LG V10 智能手机简短评测
LG V10 (V Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 418, Core: 600 MHz
Memory
4 GB
Display
5.70 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, 电容式触控屏幕，10点触控, 量子 IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 21.95 GB free
Weight
192 g, Power Supply: 78 g
Price
649 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 450 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 430.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.92 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 450 cd/m²
Contrast: 2045:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.18 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.94 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 8091 K
| LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -17% | 18% | -17% | 21% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 450 | 566 26% | 297 -34% | 538 20% | 363 -19% | 335.7 -25% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 431 | 536 24% | 297 -31% | 528 23% | 365 -15% | 332 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 90 -3% | 93 0% | 92 -1% | 90 -3% | 89 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.22 | 0.47 -114% | 0.66 -200% | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 2045 | 1204 -41% | 815 -60% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.18 | 6.17 -19% | 2.67 48% | 2.63 49% | 2.34 55% | 2.33 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.39 | 3.98 62% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.94 | 6.26 10% | 2.81 60% | 3.24 53% | 1.03 85% | 2.15 69% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.48 89% | 2.08 106% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 8091 80% | 8171 80% | 6379 102% | 6906 94% | 6429 101% | 6184 105% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 65.48 | 66.31 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 98.63 | 99.79 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 40 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8170 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench 3.0 | PCMark for Android | Smartbench 2012 | BaseMark OS II | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | Linpack Android / IOS
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Smartbench 2012 | |
| Productivity Index (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Gaming Index (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Linpack Android / IOS | |
| Single Thread (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Multi Thread (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| LG V10 | |
| LG G4 | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.08 / 0.21 Watt |
| Idle |  0.67 / 1.94 / 2.1 Watt |
| Load |
6.53 / 9.93 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| LG V10 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -15% | -8% | 7% | 12% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 28.3 | 27.6 -2% | 18 -36% | 24.1 -15% | 24.3 -14% | 19 -33% |
| H.264 (h) | 9 | 8.4 -7% | 10.2 13% | 8.9 -1% | 6.4 -29% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.9 | 5.4 -8% | 6.2 5% | 6.3 7% | 8.4 42% | 6.7 14% |
| Load (h) | 3.4 | 1.9 -44% | 3 -12% | 4.7 38% | 3.7 9% | 3.7 9% |
Pros
+ 高速处理器
+ 坚固优雅的机身设计
+ 不错的可连接性
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 可更换电池
+ 优秀的相机
+ 快速充电功能
+ 32位 HiFi DAC
+ 快速指纹识别器
+ 节能的第二块屏幕...
Cons
- ...不过功能有限
- 电源适配器功率有限
- 处理器降频问题
- 用户界面拖慢了系统响应速度
- 不支持无线充电
LG的V10是这家韩国生产商推出的又一款出色智能手机，它在配置上和G4非常相近，不过在外观上大相径庭。爱自拍的用户可能会很喜欢它的前置双相机。它的第二块屏幕十分新颖，不过实际用途还没有得到完全挖掘，主要的功能都可以在主屏幕上完成。
V10还搭配了非常优秀的指纹识别器，它隐藏在了机身背面的电源键中。LG还在屏幕上相比G4作出了改进，它搭配了具有超高对比度的出色屏幕。非常优秀的相机也得到了进一步的优化，不过遗憾的是生产商没能进一步完善自动模式。
LG为我们带来了又一款强大的智能手机V10。它的最大缺点在于较高的售价。
是否值得选择这台LG旗舰机还在于个人品味以及预算上。V10的售价相比G4高出了近200欧元（约1429人民币），最近后者的售价有了大幅降低。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
LG V10
- 02/02/2016 v4.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
