富士通 Celsius H970 (E3-1535M v6, P4000) 工作站简短评测

Name: Fujitsu Celsius H970
Brand: Fujitsu

强劲处理器，孱弱散热系统。 Celsius H970可能是富士通的最后一款17.3寸工作站设备。这足以成为让生产商全力以赴的原因。不过遗憾的是，富士通在两个方面有所疏忽。请阅读我们的评测了解它们是哪两个地方。

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 07/22/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Workstation Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Business

Test device courtesy of Fujitsu Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu Celsius H970

Processor

Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 4 x 3.1 - 4.2 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1252 MHz, Memory: 1499 MHz, GP104, 376.33, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4-2400, 4个内存槽2个已占用

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel CM238

Storage

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB

, 424 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: 三合一 SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, EM7305, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 418 x 288

Battery

96 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 6行背光键盘搭配数字键盘区, Keyboard Light: yes, 恢复盘，驱动盘, Fujitsu Battery Utility, 微软 Office 试用版, CyberLink YouCam 6, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

3 kg, Power Supply: 999 g

Price

5299 Euro

Links

Fujitsu homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

SCHENKER W706 Dell Precision 7710 Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Fujitsu Celsius H970 MSI WE72 7RJ DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD-card slot, 2x Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-A, DisplayPort, power

Left: Kensington lock, VGA, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, 3.5-mm audio combo, smart-card reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 7710	213 MB/s +52%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE	156 MB/s +11%
Fujitsu Celsius H970	140 MB/s
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	114 MB/s -19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE	216 MB/s +23%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA	210 MB/s +20%
Fujitsu Celsius H970	175.5 MB/s
Dell Precision 7710	142 MB/s -19%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	512 MBit/s +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	504 MBit/s
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	287 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	676 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	667 MBit/s -1%
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168	351 MBit/s -48%


360 cd/m²	364 cd/m²	360 cd/m²
354 cd/m²	368 cd/m²	362 cd/m²
344 cd/m²	379 cd/m²	350 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LP173WF4-SPF3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 379 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 360.1 cd/m² Minimum: 37.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 373 cd/m²
Contrast: 1227:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.02

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 LP173WF4-SPF3, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE LEN4123, VVX17P051J00, , 3840x2160, 17.30	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA SDC3854, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Dell Precision 7710 SDC8151, VHN17_173HL, , 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI WE72 7RJ LP173WF4-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER W706 LP173WF4-SPD1, LGD046C, , 1920x1080, 17.30
Display			9%	9%	1%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	66.8		67.3 1%	66.6 0%	67.4 1%	66.2 -1%
sRGB Coverage	84.6		95.9 13%	96.9 15%	85.3 1%	84.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.8		69 12%	68.6 11%	62.4 1%	61.5 0%
Response Times		-6%	-33%	-46%	-21%	-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32 ?(14.8, 17.2)	39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8) -23%	50.4 ?(17.2, 33.2) -58%	50 ?(17, 33) -56%	45.2 ?(27.2, 18) -41%	44 ?(17.2, 26.8) -38%
Response Time Black / White *	26.4 ?(14.8, 11.6)	23.2 ?(11.6, 11.6) 12%	28.4 ?(7.2, 21.2) -8%	36 ?(11, 25) -36%	26.4 ?(14.8, 11.6) -0%	29.2 ?(8.4, 20.8) -11%
PWM Frequency		1412 ?(90)	200 ?(40)	198 ?(25)
Screen		23%	18%	7%	-6%	-5%
Brightness middle	368	358 -3%	252 -32%	332 -10%	302 -18%	356 -3%
Brightness	360	338 -6%	243 -32%	307 -15%	306 -15%	331 -8%
Brightness Distribution	91	83 -9%	86 -5%	83 -9%	93 2%	86 -5%
Black Level *	0.3	0.31 -3%	0.21 30%	0.33 -10%	0.31 -3%	0.48 -60%
Contrast	1227	1155 -6%	1200 -2%	1006 -18%	974 -21%	742 -40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.4	2.1 67%	2.2 66%	3 53%	6.2 3%	4.64 27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.1	3.6 64%	3.8 62%		10.6 -5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.2	2 72%	2.7 62%	4 44%	7.3 -1%	3.65 49%
Gamma	2.02 ^109%	2.16 ^102%	2.28 ^96%	2 ^110%	2.08 ^106%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	6882 ^94%	6216 ^105%	6686 ^97%	7089 ^92%	7020 ^93%	6393 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.5	77 39%	62 12%	62 12%	56 1%	55 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84.4	99.97 18%	96 14%	97 15%	85.2 1%	84 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		9% / 19%	-2% / 9%	-10% / -0%	-9% / -6%	-10% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	171 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Core i7-7820HQ	166 Points -3%
Dell Precision 7710 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	162 Points -5%
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points -6%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	156 Points -9%
SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700	117 Points -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Intel Core i7-7820HQ	762 Points +13%
Dell Precision 7710 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	746 Points +11%
SCHENKER W706 Intel Core i7-6700	743 Points +10%
MSI WE72 7RJ Intel Core i7-7700HQ	743 Points +10%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	742 Points +10%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	675 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6831

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20729

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6426

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6832 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

28617 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

8325 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

105.6 fps

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

107.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

675 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

171 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Precision 7710 FirePro W7170M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5417 Points +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5277 Points
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Quadro M3000M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5271 Points 0%
SCHENKER W706 Quadro M5000M, 6700, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5151 Points -2%
MSI WE72 7RJ Quadro M2200, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	5150 Points -2%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	7135 Points
SCHENKER W706 Quadro M5000M, 6700, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	6772 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Quadro P3000, i7-7820HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	6402 Points -10%
Dell Precision 7710 FirePro W7170M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5668 Points -21%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Quadro M3000M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4564 Points -36%

PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		7135 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5277 points
PCMark 10 Score		5041 points
Help

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI WE72 7RJ Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Dell Precision 7710 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	SCHENKER W706 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD		-15%	18%	14%	-7%	-2%
Seq Read	2726	1596 -41%	2586 -5%	2447 -10%	1886 -31%	1915 -30%
Seq Write	1609	703 -56%	1441 -10%	1596 -1%	626 -61%	1511 -6%
4K Read	38.88	51.1 31%	53 36%	53.3 37%	51 31%	49.71 28%
4K Write	78.1	148.2 90%	148.1 90%	144.1 85%	179 129%	146.2 87%
4K-64 Read	1246	1037 -17%	1517 22%	1362 9%	1064 -15%	1115 -11%
4K-64 Write	971	230.4 -76%	826 -15%	740 -24%	275 -72%	375 -61%
Score Total	3509	2302 -34%	3831 9%	3517 0%	2435 -31%	2712 -23%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e

Sequential Read: 1821 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1622 MB/s

512K Read: 395.5 MB/s

512K Write: 1258 MB/s

4K Read: 42.86 MB/s

4K Write: 87.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 590 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 522 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	15433 Points
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	12015 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	11162 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	10259 Points -34%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	9708 Points -37%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	8313 Points -46%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7319 Points -53%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	65687 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	61574 Points +14%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	53834 Points
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	50666 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	49204 Points -9%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	43124 Points -20%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	37841 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	12259 Points
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	9368 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	9022 Points -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	7723 Points -37%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	6935 Points -43%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	6658 Points -46%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	5869 Points -52%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	117.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	107.3 fps -8%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	105 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	97.1 fps -17%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	85.3 fps -27%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	84.8 fps -28%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	73 fps -38%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	127.8 fps +54%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	88 fps +6%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	83.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	73.3 fps -12%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	65.8 fps -21%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	63 fps -24%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	58.1 fps -30%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	67.2 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	54 fps -20%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	44 fps -35%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	43.81 fps -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	40.33 fps -40%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	37 fps -45%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	32.77 fps -51%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	39.4 fps
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	33 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	29.32 fps -26%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	27 fps -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	26.06 fps -34%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	22.34 fps -43%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	20.34 fps -48%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	77.9 fps
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	73 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	64.6 fps -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	64 fps -18%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	50.4 fps -35%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	46.94 fps -40%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	46 fps -41%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	10.29 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	7.6 fps -26%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	7.4 fps -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	6.04 fps -41%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	4.85 fps -53%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4.28 fps -58%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	3.17 fps -69%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	97.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	85.6 fps -12%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	82 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	78.4 fps -19%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	68.5 fps -29%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	64.8 fps -33%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	50 fps -49%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	115.2 fps
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	99 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	92.3 fps -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	88.1 fps -24%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	77.9 fps -32%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	73.2 fps -36%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	58 fps -50%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	93.6 fps

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1847 Samples/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	1824 Samples/s -1%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	1324 Samples/s -28%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	1288 Samples/s -30%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1204 Samples/s -35%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	782 Samples/s -58%
Sala GPUs-only
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	3564 Samples/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	3386 Samples/s -5%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA NVIDIA Quadro M3000M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	2288 Samples/s -36%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	2167 Samples/s -39%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	2086 Samples/s -41%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	1412 Samples/s -60%

ComputeMark v2.1 - 1024x600 Normal, Score
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	8609 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	6501 Points -24%
SCHENKER W706 NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Intel Core i7-6700	6291 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P70-20ER000XUS NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5	5686 Points -34%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	4332 Points -50%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	925 Points -89%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	209.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	165.8 fps -21%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	110.7 fps -47%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	60 fps 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	60 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	41.8 fps -30%

3DMark Vantage - 1280x1024 P Result
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	36260 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE NVIDIA Quadro P3000, Intel Core i7-7820HQ	33390 Points -8%
Dell Precision 7710 AMD FirePro W7170M, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5	26345 Points -27%
MSI WE72 7RJ NVIDIA Quadro M2200, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	24622 Points -32%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		29155 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		36260 points
3DMark 11 Performance		12346 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		68394 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		18726 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		10158 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		5526 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3825 points
Help

... in comparison

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	84.6 fps +29%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	65.5 fps
SCHENKER XMG P507 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	59.1 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE Quadro P3000, i7-7820HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	50.3 fps -23%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	39.7 fps -39%
MSI WE72 7RJ Quadro M2200, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	34.4 fps -47%
HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Quadro M3000M, E3-1535M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	33.4 fps -49%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	196.9	174.4	162.4	96
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	67.6	61.1	59.7	44.94
Total War: Rome II (2013)	236.7	184.1	151.4	63.3
GRID: Autosport (2014)	153.8	106.3	96.9	84.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)	159.7	113.6	77.2	41.09
Star Wars Battlefront (2015)	122.5	116.4	89.2	85.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	115.9	103.2	76.8	65.5
Doom (2016)	119.5	112.4	91	87.1
Civilization VI (2016)	66.7	55.2	45.13	43.7
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	70.3	61.6	58.8	54

Noise Level

Idle		30.2 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB(A)
Load		47.3 / 47.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


38 °C	39.9 °C	41.4 °C
32.7 °C	36.1 °C	35 °C
25.4 °C	26.6 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 33.5 °C


42.4 °C	48.7 °C	40.8 °C
43.3 °C	39.9 °C	32.9 °C
28.5 °C	26.7 °C	29.7 °C

Maximum: 48.7 °C
Average: 37 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.5 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+1.2 °C / 2.1 F).

Fujitsu Celsius H970 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.66 / 1.1 Watt
Idle	10.7 / 15.8 / 17.8 Watt
Load	92 / 137 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER W706 6700, Quadro M5000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE i7-7820HQ, Quadro P3000, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Power Consumption		6%	-29%	-17%	-74%	0%
Idle Minimum *	10.7	6.7 37%	6.04 44%	15 -40%	25.9 -142%	7.44 30%
Idle Average *	15.8	12.5 21%	15.2 4%	20.1 -27%	31 -96%	18 -14%
Idle Maximum *	17.8	13.2 26%	42.3 -138%	23.8 -34%	31.9 -79%	21.8 -22%
Load Average *	92	128.2 -39%	112.8 -23%	85.6 7%	104.7 -14%	77.1 16%
Load Maximum *	137	158.9 -16%	182.2 -33%	128 7%	193 -41%	150.5 -10%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 42min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 14min

	Fujitsu Celsius H970 E3-1535M v6, Quadro P4000, 96 Wh	HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, 96 Wh	Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, 72 Wh	MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, 51 Wh	SCHENKER W706 6700, Quadro M5000M, 82 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P71-20HK0004GE i7-7820HQ, Quadro P3000, 96 Wh
Battery Runtime		-13%	-23%	-63%	-48%	-17%
Reader / Idle	1002	956 -5%	775 -23%	268 -73%	205 -80%	872 -13%
H.264	573	299 -48%	283 -51%	181 -68%	151 -74%	517 -10%
WiFi v1.3	542	290 -46%	365 -33%	177 -67%	177 -67%	358 -34%
Load	74	110 49%	85 15%	42 -43%	96 30%	66 -11%

Pros

+ 高屏幕亮度

+ 非常优秀的电池续航

+ 易于维护

+ 高效的显卡散热

Cons

- 处理器在日常使用中有降频问题

- 处理器风扇很吵

- 键盘坚固度差

- 无宽色域覆盖4K屏幕选项

In review: Fujitsu Celsius H970, provided by Fujitsu

在工作站市场上取得成功并不容易。只有很少的几家生产商拥有足够的经验和口碑，可以在这个“尊贵”的笔记本类型中一展身手。富士通也希望成为这些生产商的其中之一——至少到现在为止。不过，富士通Celsius H970并不能让我们满意。富士通带来了一款在一些方面非常优秀的移动工作站，但它在其他一些方面却很弱。它的优势包括电池续航，对于一台工作站笔记本电脑来说十分出色。它证明了搭配最新的高能效处理器架构，即使是四核处理器也不一定需要在电池续航上作出牺牲。它的屏幕亮度也十分优秀，和电池续航一样在同类设备中Celsius数一数二。它的显卡性能也属于顶级，这也要归功于它有效的显卡散热系统。最后，我们还需要提到的是它的另一个优势，出色的可维护性。唯一的遗憾是用户需要使用特别的连接线才可以加装2.5寸硬盘。

电池续航和屏幕亮度——这些是一台由于重量和体积大部分时间会固定在桌面上使用的设备所必需的特质吗？大概不是！遗憾的是，富士通在更重要的方面有所失误，比如处理器散热系统。尽管它的显卡散热表现出色，但处理器散热却让人担忧。它搭配的散热系统显然严重无法满足需要。这让它在使用中非常吵，因为处理器风扇需要开足马力才能保持芯片温度不会过高。尽管如此，它还是会遇到过热降频的情况。这在对系统压力较小的Cinebench测试中就已经露出征兆，因此即使是在日常使用中Celsius也很难完全发挥它搭载处理器的全部性能。从这方面来看，本应是最快Kaby Lake架构处理器的昂贵的至强 E3-1535M V6，在我们的对比中竟然是最慢的。不仅如此，不够稳固的键盘是富士通犯下的另一个错误。尽管它的屏幕十分明亮，但色彩并不出众，甚至无法完全覆盖sRGB色域。富士通也没有提供一块色域覆盖和分辨率更高的屏幕供用户选择。

不及格：尽管富士通的Celsius H970有它的优势，但严重不足的处理器散热系统让它无法成为一台称职的移动工作站。

由于这些问题，Celsius将在和ThinkPad P71，ZBook 17 G3或Precision 7710等各占胜场的对手竞争时遇到很大困难。它仅剩的优势是最新架构的高性能专业显卡。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Fujitsu Celsius H970 - 2017-07-07 07/07/2017 v6^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

84 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

76%

Pointing Device

85%

Connectivity

74 / 81 → 91%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 83%

Battery

91%

Display

86%

Games Performance

93%

Application Performance

91%

Temperature

91 / 95 → 95%

Noise

67 / 90 → 74%

Audio

50%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

78%

86%

Workstation - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 富士通 Celsius H970 (E3-1535M v6, P4000) 工作站简短评测

Benjamin Herzig, 2017-07-22 (Update: 2017-07-22)