BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 智能手机简短评测

Name: BQ Aquaris X5 Plus
Brand: BQ

更光鲜亮丽。 BQ, 作为西班牙的制造商，推出了它的中端手机Aquaris X5 Plus。该设备带有指纹传感器，双SIM卡功能以及（非常）明亮的5英寸FHD屏幕。在我们的评测中，我们将了解该智能手机在当前市场中的表现。

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 12/25/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of BQ Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus (Aquaris Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 510, Core: 600 MHz

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, 多点触摸 - 5 点电容式触摸, IPS, Dinorex-Glass, 抗指纹, Quantum Color +, 620 Nits, NTSC 84%, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.5 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 音频插孔, Card Reader: microSD up to256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 霍尔传感器，电子罗盘，陀螺仪，加速度计，近距离传感器, UKW-收音机, Wi-Fi 直连, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM (850 / 900 / 1,800 / 1,900), 3G HSPA+ (850 / 900/ 1,900 / 2,100), 4G (LTE ) FDD (800 / 1,800 / 2,100 / 2,600), SAR (Head): 0.253 W/kg (10g), SAR (Body): 1.480 W/kg (10g), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 145 x 70

Battery

11.8 Wh, 3200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Auto-focus f/2.0, 2160p-Video @ 30 fps, 720p-Video @ 120 fps, Sony IMX298)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Fix focus f/2.0, 1080p-Video @ 60 fps, Sony IMX219)

Additional features

Speakers: Mono speaker below, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, USB cable, BQ Plus App, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

145 g

Price

299 Euro

Links

BQ homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s +69%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s +30%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash	258 MBit/s
Fairphone 2 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 32 GB eMMC Flash	254 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s -57%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.9 MBit/s -79%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s +48%
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 16 GB eMMC Flash	348 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s -19%
Fairphone 2 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 32 GB eMMC Flash	164 MBit/s -53%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s -65%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.7 MBit/s -85%

ColorChecker colors photographed. In the bottom half of each patch, the original color is shown.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus

Samsung Galaxy S7

LG G5

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus

Samsung Galaxy S7

LG G5

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus

Samsung Galaxy S7

LG G5

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


590 cd/m²	626 cd/m²	559 cd/m²
602 cd/m²	640 cd/m²	585 cd/m²
600 cd/m²	657 cd/m²	625 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 657 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 609.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.32 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 640 cd/m²
Contrast: 688:1 (Black: 0.93 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.35
CCT: 6477 K

	BQ Aquaris X5 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5"	Sony Xperia XA IPS, 1280x720, 5"	ZTE Axon 7 Mini AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Huawei P9 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Gigaset ME IPS, 1920x1080, 5"
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	640	518 -19%	327 -49%	505 -21%	378 -41%	445 -30%
Brightness (cd/m²)	609	475 -22%	335 -45%	468 -23%	380 -38%	456 -25%
Brightness Distribution (%)	85	81 -5%	94 11%	88 4%	91 7%	93 9%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.93	0.61 34%		0.74 20%		0.38 59%
Contrast (:1)	688	849 23%		682 -1%		1171 70%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.8	6.8 -143%	6.3 -125%	4.1 -46%	1.95 30%	4.29 -53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.7	11.4 -100%	11.4 -100%	5.8 -2%	3.09 46%	7.89 -38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.6	7 -169%	7.1 -173%	4.9 -88%	1.86 28%	4.97 -91%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.35 ^94%	2.25 ^98%	2.5 ^88%	2.13 ^103%	2.57 ^86%
CCT	6477 ^100%	8151 ^80%	7637 ^85%	7116 ^91%	6376 ^102%	7625 ^85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
80 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 42 ms rise
80 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 38 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	75533 Points
Sony Xperia XA	48331 Points -36%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	46968 Points -38%
Huawei P9 Lite	50366 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	41676 Points -45%
Gigaset ME	54213 Points -28%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	843 Points
Sony Xperia XA	717 Points -15%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	10 Points -99%
Huawei P9 Lite	765 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	741 Points -12%
Gigaset ME	1233 Points +46%
Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	1635 Points
Sony Xperia XA	669 Points -59%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	827 Points -49%
Huawei P9 Lite	818 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	488 Points -70%
Gigaset ME	4449 Points +172%
Memory (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	798 Points
Sony Xperia XA	1076 Points +35%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	1052 Points +32%
Huawei P9 Lite	1346 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	554 Points -31%
Gigaset ME	781 Points -2%
System (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	2582 Points
Sony Xperia XA	2289 Points -11%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	1379 Points -47%
Huawei P9 Lite	2438 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	2153 Points -17%
Gigaset ME	1422 Points -45%
Overall (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	1297 Points
Sony Xperia XA	1043 Points -20%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	328 Points -75%
Huawei P9 Lite	1197 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	810 Points -38%
Gigaset ME	1571 Points +21%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	2511 Points
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	2092 Points -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	1204 Points
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	698 Points -42%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	3248 Points

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	4964 Points
Sony Xperia XA	4685 Points -6%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	3663 Points -26%
Huawei P9 Lite	5339 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	4008 Points -19%
Gigaset ME	4544 Points -8%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	9138 Points
Sony Xperia XA	4046 Points -56%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	3371 Points -63%
Huawei P9 Lite	4756 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3611 Points -60%
Gigaset ME	7109 Points -22%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	3465 ms *
Sony Xperia XA	9610 ms * -177%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	11109 ms * -221%
Huawei P9 Lite	9397 ms * -171%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11887 ms * -243%
Gigaset ME	7670 ms * -121%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	50.1 Points
Sony Xperia XA	27.5 Points -45%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	23 Points -54%
Huawei P9 Lite	29.03 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22 Points -56%
Gigaset ME	28.48 Points -43%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	31 fps
Sony Xperia XA	28 fps -10%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	18 fps -42%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps -55%
Gigaset ME	50 fps +61%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	30 fps
Sony Xperia XA	18 fps -40%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	17 fps -43%
Huawei P9 Lite	19 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	14 fps -53%
Gigaset ME	51 fps +70%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	14 fps
Sony Xperia XA	7.2 fps -49%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	6.7 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite	7.8 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps -73%
Gigaset ME	24 fps +71%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	14 fps
Sony Xperia XA	15 fps +7%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	7 fps -50%
Huawei P9 Lite	8.4 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	3.8 fps -73%
Gigaset ME	25 fps +79%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	9.6 fps
Sony Xperia XA	4.8 fps -50%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	4.2 fps -56%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.5 fps -53%
Gigaset ME	17 fps +77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	9.4 fps
Sony Xperia XA	11 fps +17%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	4.5 fps -52%
Huawei P9 Lite	4.9 fps -48%
Gigaset ME	18 fps +91%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	11532 Points
Sony Xperia XA	12138 Points +5%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	9670 Points -16%
Huawei P9 Lite	13676 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	9495 Points -18%
Gigaset ME	10927 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	21668 Points
Sony Xperia XA	10916 Points -50%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	9913 Points -54%
Huawei P9 Lite	11318 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7542 Points -65%
Gigaset ME	25016 Points +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	18127 Points
Sony Xperia XA	11156 Points -38%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	9858 Points -46%
Huawei P9 Lite	11769 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	7903 Points -56%
Gigaset ME	19445 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	1793 Points
Sony Xperia XA	1259 Points -30%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	1102 Points -39%
Huawei P9 Lite	1373 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	1479 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	1252 Points
Sony Xperia XA	525 Points -58%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	606 Points -52%
Huawei P9 Lite	473 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	275 Points -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	1342 Points
Sony Xperia XA	603 Points -55%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	673 Points -50%
Huawei P9 Lite	554 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	336 Points -75%

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	12.44 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	10.6 MB/s -15%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	6.7 MB/s -46%
Huawei P9 Lite	15.35 MB/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	11.2 MB/s -10%
Gigaset ME	15 MB/s +21%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	36.85 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	22.05 MB/s -40%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	14.05 MB/s -62%
Huawei P9 Lite	38.22 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	22.9 MB/s -38%
Gigaset ME	22 MB/s -40%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	47.03 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	68.6 MB/s +46%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	122.8 MB/s +161%
Huawei P9 Lite	46.24 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	60.4 MB/s +28%
Gigaset ME	131 MB/s +179%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	228.4 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	240.4 MB/s +5%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	230.8 MB/s +1%
Huawei P9 Lite	283.5 MB/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016	209.4 MB/s -8%
Gigaset ME	232 MB/s +2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	54.9 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	50.7 MB/s -8%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	50.3 MB/s -8%
Huawei P9 Lite	25.1 MB/s -54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X5 Plus	73.2 MB/s
Sony Xperia XA	72.9 MB/s 0%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini	73.9 MB/s +1%
Huawei P9 Lite	60.8 MB/s -17%

Legend

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Axon 7 Mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset ME Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


37.8 °C	37.3 °C	36.6 °C
37.7 °C	37.5 °C	36.5 °C
36.6 °C	36.6 °C	35.8 °C

Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 36.9 °C


33.4 °C	36.5 °C	38.5 °C
34.9 °C	35.5 °C	39.9 °C
34.8 °C	36.5 °C	39.9 °C

Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 36.7 °C

Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Frequency diagram to compare (Checkboxes can be selected!)

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	0.87 / 1.33 / 1.35 Watt
Load	5.44 / 7.11 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 3200 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 Mini 2705 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh	Gigaset ME 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		8%	23%	-9%	3%	-32%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.87	0.72 17%	0.68 22%	0.73 16%	0.96 -10%	0.75 14%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.33	1.5 -13%	0.96 28%	2.09 -57%	1.64 -23%	1.7 -28%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.35	1.57 -16%	1.06 21%	2.11 -56%	1.71 -27%	1.84 -36%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.44	3.48 36%	3.22 41%	4.15 24%	2.98 45%	7.18 -32%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	7.11	6.04 15%	6.75 5%	5.05 29%	5.08 29%	12.75 -79%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 54)

8h 24min

	BQ Aquaris X5 Plus 3200 mAh	Sony Xperia XA 2300 mAh	ZTE Axon 7 Mini 2705 mAh	Huawei P9 Lite 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh	Gigaset ME 3000 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	8.4	5.9 -30%	6.7 -20%	10.1 20%	10.4 24%	6.6 -21%

Pros

+ 坚固的机身

+ 双SIM卡

+ microSD卡可以格式化为内部存储

+ USB-OTG，Miracast和NFC

+ 指纹传感器

+ 精准的传感器和良好的触摸屏

+ 优秀的整体表现

+ 屏幕非常明亮，颜色精度高

+ 可以接受的扬声器

+ 白天时，清晰的照相和视频表现...

Cons

- …但在较差的照明条件下，照相和视频表现欠佳

- 触摸屏和边框之间的过渡粗糙

- 内部存储器的写入速度很低

- 一般般的屏幕对比度

- 配件不包括耳机和电源适配器

- 集成电池

Verdict

In review: BQ Aquaris X5 Plus. Test model provided by BQ Germany.

作为中端智能手机，BQ Aquaris X5 Plus是相当令人印象深刻的：它的处理器的性能足以满足日常任务的需要，拥有诸如USB OTG，Miracast和NFC等优秀功能。显示屏非常明亮，而在正常的照明条件下，前后摄像头的照相效果都相当的好。主相机能拍摄出非常精细的照片。然而，在照明条件不佳时，摄像头将会缺乏清晰度；这使得用来这款机器，和相对更昂贵的高端机型之间的差距变得明显。我们喜欢三个卡槽和双SIM卡功能。指纹传感器也可以确保设备的安全。

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus是一个全能型的中端智能手机：它提供了一个优秀的屏幕，众多的功能和良好的性能（总体上来说）。包装盒内的配件有点少。

在某些商店中，消费者可以获得，与我们的测试机型价格相同，并且拥有更大存储空间的32 GB版本的（具有3 GB RAM的）Aquaris X5 Plus。然而，如果你正在寻找一个拥有更大屏幕和更长电池续航时间的设备，那么我们建议你看看300欧元（〜 312美元，最新价格）的三星Galaxy A5（2016年）。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

BQ Aquaris X5 Plus - 12/09/2016 v6 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis

85%

Keyboard

70 / 75 → 93%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

48 / 60 → 81%

Weight

93%