Notebookcheck

柯达 Ektra 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer (translated by Delta Zhang), 02/12/2017
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

相机还是手机? 柯达Ektra的名号打得很响因此也想获得最佳智能手机相机的称号。继续阅读我们得评测来看看它是否能做到,亦或者说这台手机对你是否有价值。

Kodak Ektra
Processor
Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 2.3 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
5 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 441 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, IPS, 大猩猩玻璃, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机接口, Card Reader: 最大128GB micro SD卡槽, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 距离传感器, USB-OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (1,3,7,20), bandwidth download and upload: 150 MBit/s and ​50 MBit/s (LTE); SAR value: 0.53 W/kg (head); 1.51 W/kg (body), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.69 x 147.8 x 73.4
Battery
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, MediaTek Pump Express Plus
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 21 MPix f/​2.0, 相位自动对焦, OIS, 双LED闪光灯, 录像 @2160p/​30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, 录像 @1080p/​30 FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 背部扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 腕带, 充电器, USB 线缆, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
163 g, Power Supply: 47 g
Price
499 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Kodak Ektra
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
306 MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
279 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
32.9 MBit/s ∼11% -89%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Kodak Ektra
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
280 MBit/s ∼89%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
185 MBit/s ∼59% -34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
31.2 MBit/s ∼10% -89%
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500: intersection
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500: bridge
GPS Kodak Ektra: overview
GPS Kodak Ektra: overview
GPS Kodak Ektra: intersection
GPS Kodak Ektra: intersection
GPS Kodak Ektra: bridge
GPS Kodak Ektra: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
376
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 448 cd/m² Average: 418.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 428 cd/m²
Contrast: 652:1 (Black: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.17
Kodak Ektra
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG V10
Quantum-IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7
Screen
51%
31%
9%
58%
Brightness
419
563
34%
633
51%
430
3%
431
3%
Brightness Distribution
84
91
8%
93
11%
84
0%
93
11%
Black Level *
0.64
0.38
41%
0.66
-3%
0.22
66%
Contrast
652
1532
135%
997
53%
2045
214%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8
4.4
45%
4.9
39%
7.1
11%
5.18
35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.6
4.8
44%
5.8
33%
6.8
21%
6.94
19%
Gamma
2.17 111%
2.2 109%
2.26 106%
2.23 108%
2.24 107%
CCT
8952 73%
6175 105%
7840 83%
7866 83%
8091 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4287 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
63.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 37.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
85774 Points ∼38%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼42% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (6.2.1)
62484 Points ∼27% -27%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼70% +86%
LG V10
66304 Points ∼29% -23%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
4596 Points ∼17%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼18% +7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼15% -12%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼16% -8%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1643 Points ∼30%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼32% +7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼15% -50%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼34% +14%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1387 Points ∼46%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼83% +80%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2109 Points ∼70% +52%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼57% +25%
LG V10
1267 Points ∼42% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
739 Points ∼14%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼15% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
380 Points ∼7% -49%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% +227%
LG V10
436 Points ∼8% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
825 Points ∼21%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼25% +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
465 Points ∼12% -44%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% +169%
LG V10
510 Points ∼13% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1531 Points ∼52%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼86% +64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼72% +38%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼50% -5%
LG V10
1241 Points ∼42% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1206 Points ∼16%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼14% -10%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼9% -40%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% +174%
LG V10
1361 Points ∼18% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1266 Points ∼25%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼25% -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼17% -33%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼52% +104%
LG V10
1332 Points ∼27% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
9851 Points ∼14%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼22% +58%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼23% +62%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼32% +128%
LG V10
10898 Points ∼16% +11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
18300 Points ∼4%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼5% +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% -26%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% +88%
LG V10
23276 Points ∼5% +27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
15370 Points ∼8%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼10% +29%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼7% -9%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% +100%
LG V10
18585 Points ∼9% +21%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
31 fps ∼2%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼3% +29%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼2% -26%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% +194%
LG V10
35 fps ∼3% +13%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
34 fps ∼7%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼9% +26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼5% -38%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% +74%
LG V10
25 fps ∼5% -26%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
17 fps ∼3%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% -42%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% +171%
LG V10
15 fps ∼3% -12%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
17 fps ∼7%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼8% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼4% -43%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼20% +165%
LG V10
9.4 fps ∼4% -45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
10 fps ∼2%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼2% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼1% -38%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +220%
LG V10
9.9 fps ∼2% -1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
10 fps ∼6%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼6% +10%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼3% -39%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% +220%
LG V10
5.6 fps ∼3% -44%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
3479 Points ∼42%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼85% +103%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼82% +95%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼68% +63%
LG V10
4800 Points ∼58% +38%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1031 Points ∼67%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼67% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼46% -32%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -14%
LG V10
903 Points ∼59% -12%
Graphics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1648 Points ∼19%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼18% -4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼12% -38%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% +170%
LG V10
1954 Points ∼23% +19%
Memory (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1907 Points ∼45%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼61% +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼24% -45%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼46% +2%
LG V10
1527 Points ∼36% -20%
System (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
3718 Points ∼56%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼60% +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼44% -21%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -16%
LG V10
2598 Points ∼39% -30%
Overall (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
1863 Points ∼50%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼55% +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼33% -35%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼60% +19%
LG V10
1627 Points ∼44% -13%

Legend

 
Kodak Ektra Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG V10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
23.49 MB/s ∼27%
Huawei P9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.83 MB/s ∼28% +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.07 MB/s ∼57% +113%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37.59 MB/s ∼39%
Huawei P9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
55.05 MB/s ∼57% +46%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
79.22 MB/s ∼82% +111%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
7.4 MB/s ∼5%
Huawei P9
47.45 MB/s ∼31% +541%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
7.4 MB/s ∼5% 0%
OnePlus 3T
74.39 MB/s ∼49% +905%
LG V10
16.55 MB/s ∼11% +124%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
17 MB/s ∼10%
Huawei P9
39 MB/s ∼23% +129%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
74 MB/s ∼43% +335%
OnePlus 3T
123.57 MB/s ∼71% +627%
LG V10
29.57 MB/s ∼17% +74%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
71.8 MB/s ∼35%
Huawei P9
72.19 MB/s ∼35% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
188 MB/s ∼91% +162%
OnePlus 3T
165.3 MB/s ∼80% +130%
LG V10
105.3 MB/s ∼51% +47%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra
226.3 MB/s ∼29%
Huawei P9
281.26 MB/s ∼35% +24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
282 MB/s ∼36% +25%
OnePlus 3T
436.43 MB/s ∼55% +93%
LG V10
249.31 MB/s ∼31% +10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra (Chrome 55)
3623.9 ms * ∼6%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
2922.6 ms * ∼5% +19%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
8041.4 ms * ∼14% -122%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼5% +25%
LG V10 (Chrome 47)
4498.8 ms * ∼8% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra (Chrome 55)
10006 Points ∼20%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
11783 Points ∼24% +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
4905 Points ∼10% -51%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼20% -2%
LG V10 (Chrome 47)
8083 Points ∼16% -19%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra (Chrome 55)
54.26 Points ∼0%
Huawei P9 (Chrome 48)
68.4 Points ∼0% +26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL (Chrome 53.0.2785.124)
31.118 Points ∼0% -43%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼0% 0%
LG V10 (Chrome 47)
42 Points ∼0% -23%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 42.2 °C42.5 °C43.5 °C 
 42.4 °C42.6 °C44.2 °C 
 42 °C41.8 °C43.3 °C 
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 42.7 °C
38.3 °C40.9 °C44.1 °C
39.1 °C40.3 °C43 °C
38.6 °C40.2 °C41.5 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6462525.437.53125.338.74032.934.95033.635.76331.639.48028.437.4100272812520.825.81602228.620021.331.225020.837.331521.246.440019.454.450019.56363017.769.180017.977.8100017.882.6125017.379.8160017.478.5200016.779.7250017.278.8315018.278.7400017.977.9500017.676.3630017.777.4800017.876.81000017.970.21250018.162.81600018.254.2SPL3090N1.379.8median 17.9Kodak Ektramedian 70.2Delta1.315.926.128.726.12625.22625.42725.425.829.325.825.226.125.223.123.823.133.430.833.436.13336.135.428.935.434.724.734.743.324.943.349.71949.753.319.153.356.520.456.559.318.159.363.617.563.664.71764.768.815.968.869.114.569.170.713.770.772.614.372.675.813.475.874.213.674.275.513.375.574.312.974.371.812.771.871.81371.872.212.772.266.61366.65512.75584.427.584.456.9156.9median 66.6OnePlus 3Tmedian 14.5median 66.69.83.69.834.429.632.434.42729.531.32728.125.831.728.131.432.22631.445.74539.445.72929.636.22926.324.428.626.325.726.725.425.724.321.621.324.328.923.423.328.939.229.622.539.249.94022.449.957.846.221.357.859.450.218.459.462.452.417.562.466.655.317.566.667.454.817.267.468.853.716.868.871.955.817.371.973.55617.473.575.357.716.675.376.758.817.376.779.36117.679.381.263.517.681.278.160.617.778.174.657.517.474.674.357.117.774.372.85617.972.868.85118.168.860.942.218.160.987.970.529.887.96825.51.368median 68.8Huawei P9median 54.8median 17.7median 68.811.38.11.611.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Kodak Ektra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 2.23 / 2.34 Watt
Load midlight 4.8 / 8.46 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Kodak Ektra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
LG V10
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
17%
18%
2%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.77
17%
0.83
11%
0.61
34%
0.67
28%
Idle Average *
2.23
2.36
-6%
2.11
5%
1.77
21%
1.94
13%
Idle Maximum *
2.34
2.37
-1%
2.12
9%
1.81
23%
2.1
10%
Load Average *
4.8
3.09
36%
3.41
29%
6.67
-39%
6.53
-36%
Load Maximum *
8.46
5.35
37%
5.46
35%
10.98
-30%
9.93
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3
7h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 34min
Kodak Ektra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
LG V10
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
9%
68%
19%
-15%
Reader / Idle
1514
1502
1423
1697
Load
214
206
-4%
352
64%
282
32%
203
-5%
WiFi v1.3
467
569
22%
797
71%
494
6%
353
-24%
H.264
568
905
810
539

Pros

+ 别致而复古的外壳
+ 稳固的机身
+ USB-OTG & USB 3.0
+ 出色的照相应用
+ 出色的声音质量
+ 出色的前置相机
+ 个性化的配件
+ 能够工作的性能

Cons

- 外壳明显发热
- 大面积塑料外壳
- 较短电池续航时间
- 高能耗
- 低亮度低对比度屏幕
- 相对较贵
- 仅有糟糕的主相机
- ... 和糟糕的成像质量
- 无 NFC
- 无指纹识别
In review: Kodak Ektra. Review unit provided by Kodak Germany.
In review: Kodak Ektra. Review unit provided by Kodak Germany.

柯达Ektra在众多产品中有它的一个位置:那些希望他们的设备特立独行并欣赏复古的相机设计的人会喜欢这台手机。皮质相机外壳是一个很合适它的配件。但这台手机在好看之外还有什么优点嘛?它的性能出色,有着一些很有趣的附加软件,坚固的外壳以及相对出色的声音质量。再者,前置相机的成像质量出色。 

但柯达 Ektra并不令人激动。问题在于,其内置的主摄像头相较于同等价位的产品来说缺少亮点功能,甚至都不能拍出值得称赞的照片。屏幕以及电池续航也不能使我们满意。 

一款为摄影而生的智能手机仅配备平庸的摄像头?柯达 Ektra在它最重要的方面犯了错误,同时配备了一块低亮度,低对比度的屏幕,以及不足的电池续航。这个备受尊敬的品牌并不会因此重生。

总之,在这个价格区间中有很多明显更好的选择,其中不乏更具性价比的设备。柯达Ektra只是其品牌的粉丝仅用于快拍的最佳选择。想要一款配备有良好摄像头的手机的用户应该去看看我们关于最佳拍照手机的对比。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里


Kodak Ektra - 01/24/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
41 / 60 → 69%
Weight
91%
Battery
90%
Display
81%
Games Performance
43 / 63 → 68%
Application Performance
50 / 70 → 71%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
59%
Average
72%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 柯达 Ektra 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-02-12 (Update: 2017-02-13)