.59
-15%
853.28
5%
735.3
-9%
632.6
-22%
748.59
-8%
768 (725 - 811, n=2)
-5%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=694)
-69%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; 0.11.0: Ø39.1 (14-42)
Asphalt 9
0102030Tooltip
; 1.4.1a: Ø29.1 (26-30)
Battle Bay
0102030405060Tooltip
; 4.3.22176: Ø59.6 (57-60)
Max. Load
 35.8 °C36.9 °C36.3 °C 
 36.3 °C38 °C38.1 °C 
 37.2 °C39.3 °C37.1 °C 
Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
35.1 °C34.8 °C34.8 °C
34.7 °C35.6 °C35.2 °C
33.4 °C35.4 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 35.6 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.62522.424.93122.724.94023.820.95030.930.96320.422.4802320.810021.123.412516.936.316017.853.320015.650.625014.855.631516.262.740014.364.550013.865.963013.769.880014.869.8100014.673.4125014.974.7160013.975.4200014.276.3250013.875.7315014.678.5400015.578.3500014.478.8630014.277.2800015.174.41000015.271.51250015.167.61600014.863.5SPL26.787.8N0.872.7median 14.8median 69.8Delta0.69.440.441.73634.540.928.533.230.441.14224.734.524.624.622.930.22038.717.545.718.849.818.951.11749.915.655.918.955.614.653.312.856.512.759.81264.31166.71168.91169.410.768.210.962.910.961.61162.711641161.911.158.111.152.862.324.877.215.60.637median 12median 58.135.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusApple iPhone Xs Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone Xs Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.53 / 2.07 Watt
Load midlight 6.03 / 9.18 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
32%
12%
-4%
8%
6%
14%
10%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.68
7%
0.87
-19%
0.95
-30%
1
-37%
0.7
4%
0.7
4%
0.647 (0.6 - 0.73, n=3)
11%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=724)
-21%
Idle Average *
1.53
0.95
38%
1.39
9%
2.17
-42%
1.4
8%
1.4
8%
1.1
28%
1.333 (1.2 - 1.53, n=3)
13%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=723)
-14%
Idle Maximum *
2.07
1.09
47%
1.41
32%
2.25
-9%
1.7
18%
2
3%
2.1
-1%
1.623 (1.3 - 2.07, n=3)
22%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=724)
2%
Load Average *
6.03
4.58
24%
3.96
34%
4.47
26%
4.6
24%
4.8
20%
4.2
30%
5.8 (5.2 - 6.17, n=3)
4%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=718)
33%
Load Maximum *
9.18
5.16
44%
8.6
6%
6.15
33%
6.7
27%
9.5
-3%
8.3
10%
9.31 (8.55 - 10.2, n=3)
-1%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=718)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
8h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 07min
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
6%
29%
11%
35%
23%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1560
1343
-14%
1140
-27%
1747
12%
1305
-16%
1936
24%
1725
11%
1347
-14%
H.264
921
674
-27%
659
-28%
854
-7%
801
-13%
903
-2%
724
-21%
520
-44%
WiFi v1.3
483
521
8%
510
6%
767
59%
742
54%
865
79%
691
43%
547
13%
Load
187
237
27%
320
71%
282
51%
223
19%
261
40%
299
60%
235
26%

Pros

+ 很棒的设计
+ 优质的用料
+ 高性能SoC
+ 充足的RAM和存储空间
+ 可扩展存储
+ 双SIM卡
+ 相机表现优秀
+ 很不错的的OLED面板
+ 防水防尘
+ USB 3.1 TypeC,支持DP,HDMI和OTG
+ 扬声器效果出色
+ 好用的指纹传感器
+ 无线充电

Cons

- 一般般的续航
- 没有eSIM
- 面部识别不够安全
- SoC在高负载下会降频
- PWM调光
- 不支持aptX HD
三星Galaxy S10+智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany.
三星Galaxy S10+智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany.

三星Galaxy S10 +肯定是其前辈合格的的继承者,是一款真正的旗舰智能手机。然而,最新的Galaxy S系列产品并不像其前身那样物有所值,部分原因是竞争对手们早就迎头赶上。最好的例子是S10 +的屏幕和相机。显示效果很好,但它不像我们的比较设备那样明亮或颜色准确。此外,虽然相机也可以拍摄精彩的照片和精彩的视频,但在低光照摄影方面还有更好的选择。从本质上讲,三星在过去两年中已经对其相机技术过于自信了。

Exynos 9820 SoC是一个强大的产品,但在今年晚些时候上市后,它可能会落后于Snapdragon 855。 LTE调制解调器也很快,但我们希望看到对更多频段的支持。此外,虽然Galaxy S10设备是支持Wi-Fi 6的最快的智能手机,但我们评测机中的调制解调器功耗太大,这个问题需要解决。

三星Galaxy S10 +拥有许多当前的技术趋势,并成功地将它们集成在一起,但它不足以成为2019年的年度智能手机。

我们仍然认为缺乏aptX HD支持是值得怀疑的。虽然LDAC是一种码率更高的编解码器,但在撰写本文时只有少数耳机支持它,所以三星继续放弃aptX HD实在无法理解。不过三星仍在为其旗舰智能手机配备耳机插孔,这样的OEM已经不多了。

超声波指纹传感器在测试过程中运行流畅,甚至用湿手或油腻的手也能解锁,这是令人印象深刻的。最后,新的Galaxy S10系列提供了极大的存储空间,可以使用高达512 GB的microSD卡进行扩展。不过你必须准备好投入大量资金来做到这一点。

总的来说,Galaxy S10 +几乎没有给已经过度饱和的市场带来任何新鲜感。我们怀疑三星已经为Galaxy Fold保留了任何真正的创新功能。虽然这对于一台旗舰级手机来说不那么要紧,我们还是建议在考虑是否要购买S10+时,应该谨慎行事。

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S10+智能手机评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-04-13 (Update: 2019-04-13)