柯达 Ektra 智能手机简短评测

Name: Kodak Ektra
Brand: Kodak

相机还是手机？ 柯达Ektra的名号打得很响因此也想获得最佳智能手机相机的称号。继续阅读我们得评测来看看它是否能做到，亦或者说这台手机对你是否有价值。

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 02/12/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Kodak Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Kodak Ektra

Processor

Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 10 x 2.3 GHz, Cortex-A72 / A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

Memory

3 GB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, IPS, 大猩猩玻璃, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机接口, Card Reader: 最大128GB micro SD卡槽, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计, 距离传感器, USB-OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (1,3,7,20), bandwidth download and upload: 150 MBit/s and 50 MBit/s (LTE); SAR value: 0.53 W/kg (head); 1.51 W/kg (body), LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.69 x 147.8 x 73.4

Battery

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, MediaTek Pump Express Plus

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 21 MPix f/2.0, 相位自动对焦, OIS, 双LED闪光灯, 录像 @2160p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, 录像 @1080p/30 FPS

Additional features

Speakers: 背部扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 腕带, 充电器, USB 线缆, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

163 g, Power Supply: 47 g

Price

499 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	313 MBit/s +12%
Kodak Ektra Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 32 GB eMMC Flash	280 MBit/s
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	185 MBit/s -34%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31.2 MBit/s -89%
iperf3 receive AX12
Kodak Ektra Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 32 GB eMMC Flash	306 MBit/s
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	279 MBit/s -9%
OnePlus 3T Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	257 MBit/s -16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.9 MBit/s -89%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


376 cd/m²	414 cd/m²	448 cd/m²
397 cd/m²	417 cd/m²	442 cd/m²
420 cd/m²	428 cd/m²	425 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 448 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 418.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 428 cd/m²
Contrast: 652:1 (Black: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.17

	Kodak Ektra IPS, 1920x1080, 5.00	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.20	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50	LG V10 Quantum-IPS, 2560x1440, 5.70
Screen		49%	34%	3%	47%
Brightness middle	417	582 40%	658 58%	421 1%	450 8%
Brightness	419	563 34%	633 51%	430 3%	431 3%
Brightness Distribution	84	91 8%	93 11%	84 0%	93 11%
Black Level *	0.64	0.38 41%	0.66 -3%		0.22 66%
Contrast	652	1532 135%	997 53%		2045 214%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8	4.4 45%	4.9 39%	7.1 11%	5.18 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.9	7.4 43%	9.1 29%	15.3 -19%	10.39 19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	8.6	4.8 44%	5.8 33%	6.8 21%	6.94 19%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.2 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.23 ^99%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	8952 ^73%	6175 ^105%	7840 ^83%	7866 ^83%	8091 ^80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.44

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.6 ms rise
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
63.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 26 ms rise
63.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 37.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	85774 Points
Huawei P9	95743 Points +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points -27%
OnePlus 3T	159866 Points +86%
LG V10	66304 Points -23%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1643 Points
Huawei P9	1755 Points +7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	820 Points -50%
OnePlus 3T	1881 Points +14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	4596 Points
Huawei P9	4904 Points +7%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4042 Points -12%
OnePlus 3T	4236 Points -8%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	15370 Points
Huawei P9	19854 Points +29%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points -9%
OnePlus 3T	30810 Points +100%
LG V10	18585 Points +21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	18300 Points
Huawei P9	21577 Points +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points -26%
OnePlus 3T	34494 Points +88%
LG V10	23276 Points +27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	9851 Points
Huawei P9	15517 Points +58%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points +62%
OnePlus 3T	22426 Points +128%
LG V10	10898 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1266 Points
Huawei P9	1237 Points -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points -33%
OnePlus 3T	2577 Points +104%
LG V10	1332 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1206 Points
Huawei P9	1080 Points -10%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points -40%
OnePlus 3T	3310 Points +174%
LG V10	1361 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1531 Points
Huawei P9	2510 Points +64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points +38%
OnePlus 3T	1452 Points -5%
LG V10	1241 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	825 Points
Huawei P9	974 Points +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	465 Points -44%
OnePlus 3T	2221 Points +169%
LG V10	510 Points -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	739 Points
Huawei P9	829 Points +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	380 Points -49%
OnePlus 3T	2418 Points +227%
LG V10	436 Points -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1387 Points
Huawei P9	2503 Points +80%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2109 Points +52%
OnePlus 3T	1728 Points +25%
LG V10	1267 Points -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	34 fps
Huawei P9	43 fps +26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	21 fps -38%
OnePlus 3T	59 fps +74%
LG V10	25 fps -26%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	31 fps
Huawei P9	40 fps +29%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	23 fps -26%
OnePlus 3T	91 fps +194%
LG V10	35 fps +13%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	17 fps
Huawei P9	19 fps +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.7 fps -43%
OnePlus 3T	45 fps +165%
LG V10	9.4 fps -45%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	17 fps
Huawei P9	18 fps +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	9.9 fps -42%
OnePlus 3T	46 fps +171%
LG V10	15 fps -12%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	10 fps
Huawei P9	11 fps +10%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.1 fps -39%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +220%
LG V10	5.6 fps -44%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	10 fps
Huawei P9	10 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6.2 fps -38%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +220%
LG V10	9.9 fps -1%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	3479 Points
Huawei P9	7058 Points +103%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points +95%
OnePlus 3T	5664 Points +63%
LG V10	4800 Points +38%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1863 Points
Huawei P9	2025 Points +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points -35%
OnePlus 3T	2218 Points +19%
LG V10	1627 Points -13%
System (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	3718 Points
Huawei P9	3930 Points +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points -21%
OnePlus 3T	3130 Points -16%
LG V10	2598 Points -30%
Memory (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1907 Points
Huawei P9	2627 Points +38%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points -45%
OnePlus 3T	1954 Points +2%
LG V10	1527 Points -20%
Graphics (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1648 Points
Huawei P9	1583 Points -4%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points -38%
OnePlus 3T	4444 Points +170%
LG V10	1954 Points +19%
Web (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	1031 Points
Huawei P9	1029 Points 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points -32%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -14%
LG V10	903 Points -12%

Legend

Kodak Ektra Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

LG V10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	226.3 MB/s
Huawei P9	281.3 MB/s +24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	282 MB/s +25%
OnePlus 3T	436.4 MB/s +93%
LG V10	249.3 MB/s +10%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	71.8 MB/s
Huawei P9	72.2 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	188 MB/s +162%
OnePlus 3T	165.3 MB/s +130%
LG V10	105.3 MB/s +47%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	17 MB/s
Huawei P9	39 MB/s +129%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	74 MB/s +335%
OnePlus 3T	123.6 MB/s +627%
LG V10	29.57 MB/s +74%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	7.4 MB/s
Huawei P9	47.45 MB/s +541%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	7.4 MB/s 0%
OnePlus 3T	74.4 MB/s +905%
LG V10	16.55 MB/s +124%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	37.59 MB/s
Huawei P9	55 MB/s +46%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	79.2 MB/s +111%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	23.49 MB/s
Huawei P9	24.83 MB/s +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	50.1 MB/s +113%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	3624 ms *
Huawei P9	2923 ms * +19%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	8041 ms * -122%
OnePlus 3T	2719 ms * +25%
LG V10	4499 ms * -24%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	10006 Points
Huawei P9	11783 Points +18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4905 Points -51%
OnePlus 3T	9798 Points -2%
LG V10	8083 Points -19%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Kodak Ektra	54.3 Points
Huawei P9	68.4 Points +26%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	31.12 Points -43%
OnePlus 3T	54.5 Points 0%
LG V10	42 Points -23%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


42.2 °C	42.5 °C	43.5 °C
42.4 °C	42.6 °C	44.2 °C
42 °C	41.8 °C	43.3 °C

Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 42.7 °C


38.3 °C	40.9 °C	44.1 °C
39.1 °C	40.3 °C	43 °C
38.6 °C	40.2 °C	41.5 °C

Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 40.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Kodak Ektra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.18 Watt
Idle	0.93 / 2.23 / 2.34 Watt
Load	4.8 / 8.46 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Kodak Ektra 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	LG V10 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		17%	18%	2%	-0%
Idle Minimum *	0.93	0.77 17%	0.83 11%	0.61 34%	0.67 28%
Idle Average *	2.23	2.36 -6%	2.11 5%	1.77 21%	1.94 13%
Idle Maximum *	2.34	2.37 -1%	2.12 9%	1.81 23%	2.1 10%
Load Average *	4.8	3.09 36%	3.41 29%	6.67 -39%	6.53 -36%
Load Maximum *	8.46	5.35 37%	5.46 35%	10.98 -30%	9.93 -17%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		7h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 34min

	Kodak Ektra 3000 mAh	Huawei P9 3000 mAh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	LG V10 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		9%	68%	19%	-15%
WiFi v1.3	467	569 22%	797 71%	494 6%	353 -24%
Load	214	206 -4%	352 64%	282 32%	203 -5%
Reader / Idle		1514	1502	1423	1697
H.264		568	905	810	539

Pros

+ 别致而复古的外壳

+ 稳固的机身

+ USB-OTG & USB 3.0

+ 出色的照相应用

+ 出色的声音质量

+ 出色的前置相机

+ 个性化的配件

+ 能够工作的性能

Cons

- 外壳明显发热

- 大面积塑料外壳

- 较短电池续航时间

- 高能耗

- 低亮度低对比度屏幕

- 相对较贵

- 仅有糟糕的主相机

- ... 和糟糕的成像质量

- 无 NFC

- 无指纹识别

In review: Kodak Ektra. Review unit provided by Kodak Germany.

柯达Ektra在众多产品中有它的一个位置：那些希望他们的设备特立独行并欣赏复古的相机设计的人会喜欢这台手机。皮质相机外壳是一个很合适它的配件。但这台手机在好看之外还有什么优点嘛？它的性能出色，有着一些很有趣的附加软件，坚固的外壳以及相对出色的声音质量。再者，前置相机的成像质量出色。

但柯达 Ektra并不令人激动。问题在于，其内置的主摄像头相较于同等价位的产品来说缺少亮点功能，甚至都不能拍出值得称赞的照片。屏幕以及电池续航也不能使我们满意。

一款为摄影而生的智能手机仅配备平庸的摄像头？柯达 Ektra在它最重要的方面犯了错误，同时配备了一块低亮度，低对比度的屏幕，以及不足的电池续航。这个备受尊敬的品牌并不会因此重生。

总之，在这个价格区间中有很多明显更好的选择，其中不乏更具性价比的设备。柯达Ektra只是其品牌的粉丝仅用于快拍的最佳选择。想要一款配备有良好摄像头的手机的用户应该去看看我们关于最佳拍照手机的对比。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Kodak Ektra - 2017-01-24 01/24/2017 v6^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

84%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

41 / 60 → 69%

Weight

91%

Battery

90%

Display

81%

Games Performance

43 / 63 → 68%

Application Performance

50 / 70 → 71%

Temperature

82%

Noise

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Camera

59%

Average

72%

81%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 柯达 Ektra 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2017-02-12 (Update: 2017-02-13)