对 Cubot KingKong 11 的评价
Cubot KingKong 11 售价合理。它采用了中端 SoC 处理器,电池续航能力不错,屏幕亮度尚可,没有 PWM 功能,但蓝色调较强。
防水机身似乎有点过时,因为它(又一次)采用了棱角分明的工业设计。手感相当不错,但长期使用会很重。
虽然有专门的微距和广角摄像头,但这些摄像头更像是临时解决方案。夜视摄像头效果不错,在某些情况下能提供真正的附加值。
Wi-Fi 的速度不是特别快,在决定购买时还应考虑到缺乏可持续发展的努力和没有任何更新的承诺。
总的来说,Cubot 提供了一款目前的中端手机,它可以防止外界环境的影响和跌落,而且价格不高。不过,购买者必须做出一些妥协。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Cubot KingKong 11 已在Aliexpress 上出售,售价约为 244 美元。.
它很快将在Cubot 在亚马逊上的商店出售。.
规格
外壳和功能 - 坚固耐用,带有第二个屏幕
Cubot KingKong 11 只有一种颜色:黑色,背面为红色。设计棱角分明,螺丝清晰可见。
它的手感还不错,但 419 克的重量并不是一款特别轻的智能手机。不过,它可以在较不舒适的环境中使用,因为它已通过 IP68/IP69K 和 MIL-STD-810H 的测试,因此可以很好地防水、防尘和防跌落到地面。制造商规定其在淡水中的潜水深度可达 5 米。
背面的圆形秒针显示屏是其一大特色。它可以显示时间,通过后置摄像头用作自拍取景器,显示通知或指南针,还可以用作音乐播放器。这是一块触摸屏。
可使用 NFC 进行非接触式支付或身份验证。
SIM 卡插槽可容纳两张 SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡进行内存扩展。后者的数据传输速率与同类手机大致相当。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Oukitel WP35 (Angelbird V60) | |
Doogee Blade 20 Turbo (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cubot KingKong 11 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=65, last 2 years) |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 无 Wi-Fi 火箭
WiFi 5 是无线网络的最快标准,在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 进行的测试中,它显示了相当稳定的传输速率,但在其他方面则相当缓慢。
在移动通信方面,可使用许多国家的所有必要移动频率以及 5G。
屏幕频率高达 120 Hz,对输入的响应非常迅速。触摸屏非常可靠,即使在边角位置也能保持灵敏。机身左侧有一个按键,可以自由分配。
Networking | |
Cubot KingKong 11 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Oukitel WP35 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性 - 更新前景渺茫
Android 15 作为操作系统安装在强大的手机上。安全更新是从 2025 年 6 月开始的,因此在测试时已经有些过时。此外,也没有说明手机将在多长时间内接受软件更新。
包装也使用了塑料,没有明显的可持续发展措施。
摄像头 - 包括夜视摄像头
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light

显示屏 - 可能有蓝色色调
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 586 cd/m²
Contrast: 1628:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.49 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
CCT: 9382 K
Cubot KingKong 11 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Doogee Blade 20 Turbo IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Oukitel WP35 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -14% | -12% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 586 | 475 -19% | 552 -6% | 600 2% |
Brightness | 569 | 441 -22% | 549 -4% | 561 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 94 11% | 89 5% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.43 -19% | 0.42 -17% | 0.57 -58% |
Contrast | 1628 | 1105 -32% | 1314 -19% | 1053 -35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.49 | 7.83 -21% | 7.22 -11% | 5.07 22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.9 | 11.09 -2% | 13.09 -20% | 8.1 26% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8 | 8.3 -4% | 10.1 -26% | 5.7 29% |
Gamma | 2.252 98% | 2.68 82% | 1.785 123% | 2.249 98% |
CCT | 9382 69% | 8806 74% | 9036 72% | 8162 80% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 花小钱办大事
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7020SoC 是专为经济实惠的中端手机设计的,这正是 Cubot KingKong 11 的定位。其他户外智能手机的运行速度通常较慢,但使用要求不高的应用程序通常可以流畅运行。
在图形方面,许多标准都不支持,因此现代手机游戏可能无法运行。
内存速度较快,因此传输数据或加载应用程序所需的时间较短。
机壳上的温度变化适中,但遗憾的是,3DMark 压力测试无法在智能手机上运行。
背面的单声道扬声器音量适中,但听起来高音偏重。连接外部音频设备会更有趣。由于支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器,外接音频设备的运行没有任何问题,而且音质很好。
电池容量为 10,200 毫安时,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,续航时间长达 21:13 小时。这样的续航时间可以让您轻松度过一整天的徒步旅行,如果使用适度,甚至可以在野外使用数天。手机最大充电功率为 33 瓦,充电时间可达 3 小时或更长。
Cubot KingKong 11 | Doogee Blade 20 Turbo | Oukitel WP35 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -20% | -87% | -42% | 1% | 21% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1844.1 | 1873.2 2% | 292 -84% | 488.2 -74% | 1733 ? -6% | 2181 ? 18% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1488.7 | 1250.2 -16% | 149.5 -90% | 501 -66% | 1166 ? -22% | 1791 ? 20% |
Random Read 4KB | 271.1 | 280.9 4% | 61.7 -77% | 212 -22% | 286 ? 5% | 295 ? 9% |
Random Write 4KB | 251 | 72.4 -71% | 9.4 -96% | 240.2 -4% | 314 ? 25% | 342 ? 36% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Cubot KingKong 11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Cubot KingKong 11 10200 mAh | Doogee Blade 20 Turbo 10300 mAh | Oukitel WP35 11000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 4050 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 10% | 30% | -37% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1273 | 1397 10% | 1659 30% | 803 -37% |
Reader / Idle | 1405 | |||
H.264 | 861 | |||
Load | 284 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分

Cubot KingKong 11 是一款经济实惠的户外智能手机,具有与众不同的功能。
不过,如果您正在寻找更新保障和可持续性,这款手机将无法满足您的需求。
Cubot KingKong 11
- 08/18/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cubot KingKong 11 MediaTek Dimensity 7020 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.99 Shantime [2 Pack Tempered Gl... 2. $14.99 BOVUGAC [2 Pack] Screen Prot... 3. $44.90 for Cubot Kingkong 9 Screen ... List Price: 300€ | 419 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 392 PPI IPS | |
Doogee Blade 20 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 7050 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $259.98 List Price: 379€ | 331 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.60" 1612x720 267 PPI IPS | |
Oukitel WP35 MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $37.99 SiuVorZhi LCD Display Compat... 2. $8.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. $8.99 Tzstz For OUKITEL WP35 / OUK... List Price: 285€ | 360 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 6.60" 2408x1080 400 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $7.98 3 Pack Tempered Glass Screen... 3. $7.99 Suttkue for Samsung Galaxy X... List Price: 359€ | 240 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" 2408x1080 400 PPI PLS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.