Blackview A8 Max 智能手机简短评测

Name: Blackview A8 Max
Brand: Blackview

缺乏对比度。 虽然配备齐全，但这款来自 Blackview 的 A8 Max 入门级智能手机售价仅为90欧元（约合99美金）。来自中国厂商的低价手机有着良好的性价比, 但它所配备的IPS高清屏不尽人意的对比度使它的得分下降。

Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 10/31/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Blackview

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Blackview A8 Max (A Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, 电容屏, LCD, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 11.13 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm 音频接口有, Card Reader: 最大64GB的microSD储存卡, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度传感器，距离传感器, App2SD

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz; 3G: WCDMA 900 / 2100 MHz; 4G: LTE 800 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 154.3 x 78

Battery

3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 336 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 14 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块化电源适配器，UBC数据线, Blackview UI, 12 Months Warranty, SAR n.b., fanless

Weight

177 g, Power Supply: 28 g

Price

90 Euro

Links

Blackview homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Blackview A8 Max Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.5 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Blackview A8 Max Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	34.3 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	316 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	88.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.7 MBit/s
Oukitel U7 Plus Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.3 MBit/s
Leagoo M5 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.5 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.9 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Xiaomi Mi 5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	265 MBit/s
Blackview R7 Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79.4 MBit/s
Ulefone Metal Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash	73.1 MBit/s
Oukitel U7 Plus Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.1 MBit/s
Leagoo M5 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	51 MBit/s
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.3 MBit/s
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash	48.5 MBit/s

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


376 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	396 cd/m²
394 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	389 cd/m²
399 cd/m²	436 cd/m²	402 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 436 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 406.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 435 cd/m²
Contrast: 403:1 (Black: 1.08 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 8164 K

	Blackview A8 Max IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Ulefone Metal IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Oukitel U7 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Leagoo M5 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Archos 50 Platinum 4G IPS, 1280x720, 5"	TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Xiaomi Mi 5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		-2%	10%	-18%	7%	20%	-11%	57%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	435	312 -28%	462 6%	401 -8%	344 -21%	508 17%	552 27%	598 37%
Brightness (cd/m²)	407	315 -23%	437 7%	387 -5%	349 -14%	491 21%	526 29%	566 39%
Brightness Distribution (%)	86	87 1%	91 6%	92 7%	89 3%	89 3%	91 6%	90 5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	1.08	0.56 48%	0.58 46%	0.53 51%	0.65 40%	0.58 46%	0.64 41%	0.51 53%
Contrast (:1)	403	557 38%	797 98%	757 88%	529 31%	876 117%	863 114%	1173 191%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.7	6.8 -19%	7.5 -32%	9.7 -70%	5.8 -2%	7 -23%	11 -93%	3.5 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.3	14 -14%	12.8 -4%	22.3 -81%	10.7 13%	14.1 -15%	20.8 -69%	6.1 50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.9	7.1 -20%	8.5 -44%	13.3 -125%	5.7 3%	6.1 -3%	14.3 -142%	3.5 41%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.77 ^79%	2.54 ^87%	2.3 ^96%	2.1 ^105%	2.15 ^102%	2.21 ^100%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	8164 ^80%	7402 ^88%	8914 ^73%	10359 ^63%	7792 ^83%	8068 ^81%	12996 ^50%	6532 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 36 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	18.5 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	27.6 MB/s +49%
Oukitel U7 Plus	22.6 MB/s +22%
Leagoo M5	18.48 MB/s 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	15.58 MB/s -16%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.89 MB/s +2%
Blackview R7	11.87 MB/s -36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	35.94 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	49.6 MB/s +38%
Oukitel U7 Plus	46.63 MB/s +30%
Leagoo M5	36.07 MB/s 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	31.85 MB/s -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5	39.11 MB/s +9%
Blackview R7	15.56 MB/s -57%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	5.65 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	7.87 MB/s +39%
Oukitel U7 Plus	2.18 MB/s -61%
Leagoo M5	5.46 MB/s -3%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.35 MB/s -23%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.85 MB/s +21%
Blackview R7	11.4 MB/s +102%
Xiaomi Mi 5	13.61 MB/s +141%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	16.15 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	22.18 MB/s +37%
Oukitel U7 Plus	11.25 MB/s -30%
Leagoo M5	14.98 MB/s -7%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	14.31 MB/s -11%
TP-Link Neffos C5	17.16 MB/s +6%
Blackview R7	28.02 MB/s +73%
Xiaomi Mi 5	106.8 MB/s +561%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	47.25 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	39.91 MB/s -16%
Oukitel U7 Plus	59 MB/s +25%
Leagoo M5	12.11 MB/s -74%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	7.56 MB/s -84%
TP-Link Neffos C5	52.4 MB/s +11%
Blackview R7	122.7 MB/s +160%
Xiaomi Mi 5	159.3 MB/s +237%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	141.8 MB/s
Ulefone Metal	228.8 MB/s +61%
Oukitel U7 Plus	125.9 MB/s -11%
Leagoo M5	133.7 MB/s -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	125.4 MB/s -12%
TP-Link Neffos C5	145.8 MB/s +3%
Blackview R7	247.6 MB/s +75%
Xiaomi Mi 5	459.6 MB/s +224%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	30916 Points
Ulefone Metal	37103 Points +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus	28683 Points -7%
Leagoo M5	24238 Points -22%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	23657 Points -23%
TP-Link Neffos C5	32681 Points +6%
Blackview R7	50572 Points +64%
Xiaomi Mi 5	116330 Points +276%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	3809 Points
Ulefone Metal	7059 Points +85%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3656 Points -4%
Leagoo M5	2921 Points -23%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3103 Points -19%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4906 Points +29%
Blackview R7	10762 Points +183%
Xiaomi Mi 5	29246 Points +668%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	3284 Points
Ulefone Metal	6469 Points +97%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3137 Points -4%
Leagoo M5	2478 Points -25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2681 Points -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4223 Points +29%
Blackview R7	10334 Points +215%
Xiaomi Mi 5	32613 Points +893%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	8646 Points
Ulefone Metal	10371 Points +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus	8660 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	7886 Points -9%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	6902 Points -20%
TP-Link Neffos C5	9291 Points +7%
Blackview R7	12585 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi 5	21483 Points +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	158 Points
Ulefone Metal	293 Points +85%
Oukitel U7 Plus	155 Points -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5	203 Points +28%
Blackview R7	590 Points +273%
Xiaomi Mi 5	3542 Points +2142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	129 Points
Ulefone Metal	243 Points +88%
Oukitel U7 Plus	126 Points -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5	167 Points +29%
Blackview R7	518 Points +302%
Xiaomi Mi 5	4558 Points +3433%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	727 Points
Ulefone Metal	1057 Points +45%
Oukitel U7 Plus	749 Points +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5	810 Points +11%
Blackview R7	1155 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1976 Points +172%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	10 fps
Ulefone Metal	12 fps +20%
Oukitel U7 Plus	9.8 fps -2%
Leagoo M5	8 fps -20%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	4.9 fps -51%
TP-Link Neffos C5	8.3 fps -17%
Blackview R7	17 fps +70%
Xiaomi Mi 5	60 fps +500%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	6 fps
Ulefone Metal	19 fps +217%
Oukitel U7 Plus	5.9 fps -2%
Leagoo M5	4.4 fps -27%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	8.7 fps +45%
TP-Link Neffos C5	14 fps +133%
Blackview R7	17 fps +183%
Xiaomi Mi 5	90 fps +1400%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	4.5 fps
Ulefone Metal	6.4 fps +42%
Oukitel U7 Plus	2.1 fps -53%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -73%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2.8 fps -38%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi 5	42 fps +833%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	2.2 fps
Ulefone Metal	2.9 fps +32%
Oukitel U7 Plus	4.4 fps +100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	3.6 fps +64%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.1 fps +177%
Blackview R7	4.7 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi 5	42 fps +1809%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	3.2 fps
Ulefone Metal	4.5 fps +41%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3.2 fps 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1.2 fps -62%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mi 5	31 fps +869%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	1.4 fps
Ulefone Metal	8.9 fps +536%
Oukitel U7 Plus	1.4 fps 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2.7 fps +93%
Blackview R7	2.5 fps +79%
Xiaomi Mi 5	30 fps +2043%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	3427 Points
Ulefone Metal	4079 Points +19%
Oukitel U7 Plus	3105 Points -9%
Leagoo M5	2808 Points -18%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2807 Points -18%
TP-Link Neffos C5	3443 Points 0%
Blackview R7	4364 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 5	6873 Points +101%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	1525 Points
Ulefone Metal	2458 Points +61%
Oukitel U7 Plus	1508 Points -1%
Leagoo M5	1166 Points -24%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	1206 Points -21%
Blackview R7	2851 Points +87%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	589 Points
Ulefone Metal	609 Points +3%
Oukitel U7 Plus	580 Points -2%
Leagoo M5	407 Points -31%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	428 Points -27%
Blackview R7	728 Points +24%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	201 Points
Ulefone Metal	273 Points +36%
Oukitel U7 Plus	568 Points +183%
Leagoo M5	144 Points -28%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	148 Points -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5	683 Points +240%
Blackview R7	338 Points +68%
Xiaomi Mi 5	2392 Points +1090%
System (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	1125 Points
Ulefone Metal	1691 Points +50%
Oukitel U7 Plus	1120 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	990 Points -12%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	838 Points -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5	1199 Points +7%
Blackview R7	1971 Points +75%
Xiaomi Mi 5	3638 Points +223%
Memory (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	733 Points
Ulefone Metal	802 Points +9%
Oukitel U7 Plus	770 Points +5%
Leagoo M5	331 Points -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	354 Points -52%
TP-Link Neffos C5	991 Points +35%
Blackview R7	1030 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1801 Points +146%
Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	211 Points
Ulefone Metal	433 Points +105%
Oukitel U7 Plus	211 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	139 Points -34%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	175 Points -17%
TP-Link Neffos C5	281 Points +33%
Blackview R7	655 Points +210%
Xiaomi Mi 5	4522 Points +2043%
Web (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	9 Points
Ulefone Metal	10 Points +11%
Oukitel U7 Plus	573 Points +6267%
Leagoo M5	9 Points 0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	9 Points 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5	638 Points +6989%
Blackview R7	10 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 5	1106 Points +12189%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	13643 ms *
Ulefone Metal	13397 ms * +2%
Oukitel U7 Plus	14931 ms * -9%
Leagoo M5	14767 ms * -8%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	19092 ms * -40%
TP-Link Neffos C5	12783 ms * +6%
Blackview R7	9748 ms * +29%
Xiaomi Mi 5	2973 ms * +78%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	2607 Points
Ulefone Metal	2738 Points +5%
Oukitel U7 Plus	2554 Points -2%
Leagoo M5	2144 Points -18%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	2122 Points -19%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2738 Points +5%
Blackview R7	3885 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mi 5	8619 Points +231%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview A8 Max	17.19 Points
Ulefone Metal	17.83 Points +4%
Oukitel U7 Plus	17.26 Points 0%
Leagoo M5	14.45 Points -16%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G	12.76 Points -26%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.21 Points +6%
Blackview R7	25.35 Points +47%
Xiaomi Mi 5	54 Points +214%

Legend

Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel U7 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Leagoo M5 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


38 °C	37.6 °C	40.6 °C
39.3 °C	38.4 °C	40.4 °C
38.2 °C	38.4 °C	38.4 °C

Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 38.8 °C


34 °C	34.4 °C	38.7 °C
33.9 °C	34.5 °C	40 °C
33.9 °C	35 °C	40.8 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 36.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Blackview A8 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.18 Watt
Idle	0.74 / 1.97 / 2.09 Watt
Load	4.89 / 5.09 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh	Leagoo M5 2300 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-39%	-24%	-24%	16%	-7%	-74%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.74	1.41 -91%	0.86 -16%	0.81 -9%	0.59 20%	0.72 3%	1.83 -147%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.97	2.46 -25%	2.68 -36%	2.26 -15%	1.68 15%	1.87 5%	3.21 -63%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.09	2.83 -35%	2.78 -33%	2.39 -14%	1.79 14%	2 4%	3.45 -65%
Load Average * (Watt)	4.89	5.15 -5%	5.33 -9%	6.97 -43%	4.22 14%	5.99 -22%	5.67 -16%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	5.09	7.05 -39%	6.49 -28%	7.03 -38%	4.26 16%	6.45 -27%	9.16 -80%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		8h 26min

	Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh	Ulefone Metal 3050 mAh	Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh	Leagoo M5 2300 mAh	Archos 50 Platinum 4G 2200 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	8.4	6.7 -20%	6.1 -27%	6.8 -19%	6.4 -24%	7.6 -10%	6.9 -18%

Pros

+ IPS 高清屏幕

+ 出色的性能 (入门级手机)

+ 16 GB 内置存储空间

+ 2 GB 运行内存

+ 高质量外壳

+ LTE (包括 band 20)

+ 良好的续航能力

Cons

- 低对比度

- 低速 eMMC 存储

- SoC 不是非常强大

- 较低的WLAN连接速度

- 偶尔丢失连接

- 按键没有背光

In Review: Blackview A8 Max. Test model courtesy of Blackview.

Blackview A8 Max 是一款很有意思的入门级智能手机。仅仅90欧元（约合99美金）的售价，A8 Max 拥有该价位上极为出色的外壳设计与良好的系统性能表现。其十分有效的温度控制系统以及适中的电量消耗，都能够提高它的续航能力。

并且这款手机配有一块基于IPS技术的高亮度屏幕，为其提供了良好的可视角度以及出色的色彩表现。

但是同时，这块屏幕的对比度不尽人意，而且其内置存储的传输速率也很低，无线网络模块不但性能低下而且稳定性欠佳。

入门级智能手机通常需要通过对比来进行评价，Blackview A8 Max 也不例外。在考虑到价格因素情况下，A8 Max 不失为一个购买的好选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Blackview A8 Max - 10/19/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

85%

Keyboard

61 / 75 → 82%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

37 / 60 → 62%

Weight

90%

Battery

91%

Display

79%

Games Performance

7 / 63 → 12%

Application Performance

30 / 70 → 42%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

63%

Average

67%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Blackview A8 Max 智能手机简短评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2016-10-31 (Update: 2016-10-31)