Notebookcheck

中兴 Blade V8 智能手机简短评测

Niklas Böhm (translated by Delta Zhang), 05/14/2017
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

大中端。 来自中国的生产商ZTE靠着blade V8进入了下一轮低价之王的争夺中。以当前汇率下269欧元的价格,新设备听起来像一个便宜货并且它的技术参数能让人心跳加速。这种喜悦是否可以在测试过程中保持。

ZTE Blade V8 (Blade Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4 GHz
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 505, Core: 450 MHz
Memory
3072 MB 
, 2GB 或 3GB
Display
5.2 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 424 PPI, 电容屏, IPS, 五点触控屏, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.25 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm 接口, Card Reader: 最大256G microSD 卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 前置指纹识别, 加速度计, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 罗盘, micro-USB
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM, HSPA, LTE, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 148 x 72
Battery
2730 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 19 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 19 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 450 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 450 h
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13M AF +2M FF 附带闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 支持杜比音效的扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 充电器和充电线, 耳机, SIM 卡工具, 快速入门指南, 保修卡, MiFavor 4.2, 24 Months Warranty, micro-USB SAR rates: body: 1.500 W/kg at 5 mm distance head: 0.374 W/kg at 5 mm distance, fanless
Weight
142 g, Power Supply: 45 g
Price
230 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.6 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.5 MBit/s ∼100%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
52.7 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
57.9 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.9 MBit/s ∼95% +3%
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
53.2 MBit/s ∼92%
Bokeh photo
Bokeh photo
Bokeh photo
Bokeh photo

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
393
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 496 cd/m² Average: 448.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15.89 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 482 cd/m²
Contrast: 753:1 (Black: 0.64 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.13
ZTE Blade V8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-10%
-5%
-43%
-46%
Brightness
448
468
4%
540
21%
335
-25%
411
-8%
Brightness Distribution
79
88
11%
94
19%
94
19%
96
22%
Black Level *
0.64
0.74
-16%
0.57
11%
0.38
41%
Contrast
753
682
-9%
960
27%
1076
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
4.1
-3%
5.1
-28%
6.3
-58%
9.4
-135%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
4.9
-44%
6.2
-82%
7.1
-109%
11.6
-241%
Gamma
2.13 113%
2.5 96%
2.09 115%
2.25 107%
2.25 107%
CCT
6774 96%
7116 91%
6546 99%
7637 85%
9597 68%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 5435 Hz1 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 5435 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 1 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 5435 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4396 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.4 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
45868 Points ∼20%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points ∼22% +10%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼25% +24%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
46968 Points ∼21% +2%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼16% -19%
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points ∼19% -3%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
2308 Points ∼9%
Honor 6X
3341 Points ∼12% +45%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2092 Points ∼8% -9%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2085 Points ∼8% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
577 Points ∼11%
Honor 6X
788 Points ∼14% +37%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
698 Points ∼13% +21%
Wiko U Feel Prime
644 Points ∼12% +12%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
1214 Points ∼40%
Huawei P9 Lite
1370 Points ∼46% +13%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼48% +19%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1121 Points ∼37% -8%
ZTE Blade V7
914 Points ∼30% -25%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points ∼34% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
263 Points ∼5%
Huawei P9 Lite
305 Points ∼6% +16%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼6% +21%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
327 Points ∼6% +24%
ZTE Blade V7
159 Points ∼3% -40%
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points ∼5% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
318 Points ∼8%
Huawei P9 Lite
369 Points ∼10% +16%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼10% +21%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
388 Points ∼10% +22%
ZTE Blade V7
195 Points ∼5% -39%
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points ∼8% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
1127 Points ∼39%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points ∼47% +22%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼49% +27%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1102 Points ∼38% -2%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼32% -16%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points ∼38% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
542 Points ∼7%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points ∼6% -13%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼6% -14%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
606 Points ∼8% +12%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼3% -55%
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points ∼7% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
613 Points ∼12%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points ∼11% -10%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼11% -10%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
673 Points ∼14% +10%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼6% -52%
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points ∼12% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
8905 Points ∼13%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points ∼20% +54%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼20% +52%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼20% +52%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9670 Points ∼14% +9%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼15% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
10271 Points ∼2%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points ∼2% +10%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +11%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼2% +11%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9913 Points ∼2% -3%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
9932 Points ∼5%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points ∼6% +18%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +19%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼6% +19%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
9858 Points ∼5% -1%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼3% -32%
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points ∼5% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
11 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼1% +73%
Honor 6X
18 fps ∼1% +64%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
17 fps ∼1% +55%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼1% +9%
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps ∼1% +55%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
9.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps ∼4% +96%
Honor 6X
19 fps ∼4% +96%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
18 fps ∼4% +86%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼3% +24%
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps ∼3% +65%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4.6 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps ∼1% +70%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps ∼1% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
6.7 fps ∼1% +46%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -2%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps ∼1% +54%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4.5 fps ∼2%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼4% +87%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps ∼4% +89%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
7 fps ∼3% +56%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼2% 0%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps ∼3% +67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
2.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps ∼1% +88%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps ∼1% +4%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
4.2 fps ∼1% +75%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼1% +21%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps ∼1% +83%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4.9 fps ∼3%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps ∼3% 0%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps ∼3% 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
4.5 fps ∼3% -8%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼2% -41%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps ∼3% -2%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
4978 Points ∼60%
Huawei P9 Lite
5339 Points ∼64% +7%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼53% -12%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
3663 Points ∼44% -26%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼48% -21%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points ∼40% -33%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
744 Points ∼48%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points ∼50% +3%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼47% -3%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
10 Points ∼1% -99%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
787 Points ∼9%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points ∼10% +4%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼10% +4%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
827 Points ∼10% +5%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼5% -45%
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points ∼9% -6%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
812 Points ∼19%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points ∼31% +66%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼42% +119%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1052 Points ∼25% +30%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼18% -3%
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points ∼18% -5%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
1562 Points ∼24%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points ∼37% +56%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼41% +74%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
1379 Points ∼21% -12%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼18% -24%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points ∼19% -18%
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
928 Points ∼25%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points ∼32% +29%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼35% +40%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
328 Points ∼9% -65%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼7% -73%
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points ∼8% -69%

Legend

 
ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
29.03 Points ∼100% +66%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
26.464 Points ∼91% +51%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini (Chrome 45)
23 Points ∼79% +31%
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
21.4 Points ∼74% +22%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
18.19 Points ∼63% +4%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
17.524 Points ∼60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
13761.1 ms * ∼100% -12%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
12297.4 ms * ∼89%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini (Chrome 45)
11109.2 ms * ∼81% +10%
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
10826 ms * ∼79% +12%
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
9396.5 ms * ∼68% +24%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9373.3 ms * ∼68% +24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Lite (Chrome 50.0.2661.89)
4756 Points ∼100% +68%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
4199 Points ∼88% +49%
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
3383 Points ∼71% +20%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini (Chrome 45)
3371 Points ∼71% +19%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
2826 Points ∼59%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
2689 Points ∼57% -5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
73 Points ∼100% +38%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points ∼92% +26%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini (Chrome 45)
54 Points ∼74% +2%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
53 Points ∼73%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Blade V8Huawei P9 LiteHonor 6XZTE Axon 7 MiniZTE Blade V7Wiko U Feel Prime
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
24%
-23%
-47%
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
87.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
25.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-71%
34.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-60%
50.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-42%
20.89 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-76%
35.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
96.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
60.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-37%
52.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-46%
73.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-23%
43.67 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-55%
41.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-56%
Random Write 4KB
12.69
15.35
21%
45.05
255%
6.7
-47%
7.58
-40%
9.4
-26%
Random Read 4KB
39.89
38.22
-4%
39.55
-1%
14.05
-65%
28.07
-30%
55
38%
Sequential Write 256KB
77.7
46.24
-40%
73.85
-5%
122.84
58%
39.45
-49%
137.3
77%
Sequential Read 256KB
278.06
283.55
2%
283.37
2%
230.82
-17%
196.76
-29%
270.9
-3%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high19 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
Max. Load
 34.1 °C34.3 °C36.3 °C 
 33.9 °C33.2 °C36.5 °C 
 32.5 °C32.9 °C35.3 °C 
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
32.1 °C33.1 °C33.3 °C
32.4 °C32.8 °C33.3 °C
31.2 °C32.7 °C33.3 °C
Maximum: 33.3 °C
Average: 32.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.640.62525.4383125.330.54032.931.85033.632.86331.634.18028.428.4100272812520.828.31602226.520021.331.625020.838.531521.246.840019.453.450019.556.763017.760.280017.960.6100017.870.4125017.372.2160017.471.4200016.768.3250017.268.8315018.267.5400017.973.1500017.674.2630017.771.2800017.862.81000017.956.91250018.1541600018.238.7SPL3081.8N1.347.9median 17.9ZTE Blade V8median 60.2Delta1.314.440.731.832.440.732.731.831.332.730.834.231.730.831.830.42631.836.633.139.436.633.330.936.233.332.42528.632.429.624.325.429.631.523.921.331.536.324.323.336.344.329.822.544.352.236.622.452.257.341.721.357.362.747.118.462.764.950.117.564.96752.517.56769.153.917.269.17254.216.8727454.217.37475.755.317.475.775.756.916.675.776.157.817.376.17757.917.67779.159.517.679.180.161.117.780.178.359.417.478.377.358.417.777.378.859.717.978.872.953.518.172.956.83718.156.888.469.529.888.473.724.21.373.7median 72Huawei P9 Litemedian 53.9median 17.7median 7211.19.91.611.131.642.625.437.525.334.632.931.333.630.931.632.428.429.72728.420.829.22231.721.336.920.84621.252.319.455.819.559.117.760.817.966.617.871.517.37517.472.316.772.717.271.618.270.717.967.617.666.617.761.617.856.517.957.118.156.918.242.23081.91.346.3median 17.9Honor 6Xmedian 59.11.311hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
ZTE Blade V8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.49 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.98 / 1.76 / 1.79 Watt
Load midlight 2.89 / 5.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
16h 04min
WiFi Surfing
0h 00min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
11h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 57min
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
2705 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
65%
-16%
-26%
Reader / Idle
964
1404
46%
2250
133%
1287
34%
Load
297
272
-8%
375
26%
196
-34%
WiFi v1.3
700
604
-14%
957
37%
399
-43%
519
-26%
H.264
545
568
4%
885
62%
435
-20%

Pros

+ 低价
+ 双摄
+ 前置1300万像素相机
+ 指纹识别
+ 杜比音效
+ 出色续航
+ micro-SD 卡最大支持到(理论上)2TB
+ 双SIM卡

Cons

- 平均性能水平
- 只合适一般玩家
- 糟糕的耳机
- 扬声器在默认模式下偏弱
In review: ZTE Blade V8. Review sample courtesy of ZTE Germany
In review: ZTE Blade V8. Review sample courtesy of ZTE Germany

在测试结束阶段,关于这台手机设备适合谁的问题出现了。它主要针对那些要求不仅功能多而且价格低的便宜货猎手。这些购买者可以获得双摄像头并且1300万像素的前置摄像头、支持杜比音效的扬声器、相当优秀的电池寿命、不错的屏幕,也包括了可通过micro-SD扩展的存储。 


Blade v8是一款以低廉的价格为中端用户提供了优异性能的手机。


至于缺点?消费者应该注意到尽管有着铝制外壳,这不是一款高端的手机。它所带来的配置十分平均,但丝毫不比平均水平好多少。如果有着对更高的性能和更好的配置的需求,你应该选择一款更贵的型号。实际上不太好的性能评分在性能对比中是最大的缺点。不幸的是,离开了杜比音效扬声器就十分差劲,这就导致了扬声器的音量不足。相机在低亮度的条件下会表现出肉眼可见的不足。


注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

ZTE Blade V8 - 03/29/2017 v6
Niklas Böhm

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
39 / 60 → 66%
Weight
93%
Battery
95%
Display
85%
Games Performance
16 / 63 → 26%
Application Performance
43 / 70 → 62%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
68%
Average
72%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 中兴 Blade V8 智能手机简短评测
Niklas Böhm, 2017-05-14 (Update: 2017-05-14)