Notebookcheck

华为Mate 20 Pro智能手机评测

Allen Ngo, Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), 03/13/2019
Android ARM Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

集大成之作 - 华为Mate 20 Pro的规格表上列满了旗舰级的硬件,包括新的麒麟980 SoC,民用智能手机中最快的LTE调制解调器,反向无线充电和屏下指纹。本篇评测将通过对这些硬件的测试来确定Mate 20 Pro的技术实力是否成功转化为了实际性能。

Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Mate 20 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Dual-Core NPU
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP10, GPU Turbo 2.0
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.3 inch 13:6, 3120 x 1440 pixel 545 PPI, 十点触控, OLED, HDR, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 112.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: 最高256 GB的Nano存储卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,气压计,指南针,色温传感器,重力传感器,陀螺仪,磁力计,接近传感器, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge, UMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 21, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 156.9 x 72.4
Battery
4200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 华为Super Charge-40 W,Qi无线充电, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 41 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 30 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 502 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 555 h
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix 4000万像素广角, f1.8光圈; 2000万像素超广角镜头,f / 2.2光圈; 800万像素长焦镜头,f / 2.4光圈,激光对焦,相位对焦,对比度对焦,华为AI图像稳定
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, USB充电器,USB Type-C线,手机壳,耳机,SIM工具, EMUI 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, SAR值:Head - 0.42 W / kg,Body-0.95 W / kg,IP68;无风扇, fanless
Weight
189 g, Power Supply: 125 g
Price
5399元起 ~ 999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

From left to right: Huawei Mate 9, Mate 20 Pro and Mate 10 Pro
From left to right: Huawei Mate 9, Mate 20 Pro and Mate 10 Pro
The Mate 20 Pro’s hybrid slot
The Mate 20 Pro’s 40 W charger

Size Comparison

158 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 236 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g155.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.75 mm 177 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g154.2 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 178 g153.2 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 162 g
Top side: IR transmitter, microphone
Top side: IR transmitter, microphone
Left-hand side
Left-hand side
Right-hand side: volume rocker, power button
Right-hand side: volume rocker, power button
Bottom edge: microphone, card slot, USB 3.1 Type-C, microphone
Bottom edge: microphone, card slot, USB 3.1 Type-C, microphone
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼97% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼91% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼73% -20%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 (min: 105, max: 550) MBit/s ∼52% -42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼50% -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=348)
217 MBit/s ∼32% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
627 (min: 490, max: 666) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=348)
209 MBit/s ∼30% -70%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Finale Firmware iperf 3.1.3: Ø615 (532-642)
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø490 (100-534)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø696 (647-714)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Finale Firmware iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (289-805)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Corners
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Corners
GPS test: Huawei Mate 20 Pro – Overview
GPS test: Huawei Mate 20 Pro – Overview
GPS test: Huawei Mate 20 Pro – Bridge
GPS test: Huawei Mate 20 Pro – Bridge
GPS test: Huawei Mate 20 Pro – Corners
GPS test: Huawei Mate 20 Pro – Corners
Mate 10 Pro
Mate 10 Pro
Mate 20 Pro
Mate 20 Pro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Hybrid Zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Hybrid Zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Hybrid Zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: 10x Digital zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera - Night mode
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
A photo of our test chart taken with the 40 MP camera
A photo of our test chart taken with the 40 MP camera
A photo of our test chart taken with the 10 MP camera
A detailed look at our test chart taken with the 10 MP camera
A photo of our test chart taken with the telephoto sensor
A photo of our test chart taken with the wide-angle sensor
560
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 620 cd/m² Average: 581.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.84 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 576 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
LG G7 ThinQ
IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-10%
-22%
-40%
1%
-110%
-35%
-62%
Brightness middle
576
629
9%
565
-2%
477
-17%
656
14%
974
69%
430
-25%
429
-26%
Brightness
582
636
9%
571
-2%
453
-22%
659
13%
975
68%
437
-25%
432
-26%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
96
7%
86
-4%
88
-2%
96
7%
87
-3%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.49
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.7
-31%
2.3
-77%
2.1
-62%
1.7
-31%
5.4
-315%
2.3
-77%
3.39
-161%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.5
3.6
-3%
4.8
-37%
8.2
-134%
2.8
20%
13.1
-274%
4.6
-31%
5.25
-50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.4
-50%
1.9
-19%
1.6
-0%
1.7
-6%
5
-213%
2.4
-50%
3.3
-106%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.15 102%
2.16 102%
2.28 96%
1.998 110%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.238 98%
CCT
6561 99%
6337 103%
6332 103%
6425 101%
6487 100%
7480 87%
6160 106%
7135 91%
Contrast
1445
1988

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9902 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.9 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points ∼62%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼59% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
14299 Points ∼99% +60%
LG G7 ThinQ
13497 Points ∼94% +51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5759 - 9870, n=5)
8034 Points ∼56% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 21070, n=238)
4591 Points ∼32% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼60% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼80% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼76% -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8548 Points ∼76% -15%
LG G7 ThinQ
9029 Points ∼80% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9735 - 10024, n=5)
9889 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1634 - 11598, n=289)
4412 Points ∼39% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points ∼71%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼40% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼79% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2441 Points ∼51% -28%
LG G7 ThinQ
2448 Points ∼51% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3234 - 3378, n=5)
3320 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (590 - 4824, n=290)
1291 Points ∼27% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7360 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼90% -10%
LG G7 ThinQ
7717 Points ∼84% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7567 - 9326, n=5)
8627 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2828 - 9868, n=299)
4732 Points ∼51% -49%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼46% -54%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8967 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼77% -23%
LG G7 ThinQ
9503 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9728 - 13531, n=5)
11688 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (3977 - 13531, n=467)
5163 Points ∼41% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3002 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2546 Points ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2713 Points ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2227 Points ∼51% -49%
OnePlus 6
3566 Points ∼82% -18%
LG G7 ThinQ
3416 Points ∼78% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2371 - 4439, n=5)
3614 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (939 - 4439, n=315)
1758 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points ∼75%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3034 Points ∼54% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3792 Points ∼67% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5651 Points ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points ∼85% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4209 Points ∼74% -1%
OnePlus 6
5547 Points ∼98% +31%
LG G7 ThinQ
5322 Points ∼94% +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3718 - 4319, n=5)
4097 Points ∼73% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (138 - 8206, n=315)
1480 Points ∼26% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points ∼87%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3027 Points ∼61% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3420 Points ∼69% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4555 Points ∼92% +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points ∼83% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3512 Points ∼71% -18%
OnePlus 6
4937 Points ∼100% +15%
LG G7 ThinQ
4735 Points ∼96% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3524 - 4315, n=5)
3912 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (170 - 5200, n=318)
1383 Points ∼28% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2983 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2561 Points ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2721 Points ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2145 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 6
3555 Points ∼81% -19%
LG G7 ThinQ
3109 Points ∼71% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2421 - 4493, n=5)
3640 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=332)
1731 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points ∼56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3306 Points ∼32% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4797 Points ∼46% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7609 Points ∼73% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
5922 Points ∼57% +1%
OnePlus 6
8014 Points ∼77% +37%
LG G7 ThinQ
7882 Points ∼76% +35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2536 - 5893, n=5)
4454 Points ∼43% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=332)
2053 Points ∼20% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3228 Points ∼48% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4018 Points ∼60% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5438 Points ∼82% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4232 Points ∼63% -22%
OnePlus 6
6267 Points ∼94% +15%
LG G7 ThinQ
5877 Points ∼88% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2525 - 5511, n=5)
4236 Points ∼64% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=333)
1743 Points ∼26% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼59% -41%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2118 Points ∼51% -49%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼82% -18%
LG G7 ThinQ
3255 Points ∼78% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3643 - 4216, n=5)
3994 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (918 - 4216, n=390)
1692 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼55% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points ∼71% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3742 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100% +24%
LG G7 ThinQ
5006 Points ∼96% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3528 - 4256, n=5)
3958 Points ∼76% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 5246, n=392)
1207 Points ∼23% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points ∼75% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3197 Points ∼68% -24%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼99% +11%
LG G7 ThinQ
4471 Points ∼94% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3575 - 4238, n=5)
3966 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (184 - 4734, n=400)
1159 Points ∼24% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼61% -39%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2176 Points ∼52% -48%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼83% -17%
LG G7 ThinQ
3150 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3756 - 4215, n=5)
4030 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4215, n=425)
1592 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points ∼64%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100% +55%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points ∼85% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6554 Points ∼79% +24%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100% +56%
LG G7 ThinQ
7633 Points ∼92% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2347 - 5305, n=5)
4181 Points ∼51% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=425)
1654 Points ∼20% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼62% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼87% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points ∼83% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4529 Points ∼72% -9%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼100% +26%
LG G7 ThinQ
5799 Points ∼92% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (2567 - 4996, n=5)
4089 Points ∼65% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6454, n=433)
1420 Points ∼23% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
30765 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼93% -7%
LG G7 ThinQ
27817 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (19993 - 37164, n=5)
30139 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=584)
13212 Points ∼36% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼21% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼29% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points ∼100% +136%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
77003 Points ∼48% +14%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼51% +20%
LG G7 ThinQ
80534 Points ∼50% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (42128 - 67956, n=5)
57556 Points ∼36% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=584)
18689 Points ∼12% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼39% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼51% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
57711 Points ∼74% +1%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼80% +9%
LG G7 ThinQ
56669 Points ∼73% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (34035 - 57073, n=5)
47844 Points ∼62% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=585)
15718 Points ∼20% -72%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps ∼53%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼50% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼65% +23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼66% +25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps ∼100% +88%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
102 fps ∼45% -15%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼66% +25%
LG G7 ThinQ
144 fps ∼64% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (70 - 134, n=5)
112 fps ∼50% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=608)
32.5 fps ∼14% -73%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
58 fps ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼98% -2%
LG G7 ThinQ
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (55 - 62, n=5)
59.2 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=611)
25.8 fps ∼42% -58%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼50% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼69% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼66% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps ∼100% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
54 fps ∼50% -26%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼62% -10%
LG G7 ThinQ
63 fps ∼59% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48 - 87, n=5)
70.6 fps ∼66% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=529)
17.5 fps ∼16% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps ∼71%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼95% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼98% +38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
51 fps ∼86% +21%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98% +38%
LG G7 ThinQ
41 fps ∼69% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (42 - 60, n=5)
55.4 fps ∼94% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=533)
16.6 fps ∼28% -60%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps ∼42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼53% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼68% +62%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼84% +100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps ∼100% +139%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
32 fps ∼46% +10%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼81% +93%
LG G7 ThinQ
51 fps ∼74% +76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (29 - 55, n=5)
48 fps ∼69% +66%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 88, n=390)
14.8 fps ∼21% -49%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps ∼44%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼65% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼41% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼95% +115%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps ∼100% +127%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
29 fps ∼49% +12%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼92% +108%
LG G7 ThinQ
26 fps ∼44% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (26 - 51, n=5)
44.4 fps ∼75% +71%
Average of class Smartphone (3.5 - 110, n=393)
14.3 fps ∼24% -45%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps ∼59%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
14 fps ∼44% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
25 fps ∼78% +32%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps ∼100% +69%
OnePlus 6
23 fps ∼72% +21%
LG G7 ThinQ
13 fps ∼40% -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (19 - 21, n=4)
20 fps ∼62% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 59, n=96)
9.28 fps ∼29% -51%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps ∼80%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8.5 fps ∼52% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14 fps ∼86% +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 6
14 fps ∼86% +8%
LG G7 ThinQ
14 fps ∼86% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (13 - 14, n=4)
13.3 fps ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 31, n=96)
6.27 fps ∼38% -52%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps ∼38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
23 fps ∼49% +28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
40 fps ∼85% +122%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps ∼100% +161%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼74% +94%
LG G7 ThinQ
20 fps ∼43% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (18 - 32, n=4)
27.5 fps ∼59% +53%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 59, n=96)
13.8 fps ∼29% -23%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps ∼87%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
24 fps ∼63% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps ∼97% +12%
OnePlus 6
38 fps ∼100% +15%
LG G7 ThinQ
37 fps ∼97% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (30 - 34, n=4)
32.8 fps ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 63, n=95)
15.1 fps ∼40% -54%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼53% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼70% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼88% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
25 fps ∼63% -19%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼88% +13%
LG G7 ThinQ
33 fps ∼83% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (28 - 32, n=5)
30.2 fps ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 54, n=320)
10.1 fps ∼25% -67%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps ∼43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼59% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼38% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +131%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps ∼84% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
24 fps ∼65% +50%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼86% +100%
LG G7 ThinQ
17 fps ∼46% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (16 - 30, n=5)
25.6 fps ∼69% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 58, n=323)
9.11 fps ∼25% -43%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼83%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
16.82 (min: 5.26, max: 61.1) fps ∼48% -42%
OnePlus 6
35.26 (min: 20.31, max: 62.64) fps ∼100% +21%
LG G7 ThinQ
30.49 (min: 9.86, max: 49.99) fps ∼86% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
29.1 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7.98 - 651, n=42)
30.4 fps ∼86% +4%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼61%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6.67 (min: 2.29, max: 86.53) fps ∼24% -61%
OnePlus 6
26.15 (min: 15.32, max: 59.39) fps ∼94% +55%
LG G7 ThinQ
17.42 (min: 10.81, max: 36.84) fps ∼63% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
16.9 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10.1 - 606, n=38)
27.7 fps ∼100% +64%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼75%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8.37 (min: 3.32, max: 81.15) fps ∼25% -67%
OnePlus 6
28.35 (min: 16.41, max: 60.76) fps ∼83% +11%
LG G7 ThinQ
28.33 (min: 16.3, max: 60.18) fps ∼83% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
25.6 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 739, n=37)
34 fps ∼100% +33%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼70% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼83% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼81% -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
288062 Points ∼95% -4%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼88% -11%
LG G7 ThinQ
256276 Points ∼85% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 306296, n=5)
290229 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (41483 - 348178, n=212)
120944 Points ∼40% -60%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼70% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼88% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
232931 Points ∼92% -7%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼91% -8%
LG G7 ThinQ
223464 Points ∼88% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (250848 - 254229, n=5)
252881 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 273655, n=428)
79983 Points ∼32% -68%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5025 Score ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1704 Score ∼34% -66%
OnePlus 6
4710 Score ∼94% -6%
LG G7 ThinQ
4598 Score ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
5025 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1029 - 5025, n=44)
1824 Score ∼36% -64%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼71% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼64% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼81% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
1288 Points ∼74% -10%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼80% -3%
LG G7 ThinQ
1374 Points ∼79% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1239 - 1430, n=5)
1351 Points ∼78% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=540)
712 Points ∼41% -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points ∼40%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼23% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼41% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points ∼100% +150%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7965 Points ∼51% +27%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼51% +27%
LG G7 ThinQ
7906 Points ∼50% +26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4963 - 7484, n=5)
5849 Points ∼37% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=540)
1790 Points ∼11% -71%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼42% -58%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3521 Points ∼56% -44%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼60% -40%
LG G7 ThinQ
3744 Points ∼60% -40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5431 - 6283, n=5)
5792 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=540)
1322 Points ∼21% -79%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼45% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼55% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼72% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6556 Points ∼56% -24%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼70% -4%
LG G7 ThinQ
8070 Points ∼69% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7789 - 8604, n=5)
8302 Points ∼71% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=540)
2651 Points ∼23% -69%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼64% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼67% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼88% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3923 Points ∼80% -16%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼88% -8%
LG G7 ThinQ
4257 Points ∼87% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4014 - 4746, n=5)
4403 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=544)
1312 Points ∼27% -72%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1571 Points ∼65%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points ∼33% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼62% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2407 Points ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼49% -26%
LG G7 ThinQ
1176 Points ∼49% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
1571 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=82)
711 Points ∼30% -55%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +150%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (93.2 - 109, n=5)
104 Points ∼38% -5%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
88.081 Points ∼32% -19%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼32% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼30% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼25% -36%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼21% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=465)
37.5 Points ∼14% -66%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +85%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20975 - 23285, n=5)
21963 Points ∼51% -6%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼39% -27%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
16720 Points ∼39% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼34% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼34% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% -43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼24% -55%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=601)
5807 Points ∼13% -75%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=620)
11195 ms * ∼100% -474%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼32% -84%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼28% -63%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
2484.1 ms * ∼22% -27%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼22% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼21% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼18% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 2145, n=5)
2015 ms * ∼18% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼5% +69%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=5)
106 Points ∼68% -15%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
98 Points ∼63% -21%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
97 Points ∼63% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points ∼48% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=84)
64.3 Points ∼41% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼41% -48%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼96%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (228 - 334, n=5)
277 Points ∼80% -17%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼73% -25%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼73% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼72% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼47% -51%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼46% -53%
Average of class Smartphone (74 - 362, n=306)
117 Points ∼34% -65%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 20 ProHuawei Mate 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumOnePlus 6Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-19%
-40%
-28%
-12%
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-58%
64.9 (51.3 - 72.4, n=9)
-10%
47 (19.2 - 87.1, n=355)
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
80.8 (73.7 - 85.4, n=9)
-3%
65.2 (29.8 - 96.5, n=355)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
157.84
164.45
4%
22.74
-86%
21.75
-86%
21.8
-86%
93 (19.5 - 250, n=23)
-41%
17.7 (0.14 - 250, n=649)
-89%
Random Read 4KB
157.42
132.27
-16%
129.68
-18%
135.99
-14%
137
-13%
140 (117 - 158, n=23)
-11%
41 (1.59 - 173, n=649)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
196.39
208.72
6%
204.94
4%
170.98
-13%
201.4
3%
200 (183 - 212, n=23)
2%
85.5 (2.99 - 253, n=649)
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
853.28
732.46
-14%
818.69
-4%
748.59
-12%
725.6
-15%
756 (427 - 912, n=23)
-11%
240 (12.1 - 912, n=649)
-72%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
; 0.8.0: Ø24.9 (18-26)
Arena of Valor (Ultra High)
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.25.1.2: Ø61.1 (26-62)
Asphalt 9: Legends (High)
010203040Tooltip
; 1.1.4a: Ø30.6 (28-32)
Max. Load
 43.2 °C43.3 °C38.3 °C 
 41.8 °C42.2 °C39.4 °C 
 40.8 °C39.9 °C37.7 °C 
Maximum: 43.3 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
36.5 °C39.9 °C44.5 °C
36.4 °C38.9 °C44.1 °C
36.1 °C39.5 °C42.6 °C
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.736252524.13126.829.94026.328.75029.836.16327.429.6802128.110019.527.412518.835.716019.247.520017.645.525016.947.331515.8544001552.35001553.663014.753.980014.859.8100014.664.1125014.366.4160013.467.9200014.469.3250014.464.7315014.86640001568.5500014.866.3630014.765.580001562.91000014.957.21250015.255.81600015.745.3SPL26.877.7N0.938.7median 15median 57.2Delta1.28.73033.936.137.63228.229.429.431.541.127.928.722.123.1222421.223.521.528.120.337.718.442.617.351.516.757.81763.116.163.615.869.115.872.715.37015.870.214.9731571.514.770.914.772.51571.315.1761572.815.472.91561.716.34827.683.6157.3median 15.8median 69.11.912.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate 20 ProSony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.95 / 2.17 / 2.25 Watt
Load midlight 4.47 / 6.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
LG G7 ThinQ
3000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
15%
30%
-1%
8%
-54%
17%
-8%
-5%
10%
Idle Minimum *
0.95
0.85
11%
0.68
28%
0.67
29%
1
-5%
1.8
-89%
0.6
37%
1.16
-22%
0.8 (0.6 - 0.97, n=5)
16%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=680)
7%
Idle Average *
2.17
1.15
47%
0.95
56%
2.5
-15%
1.4
35%
2.9
-34%
1
54%
1.98
9%
1.93 (0.9 - 2.58, n=5)
11%
1.731 (0.6 - 6.2, n=679)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.25
1.23
45%
1.09
52%
2.51
-12%
1.7
24%
3.5
-56%
1.6
29%
2.07
8%
2.23 (1.83 - 2.63, n=5)
1%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=680)
10%
Load Average *
4.47
4.12
8%
4.58
-2%
4.3
4%
4.6
-3%
4.8
-7%
4.3
4%
4.51
-1%
5.35 (4.47 - 6.3, n=5)
-20%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=674)
9%
Load Maximum *
6.15
8.42
-37%
5.16
16%
6.87
-12%
6.7
-9%
11.2
-82%
8.6
-40%
8.3
-35%
8.05 (6.15 - 9.85, n=5)
-31%
5.82 (1.2 - 14.2, n=674)
5%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 07min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 69)
12h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 14min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 42min
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
LG G7 ThinQ
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
-23%
-27%
-14%
-14%
-5%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1747
1744
0%
1343
-23%
1347
-23%
1305
-25%
1401
-20%
1806
3%
1662
-5%
H.264
854
929
9%
674
-21%
520
-39%
801
-6%
921
8%
791
-7%
908
6%
WiFi v1.3
767
818
7%
521
-32%
547
-29%
742
-3%
694
-10%
762
-1%
591
-23%
Load
282
398
41%
237
-16%
235
-17%
223
-21%
191
-32%
246
-13%
260
-8%

Pros

+ 高品质的工艺和多彩的颜色选择
+ 一流的OLED显示屏
+ 强大的三摄
+ 高速MIMO WiFi
+ LTE Cat.21
+ IP68认证
+ 稳定的通话质量
+ 精确的GPS
+ 快速SuperCharge和无线充电
+ 双VoLTE
+ 强大的SoC

Cons

- nano存储卡实用性存疑
- 扬声器的放置实在不佳
- 只支持混合双卡
华为Mate 20 Pro智能手机评测. Test device provided by Huawei Germany.
华为Mate 20 Pro智能手机评测. Test device provided by Huawei Germany.

华为Mate 20 Pro是一款出色的智能手机,拥有各种旗舰级硬件。该设备是我们第一次接触新款麒麟980 SoC并进行测试。它还有着比P20 Pro更加出色的后置三摄像头。此外,尽管我们的测试设备在刚开始测试时具有相对较高的功耗,但Mate 20 Pro拥有巨大的电池,仍然提供了一流的续航时间。该设备还配备有快速通信模块,快速有线和无线充电,并通过了IP68认证。

华为克服了开发Mate 20 Pro中的重重困难,这不仅仅是一款高端旗舰智能手机。

尽管如此,该设备并非没有缺点。扬声器素质仅略高于平均水平,而有些人可能会认为华为决定将Mate 20 Pro的主扬声器置于其USB Type-C端口内是一个设计缺陷。我们同样不相信华为的新型Nano存储卡,与microSD卡相比,它几乎没有什么实际优势。我们的测试设备也具有相对较高的功耗,不过我们认为这是因为它比零售版附带的软件具有更少的电池优化,但这并不能阻止Mate 20 Pro成为2018年最好的旗舰智能手机之一。

Huawei Mate 20 Pro - 10/26/2018 v6
Allen Ngo, Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
94%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
61 / 60 → 100%
Weight
89%
Battery
95%
Display
92%
Games Performance
66 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
86 / 70 → 100%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
93%
Average
85%
92%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为Mate 20 Pro智能手机评测
Allen Ngo, Daniel Schmidt, 2019-03-13 (Update: 2019-03-13)