中兴 Blade A510 智能手机简短评测

Name: ZTE Blade A510
Brand: ZTE

低价位高品质拍照手机？ 中国生产商中兴的最新入门级智能手机Blade A510主攻高性价比市场，适合需要高品质拍照／录像的用户。它的1300万前置相机究竟效果如何，作为低价位设备它的整体表现又如何，请阅读我们的评测了解更多。

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 03/26/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Android Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

ZTE Blade A510 (Blade Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6735P 4 x 1 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720

Memory

1024 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式，多点触控, LCD, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB

, 3 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 卡 (最高 32GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器，近距感应器，环境光感应器，霍尔感应器, WiFi Direct, LED状态灯

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G 850/900/1800/1900 3G 900/2100 4G B1/B3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 143 x 70

Battery

2200 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 25 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 12 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 395 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 620 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 相变自动对焦，拍摄模式：曝光度／场景模式／色彩效果，连拍／面部识别／防抖，拍摄尺寸设定／白平衡
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 单通道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 手机（包括电池），立体声耳机，电源适配器，USB数据线，快速开始说明, ZTE UI, 24 Months Warranty, 头部电磁辐射值：0.416 W/Kg, fanless

Weight

130 g, Power Supply: 38 g

Price

129 Euro

Links

ZTE homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s +808%
ZTE Blade A510 Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash	47.9 MBit/s
Blackview A8 Max Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.5 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s +957%
ZTE Blade A510 Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s
Blackview A8 Max Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	34.3 MBit/s -30%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	73.1 MBit/s
Huawei Y5 II Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52.9 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.5 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	88.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s
Huawei Y5 II Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.3 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 MBit/s

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


523 cd/m²	538 cd/m²	534 cd/m²
516 cd/m²	528 cd/m²	521 cd/m²
517 cd/m²	505 cd/m²	537 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 538 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 524.3 cd/m² Minimum: 14.85 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 528 cd/m²
Contrast: 852:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 1.99
CCT: 6631 K

	ZTE Blade A510 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Blackview A8 Max IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Huawei Y5 II IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Screen		-11%	-14%	-29%	-19%	-29%	-35%	-1%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	528	312 -41%	508 -4%	312 -41%	344 -35%	435 -18%	465 -12%	402 -24%
Brightness (cd/m²)	524	302 -42%	491 -6%	315 -40%	349 -33%	407 -22%	443 -15%	408 -22%
Brightness Distribution (%)	94	79 -16%	89 -5%	87 -7%	89 -5%	86 -9%	90 -4%	85 -10%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.62	0.15 76%	0.58 6%	0.56 10%	0.65 -5%	1.08 -74%	0.84 -35%
Contrast (:1)	852	2080 144%	876 3%	557 -35%	529 -38%	403 -53%	554 -35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.2	8.2 -58%	7 -35%	6.8 -31%	5.8 -12%	5.7 -10%	7.8 -50%	4 23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.7	16.5 -90%	14.1 -62%	14 -61%	10.7 -23%	12.3 -41%	15.7 -80%	10.1 -16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.7	9.2 -61%	6.1 -7%	7.1 -25%	5.7 -0%	5.9 -4%	8.4 -47%	3.2 44%
Gamma	1.99 ^111%	2.29 ^96%	2.15 ^102%	2.77 ^79%	2.1 ^105%	2.18 ^101%	2.07 ^106%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6631 ^98%	9017 ^72%	8068 ^81%	7402 ^88%	7792 ^83%	8164 ^80%	8438 ^77%	7037 ^92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
636 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 476 ms rise
636 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 160 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	16.5 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.62 MB/s -24%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.89 MB/s +14%
Ulefone Metal	27.6 MB/s +67%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	15.58 MB/s -6%
Blackview A8 Max	18.5 MB/s +12%
Huawei Y5 II	18.03 MB/s +9%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	25.55 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	22.77 MB/s -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5	39.11 MB/s +53%
Ulefone Metal	49.6 MB/s +94%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	31.85 MB/s +25%
Blackview A8 Max	35.94 MB/s +41%
Huawei Y5 II	29.47 MB/s +15%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	4.69 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.26 MB/s +76%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.85 MB/s +46%
Ulefone Metal	7.87 MB/s +68%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.35 MB/s -7%
Blackview A8 Max	5.65 MB/s +20%
Huawei Y5 II	6 MB/s +28%
Google Pixel XL 2016	14.56 MB/s +210%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	14.03 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	18.24 MB/s +30%
TP-Link Neffos C5	17.16 MB/s +22%
Ulefone Metal	22.18 MB/s +58%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	14.31 MB/s +2%
Blackview A8 Max	16.15 MB/s +15%
Huawei Y5 II	27.3 MB/s +95%
Google Pixel XL 2016	87.7 MB/s +525%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	9.94 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	70.3 MB/s +607%
TP-Link Neffos C5	52.4 MB/s +427%
Ulefone Metal	39.91 MB/s +302%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	7.56 MB/s -24%
Blackview A8 Max	47.25 MB/s +375%
Huawei Y5 II	21.6 MB/s +117%
Google Pixel XL 2016	83.4 MB/s +739%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	111.9 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	187.3 MB/s +67%
TP-Link Neffos C5	145.8 MB/s +30%
Ulefone Metal	228.8 MB/s +104%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	125.4 MB/s +12%
Blackview A8 Max	141.8 MB/s +27%
Huawei Y5 II	173.3 MB/s +55%
Google Pixel XL 2016	258.2 MB/s +131%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	24338 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	23822 Points -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5	32681 Points +34%
Ulefone Metal	37103 Points +52%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	23657 Points -3%
Blackview A8 Max	30916 Points +27%
Huawei Y5 II	23795 Points -2%
Google Pixel XL 2016	138641 Points +470%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	429 Points
Ulefone Metal	609 Points +42%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	428 Points 0%
Blackview A8 Max	589 Points +37%
Huawei Y5 II	561 Points +31%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1513 Points +253%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	1195 Points
Ulefone Metal	2458 Points +106%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1206 Points +1%
Blackview A8 Max	1525 Points +28%
Huawei Y5 II	1573 Points +32%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4167 Points +249%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	3109 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3070 Points -1%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4906 Points +58%
Ulefone Metal	7059 Points +127%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3103 Points 0%
Blackview A8 Max	3809 Points +23%
Huawei Y5 II	Points -100%
Google Pixel XL 2016	27766 Points +793%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	2682 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2645 Points -1%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4223 Points +57%
Ulefone Metal	6469 Points +141%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2681 Points 0%
Blackview A8 Max	3284 Points +22%
Huawei Y5 II	Points -100%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32652 Points +1117%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	7025 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	7026 Points 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5	9291 Points +32%
Ulefone Metal	10371 Points +48%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	6902 Points -2%
Blackview A8 Max	8646 Points +23%
Huawei Y5 II	Points -100%
Google Pixel XL 2016	18222 Points +159%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	124 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	203 Points
Ulefone Metal	293 Points
Blackview A8 Max	158 Points
Huawei Y5 II	Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	3180 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	101 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	167 Points
Ulefone Metal	243 Points
Blackview A8 Max	129 Points
Huawei Y5 II	Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	3935 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	618 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	810 Points
Ulefone Metal	1057 Points
Blackview A8 Max	727 Points
Huawei Y5 II	Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	1902 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	81 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	125 Points
Ulefone Metal	195 Points
Blackview A8 Max	102 Points
Huawei Y5 II	Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2560 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	65 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	101 Points
Ulefone Metal	158 Points
Blackview A8 Max	82 Points
Huawei Y5 II	Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2820 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	609 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	796 Points
Ulefone Metal	1084 Points
Blackview A8 Max	728 Points
Huawei Y5 II	Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	1935 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	8.5 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.2 fps -4%
TP-Link Neffos C5	8.3 fps -2%
Ulefone Metal	12 fps +41%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.9 fps -42%
Blackview A8 Max	10 fps +18%
Huawei Y5 II	15 fps +76%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55 fps +547%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	4.9 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	4.9 fps 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5	14 fps +186%
Ulefone Metal	19 fps +288%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	8.7 fps +78%
Blackview A8 Max	6 fps +22%
Huawei Y5 II	8.4 fps +71%
Google Pixel XL 2016	91 fps +1757%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	3.5 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.8 fps -49%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2.8 fps -20%
Ulefone Metal	6.4 fps +83%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -66%
Blackview A8 Max	4.5 fps +29%
Huawei Y5 II	6.1 fps +74%
Google Pixel XL 2016	30 fps +757%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3.4 fps
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.1 fps
Ulefone Metal	2.9 fps
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3.6 fps
Blackview A8 Max	2.2 fps
Huawei Y5 II	fps
Google Pixel XL 2016	48 fps

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	2.5 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.2 fps -52%
Ulefone Metal	4.5 fps +80%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -52%
Blackview A8 Max	3.2 fps +28%
Huawei Y5 II	fps -100%
Google Pixel XL 2016	17 fps +580%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	1.1 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2.5 fps +127%
Ulefone Metal	8.9 fps +709%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2.7 fps +145%
Blackview A8 Max	1.4 fps +27%
Huawei Y5 II	fps -100%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32 fps +2809%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	2675 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	3443 Points +29%
Ulefone Metal	4079 Points +52%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2807 Points +5%
Blackview A8 Max	3427 Points +28%
Huawei Y5 II	3237 Points +21%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4739 Points +77%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	141 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	448 Points +218%
TP-Link Neffos C5	683 Points +384%
Ulefone Metal	273 Points +94%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	148 Points +5%
Blackview A8 Max	201 Points +43%
Huawei Y5 II	183 Points +30%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2378 Points +1587%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	829 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	801 Points -3%
TP-Link Neffos C5	1199 Points +45%
Ulefone Metal	1691 Points +104%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	838 Points +1%
Blackview A8 Max	1125 Points +36%
Huawei Y5 II	1094 Points +32%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3889 Points +369%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	285 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	487 Points +71%
TP-Link Neffos C5	991 Points +248%
Ulefone Metal	802 Points +181%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	354 Points +24%
Blackview A8 Max	733 Points +157%
Huawei Y5 II	375 Points +32%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1677 Points +488%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	174 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	174 Points 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5	281 Points +61%
Ulefone Metal	433 Points +149%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	175 Points +1%
Blackview A8 Max	211 Points +21%
Huawei Y5 II	283 Points +63%
Google Pixel XL 2016	5017 Points +2783%
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	10 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	592 Points +5820%
TP-Link Neffos C5	638 Points +6280%
Ulefone Metal	10 Points 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	9 Points -10%
Blackview A8 Max	9 Points -10%
Huawei Y5 II	10 Points 0%
Google Pixel XL 2016	977 Points +9670%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	17364 ms *
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	19234 ms * -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5	12783 ms * +26%
Ulefone Metal	13397 ms * +23%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	19092 ms * -10%
Blackview A8 Max	13643 ms * +21%
Huawei Y5 II	12505 ms * +28%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2654 ms * +85%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	2102 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1910 Points -9%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2738 Points +30%
Ulefone Metal	2738 Points +30%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2122 Points +1%
Blackview A8 Max	2607 Points +24%
Huawei Y5 II	2707 Points +29%
Google Pixel XL 2016	8690 Points +313%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510	12.78 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.73 Points 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.21 Points +42%
Ulefone Metal	17.83 Points +40%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	12.76 Points 0%
Blackview A8 Max	17.19 Points +35%
Huawei Y5 II	18.47 Points +45%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55.4 Points +333%

Legend

ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


35.3 °C	36 °C	35 °C
35.6 °C	35.3 °C	37.4 °C
34.7 °C	35 °C	35.4 °C

Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 35.5 °C


33.3 °C	33.3 °C	35.5 °C
33.3 °C	33.1 °C	36.1 °C
32.7 °C	33.4 °C	35.3 °C

Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 34 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.11 Watt
Idle	0.61 / 1.75 / 1.83 Watt
Load	4.49 / 5.14 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh	Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh
Power Consumption		20%	-18%	-56%	6%	-11%	13%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.61	0.63 -3%	0.72 -18%	1.41 -131%	0.59 3%	0.74 -21%	0.54 11%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.75	1.37 22%	1.87 -7%	2.46 -41%	1.68 4%	1.97 -13%	1.58 10%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.83	1.71 7%	2 -9%	2.83 -55%	1.79 2%	2.09 -14%	1.7 7%
Load Average * (Watt)	4.49	2.82 37%	5.99 -33%	5.15 -15%	4.22 6%	4.89 -9%	2.98 34%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	5.14	3.36 35%	6.45 -25%	7.05 -37%	4.26 17%	5.09 1%	4.98 3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		6h 56min

	ZTE Blade A510 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh	Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	6.9	8.6 25%	7.6 10%	6.7 -3%	6.4 -7%	8.4 22%	8.4 22%

Pros

+ IPS屏幕面板

+ 屏幕最高亮度

+ 相对低的色彩偏差

+ 零售价

+ 低发热量

+ 非常优秀的通话音质

Cons

- 性能

- 1GB工作内存

- 迟缓的8GB闪存

- 扬声器

In review: ZTE Blade A510. Review sample courtesy of notebookbilliger.de.

来自中国生产商中兴的Blade A510毋庸置疑是一台性价比十分优秀的入门级智能手机。它的IPS屏幕明亮且均匀，在这个价位上对比度也十分优秀。在我们的测试中它的色彩还原能力也可以让人满意。另外，中兴的这台设备通话音质优秀，相机模组表现也在同价位设备中属于佼佼者。它的电池续航也可以令人满意。

十分不错的Blade A510唯一的弱点是性能上的不足，它可能会实现不错的销售额。

Blade A510的最大一个弱点是较低的系统性能，这也是我们不能完全向消费者推荐这台设备的原因所在。这块MediaTek芯片的低性能搭配1GB工作内存，和缓慢的eMMC闪存让它的系统运行时常缓慢不堪，加载应用的等待时间也相对过长。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

ZTE Blade A510 - 03/06/2017 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

37 / 60 → 62%

Weight

94%

Battery

89%

Display

83%

Games Performance

5 / 63 → 7%

Application Performance

19 / 70 → 28%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

59 / 91 → 65%

Camera

60%

Average

67%

78%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 中兴 Blade A510 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2017-03-26 (Update: 2017-03-26)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison